Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1231975 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

ra_con_teur

Oklahoma City, OK

#812396 Nov 27, 2012
Homer wrote:
<quoted text>So the underlying theme then: Fox News is crap.
Homer agrees.
You sure know how to reach for the sta (r)...

you are Pekker peeker and a nut for answering yourself...

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#812398 Nov 27, 2012
Not Surprized wrote:
<quoted text>
Up to your old tricks again eh stalker? Reported for stalking. Another time out looming for Waxtard? Ya fckin idiot. Nostrilis Waxballs, the turd that just wont flush.
Nostrilis Waxman/Floriduuuh aka known as the stalker "WAXBALLS", topix troll clusterfvck, same troll-multiple id's==Delusional army of one.
fake new yawk,loulee rat mouth fl, Barney Frank (anyone from Temecula, CA), fake Dem, Lt Dan, LOL, lily's children, LOL, Floriduh, Nobama, fukutu, Ignoramus, Liberals Eat Feces, DEM idiots, Billy Carter,, Warturds, CAE, Fetch N Stepinit, Rectal Liberal, Commie DemocRATs, Wartime, Billy C, Groucho, FUBO, King George, Patrick, Democrats are Fascists, Gay Ghost, VAGITARIAN, Jimmy, Bronach, Pete, King George, bailout my duck, PTBW Forever, Sally Fourth, The Real Truth, WorthlessWhore, Louise, Cheryl
Messaged u
ra_con_teur

Oklahoma City, OK

#812399 Nov 27, 2012
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
Super summation!
What gives you more pleasure...

Watching homer tinkle/poo poo or giving out cyber high-5s about homer going to the bathroom?
THE DEBIL

Poland

#812400 Nov 27, 2012
YOU SEE? AS A NEW YORKER YOU SHOULD REALIZE THAT THE "TOWERS" MEN BUILD FOR THEMSELVES ARE SIMPLY PENISES IN STEEL AND CONCRETE. VERY OFTEN THESE MEN DO HAVE BIG PENISES, BUT THE FLESH AND BLOOD ONES TEND TO GIVE OUT SO THEY BUILD MODELS OF THEM OUT OF MORE DURABLE MATERIALS. TAKE THE WORLD TRADE TOWERS. THE MESSAGE HERE WAS: I'M A CAPITALIST SO I HAVE A BIGGER PENIS THAN YOU DO, AND HERE IT IS. IN FACT, HERE'S TWO OF THEM. BY NAMING YOUR SON, "TOWERS," YOU ARE ANNOUNCING TO THE WORLD THAT THE BOY HAS A BIG ONE. YOU ARE ALSO TELLING HIM THAT HE'D BETTER GET OUT THERE AND SCREW SOMETHING.
Cardinal of the Kremlin

Bronx, NY

#812402 Nov 27, 2012
The interview below with Osama bin Laden was conducted by the Karachi, Pakistan, daily newspaper, Ummat and published on September 28, 2001, 17 days after the alleged, but unsubstantiated, al Qaeda attack of September 11, 2001, on the World Trade Center twin towers and Pentagon. The interview was sensational. The alleged “mastermind” of 9/11 said that he and al Qaeda had nothing to do with the 9/11 attack. The British Broadcasting Corporation’s World Monitoring Service had the interview translated into English and made public on September 29, 2001.
Osama bin Laden’s sensational denial was not reported by the US print and TV media. It was not investigated by the executive branch. No one in the US Congress called attention to bin Laden’s refusal of responsibility for the greatest humiliation ever inflicted on a superpower.
To check my memory of the lack of coverage, I googled “Osama bin Laden’s interview denying responsibility for 9/11.” Some Internet sites reproduced the interview, but the only mainstream news source that I found was a 1 minute YouTube video from CNN in which the anchor, after quoting an al Jazeera report of bin Laden’s denial, concludes that “we can all weigh that in the scale of credibility and come to our own conclusions.” In other words, bin Laden had already been demonized, and his denial was not credible.
The sensational news was unfit for US citizens and was withheld from them by the american “free press,” a press free to lie for the government but not to tell the truth.
Obviously, if bin Laden had outwitted not only the National Security Agency, the CIA, the Defense Intelligence Agency, and the FBI, but also all 16 US intelligence agencies, all intelligence agencies of Washington’s NATO puppet states, Israel’s Mossad, and in addition the National Security Council, NORAD, US air traffic control, and airport security four times on the same morning, it would be the greatest feat in world history, a movement building feat that would have made al Qaeda the most successful anti-imperialist organization in human history, an extraordinary victory over “the great satan” that would have brought millions of new recruits into al Qaeda’s ranks. Yet the alleged “mastermind” denied all responsibility.THE BUSH FAMILY NEVER LEFT THE WHITEHOUSE SAME POLICIES AND LIES
Mike R

New York, NY

#812406 Nov 27, 2012
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Total bullsht.
Prove it.
THE DEBIL

Poland

#812408 Nov 27, 2012
WOMEN DON'T BUILD TOWERS. THEY BUILD EMPIRES. VERY OFTEN THEY INCORPORATE TOWERS INTO THEIR EMPIRES BUT THEY ARE AS LIKELY TO TEAR THEM DOWN AGAIN JUST BEFORE THEY'RE FINISHED. THEN THEY'LL HAVE SOME MAN WITH A BIG TALLYWACKER BUILD THEM A NEW TOWER OR SOMETIMES WILL FOREGO TOWERS ALTOGETHER.
ra_con_teur

Oklahoma City, OK

#812410 Nov 27, 2012
dem wrote:
<quoted text>
That's him.
When you look in the toilet and a brown terd is floating around with no purpose...

thats you...

“I've visited all 57 states!”

Since: Mar 12

Jivetown

#812411 Nov 27, 2012
Mike R wrote:
<quoted text>Prove it.
Realtime can only prove what an idiot he is. He does that quite well.
THE DEBIL

Poland

#812413 Nov 27, 2012
MOST WOMEN - ABOUT 80%- DON'T EVEN LIKE BIG TALLYWACKERS BUT THEY REALIZE THAT THE MEN WHO OWN THEM WILL OFTEN BUILD THEM A TOWER. SUCH IS LIFE. WHEN THE SAUDIS FLEW THE PLANES INTO THE TOWERS THE MESSAGE WAS: "TAKE THAT, CAPITALIST PENISES." AND, AS WITH ANY DICK-SLAPPIN' ANTI-CAPITALIST, THE PENISES THEN INVADED IRAQ.
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#812414 Nov 27, 2012
Cardinal of the Kremlin wrote:
Wikileaks founder Julian Assange was bitterly right when he said US president Barack Obama “seems to be a nice man, and that is precisely the problem” and aptly described him as a “wolf in sheep’s clothing”.
Under the pretext of combating terrorism, Obama has followed in the footsteps of former President George Bush and even intensified the killer drone attacks in different parts of the world, a move which has terminated in the unfortunate deaths of multitudes of innocent people. President Obama argues that the drone strikes are focused efforts to exterminate people who are on a list of active terrorists and that they have not caused huge human losses.
Pakistani lawyer Shahzad Akbar, who represents families of civilians killed in US killer drone strikes, says,“Either President Obama is lying to the nation, or he is too naive, to believe on the reports which CIA is presenting to [him].”
In a similar strain, Medea Benjamin, co-founder of CODEPINK has said:
“So many people who spoke out against George [W.] Bush’s extraordinary rendition and Guantánamo and indefinite detention have been very quiet when it comes to the Obama administration, who is not putting people in those same kind of conditions, instead is just taking them out and killing them. So we need to make people speak up and say that when Obama says this [program] is on a tight leash, this is not true, this is a lie.”
Only in Pakistan, Obama has authorized over 300 drone attacks and has killed innocent civilians. A new study by Stanford Law School and New York University’s School of Law shows that the killer “drone strikes in Pakistan have killed far more people than the United States has acknowledged, have traumatized innocent residents and largely been ineffective.” Besides, the study calls for a re-evaluation of the practice, saying the number of “high-level” targets killed as a percentage of total casualties is extremely low – about 2%. The report says Washington is misrepresenting drone strikes as “a surgically precise and effective tool that makes the US safer,” saying that in reality,“there is significant evidence that US drone strikes have injured and killed civilians.”
In a 29-page report to the United Nations Human Rights Council, Philip Alston, the United Nations special representative on extrajudicial executions, called on the United States to exercise greater restraint in its use of drones.
“I’m particularly concerned that the United States seems oblivious to this fact when it asserts an ever-expanding entitlement for itself to target individuals across the globe. But this strongly asserted but ill-defined license to kill without accountability is not an entitlement which the United States or other states can have without doing grave damage to the rules designed to protect the right to life and prevent extrajudicial executions.”
Any mention of the "total" financial aid that the US pays out each year to our long time ally Pakistan???

Without US aid and lax immigration and travel policies that fkn shthole would collapse in around itself.

“I've visited all 57 states!”

Since: Mar 12

Jivetown

#812416 Nov 27, 2012
Not Surprized wrote:
<quoted text>
Reported for stalking asshole.
#105825 Jun 17, 2011
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/grantley-pa/T ...
#108974
Waxballs Is Stalking Again wrote:
No need to lie stalker. You were banned for stalking and for spamming topix with your judgit machine, Waxballs. Your lucky you weren't arrested for what you did to that woman you fckn sick bastard. Go back to the cesspool you dragged yourself out of you animal.
Waxballs Waxbrains resurfaces from the longest dumpster dive in history!! Remember that topix banishment ? Still stalking women and giving out their personal information to the many topix posters roound the world? Better watch your step there Waxbrains, the Moderators are watching, you sick, psycho Stalker. Still spamming threads with macros runescape I see. You're a real honest to God psychotic STALKER if there ever was one. Keep it up maybe the FBI will catch on.
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/itasca-il/T50 ...
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/itasca-il/T50 ...
#18127
Oct 17, 2009
"Sounds Paranoid To Me wrote:
She changed her name bacause she was being stalked. The poster who was stalking her got her private information and published it for the world to see on this forum. That is why he was banned. So she changed her name. I observed the whole incident from the start. Not only did he publish her information but continued to stalk and harass her. Can you understand why she would change her name now?
sunnycali wrote:
Would you report someone HERE to the moderators if they were giving out YOUR personal information?
17602
Oct 15, 2009
"sunnycali wrote:
Again, if someone posted YOUR private information would you just sit there and say, "way to go - that's freedom of speech in action?" And I mean information that included your home address and phone number. You would do nothing? If the answer is that you would do nothing then you apparently care little for your family.
17603
Oct 15, 2009
"sunnycali wrote:
So if someone were giving out your personal information you would not report that person? If someone were using extremely obscene language you would not report that person?
This has absolutely nothing to do ideology. I don't have any problem with free speech. I don't have any problem with people of any political bent expressing their opinions. I DO have a problem with people violating the most basic terms of decency.
Oh, and I would report someone if I saw them breaking into YOUR house. Or abusing a member of YOUR family. I guess you and I are different in that respect. And I'm very sorry for that. Not for me but for you.
#58531Reply Jun 9, 2010
"Devin wrote:
Waxman, you are a known stalker, you've been sactioned by Topix on several occasions.
You are the poster child for keeping certain presonal information unrelated to the debate to one's self.
Come on now...... What's your purpose why aren't your focusing on the issues of the debate, the 1995 Budget Impass?
.... stay with the issue of the debate which is more than enough dialogue with individuals like yourself... didn't you ever warn your children about relating personal information over the internet about themselves?.. it's an employed security feature...
Report this .|..

You say everyone is this Waxballs.

Grow up, nutcase. And stop posting with a fake name, Obama worshipper.
ra_con_teur

Oklahoma City, OK

#812418 Nov 27, 2012
THE DEBIL wrote:
WOMEN DON'T BUILD TOWERS. THEY BUILD EMPIRES. VERY OFTEN THEY INCORPORATE TOWERS INTO THEIR EMPIRES BUT THEY ARE AS LIKELY TO TEAR THEM DOWN AGAIN JUST BEFORE THEY'RE FINISHED. THEN THEY'LL HAVE SOME MAN WITH A BIG TALLYWACKER BUILD THEM A NEW TOWER OR SOMETIMES WILL FOREGO TOWERS ALTOGETHER.
Since you are in Poland...

how many friends do you bring in to change a lightbulb?

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#812420 Nov 27, 2012
TSM wrote:
<quoted text>
RealDave… Whose administration gave Solyndra the Cash? Your argument about Solyndra is about as silly as your argument ‘who sign NAFTA!! The answers are Obama/Clinton!!
1) The Bush administration tried hard to get that Solyndra loan approved before he left office.

2) NAFTA was signed by George HW Bush. The Nafta Treaty was never ratified by Congress thanks to Democrats. Clinton signed a law passed by Congress enacting the various aspects of the NAFTA Agreement that Bush signed with the heads of Mexico & Canada.

You keep proving how uninformed you are.
Cardinal of the Kremlin

Bronx, NY

#812421 Nov 27, 2012
The Democrats and the Republicans won so one set of rich elites beat the other .001% what did you GAIN more new taxes as Bush Sr. SAID read my lips so says uncle obama the plan for the darkest minority the same as before keep them on the threadmill they still dont see they have the same problems they always had "black PRESIDENT" doesn't matter keep a carrot in front of them they know no better,liberal democrate hollywood said it best in the godfather "animals"

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#812423 Nov 27, 2012
dem wrote:
<quoted text>Don't be alarmed by Yawkie.
She just fat imbecile with a penchant for abuse.
Sow. Wishing she'd bring that Ducati over; I'd love to take her for a ride on the country roads, show her a couple of the local stock ponds. Nothing like a crazy tramp to suck the wind from your sails. Guess a moniker of Waxballs says it all.
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#812424 Nov 27, 2012
Mike R wrote:
<quoted text>Prove it.
That's troll talk fkface__how about your dumbazz putting up a link to a halfway believable source. Mike Russo is a fkn right wing yahoo and you're a liar, you'll have to better than that.

“It's always darkest 'fore dawn”

Since: Jul 08

Who's dawn?

#812425 Nov 27, 2012
Homer wrote:
<quoted text>Yep, fck em, they can get a second, 3rd job, he doesn't care if they never see their kids, they never should have had them in the first place. Doesn't matter if their job was shipped overseas they should have anticipated that.
"....are there no prisons, are there no workhouses? Let them die and decrease the surplus population..."
Think there'll be a lot of forged chains Marleys in flack's Christmas Carol? Think his big 1%'ers at Massey will leave some coal in his stocking?

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#812431 Nov 27, 2012
Mike R wrote:
<quoted text> The Left has insisted that Bush pushed subsidies for Solyndra too and is therefore at least as responsible for the collapse as Obama. Solyndra execs didn’t see it that way in January 2009 and ramped up political pressure to fast-walk approval for the loan guarantees:
Solyndra officials were intensely pressuring Bush administration officials in early January 2009 to approve a government loan for the solar company before the Obama administration took power.
On Jan. 12, 2009, Solyndra CEO Chris Gronet sent an Energy Department official an email marked “urgent” expressing outrage that Bush officials had decided a few days earlier that while the loan application had “merit” it needed further study before officials could move forward with a taxpayer-financed loan.
The Obama administration went ahead with the loan that the Bush administration was reluctant to approve, let alone fast track.
The rest is history.
Nice try. Bush pushed for a decision & the application was lacking. Solyndra fixed the application & it was then approved.

What that says is that both Bush & Obama believed it was a worthy project.

What it says that it was not Obama feeding his cronies.

What it says is that Solyndra had newer technology that was worth exploring.

What it also says is that you right whiners are liars.

You have no clue about Solyndra, its promise, why it was a good investment at the time the investment was made,. why it failed, or even the purpose of the loan program.

I suggest Sonny, that you get better informed. As of now, you appear to be just another dumbass, uneducated & uninformed right whiner.

Since: Oct 12

United States

#812433 Nov 27, 2012
Can`t back a socialist!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 38 min Rogue Scholar 05 189,609
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr positronium 53,452
Another chilly, gloomy summer predicted for Chi... 2 hr Civil Blotter XIV 1
Amy 5-22-15 2 hr Julie 8
last post wins! (Apr '13) 3 hr Concerned_American 520
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 3 hr Doug77 5,988
Last word + 2 (Mar '12) 4 hr Red_Forman 894
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 9 hr editor 99,531
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]