Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1251775 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

THE DEBIL

Washington, DC

#808359 Nov 19, 2012
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Want to bet that the new company will have fewer employees, with reduced wages and benefits?
WELL, DEBIL TAKE THAT BET WITH ONE CAVEAT: THE NEW COMPANY WILL HAVE FEWER "MANAGEMENT" EMPLOYEES AND WILL ULTIMATELY PRODUCE A BETTER PRODUCT. THERE'S NO ROOM FOR SHIT-STAINS LIKE YOU ANYMORE, JOHN; IT'S TIME YOU GOT BACK TO WORK ON YOUR STATIC ELECTRICITY MOTOR THAT RUNS ON AIR AND NOT OIL.

SO, UM, AMERICAN MANUFACTURING IS FINALLY FIGURING OUT THAT YOU DON'T NEED A GRAPHICS DIRECTOR TO PRODUCE COLORFUL PLACE-MATS FOR COMPANY EVENTS? GENIUS! PURE GENIUS!
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#808360 Nov 19, 2012
Razors Edge wrote:
<quoted text>
Pay attention to the future,Obama will almost certainly claim
that part of it is Classified,he is on the brink of CYA,even
now to declare the real reason he cannot reveal the truth,and
the reason that Clinton ran away,the reason why Rice lied is
the whole thing is deemed too sensitive for the Public to get
all the facts,therefore its all ;not his FAULT!!!!
Still stacking stupid eh?

The Benghazi consulate served "only" to provide diplomatic cover for a nearby CIA base which was conducting a secret war in Libya and the region. If a US ambassador had not been killed there chances are good that US citizens would have ever heard about the ruckus. The only question that needs to be answered is "why the fk was Stephens in Benghazi that evening?"

Will add that Petreaus told Peter Kings committee on September 14th that he wasn't sure whether or not it was a terrorist attack or a spontaneous uprising__maybe he was bullshting the house intel committee on the 14th. which was a Friday__perhaps the CIA was bullshting the administration as well?

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#808363 Nov 19, 2012
TSM wrote:
<quoted text>
RealDave are you saying the’ President has a Line Item Veto Powers’ if so when was this Granted?
Not at all.

President Obama has the power to veto the entire bill.

He has the right to tell Congress which things will trigger that veto.
TheIndependentMa jority

Somerset, KY

#808364 Nov 19, 2012
Homer wrote:
<quoted text>Carol, you have a very narrow view of things. Mankind has had these ups and downs for thousands of years, beside Homer blames the 1980's when Reagan perpetuated, fueled and nurtued the global takeover by the corporations.
and nice, warm, cordoroy pants and boots were invented LOL
Ex- El Paso Resident

Las Cruces, NM

#808365 Nov 19, 2012
shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
Forget the Presidency. His brother f*cked that one up. Better yet, Teddy would've made a good Olympic Swimmer. Remember Chappaquiddick?
That's why he drank like a fish and screwed everything in sight.
It's a family thing, you know.
Those Kennedys are very good at bending the government laws for their benefit but those laws of physics catch up to them all the time.

Trees, bullets, bridges, cars, water, etc.

They cannot be bent or broken as easy and are much less forgiving.
TheIndependentMa jority

Somerset, KY

#808366 Nov 19, 2012
sonicfilter wrote:
Save the cupcakes, Suzy Q's, HoHo's, Coffee cakes and Twinkies!
Nightchalker

Lansing, MI

#808367 Nov 19, 2012
TSM wrote:
<quoted text>
RealDave are you saying the’ President has a Line Item Veto Powers’ if so when was this Granted?
"line item veto" HA!

"We don't need no stinking line item veto!"

Dave is with the program, it IS, whatever The Leader SAYS it is!

Is gut YA?

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#808368 Nov 19, 2012
moshx wrote:
<quoted text> then under the new obama wlefare plan they should be able to fund themselves with no extra funding. How many different programs do we need to hand out free stuff to people?
Not all women services are free & some have co-pays.
THE DEBIL

Washington, DC

#808369 Nov 19, 2012
JOHN, JOHN, JOHN, YOUR NAMESAKE WAS A GENIUS, YOU ADVOCATE LOWER REGULATIONS ON PIZZA SALESMEN. THERE'S A DIFFERENCE HERE, JOHN. YOU ARE NOT A GENIUS, NOR WOULD YOUR PALS THANK YOU FOR DESTROYING THE OIL INDUSTRY WHICH A STATIC ELECTRICITY MOTOR WOULD SURELY DO. YOU SEE, JOHN, THE REAL JOHN GALT GAVE SOMETHING OF REAL VALUE TO HIS FELLOW HUMANS - ALL OF THEM. YOU PROPOSE GIVING THEM A HEART ATTACK. IT'S NOT THE SAME THING, JOHN.
H-e-l-l-o-o-o

New Britain, CT

#808370 Nov 19, 2012
Can anyone hear me? Or are the brats too busy dissing each other??!

HELLO, B. OBAMA IS A TWO-TERM PRESIDENT

THIS TOPIC IS D-E-A-D

D

E

A

D

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#808371 Nov 19, 2012
shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
So you can't find facts. What else is new?
When was the last time you posted a act?

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#808372 Nov 19, 2012
Nightchalker wrote:
<quoted text>
"line item veto" HA!
"We don't need no stinking line item veto!"
Dave is with the program, it IS, whatever The Leader SAYS it is!
Is gut YA?
There is no line item veto, the SC said so.

Try to keep up.
OBAMIES ZOMBIES

Los Angeles, CA

#808374 Nov 19, 2012
H-e-l-l-o-o-o wrote:
Can anyone hear me? Or are the brats too busy dissing each other??!
HELLO, B. OBAMA IS A TWO-TERM PRESIDENT
THIS TOPIC IS D-E-A-D
D
E
A
D
So as freedom in AMERICA!

“wake up”

Since: Jan 10

utica ny

#808375 Nov 19, 2012
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text> Not all women services are free & some have co-pays.
libs reasoning ...it would be a shame for someone to have to contribute to there own needs . isn't the new obama welfare act going to pay for everything you would ever need with no turn downs. They way all you libs praisd the plan I thought you're master had you all taken care of..

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#808376 Nov 19, 2012
leosnana wrote:
<quoted text>I think carol defines a progressive secularist as one who doubts the Earth was created in a day, has ever thought that ever'body talkin''bout heaven ain't a goin' there, doubts that every army ever went into every battle with god on it's side, or votes for Democrats because they don't seem so mean and selfish...
Tell it, nana.

:)

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#808377 Nov 19, 2012
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Food safety allows us to purchase food with a reasonable assurity it won't kill us.
As for me, we grow & can my on vegetables, shop at a local fruit market & have my own bees. We buy organic when possible. No processed foods.
Same here. We've assured our food safety. You already know the government can't do it. Why bother with the FDA? A behemoth of 'regulations' routinely skirted, leaving us listening to the giant sucking sound of billions of dollars wasted.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#808380 Nov 19, 2012
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Its called a veto. Look it up.
He can tell Congress that there are some actions that he will veto.
It is well within his powers to do so.
Congress can pass whatever it chooses and let the President decide whether to veto. Threats by the President to veto specific legislation make the Congress useless if obeyed.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#808381 Nov 19, 2012
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
Vulture Capitalism Ate Your Twinkies
http://www.thenation.com/blog/171331/vulture-... #
You make a very good point.
Perhaps the unions should purchase the business and show that they are more competent than management.

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#808382 Nov 19, 2012
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Congress can pass whatever it chooses and let the President decide whether to veto. Threats by the President to veto specific legislation make the Congress useless if obeyed.
Does not make Congress useless at all. It makes the more efficient.

Why waste months passing a bill that will just be vetoed.

Veto threats are just that, threats.

A President is certain within his rights to warn Congress what might get the veto.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#808384 Nov 19, 2012
Homer wrote:
<quoted text>It's become the way of the world, join with me in blaming Reagan.
Blame the marketplace that won't allow unlimited pricing for bread and snack foods.

Each industry has efficient and inefficient producers. Hostess is an inefficient producer that must either reduce costs, add value to allow higher prices for its products, or cease to exist.

Or the taxpayers could provide a bailout.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 hr jh4freedom 192,299
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 3 hr OzRitz 53,989
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 5 hr Sublime1 99,902
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 12 hr RACE 6,144
Word (Dec '08) 12 hr RACE 5,325
Dear Abby July 3, 2015 12 hr RACE 5
Amy July 3, 2015 13 hr mrs gladys kravitz 3
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages