Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Read more
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#805754 Nov 16, 2012
You are a proven BSer, so please keep you posts short. When you write books like this, nobody will read them, because we know it's garbage. You are a liar and an idiot.
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong again Carol, the vote in the Senate to pass the American Jobs act was 50 to 49 with no Republicans voting for it. The Democrats who voted against it were the usual Blue Dogs like Ben Nelson, John Tester. Harry Reid also voted against it but did so in a parliamentary procedure that could force a revote in the future.
The House only passed a minor element of the act not even taking up most of it for a vote.
By the way nitwit, the bill also contained tax credits for working Americans and employers. It also contained provisions to shore up local and state budgets to prevent further layoffs of police, firefighters and teachers.
You right wing morons have a real problem distinguishing spending from investment. You have no problem with wasting a trillion dollars on Iraq which is money we'll never get back and in fact will keep costing money to care for the tens of thousands of servicemen who came back maimed both physically and mentally. That's spending.
Repairing our crumbling infrastructure is an investment that keeps commerce flowing over our roads and bridges. It's also an investment when you put money into education resulting in a more educated populace better able to compete with other countries in the world market.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#805755 Nov 16, 2012
The Party’s Problem

The perception that the Republican party serves the interests only of the rich underlies all the demographic weaknesses that get discussed in narrower terms. Hispanics do not vote for the Democrats solely because of immigration. Many of them are poor and lack health insurance, and they hear nothing from the Republicans but a lot from the Democrats about bettering their situation. Young people, too, are economically insecure, especially these days. If Republicans found a way to apply conservative principles in ways that offered tangible benefits to most voters and then talked about this agenda in those terms, they would improve their standing among all of these groups while also increasing their appeal to white working-class voters. For that matter, higher-income voters would prefer candidates who seem practical and solution-oriented. Better “communications skills,” that perennial item on the wish list of losing parties, will achieve little if the party does not have an appealing agenda to communicate.

http://www.nationalreview.com/blogs/print/333...
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#805756 Nov 16, 2012
Rich Idiots and the Republican Gigolos

Here’s the simple fact — pretty much every major consultant in the GOP got into technology and the web, learned the buzz words, and went off to the rich idiots for funding. The outside 501(c)(4) groups didn’t want to end up out of money, so they redoubled their efforts and did the same. The donors shelled out. They had no understanding of what they were doing, had no capacity for the metrics to judge success, and would up spending much with nothing to show for it.

There is a better way. The rich idiots do not have to be idiots. They do not have to be played for sugar daddies by Republican consultants turned gigolos. The problem is, much of the current consulting class that has turned to tech is a problem. And many of the people out there right now most vocal about how to “fix” things are as much a part of the problem as the other guys.

If the wise men who made lots of money by being very smart in business keep going the way they are going, they’ll continue being the rich idiots of the Republican Party who continue to get played by the same guys who talk the talk they are comfortable with, walk the walk they are comfortable with, but actually do not understand and cannot really implement technology as a means to a ground game end.

That’s just the truth and yeah, it probably hurts today.

http://www.redstate.com/2012/11/13/rich-idiot...
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#805757 Nov 16, 2012
As has been addressed in detail by many of the editors here at RedState the usual suspects have gleefully sounded the call for a purge of social conservatism, as they always do, as a political, cultural and structural solution for all that ills the GOP. Those rushing to the media to make these pronouncements are acting like frightened children lost in the woods, an unsurprising development considering the immaturity of thought found in the consultant class.

This isn’t to say that the GOP is doing all that much right, in fact I am drawing a blank attempting to think of something for which to give them praise this cycle.

I don’t believe our answers lie in the GOP any more. As a friend said to me, parties exist to win elections, if they aren’t doing that what is the purpose?

http://www.redstate.com/2012/11/12/our-path-f...
carol

Orlando, FL

#805758 Nov 16, 2012
Obamacare will affect small businesses in at least four ways.

1. Higher Health Care Costs. The endless regulations, mandates, fees and taxes will put upward pressure on premium prices where 88% of workers and dependents at small businesses purchase health insurance.

2. Ineffective Small Business Tax Credit. Obamacare does not address the uncertainties small businesses face in deciding whether to offer health insurance coverage to its workers.

3. Higher Regulation Compliance Costs. Many small companies will have to hire additional workers and incur external accounting expenses to handle the enhanced compliance regulations on health insurance plans and stricter tax compliance regulations.

4. Medicare Taxes on “Flow-Through” and Investment Income. Obamacare will establish a new Medicare non-payroll tax reaching a significant share of small businesses.

This tax increase is not indexed to inflation and will push more small business owners into a higher tax group. It will also lead to greater deterrence on investment and passive income which will suppress economic growth.

Obamacare fails to appropriately address the concerns of small and medium-size businesses. It will force many companies to react to new cost burdens. The intended consequences of this poorly constructed bill are harmful enough, but the many unintended consequences are even worse.

http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2010...

It's after the fact, but we should at least educate ourselves about what we face in the future.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#805759 Nov 16, 2012
Impeach Obama wrote:
<quoted text>Are you talking about the Norfolk Plant? I bought two F-150's built there. Best trucks I ever owned. Bought a Kansas City built F-150 later. Piece of crap. I don't buy F-150's anymore. Was sad to see the Norfolk plant close.
Yeah had a lot of friends that worked there. Closing that plant caused a lot of hardship, broken marriage, and lost homes.
Imhotep

United States

#805761 Nov 16, 2012
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
That's funny. Even when Toto pulled back the curtain, you'd still want to believe the man behind the curtain is Oz.
Oh carol... ;-)

I enjoy your flights into imagination and illusion.
Yes, you are pilloried daily, but i see a admirable state of conviction. Kudos! ;-)

You possess a unfounded and exaggerated distrust of others, sometimes reaching delusional proportions yet I like you're posts. Entertains me Thx!

Stamina with a capital S!
In other words... Soul!

http://m.youtube.com/watch...

And another 'carol' song...

http://touch.dailymotion.com/video/xkj8a2_chu...

“wake up”

Since: Jan 10

utica ny

#805762 Nov 16, 2012
OzRitz wrote:
<quoted text>
That depends, if you are going to employ someone and offer a days work and they finish in 6 hrs can you tell me what the point of that is ? You either pay them for 8 hrs or you offer a higher rate for an unknown amount of hrs. Like these dip$hit employers who expect someone to drive across town which might take an hour, to do 2 hrs cleaning & a hour to drive home. Not worth the time & gas in the car, those jobs are not real jobs.
he was hired for the legnth of the job aprx 8 days work ,and paid 100 a day ,if he had of worked well and was willing to travel he could of had a full time job and learned a trade.instead he got $120 and a free meal.
carol

Orlando, FL

#805763 Nov 16, 2012
Five Ways Obamacare Crushes the Middle Class

1. More taxes. Obamacare imposes $502 billion of new or increased taxes and fees. Several of the taxes will be passed on to middle-income families through higher prices.

The Medicare payroll tax from 2.9 percent to 3.8 percent for individuals earning above $200,000 isn't indexed to inflation and will impact more middle-class families each year. A Medicare trustee report states,“By the end of the long-range projection period, an estimated 80 percent of workers would pay the higher tax rate.”

2. Loss of existing coverage. As many as 35 million people could lose their existing coverage because of the financial incentives for employers to drop coverage for their employees.

3. Higher premiums. For a family of four, premiums on even the lower priced ‘silver’ option could still cost more than $15,000 annually on the exchanges. A family’s income might exclude them from subsidies but not be high enough to pay $15,000 for Obamacare’s government-approved insurance. A family of four earning $90,000 annually could find themselves spending as much as 25 percent of the family’s take home pay for an average policy.

4. Rising health care costs. As costs rise, middle-class families including those receiving a subsidy will be left paying more. Charles Blahous, a Medicare trustee, concludes “this limitation would likely cause the federal subsidies to grow less rapidly over the long term than the cost of health care and thus require low-income individuals in the exchanges to shoulder a steadily increasing percentage of their health costs.”

5. More government control of health care. Obamacare transfers massive authority to the government in delivering care and coverage. This huge expansion of government’s role in health means that, by 2020, more than half of all Americans will be dependent on the federal government for health care and government bureaucrats will be in charge of deciding what you can and cannot buy.

http://blog.heritage.org/2012/05/25/top-five-...

(Guess I'm in educating mode today.)

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#805764 Nov 16, 2012
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
The least you could do is agree to disagree.
corduroy bell bottoms? Was homer going through his attic again? God I hope he doesn't find his old parachute pants.
I use to wear them all the time. Parachute pants were the most comfortable things you could ever wear.
carol

Orlando, FL

#805765 Nov 16, 2012
Imhotep wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh carol... ;-)
I enjoy your flights into imagination and illusion.
Yes, you are pilloried daily, but i see a admirable state of conviction. Kudos! ;-)
You possess a unfounded and exaggerated distrust of others, sometimes reaching delusional proportions yet I like you're posts. Entertains me Thx!
Stamina with a capital S!
In other words... Soul!
http://m.youtube.com/watch...
And another 'carol' song...
http://touch.dailymotion.com/video/xkj8a2_chu...
Can you find any good news relating to Obamacare? If so, please share it.
LMAO

Livermore, CA

#805766 Nov 16, 2012
shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>FEMA is AWOL on the East Coast. Did anyone watch PBS News tonight?

But, of course, the Boy Messiah shows up for the photo ops. He hugs, consoles and looks concerned. His golf clubs are packed in the helicopter.
I didn't know Idiot Bush was back?
carol

Orlando, FL

#805767 Nov 16, 2012
sonicfilter wrote:
If you’re out of practice at applying your ideas to real life, you’re message will hold little weight in the eyes of others. This is something for the GOP to remember if they aim to repair the divorce they’ve had with the working class. As reflected by last week’s exit polls, it’s going to require more than empathy, theory, or dressing up the party line, much to the talking heads’ dismay.
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/tough-...
Can you find any good news relating to Obamacare? I mean, about it not costing businesses and the middle class paying for it?
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#805768 Nov 16, 2012
education....

At the CNN debate this October in Las Vegas, Gingrich took a swipe at Romney over the former Massachusetts governor’s healthcare plan that requires citizens in the Bay State to buy health insurance. Romney shot back:“Newt, we got the idea of individual mandate from you.”

Gingrich responded:“You did not get that from me. You got that from the Heritage Foundation.”

They are both correct on this revealing point. The Heritage Foundation, the influential conservative think tank, first developed the idea of an individual mandate for healthcare in the late 1980s. That is how deeply this idea is tied to conservative thinkers.

Romney used the Heritage policy in developing his Massachusetts health care law. That reform contained the dreaded individual mandate.

And Gingrich supported the federal mandate as an alternative to Hillary Clinton’s health care reform package when he was Speaker in the 1990s.

If Republican voters heard Gingrich and Romney speak honestly about health care reform — and why they came to appreciate and support the good of the individual mandate — my bet is that most GOP and independent voters would be more impressed than they are with the blatant lies now being told on the campaign trail.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2011/12/06/rom...
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#805769 Nov 16, 2012
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you find any good news relating to Obamacare? I mean, about it not costing businesses and the middle class paying for it?
Carol you just keep right on with the right wing distortions that necessarily have to be presented by the outfit that thought the whole deal up in the first place but who would have something completely different to say if the healthcare law had been implemented by a Republican.

but it is good for a giggle or 2.
GhostofRaygun

Russellville, KY

#805770 Nov 16, 2012
carol wrote:
Obamacare will affect small businesses in at least four ways.
1. Higher Health Care Costs. The endless regulations, mandates, fees and taxes will put upward pressure on premium prices where 88% of workers and dependents at small businesses purchase health insurance.
2. Ineffective Small Business Tax Credit. Obamacare does not address the uncertainties small businesses face in deciding whether to offer health insurance coverage to its workers.
3. Higher Regulation Compliance Costs. Many small companies will have to hire additional workers and incur external accounting expenses to handle the enhanced compliance regulations on health insurance plans and stricter tax compliance regulations.
4. Medicare Taxes on “Flow-Through” and Investment Income. Obamacare will establish a new Medicare non-payroll tax reaching a significant share of small businesses.
This tax increase is not indexed to inflation and will push more small business owners into a higher tax group. It will also lead to greater deterrence on investment and passive income which will suppress economic growth.
Obamacare fails to appropriately address the concerns of small and medium-size businesses. It will force many companies to react to new cost burdens. The intended consequences of this poorly constructed bill are harmful enough, but the many unintended consequences are even worse.
http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2010...
It's after the fact, but we should at least educate ourselves about what we face in the future.
Same points were made when Medicare was enacted. You Repubs hate that universal health care plan for seniors as well. But I have NEVER known of a Repub 65 or older that pays their medical bills out of their own pocket in protest of the Socialist Plan. Hypocrites one and all.
Stoneman

Boise, ID

#805771 Nov 16, 2012
dem wrote:
One of the biggest stories of the 2012 presidential election was how thoroughly convinced the wingnuts were of their impending victory. It's not just fun mocking their hilariously wrong predictions. It's also fun looking at the information they used to so fully ill-inform themselves.
I had more faith in the intelligence of the American public than I should have. I figured that there was absolutely no way the majority of the voters would ignore the fact that Lord Obama is second only to Jimmy Carter in his handling of the economy. The numbers don't lie-- look at the unemployment rate, the debt, on and on and on.

I thought the majority wouldn't ignore his embarassing behavior with foreign affairs, standing up the Israeli prime minister, the Benghazi debacle.

I thought people would look at his infatuation with movie stars, rap singers, etc. partying at the White House, Moochelle flying 60 of her closest friends on our dime to Spain for a week of frolick in the sand and be a bit annoyed.

But I was wrong. The majority, like you, are in it for the free stuff. Women were convinced to vote for him so they could get free (paid for by an Evil Rich Guy) birth control pills and save $9/month. Families everywhere were bought with free (paid for by an Evil Rich Guy) school breakfasts, lunches and dinners. Let the party continue.

It's really rather pathetic. What will it take to persuade you parasites that WORKING IS GOOD. I guess when the last Evil Rich Guy is tapped out, the well runs dry, and the Free Stuff isn't available, you'll burn tires in the street and whine like they do in Greece, Spain and elsewhere.

Whatever happens, you own it. In four more years the unemployment rate is still around 10% and the debt is in the tens of trillions, YOU VOTED FOR IT.

Congratulations.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#805772 Nov 16, 2012
Support For Repealing Obamacare Plunges To An All-Time Low

http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/11/13/11...
GhostofRaygun

Russellville, KY

#805773 Nov 16, 2012
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you find any good news relating to Obamacare? I mean, about it not costing businesses and the middle class paying for it?
You stupid Repubs NEVER consider the cost of 30 million Americans without health insurance to the rest of America.
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#805774 Nov 16, 2012
carol wrote:
Five Ways Obamacare Crushes the Middle Class
1. More taxes. Obamacare imposes $502 billion of new or increased taxes and fees. Several of the taxes will be passed on to middle-income families through higher prices.
The Medicare payroll tax from 2.9 percent to 3.8 percent for individuals earning above $200,000 isn't indexed to inflation and will impact more middle-class families each year. A Medicare trustee report states,“By the end of the long-range projection period, an estimated 80 percent of workers would pay the higher tax rate.”
2. Loss of existing coverage. As many as 35 million people could lose their existing coverage because of the financial incentives for employers to drop coverage for their employees.
3. Higher premiums. For a family of four, premiums on even the lower priced ‘silver’ option could still cost more than $15,000 annually on the exchanges. A family’s income might exclude them from subsidies but not be high enough to pay $15,000 for Obamacare’s government-approved insurance. A family of four earning $90,000 annually could find themselves spending as much as 25 percent of the family’s take home pay for an average policy.
4. Rising health care costs. As costs rise, middle-class families including those receiving a subsidy will be left paying more. Charles Blahous, a Medicare trustee, concludes “this limitation would likely cause the federal subsidies to grow less rapidly over the long term than the cost of health care and thus require low-income individuals in the exchanges to shoulder a steadily increasing percentage of their health costs.”
5. More government control of health care. Obamacare transfers massive authority to the government in delivering care and coverage. This huge expansion of government’s role in health means that, by 2020, more than half of all Americans will be dependent on the federal government for health care and government bureaucrats will be in charge of deciding what you can and cannot buy.
http://blog.heritage.org/2012/05/25/top-five-...
(Guess I'm in educating mode today.)
Got anything from the John Birch Society to go along with this other right wing horsesht that you call educating.

www.jbs.org/ very cool website

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 7 min Patriot AKA Bozo 52,734
Word (Dec '08) 9 min RACE 5,193
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 29 min Learn to Read 187,011
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 1 hr scirocco 69,622
obama our next president 9 hr bale wayne 3
News Animal brothels prevalent in Chicago? 11 hr News Junkie 1
News Ultra Foods in Crestwood offers array of prepar... (Jun '12) 15 hr J T L U K 19
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]