Dude, if the above were true, the WTC7 would not be the only building in history to have pancaked like that after an office fire - or even several of them. If you don't want to believe your government had a hand in facilitating 9/11, but are perfectly willing to believe the tripe the same governmentt feeds you as 'explanation' for it, I can't help you.<quoted text>
I PERSONALLY, remember it as never having seen such a look of total disbelief and betrayal, handled VERY WELL by President George W Bush, especially in front of small innocent children, especially remaining as calm and resolute, in front of the same innocent audience, while America was under attack.
"What those authors fail to note is that while steel melts at around 1,370°C (2500°F) it begins to lose its strength at a much lower temperature. The steel structure of the World Trade Center would not have to melt in order for the buildings to lose their structural integrity. Steel can be soft at 538°C (1,000°F) well below the burning temperature of jet fuel."
-Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility. Jefferson Science Associates. U.S. Department of Energy
Jet fuel burn temp-500-600 d F (open air-no other variables included)
THAT SIMPLE equation does NOT take a rocket scientist.
What PART of the OBVIOUS MATH of the PHYSICS do YOU NOT comprehend? Or are you just a malovent, malicious occupy anyone elses anything ghetto streeter type?
Enjoy your delusions.