Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1497829 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

mr owl II

Montgomery, AL

#811457 Nov 26, 2012
Pres Obama, twinkies, and how a Union runs a business...

"•No truck could carry both bread and snacks even when going to the same location
•Drivers were not permitted to load their own trucks
•Workers who loaded bread were not allowed to also load snacks
•Bringing products from back rooms to shelves required another set of union employees
•Multi-Employer pension obligations made Hostess liable for other, previously bankrupted, retirement plan contributions from employees that never worked for Hostess at all"

some more:

"•$52 million in Workers’ Comp Claims
•Dealing with 372 Distinct Collective-Bargaining Contracts
•Administration of 80 Separate Health and Benefits Plans
•Funding and Tending to 40 Discrete Pension Plans
•$31 million in year-over-year increases in wages and health care benefits for 2012 v. 2011"

http://www.zerohedge.com/contributed/2012-11-...
TheIndependentMa jority

East Bernstadt, KY

#811458 Nov 26, 2012
mr owl II wrote:
<quoted text>
dave, you are a duma$$...
Too much squawrk and parrot lunaTic vomit spew spilled over onto his lemming herd pack bib lol.

Poor bobble headed, lock step, bootlicking, tree hugging duhmmy Duh A Vey lol.

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#811459 Nov 26, 2012
shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
Potential humans do not have rights? What about Son of Sam? Charles Manson? Jeffrey Dahmer? Osama Bin Ladin? Hitler? Stalin? Pol Pot? John Wayne Gacy?
Do women have a right to miscarry? Huh? Do you have a right to catch a cold and take a dump?
You're nuts and damned proud of it.
It's all on the surface with you, isn't it.

Saying that all potential humans have a right to life, also says that if a woman miscarries a pregnancy, she's guilty of murder. The Governor of Indiana wants to pursue this line of thinking, by forensically investigating every miscarriage. Not sure about you, but I have a problem with that.

The criminals you paraded across your memory up there, were all born. And yes, all the American ones had the right to life, as outlined in the United States Constitution. Their right to life (other than Manson's it seems) was disregarded once they were condemned to death by the State.

You're stupid, and too stupid to know how stupid you are.

Since: May 11

Waynesboro, PA

#811461 Nov 26, 2012
mr owl II wrote:
<quoted text>
dave, you are a duma$$...
We are bringing troops home from war & you bitch about it claiming Obama is firing troops. And you have the nerve to call someone else a dumbass.

Pathetic.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#811463 Nov 26, 2012
What's the GOP message if the economy booms?
By David Frum

Here's the next thing the Republican party needs to rethink. What does it say if and when the United States returns to prosperity?

For five years, U.S. politics have been shaped by economic hardship. In 2008 and 2010, voters rejected the party in power, booting Republicans out of the White House, and then sweeping Democrats out of Congress.

Mitt Romney campaigned in 2012 on the slogan, "Obama isn't working." President Obama responded by attacking Romney as out of touch, assuming (probably correctly) that he could not win by running on his record.

The nation's economy added 171,000 jobs in October 2012, for a total of almost 700,000 in the four months before Election Day. More than half the jobs lost in the crash of 2008-2009 have now been recovered, even as public-sector employment has shrunk by a net 500,000.

The economy is recovering because consumers are less burdened by debt. They are paying down their credit cards, building home equity and strengthening their personal balance sheets.

As household debt burdens become lighter, consumers express more confidence. They are allowing themselves to spend a little more. They are even buying new homes again. Housing starts in October 2012 rose to a level 41.9% over a year before.

Accelerating economic activity is rapidly reducing the budget deficit. The deficit has contracted since 2009 at the fastest rate since the end of World War II, faster even than during the late 1990s boom.

Wages remain flat, and will likely stay flat until unemployment contracts more, but Americans can begin to see better times ahead for the first time in a long time.

As they do glimpse that better future, two things will happen in politics:

1) President Obama will begin to claim more credit. In 2012, the word "stimulus" went unmentioned by Democrats. It was Republicans who tried to make political use of the $800 billion spent on job creation in 2009-2011. In 2013-2014, however, the shoe may suddenly rematerialize on the other foot.

2) Republicans will discover that their old "Obama isn't working" theme has become obsolete. By 2014, again assuming that Congress does not leap off the fiscal cliff, it will likely look as if Obama is working. What then? If negative messaging failed in 2012, it will fail bigger in 2014.

For too long, the Republicans have predicted apocalypse, debt crisis, the loss of freedom, the overthrow of the constitution. As the economy improves, that doom-saying will seem even more out of touch than ever.

Republican political chances will depend on the Republican ability to devise a positive program to address the country's fiscal problems in ways that improve people's lives. It's a new day, guys, and it demands a new game.

http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/26/opinion/frum-go...
Real Daves therapist

United States

#811464 Nov 26, 2012
Jules wrote:
<quoted text>The Head in the Sand excuse. When will you lefties realize every time you ignore this excuse it proves you to be such morons. The CRA and social engineering by Democrats had everything to do with mortgages being given on on $450k homes to people making $70K before the unscrupoulos & greedy began selling those mortgages to investment houses who hid them in investments & sold them to unsuspecting buyers.
Democrats often have good intentions with unforseen consequences. Add it to other attempts to be "fair," like social promotion and affirmative action. Society then gets to deal with the mess and the productive get to foot the bill. And meanwhile, America inches closer to resembling a failed Euro state.
Please do not interfere with Real Dave's delusions. That is my job, one of the few real jobs created in The Obama Economy. I am compensated for his treatment by Medicaid. However once ObamaCare takes full effect in 2014, I will probably have to drop my Medicaid patients when rates are reduced.
carol

Oviedo, FL

#811465 Nov 26, 2012
Obama 2016 wrote:
<quoted text>Nobody needs to smoke. If smoking was prohibited, health care costs in America would be cut in half. Smoking is the number one cause of cancer, heart disease and stroke. 46% of lung cancer cases are caused by secondhand smoke. 60% of house fires are caused by dropped cigarettes. Thousands of endangered sea turtles eat butts thrown on our beaches and die from stomach cancer. Like the possession of deadly firearms, it's time for the Government to outlaw this filthy, deadly habit. They should render the firearms industry and tobacco industry sad relics from America's past, like Bush and Reagan. Hopefully President Obama can accomplish these goals before his third term.
Nobody should drink alcohol or abuse drugs.

Alcohol-related problems cost society more than $175 billion a year. Alcohol addiction causes thousands of deaths each year. Alcohol use by underage youths is the most frequently abused substance by young people 12 to 17 years old.

Drug and alcohol abusers are at higher risk for socially unacceptable behaviors such as becoming involved in crime, unsafe sex or self-inflicted injuries. Children and teenagers who abuse drugs and alcohol have a higher drop-out rate than non-users. Substance abuse during pregnancy increases the risk of miscarriage, birth defects, still-born births and infants with learning disabilities.

According to a 2009 report by the National Business Group on Health, up to 40 percent of industrial fatalities and 47 percent of industrial injuries are linked to alcohol use, and employees who use drugs are five times more likely to file a workers' compensation claim than workers who don't.

The PC police have decided only one vice should be demonized by creating public hysteria though. And it was pretty easy for them to do. That's what's most disturbing.
Nightchalker

Lansing, MI

#811468 Nov 26, 2012
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Nobody should drink alcohol or abuse drugs.
Alcohol-related problems cost society more than $175 billion a year. Alcohol addiction causes thousands of deaths each year. Alcohol use by underage youths is the most frequently abused substance by young people 12 to 17 years old.
Drug and alcohol abusers are at higher risk for socially unacceptable behaviors such as becoming involved in crime, unsafe sex or self-inflicted injuries. Children and teenagers who abuse drugs and alcohol have a higher drop-out rate than non-users. Substance abuse during pregnancy increases the risk of miscarriage, birth defects, still-born births and infants with learning disabilities.
According to a 2009 report by the National Business Group on Health, up to 40 percent of industrial fatalities and 47 percent of industrial injuries are linked to alcohol use, and employees who use drugs are five times more likely to file a workers' compensation claim than workers who don't.
The PC police have decided only one vice should be demonized by creating public hysteria though. And it was pretty easy for them to do. That's what's most disturbing.
WHO in the hell do you think I got through the bush years?

BOURBON!

HOW do we get through the obamma years?

MEDICAL MARIJUANA!

It helps to pass the time.

Since: Feb 10

ny ny

#811469 Nov 26, 2012
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
Is that crap allowable on SNAP programs? It shouldn't be.
Now put down the babas and do something constructive for a change.
Maybe you can tell me. I'm not a believer in the gov't telling people what to drink, eat or smoke. But to deliberately turn yourself into a two fisted smoker or soda drinker just to shove it in the gov'ts. face, which Carol suggests doing, defies stupidity. Both are bad for you and to double down on either one to prove a point is moronic. Can't speak for anyone else but emphysema and morbid obesity doesn't sound like a pleasant way to go through life. But it's a choice and we all have the right to make that choice. Unfortunately there are many people in the country who ignore the truth about things that are detrimental to their health. That is their right to do so. Seat belts save lives too. Does it make sense to not wear one just to prove a point? Guess it's up to each individual to decide. I care more about taking responsibility for my own health than trying to show the gov't, who really doesn't give a shit about my health, who's boss. Anyone who can't see through the ruse of what this is really about, revenue, is an idiot. The information is out there. It's up to each individual to take what they will from it. Keep in mind tobacco and soda are both addictive substances.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#811470 Nov 26, 2012
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Nobody should drink alcohol or abuse drugs.
Alcohol-related problems cost society more than $175 billion a year. Alcohol addiction causes thousands of deaths each year. Alcohol use by underage youths is the most frequently abused substance by young people 12 to 17 years old.
Drug and alcohol abusers are at higher risk for socially unacceptable behaviors such as becoming involved in crime, unsafe sex or self-inflicted injuries. Children and teenagers who abuse drugs and alcohol have a higher drop-out rate than non-users. Substance abuse during pregnancy increases the risk of miscarriage, birth defects, still-born births and infants with learning disabilities.
According to a 2009 report by the National Business Group on Health, up to 40 percent of industrial fatalities and 47 percent of industrial injuries are linked to alcohol use, and employees who use drugs are five times more likely to file a workers' compensation claim than workers who don't.
The PC police have decided only one vice should be demonized by creating public hysteria though. And it was pretty easy for them to do. That's what's most disturbing.
I can't wait to see how you react to the national legalization of marijuana.
brown eyes

Christiansburg, VA

#811471 Nov 26, 2012
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
Beats being so full of rancid chit that it makes yer eyes brown.
VIVA la TEA Party!!!
CAP, CURB, B-U-D-G-E-T, Balance and live with in the your own damn means-because the world (Especially hard working class, tax paying citizens!!!!) doesn't owe you a DAMN thing.
Welcome to OUR geneRATIONAL realities!!!
GOD Bless America, our families, the troops and TERM LIMITS (dictatorship-commieTic PREVENTION) on the office of POTUS.
TEA Party sign We Came Unarmed This Time. Peaceful bunch wouldn't you say.
August 7. 2012.
Northeast Pennsylvania Spirit of 1776, a branch of the Tea Party, They sent out an e-mail blast with Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, Patrick Henry and others, taking turns assaulting President Barack Obama, reports Think Progress. According to these self-proclaimed American Patriots, it's just for kicks and giggles. The Tea Party loves humor except not about them and their humor is violent or it's not funny. Hypocrites.
mr owl II

Montgomery, AL

#811472 Nov 26, 2012
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
We are bringing troops home from war & you bitch about it claiming Obama is firing troops. And you have the nerve to call someone else a dumbass.
Pathetic.
you are still a dumA$$
mr owl II

Montgomery, AL

#811473 Nov 26, 2012
dem wrote:
<quoted text>
Morning, imbecile.
I trust the election results are why you have been hiding like a pussscccee.
He's on the way out homey....
we know he's a goner...

stop schlurping on ding dongs and learn to read a calendar....
mr owl II

Montgomery, AL

#811474 Nov 26, 2012
Pres Obama, voter demographics, and idiots....

{"Russian Newspaper: Obama Was Re-Elected by "Illiterate Society"}

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/201...
mr owl II

Montgomery, AL

#811475 Nov 26, 2012
Talk a bout a war on women and their va J Js....

"They got her in the end: Mexico's fearless woman mayor who survived two drug gang assassination attempts is beaten to death and dumped by the roadside"

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-22385...
mr owl II

Montgomery, AL

#811476 Nov 26, 2012
Pres OBama, cleaning up a mess in the event of an election loss, and drones...

"Obama Rushed To Complete Rule Book On Assassination In Case Romney Won."

http://floppingaces.net/2012/11/25/obama-rush...

“wake up”

Since: Jan 10

utica ny

#811477 Nov 26, 2012
Lily Boca Raton Fl wrote:
<quoted text>
What a load
check for yourself.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#811479 Nov 26, 2012
UC Study Uncovers Tobacco Industry Efforts to Undermine Secondhand Smoke Link to Cardiovascular Disease

The documents show how tobacco companies funded epidemiological and biological research that was designed to support claims that there was little or no harm from secondhand smoke. The Circulation article identifies a pattern within the studies of exposure misclassification for nonsmokers that biased results against finding an effect from secondhand smoke. Study results were then used to call into question evidence linking secondhand smoke to the increased risks of cardiovascular disease.

Such studies, the authors also say, were often published in scientific journals that had industry representatives on their editorial boards. In one case cited by Tong and Glantz, the manuscript for a manuscript by RJ Reynolds' scientists was reviewed for Inhalation Toxicology by an employee of RJ Reynolds before its publication in 1998.

"The process was presented to the outside world as having peer review," noted Glantz. "The true level of the tobacco industry's involvement in such studies was rarely disclosed in an adequate manner."

Unfavorable research results also were suppressed by the tobacco industry, according to Tong and Glantz. Their report cites a 1995 industry study that found nonsmokers exposed to more than seven hours of secondhand smoke suffered statistically significant changes in blood lipids, inflammatory markers, pulmonary function tests and urinary mutagenicity, all of which can be biomarkers for cardiovascular disease. Those findings, say Tong and Glantz, appear to have been briefly revealed at a conference and only partially published elsewhere.

The pair note in their report that when tobacco-funded studies in the early 1990s demonstrated that secondhand smoke increased atherosclerosis, the industry criticized the findings and withdrew funding. Tong and Glantz also point to several industry studies that attempted to provide alternative explanations for the direct cardiovascular effects of secondhand smoke by attributing findings to an unproven "stress" response in individuals from the odor of smoke rather than its inherent toxicity.

Tong and Glantz suggest one of the key reasons why tobacco companies have hindered efforts to ban smoking in public places is to maintain corporate viability in the marketplace. They note that smoke-free workplace rules can reduce cigarette consumption among smokers by approximately three cigarettes per day, or about 30 percent.

"What the documents we reviewed show is an industry strategy that, in their own words, will continue to question the evidence about secondhand smoke as a way 'to keep controversy alive,'" said Tong. "Tobacco companies want to debate this forever because it helps challenge no-smoking policies. And since such policies diminish cigarette consumption, it obviously strikes at the heart of corporate revenue."

http://www.ucsf.edu/news/2007/10/7345/uc-stud...

So some would have us believe that a government study is not a viable source, while an industry funded study is.

The thing is, every study that says that second hand smoke is not bad for you has been funded by big tobacco. Though it seems some that say the opposite were also funded by big tobacco. Imagine that.
the_rac_on_teur

Montgomery, AL

#811480 Nov 26, 2012
Oracles on taxes...

"Warren Buffett: Hike tax on $500K earners"

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/842...
the_rac_on_teur

Montgomery, AL

#811481 Nov 26, 2012
the no-one under $250K a year will see a tax hike legend...

"ObamaCare's 7 Tax Hikes On Under $250,000-A-Year Earners"

http://www.forbes.com/sites/ashleaebeling/201...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 18 min Justice Dale 237,664
last post wins! (Dec '10) 25 min They cannot kill ... 3,020
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 43 min Ize Found 71,393
News Chicago homicides soar, with seven fatalities W... 58 min USS LIBERTY 7
Four letter word game (Dec '11) 1 hr Pence is PUTZ 2,484
President 666 Has Arrived 1 hr putz pence 5
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr Patriot AKA Bozo 63,386

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages