Barack Obama, our next President

[Buy American or Drop Dead]

Romney-Ryan 2012 wrote:

<quoted text>Under Bush, 575 American soldiers died and fewer than 3,000 were wounded in Afghanistan. Under Obama, 1,405 soldiers have died and nearly 15,000 soldiers have been wounded. 70% of the deaths and nearly 80% of the injuries in Afghanistan have occurred under ObamaÂ’s watch.

Funny you forgot to mention Bush started the war along with the Iraqi war which got over 5000 us servicemen killed

[Lord Fetch]

mdbuilder wrote:

<quoted text>
blah blah blah...

lil guy...you are tenacious. lucky for you wolves don't waste their time on mice

[Lord Fetch]

By the time Al Franken was sworn in on July 7, 2009, Ted Kennedy had not cast a Senate vote for about four months because he was terminally ill with brain cancer. (He died on August 25, 2009.) Robert Byrd was also hospitalized from May 18 through June 30, 2009 and may not have been well enough to attend Congress and vote for some time afterward. Thus the Democrats did not really have the 60 votes needed to break a filibuster until Kirk took office. Byrd (who died in June 2010) was also periodically too ill to attend and vote during the September 2009-February 2010 period, though I have not been able to confirm this with a quick Google.

[RealDave]

mdbuilder wrote:

<quoted text>
You nailed it. This has nothing to do with "policy". It doesn't take a genius to figure out free stuff trumps good jobs every time, and once handed out, it's impossible to take away. Illegal aliens (et al), aren't here to become productive Americans, they're here for the free stuff (74%). They're not stupid, if voting Democrat insures free stuff, they're going to vote Democrat. Most college students know free stuff costs money, but when that burden can ostensibly be shifted to someone else, the "Evil Rich", then hell yeah, go for it, vote O-B-A-M-A!!
We live in a country of spoiled children and opportunistic parasites. Obama and social networking has coalesced these 'takers' into a dominate voting block, that's his genius. This is a Democrat Party with dubious intentions and they've instituted an intoxicating and insidious mechanism to insure their success,'free stuff'. Have you ever taken a lolly-pop away from a spoiled child?

As the Republicans always run on tax cuts.

[Eman]

Where's the idiot that said the stock market would be better by today?

[Zew]

sonicfilter wrote:

Top Republicans Suddenly Back Immigration Reform After Latinos Overwhelmingly Back Obama
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/11/09/1...

So now foreigners decide the future of the countries they invade and not theirs which they abandon...!?

This is the reason I'm xenophobic.

Romney-Ryan 2012 wrote:

<quoted text>Giving free contraceptives and abortions to oversexed gutter-sluts is not an "assault on women".

Borrow money from China and Russia to stock up on free contraceptives, do free abortions, provide free ARVs, and welfare.

Romney-Ryan 2012 wrote:

<quoted text>I agree. Republicans should stop their attacks on women. They should follow the lead of female-respecting democrats like Bill Clinton, Ted Kennedy, John Edwards, Elliot Spitzer and Anthony Weiner.

Thats a good one.

Romney-Ryan 2012 wrote:

<quoted text>Nokia is reporting record cellphone sales. Teraco Inc., the Midland, Tx. manufacturer of the magnetic strip EBT cards is hiring and working extra shifts to keep up with the demand for new cards. Some aspects of the Obama economy are improving.

All taken on revolving credit like the subprime mortgage line of credit that Bill Clinton facilitated, homes many have now lost.

[TSM]

Does anyone think Obama’s going to change course? America’s is at a tipping point one being self-reliance, accountable/Responsible or Government!! This election reflects that it’s tilting toward Government so why would Obama make any attempt to change its direction because Government equals Democrats!! Liberal compassion is defined as how much FREE STUFF can we give you for your Vote!!

[SHADOW]

THE BAIN OF YAWK wrote:

It's hard for fake carol to hide when she weighs 400 plus pounds. Get real.

At 400 lbs it sounds like you are talking about a bovine with a lap band named sel.
Hard to tell if she is playing the man today or the woman. No wait she isn't a woman ------is she?

[Lord Fetch]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

http://colorlines.com/archives/2012/11/white_...

[SHADOW]

Buy American or Drop Dead wrote:

<quoted text>
Funny you forgot to mention Bush started the war along with the Iraqi war which got over 5000 us servicemen killed

How many dead on barry's watch? Seems you liberal socialist workers party people have stopped the daily count of our dead for some reason. Dead Americans under barry's watch just aren't important.
Why is that?

[Nightchalker]

leosnana wrote:

<quoted text>You're such a fool, dumb carol, probably always have been and, most definitely, always will be. I am not. "
The civil rights movement, once a controversial left-wing fringe, has grown deeply embedded into the fabric of our national story. This is a salutary development, but a problematic one for conservatives, who are the direct political descendants of (and, in the case of some of the older members of the movement, the exact same people as) the strident opponents of the civil rights movement. It has thus become necessary for conservatives to craft an alternative story, one that absolves their own ideology of any guilt. The right has dutifully set itself to its task, circulating its convoluted version of history, honing it to the point where it can be repeated by any defensive College Republican in his dorm room. Kevin Williamson’s cover story in National Review is the latest version of what is rapidly congealing into conservatism’s revisionist dogma.
The mainstream, and correct, history of the politics of civil rights is as follows. Southern white supremacy operated out of the Democratic Party beginning in the nineteenth century, but the party began attracting northern liberals, including African-Americans, into an ideologically cumbersome coalition. Over time the liberals prevailed, forcing the Democratic Party to support civil rights, and driving conservative (and especially southern) whites out, where they realigned with the Republican Party." Blow it out you're tired, lyin' ass as long as you choose, but I ain't buyin'.

Keep spreading the love, baby!

...watch out for that karma...you almost stepped in it...

[SHADOW]

Lord Fetch wrote:

By the time Al Franken was sworn in on July 7, 2009, Ted Kennedy had not cast a Senate vote for about four months because he was terminally ill with brain cancer.(He died on August 25, 2009.) Robert Byrd was also hospitalized from May 18 through June 30, 2009 and may not have been well enough to attend Congress and vote for some time afterward. Thus the Democrats did not really have the 60 votes needed to break a filibuster until Kirk took office. Byrd (who died in June 2010) was also periodically too ill to attend and vote during the September 2009-February 2010 period, though I have not been able to confirm this with a quick Google.

And everyone thought fat Kennedy got away with murder--in the end it will bite you in the butt just like the swimmer.

[carol]

Lincoln Duncan wrote:

<quoted text>
GOP needs to listen to the Latinos not the other way around.

Why I said "who understands them and hears them".

[Lord Fetch]

SHADOW wrote:

<quoted text>
At 400 lbs it sounds like you are talking about a bovine with a lap band named sel.
Hard to tell if she is playing the man today or the woman. No wait she isn't a woman ------is she?

wrong thread shadowtard...now scoot before i swat you with a broom

[Romney-Ryan 2012]

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>
Look,I know you're embarrassed.
I have the highest regard to all that serve in our military & appreciate their service.
But really, when someone like you brags, it requires a footnote.
A little history lesson.
If you were a male between 18 & 26 in the 60's & early 70's, you were subject to the draft, unless you had a deferment such as a college deferment.
Those without a deferment were in the "pool" & local draft boards selected draftees (until the lottery changed it).
The National Guard became the first choice of those who thought they would drafted & did not want to win that trip to Vietnam. The Guard quickly filled up & to get in the Guard took money & political influence ( Ref GW Bush).
The options became:
1) Try to get a medical deferment - like get a big boil on your ass (the Limbaughian).
2) Go to college & not flunk out & hope its over after 4 years.
3) Join the Navy because unless you volunteer & get selected for river boat duty, you will likely never step foot in Vietnam.
4) Run in hide in another country - flee to Canada or hide out in England (Clinton) or France (Romney).
Now you had no influence to get in the Guard. So when you thought you might get drafted, you ran out & joined the Navy.
I rate that above those that fled to other countries but really, if there was no draft,. we all know you would not have enlisted. If you were truly interested to fighting in Vietnam, you would have enlisted in the Army or Marines.
When the lottery was done, I had a high school buddy whose birthday was number 1 - he dropped out of college & joined the Navy. Lots of kids did this. But in reality, they did it to avoid the draft.
He, like you, hid out in the Navy.
Being drafyed m

Blah...blah...blah... If you think the pride I have in my service to my country is "bragging", than so be it. I don't have to answer to you or any other peace queer. The fact remains that I served my country in time of war and you did not. People like you tried to undermine our efforts. I wonder how many of our soldiers and Marines died due to the confidence that was given to our enemies because of you and your friend's war protests and the fact that they knew that people like you didn't support them and, in fact, were against them, as was proven time and time again by the reception they received from people like you upon their return. You're a coward piece of sh't. Don't lecture me about serving my country.

[Nightchalker]

Lord Fetch wrote:

<quoted text>wouldn't it be more fun and cathartic to shove 'em off?

you are almost as casual about murder as those guys on the "hate the jews" thread. Wassup with that?

[carol]

GOPidiotsx wrote:

<quoted text>
Straight from Bill O's mouth, you parrot.
Single women were tired of listening to Repubkicanmen lecture them about rape.
Stay stupid Carol. The culture wars are over.
BTW, Rasmussen, FOX's favorite pollster, ranked 24th in their polling predictions. Not even close!

Two republicans misspoke in their zealousy to preserve life at all costs.

Do you know how many republican men there are?

Romney made it quite clear rape was an exception. Women should have been listening to him.

Obama started the war against women and made it the fiasco it became.

That's what they do...start fiascos right before elections.

We still can't afford Planned Parenthood and those adamently against abortion are still forced to pay for it.

Good job. Nice going. You still don't get it.

[Sister Kathryn Lust]

sage won wrote:

People are a dying
Obama is a lying
Pakistani civilian deaths in US drone war 'in vain'– report — RT
rt.com/news/pakistan-drones-study-civilians-9...
Sep 25, 2012 – Obama's kill list - All males near drone strike sites are terrorists ... Civilian-killing drone strikes are turning local populations against the US,...
Secret 'Kill List' Tests Obama's Principles - NYTimes.com
www.nytimes.com/.../obamas-leadership-in-war-... ?...
May 29, 2012 – President Obama has placed himself at the helm of a top secret process to designate ... U.S. Law May Allow Killings, Holder Says (March 6, 2012)... C.I.A. Steps Up Drone Attacks on Taliban in Pakistan (September 28, 2010)...
Obama Administration's Drone Death Figures Don't Add Up ...
www.propublica.org/article/obama-drone-death-...
Jun 18, 2012 – We collected claims by the administration about deaths from drone strikes ...
President Obama has greatly expanded the use of drones to attack .

I'd rather we were out of there entirely, but rather than our troops getting slaughtered on the ground, I'd see the use of drones. If they don't like it, they can always surrender...

Yes, it's a cold world.
Wahh.

[leosnana]

flack wrote:

<quoted text> Here you go Homer read it for yourself. Notice the word 'I'?

"I got rid of" is not the same as "I voted against," language challenged...you probably think you will be "getting rid of" several of Obama's cabinet members before 2016, but that isn't because you voted against them--you guys are just being childish, churlish, and chump-like.

[ChromiuMan]

Eman wrote:

Where's the idiot that said the stock market would be better by today?

Wall street is pouting because they aren't going to get the goodies Romney promised.