Barack Obama, our next President

[John Galt]

Homer wrote:

<quoted text>Well duh John, economic growth will definitely ease the pressure on both taxes and spending, any real ideas on how to improve the economy? Should we consult Romney on his 12 million new jobs plan?

At least two elements are necessary. The first is consumer confidence resulting in increased demand for products. The second is investor confidence in producing a profit as a result of investment.

Government can produce these only by getting out of the way. So, in the present environment, there is little hope.

[moshx]

leosnana wrote:

<quoted text>OMG, you're not just a brain dead moran who can't even spell sterilization, but you're also a brain-washed right to lifer...Falwell's lyin' ass legacy didn't do him too much good, at least.

check the spelling on this . Gofuckyourselfyoudumbassbitch. You are good for spell checking but damm your ignorance to any reality runs deep.

[shinningelectr0n]

Obama 2016 wrote:

<quoted text>Senator Kennedy was never the Governor but he would have made an extraordinary President.

Forget the Presidency. His brother f*cked that one up. Better yet, Teddy would've made a good Olympic Swimmer. Remember Chappaquiddick?

That's why he drank like a fish and screwed everything in sight.

It's a family thing, you know.

[John Galt]

Homer wrote:

<quoted text>Well, when he does exceed his power let me know and I'll call my lawyer.

That attitude is why the economy is failing.

[Homer]

John Galt wrote:

<quoted text>
Want to bet that the new company will have fewer employees, with reduced wages and benefits?

It's become the way of the world, join with me in blaming Reagan.

[moshx]

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text> Planned Parenthood operates clinics with real doctors.

then under the new obama wlefare plan they should be able to fund themselves with no extra funding. How many different programs do we need to hand out free stuff to people?

[shinningelectr0n]

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>
I'd separate fact & fantasy from your posts but there are never any facts.

So you can't find facts. What else is new?

[sonicfilter]

OBAMIES ZOMBIES wrote:

<quoted text>
SHUT UP...COUNTRY IS GOING DOWN WITH YOUR SOCIALIST PRESIDENT AND YOU CARE ABOUT SPELLING ...baboonazz...

i've never been called that before. not even by fred.

where is fred?

[OBAMIES ZOMBIES]

moshx wrote:

<quoted text>check the spelling on this . Gofuckyourselfyoudumbassbitch. You are good for spell checking but damm your ignorance to any reality runs deep.

GOOD ~~~FOR~~~YOU~~~!!!!!!!

[OldRaider]

John Galt wrote:

<quoted text>
The point is that Obama, as President, has limited powers and has no right to demand anything.
The negotiation of any deal should be within the Congress, with Obama having the power to accept or reject the final compromise. When Obama states that certain elements are non-negotiable, he exceeds his power.

You psycho right wingers constantly bitch that Obama is not taking ENOUGH leadership and then in the next breath you right wing idiots whine that he should just stand back and WATCH congress. Unbelievable!!!

[sonicfilter]

Gaza and the Polls, the Bad and the Less Bad

Virtually every American political leader has defended the Israeli strikes on Gaza, most notably President Obama. And fans of the Israeli bombing and missile campaign can draw satisfaction from the results of a CNN poll, which indicates that 57 percent of Americans support the Israeli strikes, versus 25 percent who say they are not justified.

Those of us in the minority, inclined to point to things like Israel’s blockade and virtual occupation of Gaza, or that it broke the most recent ceasefire by assassinating a Hamas leader, might refer to some interesting internals in the poll. For instance, 36 percent of Democrats (versus 41 percent) said the Israeli strikes were not justified. This sentiment is held in contradiction, even defiance, of Obama’s own expressed views, which apparently are more in line with what one might expect from a GOP politician.

This is a sign that the vocal defiance of the “All of Jerusalem belongs to Israel” resolution, forced through at the Democratic National Convention, was not a mere one-off; it rests on a solid base of sentiment. As Alana Goodman argues in the above linked article, the days of “bipartisan” support for whatever the heck Israel wants are numbered.

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/gaza-a...

[OBAMIES ZOMBIES]

sonicfilter wrote:

<quoted text>
i've never been called that before. not even by fred.
where is fred?

I don't know! Contact Topix...lost and found dept!

[sonicfilter]

Hostess shutdown on hold

http://money.cnn.com/2012/11/19/news/companie...

[sonicfilter]

OBAMIES ZOMBIES wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't know! Contact Topix...lost and found dept!

they seem to be VERY busy trying to locate all of the Topix republicans who disappeared after the election.

[Razors Edge]

Realtime wrote:

<quoted text>Still no word on why the ambassador was at the Benghazi consulate without his security staff?

Pay attention to the future,Obama will almost certainly claim
that part of it is Classified,he is on the brink of CYA,even
now to declare the real reason he cannot reveal the truth,and
the reason that Clinton ran away,the reason why Rice lied is
the whole thing is deemed too sensitive for the Public to get
all the facts,therefore its all ;not his FAULT!!!!

[OBAMIES ZOMBIES]

sonicfilter wrote:

<quoted text>
they seem to be VERY busy trying to locate all of the Topix republicans who disappeared after the election.

Stupid is and stupid does!

[TSM]

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>
Its called a veto. Look it up.
He can tell Congress that there are some actions that he will veto.
It is well within his powers to do so.

RealDave are you saying the’ President has a Line Item Veto Powers’ if so when was this Granted?

[sonicfilter]

Zinger wrote:

<quoted text>We know where the libshits are,all around the free stuff.

another conservation who doesn't care if the GOP never wins another national election.

not that I'm complaining.

[THE DEBIL]

John Galt wrote:

<quoted text>
Want to bet that the new company will have fewer employees, with reduced wages and benefits?

WELL, DEBIL TAKE THAT BET WITH ONE CAVEAT: THE NEW COMPANY WILL HAVE FEWER "MANAGEMENT" EMPLOYEES AND WILL ULTIMATELY PRODUCE A BETTER PRODUCT. THERE'S NO ROOM FOR SHIT-STAINS LIKE YOU ANYMORE, JOHN; IT'S TIME YOU GOT BACK TO WORK ON YOUR STATIC ELECTRICITY MOTOR THAT RUNS ON AIR AND NOT OIL.

SO, UM, AMERICAN MANUFACTURING IS FINALLY FIGURING OUT THAT YOU DON'T NEED A GRAPHICS DIRECTOR TO PRODUCE COLORFUL PLACE-MATS FOR COMPANY EVENTS? GENIUS! PURE GENIUS!

[Realtime]

Razors Edge wrote:

<quoted text>
Pay attention to the future,Obama will almost certainly claim
that part of it is Classified,he is on the brink of CYA,even
now to declare the real reason he cannot reveal the truth,and
the reason that Clinton ran away,the reason why Rice lied is
the whole thing is deemed too sensitive for the Public to get
all the facts,therefore its all ;not his FAULT!!!!

Still stacking stupid eh?

The Benghazi consulate served "only" to provide diplomatic cover for a nearby CIA base which was conducting a secret war in Libya and the region. If a US ambassador had not been killed there chances are good that US citizens would have ever heard about the ruckus. The only question that needs to be answered is "why the fk was Stephens in Benghazi that evening?"

Will add that Petreaus told Peter Kings committee on September 14th that he wasn't sure whether or not it was a terrorist attack or a spontaneous uprising__maybe he was bullshting the house intel committee on the 14th. which was a Friday__perhaps the CIA was bullshting the administration as well?