Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1523323 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Zew

Johannesburg, South Africa

#800482 Nov 9, 2012
[QUOTE who="Jesus's Fetus's"]Who won the election?[/QUOTE]

Failures and welfare sponges won the elections.

USA lost and will continue to bleed while debt is mounting.

Obama doesnt know what he is doing and doesnt care.

Ask him about fiscal reforms and the dying US troops he'll tell you about his daughters.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

Gauley Bridge WV

#800484 Nov 9, 2012
[QUOTE who="Jesus's Fetus's"]<quoted text>
Except your space program.
And your military.
[/QUOTE] Defense of America is the main purpose of the federal government. Before you say anything the space program was born under the military and more than 75% is still under the military.
Imhotep

United States

#800485 Nov 9, 2012
[QUOTE who="Jesus's Fetus's"]Who won the election?[/QUOTE]

The American people
Zew

Johannesburg, South Africa

#800486 Nov 9, 2012
Zew wrote:
I like this comment from the clip: Why did Romney Lose?
1) Underestimating the ever increasing number of takers who want "free" stuff.
2) Underestimating the power of the stupid to be suckered into believing cute slogans like "hope", "change", and "forward".
3) The refusal to take the fight to Obama on things like Fast & Furious and Benghazi.
4) Trying to pander to and placate the "social" conservatives and holy rollers by focusing on issues other than the economy.
5) The inability to make Obama own up to the terrible record accumulated in his first term.
Point No. 2 - means you must never underestimate what stupid people can do with their numbers. Thing is theres just too many of them around.

Too many of them around me.

“wake up”

Since: Jan 10

utica ny

#800487 Nov 9, 2012
Jean wrote:
<quoted text>
I'd bet money that you and every one of the righties in this forum are more likely on the dole than any of the unrepublicans.
And as I've told you morons manytimes.....I need or want nothing from any of you selfish, greedy losers.
id bet I pay more in taxes per month than you earn in a year.

“See how you are?”

Since: Jul 12

Earth

#800488 Nov 9, 2012
flack wrote:
<quoted text> Hang on Homer because it is about to take a big hit. People are pulling out and going into cash. If they start buying the yuan we are in big trouble. Wait till these capital gains tax raises and loopholes close. Won't be worth much. It is no coincidence that the stocks most hurt right now is high dividend stocks.
Surprised? Who could expect anything else of job producer "patriots" who have been banking their deductions, incentives and tax cuts in Zurich all along?
Homer

Bethlehem, PA

#800490 Nov 9, 2012
Zew wrote:
I like this comment from the clip: Why did Romney Lose?
1) Underestimating the ever increasing number of takers who want "free" stuff.
2) Underestimating the power of the stupid to be suckered into believing cute slogans like "hope", "change", and "forward".
3) The refusal to take the fight to Obama on things like Fast & Furious and Benghazi.
4) Trying to pander to and placate the "social" conservatives and holy rollers by focusing on issues other than the economy.
5) The inability to make Obama own up to the terrible record accumulated in his first term.
---
I fully agree with it.
Why didnt Romney take the fight to Obama and ask him about the 2008 election lies (promise) to pull US troops out of Afghanistan within 11 months of taking office?
Why didnt he put it to Americans that Obama sent MORE troops
Theres no such thing as clean campaign, Obama played dirty in those adverts, Romney should have used the empty promises from 2008 to fight back.
GW Bush is not the type that would have let Obama get away with it if he were in Romney's shoes.
Romney's camp should take the blame for the loss. They did not lose because Obama ran a better campaign. Obama failed and the Repuiblicans should have used his failure to outdst him.
Those who say the Republicans were an obstruction and the reason Obama failed are politically immature. That happens all over the world where the houses (Congress and Senate in the case of the US) are split between the parties. Its not the Republicans that said Obama must give bailouts to companies that secure jobs in China, and fail to support small business at home.
Obama should have been nailed to the cross for his dismal failure. Theres a lot of ammunition that could have been used to get this incompetent out of the White House.
He says the best is yet to come? What best, what is it that he thinks he can do which he failed to do in the past four years in an economy that has gotten worse since he took over. The US debt has mounted since Obama took office. He blame Bush for his inability to bring that under control. How can he bring it under control when he hands free money over to companies in what is suppose to be a capitalist society?
Wrong, in 2008 while campaigning he promised to send more troops to Afghanistan which he did.

Spending doesn't reset when the new guy takes over, there was plenty already in place including a couple of unfunded wars.

The stimulis included 287 billion in tax cuts, tax rebates and also tax incentives for small businesses, the back bone of the job creators in this country.

As for your last line, the U.S goverment has a long history of subsidizing corporations(see big oil), this has been going on since long before Obama.
Zew

Johannesburg, South Africa

#800493 Nov 9, 2012
[QUOTE who="Jesus's Fetus's"]<quoted text>
Good to see you are happy with election outcome.[/QUOTE]

I am, because bad economy means less and less money will be pumped into welfare. Its going to get to a point where China cuts the line of credit to the US, thats when shit will hit the fan.

Agro subsidies will go, free / subsidised abortion, free ARVs and free contraceptives will go, food prices will skyrocket moer will fly.

You can kiss those food stamps goodbye.

The US economy is not going to recover.

Obama is re-inforcing the roots of anarchy and he doesnt care about you, he'll simply take off to Indonesia where he grew up under the care of his Indonesian stepfather.

I dont blame those who have taken to forming militia groups in frustration.

Do you really believe that a nonchalant guy like Obama cares? Obama does NOT care about any of you.
Homer

Bethlehem, PA

#800494 Nov 9, 2012
flack wrote:
<quoted text> Defense of America is the main purpose of the federal government. Before you say anything the space program was born under the military and more than 75% is still under the military.
700 billion a year on defense, when is enough enough Flack? We outspend the next 10 highest countries combined.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

Gauley Bridge WV

#800496 Nov 9, 2012
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>Me too. I like being in control of my medical and sexual decisions. I like knowing that my insurance premiums are paying for ALL of my healthcare needs. I like knowing that if my contraceptive fails for some reason, I have the choice of whether or not to become a parent for the third time. And I also like knowing that the religious views of some, are not the law for everyone.
Don't you?
(1) yes.(2) I personnel don't believe in insurance except for catastrophic insurance. Saving the money sent to pay premiums is a much better way. Med costs are cheaper when paying cash.(3) I do not believe killing a child is ever the answer. The only exception is life of the mother. I am not religious. This is just a personnel belief.

“See how you are?”

Since: Jul 12

Earth

#800497 Nov 9, 2012
Buy American or Drop Dead wrote:
<quoted text>
He was born in Detroit . His dad was born in Mexico
And his grandfather had 5 mommies.
Zew

Johannesburg, South Africa

#800498 Nov 9, 2012
[QUOTE who="Jesus's Fetus's"]<quoted text>
Why do you care?
You live in South Africa.
You native blacks are racists.[/QUOTE]

Because I have to sympathise with the thinking Americans who work to pay for your free abortion, free ARVs, free contraceptives, free housing projects and food stamps. Thats why I care.

PLUS, I dont like Obama.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

Gauley Bridge WV

#800499 Nov 9, 2012
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>Me too. I like being in control of my medical and sexual decisions. I like knowing that my insurance premiums are paying for ALL of my healthcare needs. I like knowing that if my contraceptive fails for some reason, I have the choice of whether or not to become a parent for the third time. And I also like knowing that the religious views of some, are not the law for everyone.
Don't you?
But I will say if you wish to kill your baby I'm not going to stop you. Just don't ask me to pay for it.
carol

Oviedo, FL

#800501 Nov 9, 2012
Homer wrote:
<quoted text>Flack you have never been right about anything, Homer will just have to hope that the 'even the blind squirrel finds a nut' theory does not come true.
It's just that usually things take more time than we think before they actually happen.
Homer

Bethlehem, PA

#800502 Nov 9, 2012
Sean Hannity, John Boehner say GOP should tackle immigration reform

Well, that was fast.

Just two days after President Barack Obama sailed to re-election over Mitt Romney, boosted by more than 70 percent of the Latino vote, some Republicans are striking a new tone on illegal immigration.

Conservative Fox News and radio host Sean Hannity said Thursday that his views on immigration have "evolved." Hannity continued:


We've gotta get rid of the immigration issue altogether. It's simple for me to fix it. I think you control the border first, you create a pathway for those people that are here, you don't say you gotta go home. And that is a position that I've evolved on. Because you know what—it just—it's gotta be resolved. The majority of people here—if some people have criminal records you can send 'em home—but if people are here, law-abiding, participating, four years, their kids are born here ... first secure the border, pathway to citizenship ... then it's done. But you can't let the problem continue. It's gotta stop.

Meanwhile, in an interview with ABC News' Diane Sawyer, House Speaker John Boehner said he is "confident" the two parties can agree to a deal on immigration.

"This issue has been around far too long," Boehner said. "A comprehensive approach is long overdue, and I'm confident that the president, myself, others can find the common ground to take care of this issue once and for all."

Just two years ago, Boehner said it was worth considering amending the U.S. Constitution to end birthright citizenship, because he said it might discourage people from illegally crossing the border. Boehner was also opposed to President George W. Bush's attempt to pass immigration reform.

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/sean-hanni...

What say you, rightwingers? Have the rest of you 'evolved'?

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

Gauley Bridge WV

#800503 Nov 9, 2012
[QUOTE who="Jesus's Fetus's"]<quoted text>
So you do like the government.[/QUOTE] Only that which is in the constitution, demwit.
Zew

Johannesburg, South Africa

#800504 Nov 9, 2012
Homer wrote:
<quoted text>Wrong, in 2008 while campaigning he promised to send more troops to Afghanistan which he did.
Spending doesn't reset when the new guy takes over, there was plenty already in place including a couple of unfunded wars.
The stimulis included 287 billion in tax cuts, tax rebates and also tax incentives for small businesses, the back bone of the job creators in this country.
As for your last line, the U.S goverment has a long history of subsidizing corporations(see big oil), this has been going on since long before Obama.
Obama said he'll pull US troops out of Afghanistan within 11 months of taking office, did he do that? No he did not, instead he sent more troops to fight the opium war of corruption.

Obama criticised bailouts and promised to support small business, did he do that? No he did not because he is a liar.

Obama criticised the subsidied to corporations, did he do anything to change that? No he did not because he is a loser that changed tune as soon as he stepped into the White House.

Obama wanted to occupy the White House, thats all that he wanted.

I now support the formation and strengthening of the militia in the US, four yrs under Obama is a long time.

“wake up”

Since: Jan 10

utica ny

#800505 Nov 9, 2012
Lily Boca Raton FL wrote:
<quoted text>
What a sicko, sick in the head
I didn't expect to see you on here so early, I figured you would be still celabrating obamas win down at the clinic killing babies at the expense of the taxpayers. By the way what happens after the taxpayers are gone,oh nevermind I remember the words of your master ..iresponible people will be punished with a child.
Your the sicko and you can't even comprehend it.
Jesus's Fetus's

Chicago, IL

#800506 Nov 9, 2012
Zew wrote:
[QUOTE who="Jesus's Fetus's"]<quoted text>
Why do you care?
You live in South Africa.
You native blacks are racists. "

Because I have to sympathise with the thinking Americans who work to pay for your free abortion, free ARVs, free contraceptives, free housing projects and food stamps. Thats why I care.

PLUS, I dont like Obama.
Call dr Phil and tell him your feelings.
Pray to me.
carol

Oviedo, FL

#800508 Nov 9, 2012
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Attacks on women by taking away their right to choose, their right to access to birth control thru their health insurance, equal pay for equal work.
You don't pay for PP abortions. YOU don't pay for other people's health care they get through their employer,and obviously, you think women are indeed worth less in the marketplace.
Giving states back the right to choose if they want abortion to be legal in their own state is not taking away anything.

It will make it a little more inconvenient to drive to the nearest state to get an abortion and may even encourage responsibility not to have that inconvenience - but giving the people back the power to make the important decisions in our lives and not 9 people sitting on the SC is not taking away anything.

Excuse me for saying this but you are so mixed up and brainwashed it's not even funny.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 9 min District 1 240,378
Cruel or Funny Pranks 2 hr AzzHoles 2
I think she is pissed. From a few years ago. 2 hr AllPoliticiansLIE 10
Scary Obituary 2 hr Shadow Blast 15
Look at Minn. Maine & Michigan. 2 hr The White Meat 17
A few ITEMS of interest. 2 hr Jocularity is Best 1
Julieanne Zenz 3 hr Julieanne Zenz Ri... 1

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages