Barack Obama, our next President

[Waxman]

Alloramadai wrote:

<quoted text>
Apparently Obama signs are being stolen from my State so it's going both ways. I would tend to think its more juvenile pranksters than adults looking to make some political statement.

Apparently ??? Liar!

Name one person you personally know who had their oBummer sign stolen?

I can attest first hand that one of you slimeballs took mine.

Apparently ??? Sure, liar - your typical Democrat M.O.- say everyone does it (lie).

[yepperz]

abbynormall wrote:

<quoted text>
That's not a sense of humor, that's hate hiding unsuccessfully behind a pretense.

Grow up.

[leosnana]

fred wrote:

<quoted text>
Democrats create fake report to back up communist goals. Classic KGB operation.
Nonpartisan Tax Report Withdrawn After G.O.P. Protest
By JONATHAN WEISMAN
Published: November 1, 2012
WASHINGTON — The Congressional Research Service has withdrawn an economic report that found no correlation between top tax rates and economic growth, a central tenet of conservative economic theory, after Senate Republicans raised concerns about the paper’s findings and wording.
Don Stewart, a spokesman for the Senate Republican leader, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, said Mr. McConnell and other senators “raised concerns about the methodology and other flaws.” Mr. Stewart added that people outside of Congress had also criticized the study and that officials at the research service “decided, on their own, to pull the study pending further review.”
Senate Republican aides said they had protested both the tone of the report and its findings. Aides to Mr. McConnell presented a bill of particulars to the research service that included objections to the use of the term “Bush tax cuts” and the report’s reference to “tax cuts for the rich,” which Republicans contended was politically freighted.
They also protested on economic grounds, saying that the author, Thomas L. Hungerford, was looking for a macroeconomic response to tax cuts within the first year of the policy change without sufficiently taking into account the time lag of economic policies. Further, they complained that his analysis had not taken into account other policies affecting growth, such as the Federal Reserve’s decisions on interest rates.
“There were a lot of problems with the report from a real, legitimate economic analysis perspective,” said Antonia Ferrier, a spokeswoman for the Senate Finance Committee’s Republicans.“We relayed them to C.R.S. It was a good discussion. We have a good, constructive relationship with them. Then it was pulled.”

Tax Policy: You Can’t Handle the Truth

Sahil Kapur reports on something that does not surprise me on two levels:
The author of a Congressional Research Service study, who found no evidence that tax cuts for high income earners lead to economic growth, is standing by his work, after the legislative branch’s nonpartisan research arm withdrew the report under pressure from Republican leaders. And Democratic principals are demanding to know why CRS caved to GOP pressure. CRS quietly and quickly pulled the six-week old report, despite the wishes of the research arm’s economic team, the New York Times reported Thursday ... The study, which TPM and others reported on at the time, delved into the last 65 years of U.S. tax policy — specifically how marginal rates on high incomes and capital gains taxes impact decision-making. It concluded that reducing effective taxes on the rich does not generate economic growth, but that it does correlate with rising income inequality in the short term. The report’s conclusions aren’t terribly controversial in mainstream economics. What Thomas Hungerford wrote has indeed been the consensus view among economists who are not prostituting themselves for Mitt Romney...(More at Econospeak)

Read more: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/Hzoh/...

[fred]

yepperz wrote:

<quoted text>
Are you Fred or just answering for him? Forgot to change your name?Who gives a shit what they are politically? WTH does their party affiliation have to do with ignoring mandatory evaluation orders thereby making a bad situation worse? Stupid is stupid. Why don't you come here and take a poll, see for yourself? Soda? Lol. That's the least of their problems.

Much like the dependent blacks of New Orleans,liberal New Yorkers live with the expectation that big government can prevent suffering and provide for them. Now they are finding out that they are prey to hoodie mau mau gangs. The city can't even protect them.

Bloomberg refuses to let the National Guard deploy because they have guns? Liberals are crazy.

[Razors Edge]

Obama needs to come clean on what happened in Benghazi


The American people deserve to know the truth

There is an urgent need for full disclosure of what has become the “Benghazi Betrayal and Cover-up.” The Obama national security team, including CIA, DNI and the Pentagon, apparently watched and listened to the assault on the U.S. consulate and cries for help but did nothing. If someone had described a fictional situation with a similar scenario and described our leadership ignoring the pleas for help, I would have said it was not realistic—not in my America – but I would have been proven wrong.

We now know why Ambassador Christopher Stevens had to be in Benghazi the night of 9/11 to meet a Turkish representative, even though he feared for his safety. According to various reports, one of Stevens’ main missions in Libya was to facilitate the transfer of much of Gadhafi’s military equipment, including the deadly SA-7 – portable SAMs – to Islamists and other al Qaeda-affiliated groups fighting the Assad Regime in Syria. In an excellent article, Aaron Klein states that Stevens routinely used our Benghazi consulate (mission) to coordinate the Turkish, Saudi Arabian and Qatari governments’ support for insurgencies throughout the Middle East. Further, according to Egyptian security sources, Stevens played a “central role in recruiting Islamic jihadists to fight the Assad Regime in Syria.”

In another excellent article, Clare Lopez at RadicalIslam.org noted that there were two large warehouse-type buildings associated with our Benghazi mission. During the terrorist attack, the warehouses were probably looted. We do not know what was there and if it was being administrated by our two former Navy SEALs and the CIA operatives who were in Benghazi. Nonetheless, the equipment was going to hardline jihadis.

Once the attack commenced at 10:00 p.m. Libyan time (4:00 p.m. EST), we know the mission security staff immediately contacted Washington and our embassy in Tripoli. It now appears the White House, Pentagon, State Department, CIA, NDI, JCS and various other military commands monitored the entire battle in real time via frantic phone calls from our compound and video from an overhead drone. The cries for help and support went unanswered.

Our Benghazi mission personnel, including our two former Navy SEALs, fought for seven hours without any assistance other than help from our embassy in Tripoli, which launched within 30 minutes an aircraft carrying six Americans and 16 Libyan security guards. It is understood they were instrumental in helping 22 of our Benghazi mission personnel escape the attack.

Once the attack commenced, Stevens was taken to a “safe room” within the mission. It is not known whether his location was betrayed by the February 17 Martyrs Brigade, the local force providing security to the consulate, which had ties to the Ansar al-Sharia terrorist group conducting the attack, and to al Qaeda. Unbelievably, we still do not know how Ambassador Stevens died.

The Obama national security team, including CIA, DNI, State Department and the Pentagon, watched and listened to the assault but did nothing to answer repeated calls for assistance. It has been reported that President Obama met with Vice President Joseph R. Biden and Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta in the Oval Office, presumably to see what support could be provided. After all, we had very credible military resources within striking distance. At our military base in Sigonella, Sicily, which is slightly over 400 miles from Benghazi, we had a fully equipped Special Forces unit with both transport and jet strike aircraft prepositioned. Certainly this was a force much more capable than the 22-man force from our embassy in Tripoli.

I know those Special Forces personnel were ready to leap at the opportunity. There is no doubt in my mind they would have wiped out the terrorists attackers.

politicalrant.com

[Waxman]

The thread Bozo, leosnana blathers again....

blah, blah, blah,

Yawn.

leosnana wrote:

<quoted text>Tax Policy: You Can’t Handle the Truth
Sahil Kapur reports on something that does not surprise me on two levels:
The author of a Congressional Research Service study, who found no evidence that tax cuts for high income earners lead to economic growth, is standing by his work, after the legislative branch’s nonpartisan research arm withdrew the report under pressure from Republican leaders. And Democratic principals are demanding to know why CRS caved to GOP pressure. CRS quietly and quickly pulled the six-week old report, despite the wishes of the research arm’s economic team, the New York Times reported Thursday ... The study, which TPM and others reported on at the time, delved into the last 65 years of U.S. tax policy — specifically how marginal rates on high incomes and capital gains taxes impact decision-making. It concluded that reducing effective taxes on the rich does not generate economic growth, but that it does correlate with rising income inequality in the short term. The report’s conclusions aren’t terribly controversial in mainstream economics. What Thomas Hungerford wrote has indeed been the consensus view among economists who are not prostituting themselves for Mitt Romney...(More at Econospeak)
Read more: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/Hzoh/...

[fred]

leosnana wrote:

<quoted text>Tax Policy: You Can’t Handle the Truth
Sahil Kapur reports on something that does not surprise me on two levels:
The author of a Congressional Research Service study, who found no evidence that tax cuts for high income earners lead to economic growth, is standing by his work, after the legislative branch’s nonpartisan research arm withdrew the report under pressure from Republican leaders. And Democratic principals are demanding to know why CRS caved to GOP pressure. CRS quietly and quickly pulled the six-week old report, despite the wishes of the research arm’s economic team, the New York Times reported Thursday ... The study, which TPM and others reported on at the time, delved into the last 65 years of U.S. tax policy — specifically how marginal rates on high incomes and capital gains taxes impact decision-making. It concluded that reducing effective taxes on the rich does not generate economic growth, but that it does correlate with rising income inequality in the short term. The report’s conclusions aren’t terribly controversial in mainstream economics. What Thomas Hungerford wrote has indeed been the consensus view among economists who are not prostituting themselves for Mitt Romney...(More at Econospeak)
Read more: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/Hzoh/...

Consensus of communists ya mean. America gets the commie "consensus" scam. Global warming consensus ring a bell? duh

[new yawk]

Not only are your statements utterly stupid, they are filled with hate, violence and racism.

keyedup wrote:
Let's hope they go armed and have permission to kill anyone who suppresses the vote.

keyedup wrote:
Glenn beck, Now there is a head looking for a bullet.

Last I recall, the only head(s) looking for a bullet were the black panthers who made empty threats to "kill whitey's Children".

And any Others who have made vain threats to take retribution of violence against Whites IF Obama doesn't win.
And would be foolish enough to even "try" and act upon them.

Don't be comforted, lulled, fooled or over confident.
There is no solace or safe refuge to be taken when such sheer vileness and hatred have been threatened and perhaps acted upon. So, stop and think before you speak.
Because what your words are proposing are a Race War.

And Whites are not in fear nor intimidated.
They are enraged and ready.
IF ( God Forbid ) "IT" should ever go beyond the bloviating bravado and braggadocio of overtly racist and over-confident
Mad-Men "Hate Talk".

As one poster stated: "We know the nature of the primitive enemy and are prepared....."
Bad Mix. May result in Dangerous Outcomes.

Anyone who threatens Any Parent(s) to kill Their Children ...
( Or ANY Other ~ Of Their Loved Ones ) will get a bullet between their eyes.
Last thing they will see is an explosion of white light.
Then they can fade to black ...

PS Did I mention my Uncle owns a Butcher Shop? In The City. He's skilled at portioning "parts", slice and dice for his "serf & non-turf " Clientele.
"What's your pleasure" ?!?
Ribs? Loin? Center Cut? Rump Roast? Sweet Breads even!
And Don't Forget: "The Secret's In The Sauce" ~ ;

keyedup wrote:

Glenn beck, Now there is a head looking for a bullet.

keyedup wrote:

Let's hope they go armed and have permission to kill anyone who suppresses the vote.

keyedup wrote:

Glenn beck, Now there is a head looking for a bullet

[GhostofRaygun]

Florida wrote:

<quoted text>Obama's national socialist plan hasn't worked for America retard, because that’s not how America works you idiot...
-
You're not a complete idiot nuculur -- Some critical parts are just missing....
-
Obama parties in Las Vegas as New Yorkers dumpster-dive for food and are dying... AND... More NO votes for a sellout obama..
-
It's the culture...

Well there you go again. You POS. Repub or Demo doesn't matter. The rich have it all, control it all, will keep it all and never help America at all. But you keep that party line talking point going. If we could only let the Rich have more than jobs would Trickle Down on everyone.
.
In 2010, as the nation continued to recover from the recession, a dizzying 93 percent of the additional income created in the country that year, compared to 2009 —$288 billion — went to the top 1 percent of taxpayers, those with at least $352,000 in income. That delivered an average single-year pay increase of 11.6 percent to each of these households.
Still more astonishing was the extent to which the super rich got rich faster than the merely rich. In 2010, 37 percent of these additional earnings went to just the top 0.01 percent, a teaspoon-size collection of about 15,000 households with average incomes of $23.8 million. These fortunate few saw their incomes rise by 21.5 percent.
.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/26/opinion/the...

[TSM]

Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:

<quoted text>Romney: Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States...Paul Ryan.
Badump-bump!!

I was always wondering why Obama picked Biden for his ‘VP ‘now I know, like most American’s because Biden is so Dumb that he makes Obama look smart!!

[fred]

leosnana wrote:

<quoted text>Tax Policy: You Can’t Handle the Truth
Sahil Kapur reports on something that does not surprise me on two levels:
The author of a Congressional Research Service study, who found no evidence that tax cuts for high income earners lead to economic growth, is standing by his work, after the legislative branch’s nonpartisan research arm withdrew the report under pressure from Republican leaders. And Democratic principals are demanding to know why CRS caved to GOP pressure. CRS quietly and quickly pulled the six-week old report, despite the wishes of the research arm’s economic team, the New York Times reported Thursday ... The study, which TPM and others reported on at the time, delved into the last 65 years of U.S. tax policy — specifically how marginal rates on high incomes and capital gains taxes impact decision-making. It concluded that reducing effective taxes on the rich does not generate economic growth, but that it does correlate with rising income inequality in the short term. The report’s conclusions aren’t terribly controversial in mainstream economics. What Thomas Hungerford wrote has indeed been the consensus view among economists who are not prostituting themselves for Mitt Romney...(More at Econospeak)
Read more: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/Hzoh/...

Science catches up with fred

I KNEW ALL THAT TIME WOULD COME IN HANDY ... OH, WAIT: Deflecting An Asteroid With Paintballs.

We can't do much to deflect a hurricane, but we may have a pretty good defense against asteroids. A particularly pale asteroid could reflect so much sunlight that the photons bouncing from it could create enough force to steer it away. All we'd need to do is ensure that any asteroids coming our way are bright white. MIT graduate student Sung Wook Paek's solution is to blast incoming offenders with pellets full of white paint.

[James Madison]

Obama has become everything he ran against in 2008 !!!
(Bic Liar)
Anyone that votes for obama twice,should have their heads examined !!!!!

[GhostofRaygun]

You do understand this don't you? Of all the recovery made on income durning 2010, 93% of ALL the NEW wages or money earned went to the TOP 1%.
.
You Repubs can make all the fun of the OWS you want. But your stupid if you cannot understand just how much wealth the Top 1% have. More than the first 150 MILLION Americans combined.

[Florida]

Head of AFRICOM Fired for Wanting to Assist Personnel in Benghazi
-
General Carter Ham relieved of duty as Commander of AFRICOM
-
Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta announced on Sunday that General Carter Ham Commander of GOC Africa Command (Africom), headquartered in Stuttgart, Germany has been relieved of his assignment for refusing to obey orders not to assist the US personnel in Benghazi on the night of September 11. Army General David Rodriguez has been appointed by President Obama to replace him. U.S. Africa Command is one of six unified geographic commands within the Department of Defense unified command structure.
-
http://gerarddirect.com/2012/10/28/head-of-af...
-
AND... Obama parties in Las Vegas as New Yorkers dumpster-dive for food and are dying... AND... More NO votes for a sellout obama..
-
It's the culture...

[leosnana]

fred wrote:

<quoted text>
Consensus of communists ya mean. America gets the commie "consensus" scam. Global warming consensus ring a bell? duh

How many dead horses do you and your sock drawer intend to beat until Rafalca's severed head winds up in your bed?(That's an allusion, not a threat, BTW, but most of you Romney zombies won't get it.)

[EasyEed]

Lily Boca Raton FL wrote:

<quoted text>
All lies.

"silly"
BULLMANURE!!!!
Peace

[EasyEed]

Lily Boca Raton FL wrote:

A comment on Romneys profitting from the bailout:
Robme can't wait to get his hands on Medicare and Social Security, load them with debt, extract the money from them and bankrupt them -- leaving us, the taxpayers to pay for it all. This is his only business plan. This is what he does. And there are still people who want to vote for him?

"silly"
BULLMANURE!!!!!
Peace

[abbynormall]

leosnana wrote:

<quoted text>Conservatives Are Seeing the Beginning of the End for Romney
One of the more popular conservative blogs is redstate.com . It is getting roughly the same traffic as this site (about a quarter of a million hits a day). The founder and chief cook and bottle washer, Erick Erickson, is way to the right of Rick Perry. During the run-up to the primaries he was wildly against Romney. On Nov. 8, 2011, he wrote an editorial that is definitely worth reading if you are interested in knowing what conservatives were thinking a year ago. In part, he wrote:
"Mitt Romney, on the other hand, is a man devoid of any principles other than getting himself elected. As much as the American public does not like Barack Obama, they loath a man so fueled with ambition that he will say or do anything to get himself elected. Mitt Romney is that man.
http://www.electoral-vote.com/evp2012/Pres/Ma ...

Well, that's the SECOND article you've put a link up for and I get "not found." Why is that?

[fred]

leosnana wrote:

<quoted text>How many dead horses do you and your sock drawer intend to beat until Rafalca's severed head winds up in your bed?(That's an allusion, not a threat, BTW, but most of you Romney zombies won't get it.)

Google...duh

THE HILL: Obama’s ‘revenge’ comment reverberates on campaign trail.

Rafalca is a dressage horse co-owned by Ann Romney that performed in the equestrian competition at the 2012 Summer Olympics,

[yepperz]

fred wrote:

<quoted text>
Much like the dependent blacks of New Orleans,liberal New Yorkers live with the expectation that big government can prevent suffering and provide for them. Now they are finding out that they are prey to hoodie mau mau gangs. The city can't even protect them.
Bloomberg refuses to let the National Guard deploy because they have guns? Liberals are crazy.

That's funny as I was talking to a couple guy's from the NG last night. What comic book are you getting your news from?