Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1275360 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Florida

Tampa, FL

#793752 Nov 4, 2012
CNN Exposed, Emmy Winning Former CNN Journalist, Amber Lyon Blows The Whistle, Let me repeat that.CNN is paid by the US government for reporting on some events, and not reporting on others. The Obama Administration pays for CNN content
-
The central issue is Media Controlled by The Obama Administration, and more specifically CNN – as a VERIFIED tool for propaganda and disinformation.
-
http://beforeitsnews.com/blogging-citizen-jou...
-
Obama parties in Las Vegas, lies to America as New Yorkers dumpster-dive for food and are dying... AND... More NO votes for a sellout obama..
-
It's the culture....
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#793753 Nov 4, 2012
abbynormall wrote:
<quoted text>
Then he said to Biden, "I just had the strangest call. Somebody saying terrorists were attacking them, but I personally killed Bin Ladin, so that can't be right. Can it?"
Stupidest post of the day, so far, but with daylight savings and all, the day is still young.

Maybe you can come in first, second and third!

Again
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#793754 Nov 4, 2012
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
You lie about everything.
Tell us more stories about your incarcerated children again!!
Or about your make believe world travels in your Jazzy scooter!!
BWAHAHAHAHAHA
What drug did you take today?

“What goes around, comes around”

Since: Sep 08

Ocala, FL

#793755 Nov 4, 2012
loki wrote:
<quoted text>Do all of you Romney zombies suck as bad as your analogies? Just how do you equate an Al Qaeda attack on a consulate with going into a bar? Is a van full of family like a binder full of women?
Figures that liberals have problems connecting one idea to another or being able to do comparisons connecting things. No surprise there.

To simplify it for you...someone SAID Obama didn't PLAN on killing the ambassador. However, he is still RESPONSIBLE. Like a drunk driver who didn't go out in the evening to kill. Does that help, or do you need further simplified clarification?

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#793756 Nov 4, 2012
Lily Boca Raton Fl wrote:
<quoted text>
Because we want to know if he paid no income tax on $250 million, dummy.
We want to know if he received an amnesty on Swiss accounts revealed by UBS
We want to know if he is laundering money to avoid paying taxes to his own fking country.
He wants to be President? Oh pls, not going to happen
"silly"
If Mr. Romney had broken any laws when filing his tax returns the IRS would ensure that all of us knew about it. The message is clear. Why do you not get a law passed that makes it a crime to;
- Take legal deductions
- Receive tax amnesty
Your statement "his own fking country" describes your feelings for The United States, you hate it.
Peace
Florida

Tampa, FL

#793758 Nov 4, 2012
fred wrote:
<quoted text>
There's no such thing as global warming. All data has been fake. The IPCC conspiracy has been exposed. Catch up. There has been no warming in 20 years
The green movement is a communist attack on prosperous capitalist economies. America gets it.
Let the idiot libtards riot...
-
..."Put them all back in chains"...
-
It's the culture...
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#793760 Nov 4, 2012
fred wrote:
<quoted text>
leosnotty ..dwell on this thought..everything you believe is not true. fred almost pities you, but not quite
Kenyan commie occupier fluker slut scum are spoiled brats. Ya know..like you!
MEET THE NEW TONE:‘All the cars with Romney bumper stickers have been keyed…’
Some slimey & sneaky Democrat scumbag stole all the Romney yard signs on my street. It doesn't get any lower than a Democrat. I won't put a Romney bumbper sticker on my car because a lowlife Democrat would key the car.

They are like snakes slithering in the grass.

Democrats are Kenyan commie occupier scum.

I can't imagine Obama winning again after people know what type of lying scum he represents now.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#793761 Nov 4, 2012
Right Will Rage If Obama Wins

"The other thing that's going to happen is: unbelievable rage at Obama. We're going to see the rage of fanatics and spin keep ratcheting it up. The position has been -- and this is even by relatively establishment people like Peggy Noonan, George Will -- "He's an incompetent. Americans can't stand him. They think he's a nice guy but he's in over his head. This is an historic change to end this collectivist presidency." Because underlying so much of this, in my view, is race, they're going to be furious. They really felt they could knock him off easily. So when that fails, they're going to be very angry." -- Frank Rich

http://www.drudge.com/news/162449/rich-right-...
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#793762 Nov 4, 2012
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>Not if Obama is still allowed to promote voter fraud like the last time. I hope we don't have to pay for that again. Last I heard it was a crime to commit or conspire to commit voter fraud.:-/
Why would President Obama promote Republican voter fraud, kinky redistricting and unnecessary ID requirements?

Since: Feb 10

ny ny

#793763 Nov 4, 2012
abbynormall wrote:
<quoted text>
I didn't have a change of heart. I think the NYers who were told to evacuate and didn't are to blame too.
Aren't they mostly liberals? The ones who have so much faith in the government that they take being told how large to buy their sodas in stride?
Are you Fred or just answering for him? Forgot to change your name?Who gives a shit what they are politically? WTH does their party affiliation have to do with ignoring mandatory evaluation orders thereby making a bad situation worse? Stupid is stupid. Why don't you come here and take a poll, see for yourself? Soda? Lol. That's the least of their problems.

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#793764 Nov 4, 2012
TSM wrote:
Joe Biden:'I'm going to take a Vacation well Joe Obama’s will be joining you at the end of January!! Joe we know when you said “You Have Never Been Proud to Be Obama’s VP” that must have been Heart Felt we the American People share your sentiment!!
Romney: Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States...Paul Ryan.

Badump-bump!!
fred

Milford, CT

#793765 Nov 4, 2012
Florida wrote:
<quoted text>Let the idiot libtards riot...
-
..."Put them all back in chains"...
-
It's the culture...
fred has been on Def Con 2 since Sandy looters were identified in Bgprt. Mrs fred heard.. click click coming from the basement and said... Good

Mau mau riot?#ready
Florida

Tampa, FL

#793766 Nov 4, 2012
Alloramadai wrote:
<quoted text>
Apparently Obama signs are being stolen from my State so it's going both ways. I would tend to think its more juvenile pranksters than adults looking to make some political statement.
Radical racist NAZl leftwinger terrorist threaten and kill people everyday....
-
It's the culture...
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#793767 Nov 4, 2012
Alloramadai wrote:
<quoted text>
Apparently Obama signs are being stolen from my State so it's going both ways. I would tend to think its more juvenile pranksters than adults looking to make some political statement.
Apparently ??? Liar!

Name one person you personally know who had their oBummer sign stolen?

I can attest first hand that one of you slimeballs took mine.

Apparently ??? Sure, liar - your typical Democrat M.O.- say everyone does it (lie).

Since: Feb 10

ny ny

#793768 Nov 4, 2012
abbynormall wrote:
<quoted text>
That's not a sense of humor, that's hate hiding unsuccessfully behind a pretense.
Grow up.

“We doing better...”

Since: Jul 08

we've got to do more

#793769 Nov 4, 2012
fred wrote:
<quoted text>
Democrats create fake report to back up communist goals. Classic KGB operation.
Nonpartisan Tax Report Withdrawn After G.O.P. Protest
By JONATHAN WEISMAN
Published: November 1, 2012
WASHINGTON — The Congressional Research Service has withdrawn an economic report that found no correlation between top tax rates and economic growth, a central tenet of conservative economic theory, after Senate Republicans raised concerns about the paper’s findings and wording.
Don Stewart, a spokesman for the Senate Republican leader, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, said Mr. McConnell and other senators “raised concerns about the methodology and other flaws.” Mr. Stewart added that people outside of Congress had also criticized the study and that officials at the research service “decided, on their own, to pull the study pending further review.”
Senate Republican aides said they had protested both the tone of the report and its findings. Aides to Mr. McConnell presented a bill of particulars to the research service that included objections to the use of the term “Bush tax cuts” and the report’s reference to “tax cuts for the rich,” which Republicans contended was politically freighted.
They also protested on economic grounds, saying that the author, Thomas L. Hungerford, was looking for a macroeconomic response to tax cuts within the first year of the policy change without sufficiently taking into account the time lag of economic policies. Further, they complained that his analysis had not taken into account other policies affecting growth, such as the Federal Reserve’s decisions on interest rates.
“There were a lot of problems with the report from a real, legitimate economic analysis perspective,” said Antonia Ferrier, a spokeswoman for the Senate Finance Committee’s Republicans.“We relayed them to C.R.S. It was a good discussion. We have a good, constructive relationship with them. Then it was pulled.”
Tax Policy: You Can’t Handle the Truth

Sahil Kapur reports on something that does not surprise me on two levels:
The author of a Congressional Research Service study, who found no evidence that tax cuts for high income earners lead to economic growth, is standing by his work, after the legislative branch’s nonpartisan research arm withdrew the report under pressure from Republican leaders. And Democratic principals are demanding to know why CRS caved to GOP pressure. CRS quietly and quickly pulled the six-week old report, despite the wishes of the research arm’s economic team, the New York Times reported Thursday ... The study, which TPM and others reported on at the time, delved into the last 65 years of U.S. tax policy — specifically how marginal rates on high incomes and capital gains taxes impact decision-making. It concluded that reducing effective taxes on the rich does not generate economic growth, but that it does correlate with rising income inequality in the short term. The report’s conclusions aren’t terribly controversial in mainstream economics. What Thomas Hungerford wrote has indeed been the consensus view among economists who are not prostituting themselves for Mitt Romney...(More at Econospeak)

Read more: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/Hzoh/...
fred

Milford, CT

#793770 Nov 4, 2012
yepperz wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you Fred or just answering for him? Forgot to change your name?Who gives a shit what they are politically? WTH does their party affiliation have to do with ignoring mandatory evaluation orders thereby making a bad situation worse? Stupid is stupid. Why don't you come here and take a poll, see for yourself? Soda? Lol. That's the least of their problems.
Much like the dependent blacks of New Orleans,liberal New Yorkers live with the expectation that big government can prevent suffering and provide for them. Now they are finding out that they are prey to hoodie mau mau gangs. The city can't even protect them.

Bloomberg refuses to let the National Guard deploy because they have guns? Liberals are crazy.

Razors Edge

Oak Lawn, IL

#793771 Nov 4, 2012
Obama needs to come clean on what happened in Benghazi


The American people deserve to know the truth

There is an urgent need for full disclosure of what has become the “Benghazi Betrayal and Cover-up.” The Obama national security team, including CIA, DNI and the Pentagon, apparently watched and listened to the assault on the U.S. consulate and cries for help but did nothing. If someone had described a fictional situation with a similar scenario and described our leadership ignoring the pleas for help, I would have said it was not realistic—not in my America – but I would have been proven wrong.

We now know why Ambassador Christopher Stevens had to be in Benghazi the night of 9/11 to meet a Turkish representative, even though he feared for his safety. According to various reports, one of Stevens’ main missions in Libya was to facilitate the transfer of much of Gadhafi’s military equipment, including the deadly SA-7 – portable SAMs – to Islamists and other al Qaeda-affiliated groups fighting the Assad Regime in Syria. In an excellent article, Aaron Klein states that Stevens routinely used our Benghazi consulate (mission) to coordinate the Turkish, Saudi Arabian and Qatari governments’ support for insurgencies throughout the Middle East. Further, according to Egyptian security sources, Stevens played a “central role in recruiting Islamic jihadists to fight the Assad Regime in Syria.”

In another excellent article, Clare Lopez at RadicalIslam.org noted that there were two large warehouse-type buildings associated with our Benghazi mission. During the terrorist attack, the warehouses were probably looted. We do not know what was there and if it was being administrated by our two former Navy SEALs and the CIA operatives who were in Benghazi. Nonetheless, the equipment was going to hardline jihadis.

Once the attack commenced at 10:00 p.m. Libyan time (4:00 p.m. EST), we know the mission security staff immediately contacted Washington and our embassy in Tripoli. It now appears the White House, Pentagon, State Department, CIA, NDI, JCS and various other military commands monitored the entire battle in real time via frantic phone calls from our compound and video from an overhead drone. The cries for help and support went unanswered.

Our Benghazi mission personnel, including our two former Navy SEALs, fought for seven hours without any assistance other than help from our embassy in Tripoli, which launched within 30 minutes an aircraft carrying six Americans and 16 Libyan security guards. It is understood they were instrumental in helping 22 of our Benghazi mission personnel escape the attack.

Once the attack commenced, Stevens was taken to a “safe room” within the mission. It is not known whether his location was betrayed by the February 17 Martyrs Brigade, the local force providing security to the consulate, which had ties to the Ansar al-Sharia terrorist group conducting the attack, and to al Qaeda. Unbelievably, we still do not know how Ambassador Stevens died.

The Obama national security team, including CIA, DNI, State Department and the Pentagon, watched and listened to the assault but did nothing to answer repeated calls for assistance. It has been reported that President Obama met with Vice President Joseph R. Biden and Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta in the Oval Office, presumably to see what support could be provided. After all, we had very credible military resources within striking distance. At our military base in Sigonella, Sicily, which is slightly over 400 miles from Benghazi, we had a fully equipped Special Forces unit with both transport and jet strike aircraft prepositioned. Certainly this was a force much more capable than the 22-man force from our embassy in Tripoli.

I know those Special Forces personnel were ready to leap at the opportunity. There is no doubt in my mind they would have wiped out the terrorists attackers.

politicalrant.com






Waxman

Windsor, CT

#793772 Nov 4, 2012
The thread Bozo, leosnana blathers again....

blah, blah, blah,

Yawn.
leosnana wrote:
<quoted text>Tax Policy: You Can’t Handle the Truth
Sahil Kapur reports on something that does not surprise me on two levels:
The author of a Congressional Research Service study, who found no evidence that tax cuts for high income earners lead to economic growth, is standing by his work, after the legislative branch’s nonpartisan research arm withdrew the report under pressure from Republican leaders. And Democratic principals are demanding to know why CRS caved to GOP pressure. CRS quietly and quickly pulled the six-week old report, despite the wishes of the research arm’s economic team, the New York Times reported Thursday ... The study, which TPM and others reported on at the time, delved into the last 65 years of U.S. tax policy — specifically how marginal rates on high incomes and capital gains taxes impact decision-making. It concluded that reducing effective taxes on the rich does not generate economic growth, but that it does correlate with rising income inequality in the short term. The report’s conclusions aren’t terribly controversial in mainstream economics. What Thomas Hungerford wrote has indeed been the consensus view among economists who are not prostituting themselves for Mitt Romney...(More at Econospeak)
Read more: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/Hzoh/...
fred

Milford, CT

#793773 Nov 4, 2012
leosnana wrote:
<quoted text>Tax Policy: You Can’t Handle the Truth
Sahil Kapur reports on something that does not surprise me on two levels:
The author of a Congressional Research Service study, who found no evidence that tax cuts for high income earners lead to economic growth, is standing by his work, after the legislative branch’s nonpartisan research arm withdrew the report under pressure from Republican leaders. And Democratic principals are demanding to know why CRS caved to GOP pressure. CRS quietly and quickly pulled the six-week old report, despite the wishes of the research arm’s economic team, the New York Times reported Thursday ... The study, which TPM and others reported on at the time, delved into the last 65 years of U.S. tax policy — specifically how marginal rates on high incomes and capital gains taxes impact decision-making. It concluded that reducing effective taxes on the rich does not generate economic growth, but that it does correlate with rising income inequality in the short term. The report’s conclusions aren’t terribly controversial in mainstream economics. What Thomas Hungerford wrote has indeed been the consensus view among economists who are not prostituting themselves for Mitt Romney...(More at Econospeak)
Read more: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/Hzoh/...
Consensus of communists ya mean. America gets the commie "consensus" scam. Global warming consensus ring a bell? duh

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 3 min Coffee Party 196,963
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 42 min Red_Forman 6,409
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 3 hr Earthling-1 54,503
Black lives matter 3 hr Pride in ones self 1
ask amy 8-29-15 9 hr Julie 4
abby 8-28-15 10 hr Mister Tonka 4
Steve Wilkos : talk show host ? or simple mi... (Feb '08) 11 hr Tvlover 406
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages