Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1236029 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

FIRE THE GOP

Lillington, NC

#797636 Nov 7, 2012
Hi loser!

ACA: SAVES MONEY. ever read a thing?

It's the law: no repeal.

No more tears kid!

Buck up!

Be strong!

You lost. All the righty haters racists lost.

IT'S A GOOD THING!

..........BYE BYE LOSER :)

......
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
You should probably be asking yourself that question. You will need every penny you can find anywhere you can find it. Because if that happens, you will be the next one in line being taxed to kingdom come.
Somebody's gotta pay for 30 million more people's medical care.
Maybe you should carry a sign - "Will lick for food."
Gunner

Chicago, IL

#797637 Nov 7, 2012
Colorado study says
October 4, 2012 •
Social SciencesAn update to an election forecasting model announced by two University of Colorado professors in August continues to project that Mitt Romney will win the 2012 presidential election.

According to their updated analysis, Romney is projected to receive 330 of the total 538 Electoral College votes. President Barack Obama is expected to receive 208 votes -- down five votes from their initial prediction -- and short of the 270 needed to win.

The new forecast by political science professors Kenneth Bickers of CU-Boulder and Michael Berry of CU Denver is based on more recent economic data than their original Aug. 22 prediction. The model itself did not change.

“We continue to show that the economic conditions favor Romney even though many polls show the president in the lead,” Bickers said.“Other published models point to the same result, but they looked at the national popular vote, while we stress state-level economic data.”

While many election forecast models are based on the popular vote, the model developed by Bickers and Berry is based on the Electoral College and is the only one of its type to include more than one state-level measure of economic conditions. They included economic data from all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

Their original prediction model was one of 13 published in August in PS: Political Science & Politics, a peer-reviewed journal of the American Political Science Association. The journal has published collections of presidential election models every four years since 1996, but this year the models showed the widest split in outcomes, Berry said. Five predicted an Obama win, five forecast a Romney win, and three rated the 2012 race as a toss-up.

The Bickers and Berry model includes both state and national unemployment figures as well as changes in real per capita income, among other factors. The new analysis includes unemployment rates from August rather than May, and changes in per capita income from the end of June rather than March. It is the last update they will release before the election.

Of the 13 battleground states identified in the model, the only one to change in the update was New Mexico -- now seen as a narrow victory for Romney. The model foresees Romney carrying New Mexico, North Carolina, Virginia, Iowa, New Hampshire, Colorado, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Florida. Obama is predicted to win Michigan and Nevada.

“See how you are?”

Since: Jul 12

Earth

#797638 Nov 7, 2012
brown eyes wrote:
Donald Trump, Karl Rove, and Ann Romney are reportedly under great emotional stress. May seek counseling.
Electro-shock therapy? I know a place that sells tazers.
GhostofRaygun

Russellville, KY

#797639 Nov 7, 2012
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
You should probably be asking yourself that question. You will need every penny you can find anywhere you can find it. Because if that happens, you will be the next one in line being taxed to kingdom come.
Somebody's gotta pay for 30 million more people's medical care.
Maybe you should carry a sign - "Will lick for food."
Listen up you dumbass. This is about the third time you have posted about the Rich leaving. Why would they leave?????? In the past 20 years the middle class incomes have gained 18%. The top has gained 387%. They are fine you POS. The top pays the LOWEST tax rates in US history. Didn't you Repub losers learn anything from last night????? Your lies DO NOT win elections.
Jane Says

New York, NY

#797640 Nov 7, 2012
ChromiuMan wrote:
<quoted text>
I see that you STILL haven't done any of your own research into the mortgage crisis.
What's funny is that you can read all the blogs you want and you are still unaware of your lack of knowledge.
this wasn't a blog, it was written by two liberal NY Times reporters.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/29/books/revie...

The authors, Gretchen Morgenson, a Pulitzer Prize-winning business reporter and columnist at The New York Times, and Joshua Rosner, an expert on housing finance, deftly trace the beginnings of the collapse to the mid-1990s, when the Clinton administration called for a partnership between the private sector and Fannie and Freddie to encourage home buying.

The mortgage agencies’ government backing was, in effect, a valuable subsidy, which was used by Fannie’s C.E.O., James A. Johnson, to increase home ownership while enriching himself and other executives. A 1996 study by the Congressional Budget Office found that Fannie pocketed about a third of the subsidy rather than passing it on to homeowners. Over his nine years heading Fannie, Johnson personally took home roughly $100 million. His successor, Franklin D. Raines, was treated no less lavishly.

To entrench Fannie’s privileged position, Morgenson and Rosner write, Johnson and Raines channeled some of the profits to members of Congress — contributing to campaigns and handing out patronage positions to relatives and former staff members. Fannie paid academics to do research showing the benefits of its activities and playing down the risks, and shrewdly organized bankers, real estate brokers and housing advocacy groups to lobby on its behalf. Essentially, taxpayers were unknowingly handing Fannie billions of dollars a year to finance a campaign of self-promotion and self-­protection. Morgenson and Rosner offer telling details, as when they describe how Lawrence Summers, then a deputy Treasury secretary, buried a department report recommending that Fannie and Freddie be privatized...

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#797641 Nov 7, 2012
Market down 300.
Lord Fetch

Lansing, IL

#797642 Nov 7, 2012
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe you should think about how people react to right wing visuals that go for a visceral reaction.
Abortion is not always right. Abortion is not always wrong. It is legal you know. And right wing nuts trying to put images in our heads of killing a 'baby' will not change that. Seems to me at this point we can see it's not helping one little bit.
A more mature and reasoned argument should now be the path of those who would try to use any means to make their point. Just ask BillO about Tiller.
you mean a baby being stabbed in the neck by obama as it leaves the birth canal isn't reasonable and mature?
Lord Fetch

Lansing, IL

#797643 Nov 7, 2012
Terry Buckeye wrote:
<quoted text>
Jobs were sent overseas for one reason and one reason only... GREED! There was a time when the cost of a thing was not so important, but the quality of its manufacture was. The U.S. cannot become isolationists. That has never worked for any lengthy period. But in the same vein, we need to push our elected officials for reciprocal tariffs on imported goods. When our cars go to japan, it takes days for each one to be inspected to make sure it can be used there. If we were to do the same, you would be able to drive across the Pacific in a matter of weeks for the ships backed up to Asia. NAFTA is all well and good, in principal. The reality of it is that the Central and South American countries are benefiting and the U.S. is being glutted with shoddy work and cheap labor. I will be writing to our President again, today, and to my elected state officials to ask that they address these issues. I would urge each person to do the same, whatever your issues are. Change the people in office until they get done what needs to be done!
amen brother!
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#797644 Nov 7, 2012
sonicfilter wrote:
The Romney "Landslide" That Wasn't
Every election cycle brings with it a host of pundits who get the results wrong; who misread the campaign and perhaps view events through hopeful, partisan eyes. And there's nothing unusual or especially egregious about that. What was different this time was the spectacle of a whole slate of Obama-hating conservatives who claimed that despite very clear polling evidence to the contrary, that Mitt Romney would win the election in a "landslide." Not only would the Republican defeat Obama, but he'd also do it sweeping, historic fashion.
It was fascinating to watch because these claims were supported by nothing but blind faith, as well as the far-right's signature hatred of the president and a conspiratorial view of the media. And this was the fantastic, implausible scenario conservatives fed their grateful readers, viewers and listeners right up until last night.
Indeed, it was that blinding contempt for President Obama that led so many pundits astray in the final weeks of the campaign. Unable to even comprehend how Obama would win re-election, not after he'd been denounced as a socialist, Marxist, and racist who sympathized with terrorists who was "the second coming of Jimmy Cater," his fervent media critics relied on their gut.(Truthiness?) And their gut told them this election was a no-brainer.
The Romney Landslide nicely captured the flight of fancy -the collective allergic reaction to reality-- that has defined the conservative media since the day Obama was inaugurated. Faced with the prospect of a second term by a president they had endlessly condemned as an enemy of the state (and much, much worse), the right-wing media embraced pure campaign denial and announced that Doomsday awaited Obama on November 6:....
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2012/11/07/the-r...
I think we can let Mitt's lies go on by, but we need to remind the FOXbots everyday for the next 4 that FOX lies had no effect upon the election.
George Will looked like he was going to puke when it was announced that Mitt's motorcade was whisking him to make farewell speech. Weird that after most people concluded that Obama had won, some of the high priced pundits could not let go.

Romney didn't fare well as a politician__one for four and as Mass governor his performance was only so so.

I wonder what he'll do with his grand plans to create 12 million jobs__maybe they'll become op ed pieces.
Lord Fetch

Lansing, IL

#797645 Nov 7, 2012
Romney-Ryan 2012 wrote:
<quoted text>People from Minnesota are nothing more than Canadians with a U.S. drivers license. Who needs them anyway?
see? now that's the kind of uniting and togetherness as a nation that the republican party offers...i respectfully request that you shove it up your a$$ ma'am
Romney-Ryan 2012

Virginia Beach, VA

#797646 Nov 7, 2012
[QUOTE who="Fox News. "]<quoted text>
But it isn't.
And instead it was an Obama landslide.
You're here 24/7 so It's obvious you don't have a job.[/QUOTE]50% to 48% is no landslide.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#797647 Nov 7, 2012
Romney-Ryan 2012 wrote:
<quoted text>
You left out ghetto-rats.
New noreaster going to hit Hampton Roads, or are you safe?
carol

Orlando, FL

#797648 Nov 7, 2012
Homer wrote:
<quoted text>Stop it. You make no sense, just call your self the lorac already and get over it.
You helped reelect a president who has no reservations about killing a baby coming out of the birth canal with a pair of scissors stuck in the back of its neck.

Unless, of course, you, too, have no reservations. If so, you and this president are guilty of holding the scissors.

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#797649 Nov 7, 2012
Homer wrote:
Where's Fred? Jane Says? DBWriter? Gunner? Eman? Peppy? Florida? Flack?
Come out come out where ever you are.
You realize i'm on the west coast? These funny things called time zones??

California passed a retroactive tax increase. You liberals are nuts.

How much debt can the u.s. handle? I guess we're gonna find out.
cant believe this thread

Fort Lauderdale, FL

#797650 Nov 7, 2012
Really people? this thread is talking about color and removing flags. Sad state of affairs. President Obama was voted in by your fellow Americans. If you want to take your flag down , go to the airport and get your ass out of this country. We have men serving this country , away from loved ones and you bunch of idiots are talking about skin color and removing flags. Disgraceful...
Homer

Bethlehem, PA

#797651 Nov 7, 2012
It's a good day.
carol

Orlando, FL

#797652 Nov 7, 2012
GhostofRaygun wrote:
<quoted text>Listen up you dumbass. This is about the third time you have posted about the Rich leaving. Why would they leave?????? In the past 20 years the middle class incomes have gained 18%. The top has gained 387%. They are fine you POS. The top pays the LOWEST tax rates in US history. Didn't you Repub losers learn anything from last night????? Your lies DO NOT win elections.
Just you wait, my pretty, just you wait...
hush puppy

De Forest, WI

#797653 Nov 7, 2012

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#797654 Nov 7, 2012
Homer wrote:
<quoted text>Stop it. You make no sense, just call your self the lorac already and get over it.
That post made perfect sense. Btw, hows the stock market today?
Jane Says

New York, NY

#797655 Nov 7, 2012
Bill Clinton carried Obama down the field. how sad that so many were influenced to vote style over subtance, by a serial liar. and so many--whether from gulping the liberal Kool-Aid, approving his class war rhetoric, or being more interested in Honey-Boo-Boo than the well-being of their country-- ignored Obama's abysmal record, his continuous "it was Bush's fault" blame game and in spite of benghazi and just because he appeared looking presidential for a 5 minute photo op after the hurricane, they voted for him.

so now, without his non-stop campaigning, maybe Obama will actually DO the job he was supposed to do four years ago. i.e. instead of merely spending our money with an open check book, meet with the economic commission that he himself set up in order to create REAL jobs; or actually attend security briefings and hopefully not be "flexible" with Russia where he is decimating our military for empty promises.

but my guess is Obama will no longer pretend to be anything but far left and will use the next four years to weaken the military and probably push amnesty for illegals through. and I can picture Michelle already packing away for her next fabulous vacation since she had to forego one just for this one summer.

it will be interesting to note the reaction if without doctoring the unemployment numbers, they keep going up as predicted and without controlling the stock market, it slides back, while family expenses continue to rise and income continues to fall. and then the full negative consequences of ObamaCare will hit—too late.

so we--meaning my family--will now make choices for the future based on our current Cadillac health plan being forcibly ditched for a very mediocre plan and like friends in Scotland--having enough cash to pay for quality care when we don't want to wait months and sometimes years for treatments Americans now take for granted as routine.

i also won't waste any more time preaching to or trying to educate the tone-deaf choir here. LOL--like the looney lefties will anyway now go back to volunteering their time for the greater good—maybe even Lily should get a nobel peace prize. the dumbing down of America is no more obvious than here.

i hope Obama gets taxes raised on the wealthy, including the Hollywierd hypocrites like SJP--and still sees revenues fall. as a citizen with wealth considered to be in upper middle income bracket, I can't just leave the country as many uber rich will do (like Denise Rich). but we WILL be looking to reduce investments, assets, etc--in other words, we will join "the takers," whenever and wherever possible. This will be the new normal, mediocre input with government guaranteed outcome.

if you thought Velma Hart was exhausted defending Obama in 2010, you're all about to become comatose.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505123_162-575460...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 3 min red and right 189,825
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 5 min Newt Gingrinch 99,595
abby 6-2 29 min RACE 5
amy 6-2 36 min RACE 3
News Former U.S. House Speaker Hastert indicted on f... 46 min Drifter 46
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr IB DaMann 53,580
Word (Dec '08) 2 hr Red_Forman 5,253
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]