Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1263849 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

“I've visited all 57 states!”

Since: Mar 12

Jivetown

#812411 Nov 27, 2012
Mike R wrote:
<quoted text>Prove it.
Realtime can only prove what an idiot he is. He does that quite well.
THE DEBIL

Poland

#812413 Nov 27, 2012
MOST WOMEN - ABOUT 80%- DON'T EVEN LIKE BIG TALLYWACKERS BUT THEY REALIZE THAT THE MEN WHO OWN THEM WILL OFTEN BUILD THEM A TOWER. SUCH IS LIFE. WHEN THE SAUDIS FLEW THE PLANES INTO THE TOWERS THE MESSAGE WAS: "TAKE THAT, CAPITALIST PENISES." AND, AS WITH ANY DICK-SLAPPIN' ANTI-CAPITALIST, THE PENISES THEN INVADED IRAQ.
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#812414 Nov 27, 2012
Cardinal of the Kremlin wrote:
Wikileaks founder Julian Assange was bitterly right when he said US president Barack Obama “seems to be a nice man, and that is precisely the problem” and aptly described him as a “wolf in sheep’s clothing”.
Under the pretext of combating terrorism, Obama has followed in the footsteps of former President George Bush and even intensified the killer drone attacks in different parts of the world, a move which has terminated in the unfortunate deaths of multitudes of innocent people. President Obama argues that the drone strikes are focused efforts to exterminate people who are on a list of active terrorists and that they have not caused huge human losses.
Pakistani lawyer Shahzad Akbar, who represents families of civilians killed in US killer drone strikes, says,“Either President Obama is lying to the nation, or he is too naive, to believe on the reports which CIA is presenting to [him].”
In a similar strain, Medea Benjamin, co-founder of CODEPINK has said:
“So many people who spoke out against George [W.] Bush’s extraordinary rendition and Guantánamo and indefinite detention have been very quiet when it comes to the Obama administration, who is not putting people in those same kind of conditions, instead is just taking them out and killing them. So we need to make people speak up and say that when Obama says this [program] is on a tight leash, this is not true, this is a lie.”
Only in Pakistan, Obama has authorized over 300 drone attacks and has killed innocent civilians. A new study by Stanford Law School and New York University’s School of Law shows that the killer “drone strikes in Pakistan have killed far more people than the United States has acknowledged, have traumatized innocent residents and largely been ineffective.” Besides, the study calls for a re-evaluation of the practice, saying the number of “high-level” targets killed as a percentage of total casualties is extremely low – about 2%. The report says Washington is misrepresenting drone strikes as “a surgically precise and effective tool that makes the US safer,” saying that in reality,“there is significant evidence that US drone strikes have injured and killed civilians.”
In a 29-page report to the United Nations Human Rights Council, Philip Alston, the United Nations special representative on extrajudicial executions, called on the United States to exercise greater restraint in its use of drones.
“I’m particularly concerned that the United States seems oblivious to this fact when it asserts an ever-expanding entitlement for itself to target individuals across the globe. But this strongly asserted but ill-defined license to kill without accountability is not an entitlement which the United States or other states can have without doing grave damage to the rules designed to protect the right to life and prevent extrajudicial executions.”
Any mention of the "total" financial aid that the US pays out each year to our long time ally Pakistan???

Without US aid and lax immigration and travel policies that fkn shthole would collapse in around itself.

“I've visited all 57 states!”

Since: Mar 12

Jivetown

#812416 Nov 27, 2012
Not Surprized wrote:
<quoted text>
Reported for stalking asshole.
#105825 Jun 17, 2011
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/grantley-pa/T ...
#108974
Waxballs Is Stalking Again wrote:
No need to lie stalker. You were banned for stalking and for spamming topix with your judgit machine, Waxballs. Your lucky you weren't arrested for what you did to that woman you fckn sick bastard. Go back to the cesspool you dragged yourself out of you animal.
Waxballs Waxbrains resurfaces from the longest dumpster dive in history!! Remember that topix banishment ? Still stalking women and giving out their personal information to the many topix posters roound the world? Better watch your step there Waxbrains, the Moderators are watching, you sick, psycho Stalker. Still spamming threads with macros runescape I see. You're a real honest to God psychotic STALKER if there ever was one. Keep it up maybe the FBI will catch on.
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/itasca-il/T50 ...
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/itasca-il/T50 ...
#18127
Oct 17, 2009
"Sounds Paranoid To Me wrote:
She changed her name bacause she was being stalked. The poster who was stalking her got her private information and published it for the world to see on this forum. That is why he was banned. So she changed her name. I observed the whole incident from the start. Not only did he publish her information but continued to stalk and harass her. Can you understand why she would change her name now?
sunnycali wrote:
Would you report someone HERE to the moderators if they were giving out YOUR personal information?
17602
Oct 15, 2009
"sunnycali wrote:
Again, if someone posted YOUR private information would you just sit there and say, "way to go - that's freedom of speech in action?" And I mean information that included your home address and phone number. You would do nothing? If the answer is that you would do nothing then you apparently care little for your family.
17603
Oct 15, 2009
"sunnycali wrote:
So if someone were giving out your personal information you would not report that person? If someone were using extremely obscene language you would not report that person?
This has absolutely nothing to do ideology. I don't have any problem with free speech. I don't have any problem with people of any political bent expressing their opinions. I DO have a problem with people violating the most basic terms of decency.
Oh, and I would report someone if I saw them breaking into YOUR house. Or abusing a member of YOUR family. I guess you and I are different in that respect. And I'm very sorry for that. Not for me but for you.
#58531Reply Jun 9, 2010
"Devin wrote:
Waxman, you are a known stalker, you've been sactioned by Topix on several occasions.
You are the poster child for keeping certain presonal information unrelated to the debate to one's self.
Come on now...... What's your purpose why aren't your focusing on the issues of the debate, the 1995 Budget Impass?
.... stay with the issue of the debate which is more than enough dialogue with individuals like yourself... didn't you ever warn your children about relating personal information over the internet about themselves?.. it's an employed security feature...
Report this .|..

You say everyone is this Waxballs.

Grow up, nutcase. And stop posting with a fake name, Obama worshipper.
ra_con_teur

Oklahoma City, OK

#812418 Nov 27, 2012
THE DEBIL wrote:
WOMEN DON'T BUILD TOWERS. THEY BUILD EMPIRES. VERY OFTEN THEY INCORPORATE TOWERS INTO THEIR EMPIRES BUT THEY ARE AS LIKELY TO TEAR THEM DOWN AGAIN JUST BEFORE THEY'RE FINISHED. THEN THEY'LL HAVE SOME MAN WITH A BIG TALLYWACKER BUILD THEM A NEW TOWER OR SOMETIMES WILL FOREGO TOWERS ALTOGETHER.
Since you are in Poland...

how many friends do you bring in to change a lightbulb?

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#812420 Nov 27, 2012
TSM wrote:
<quoted text>
RealDave… Whose administration gave Solyndra the Cash? Your argument about Solyndra is about as silly as your argument ‘who sign NAFTA!! The answers are Obama/Clinton!!
1) The Bush administration tried hard to get that Solyndra loan approved before he left office.

2) NAFTA was signed by George HW Bush. The Nafta Treaty was never ratified by Congress thanks to Democrats. Clinton signed a law passed by Congress enacting the various aspects of the NAFTA Agreement that Bush signed with the heads of Mexico & Canada.

You keep proving how uninformed you are.
Cardinal of the Kremlin

Bronx, NY

#812421 Nov 27, 2012
The Democrats and the Republicans won so one set of rich elites beat the other .001% what did you GAIN more new taxes as Bush Sr. SAID read my lips so says uncle obama the plan for the darkest minority the same as before keep them on the threadmill they still dont see they have the same problems they always had "black PRESIDENT" doesn't matter keep a carrot in front of them they know no better,liberal democrate hollywood said it best in the godfather "animals"

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#812423 Nov 27, 2012
dem wrote:
<quoted text>Don't be alarmed by Yawkie.
She just fat imbecile with a penchant for abuse.
Sow. Wishing she'd bring that Ducati over; I'd love to take her for a ride on the country roads, show her a couple of the local stock ponds. Nothing like a crazy tramp to suck the wind from your sails. Guess a moniker of Waxballs says it all.
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#812424 Nov 27, 2012
Mike R wrote:
<quoted text>Prove it.
That's troll talk fkface__how about your dumbazz putting up a link to a halfway believable source. Mike Russo is a fkn right wing yahoo and you're a liar, you'll have to better than that.

“We doing better...”

Since: Jul 08

we've got to do more

#812425 Nov 27, 2012
Homer wrote:
<quoted text>Yep, fck em, they can get a second, 3rd job, he doesn't care if they never see their kids, they never should have had them in the first place. Doesn't matter if their job was shipped overseas they should have anticipated that.
"....are there no prisons, are there no workhouses? Let them die and decrease the surplus population..."
Think there'll be a lot of forged chains Marleys in flack's Christmas Carol? Think his big 1%'ers at Massey will leave some coal in his stocking?

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#812431 Nov 27, 2012
Mike R wrote:
<quoted text> The Left has insisted that Bush pushed subsidies for Solyndra too and is therefore at least as responsible for the collapse as Obama. Solyndra execs didn’t see it that way in January 2009 and ramped up political pressure to fast-walk approval for the loan guarantees:
Solyndra officials were intensely pressuring Bush administration officials in early January 2009 to approve a government loan for the solar company before the Obama administration took power.
On Jan. 12, 2009, Solyndra CEO Chris Gronet sent an Energy Department official an email marked “urgent” expressing outrage that Bush officials had decided a few days earlier that while the loan application had “merit” it needed further study before officials could move forward with a taxpayer-financed loan.
The Obama administration went ahead with the loan that the Bush administration was reluctant to approve, let alone fast track.
The rest is history.
Nice try. Bush pushed for a decision & the application was lacking. Solyndra fixed the application & it was then approved.

What that says is that both Bush & Obama believed it was a worthy project.

What it says that it was not Obama feeding his cronies.

What it says is that Solyndra had newer technology that was worth exploring.

What it also says is that you right whiners are liars.

You have no clue about Solyndra, its promise, why it was a good investment at the time the investment was made,. why it failed, or even the purpose of the loan program.

I suggest Sonny, that you get better informed. As of now, you appear to be just another dumbass, uneducated & uninformed right whiner.

Since: Oct 12

United States

#812433 Nov 27, 2012
Can`t back a socialist!
Cardinal of the Kremlin

Bronx, NY

#812435 Nov 27, 2012
To see what BLACK PEOPLE have gained with the DEMOCRATIC Party LOOK AT CHICAGO HOME OF OBAMA SEE WHERE MOST BLACK YOUTH ARE GOING SINCE BECOMING slaves and servants to the dEMOCRATIC party OBAMA THE SAME AS BUSH AS A POLITICIAN only difference Obama has a color that most BLACKS prefer LIGHT AND BRIGHT almost WHITE lololo BLACKS lolol BLACK POWER FROM A WHITE WOMAN lololo
Homer

Effort, PA

#812437 Nov 27, 2012
If you could show me a rightwinger that tells the truth and I'd say you found yourself the Holy Grail.
Homer

Effort, PA

#812438 Nov 27, 2012
Homer not taking any questions until after the holidays.
carol

Orlando, FL

#812441 Nov 27, 2012
Subversive Barry wrote:
<quoted text>
Realtime can only prove what an idiot he is. He does that quite well.
Realtime thought Fox News made up the phrase "fiscal cliff".

Of course, it was being reported by CNN, ABC and NBC which I had to post to get him in the loop. Not to mention it's on the lips of everyone on Capital Hill these days.

Even so, Realtime still thinks he knows everything. Like the growing number of store chains cutting back employees hours to avoid paying benefits because they aren't good workers...or something like that.

How do you reason with somebody like that?
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#812443 Nov 27, 2012
McCain, Lindsay Gay-ham and the much taller Senator Ayote are fixin to have their azzes handed to them.

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#812448 Nov 27, 2012
Mike R wrote:
This is what America wanted? ObamaCare Work Disincentives: 4 Cliffs Hit Employees
In the time of Caesar, all roads led to Rome. In the time of ObamaCare, seemingly every path heads straight for a cliff.
The health law is filled with cliffs where the returns for more work take a nose-dive.
The Congressional Budget Office has estimated ObamaCare will "reduce the amount of labor used in the economy by roughly 1/2 a percent" — about 800,000 full-time jobs..........DS1y2sX8
Here is what I just love about you uninformed right whiners. I stopped reading your humongus pile of horse crap with the 800,000 job loss claim.

What the CBO said was that there were significant number of people who were working extra hours to just cover their healthcare cost.

The CBO said that Obamacare would lower their costs & therefore, the number of extra hours they needed to work to pay for their premiums would be lower.

These hours would be the equivalent to 800,000 jobs.

So no, it does not cut 800,000 jobs - that is a blatant lie.

It is actually a good thing that people would have to work fewer hours to pay for the health insurance costs.

My God, is there no end to the number of lies you people tell??
carol

Orlando, FL

#812451 Nov 27, 2012
flack wrote:
<quoted text> Keep after them Carol. They are and will be responsible for much misery in this country. We cannot let them and others try to smokescreen what they have done. Libtards are destroying this country and we can never let up on them.
All anyone has to do is compare the state of Texas to the state of California. They both have the largest populations and they both have similar demographics.

But Texas is predominantly conservative and of the mindset the less government, the better. They have a deficit of 1.3 billion and one of the lowest unemployment rates in the country.

California, in contrast, is predominantly liberal and are of the mindset there's no such thing as too much government. They have a deficit of 16 billion and one of the highest unemployment rates in the country.

There is also an exodus of people moving out of California to Texas.
Nj raider 1

United States

#812453 Nov 27, 2012
Nightchalker wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm tired of paying my fair share while you blacks drive Cadillacs and collect welfare.
Why you worried about what other people driving? What you mad you driving a piece of shit? You think white people are the only ones that as you say"do their fair share"? Take yo dumass to work & pay that white man uncle sam so hew can redistribute the wealth to the under class. If you dont like it secede, but you can't have the land & water so just pack yo shit & go!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 14 min ritedownthemiddle 54,358
News Fatal heat wave 20 years ago changed Chicago's ... 1 hr VeganTiger 5
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 2 hr jh4freedom 194,546
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 6 hr Mister Tonka 100,298
Ask Amy July 31 7 hr Julie 6
abby7-31-15 10 hr mrs gladys kravitz 5
News Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 11 hr Mark 52,069
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages