Reporting on a tragedy while it IS an issue and current at that is not "using" it. You are confused...the word would be "exposing or perhaps reporting" what happened, just like it's suppose to be. Of course most MSM are not doing their job as far as reporting, they are doing their job as left leaning libs for their party and the good of the party and their messiah.<quoted text>What part of Republicans and Romney are TOO STUPID to understand the risks of going public...? You, Willard and the rest of the Grumpy Old Pricks are the selfish, callous bastards who are determined to use a tragedy in a dangerous outpost to add to their own selfish goals. GFY
The fact is that actual current events are things that SHOULD BE REPORTED, and the MSM and dems have been doing all they can to stop info from getting out. They are HIDING info, some until after the election, some they want to never come out. Why doesn't any of you libs out there ever ask "why"?
If there is nothing to hide and the administration acted just as they should have and did all they could then why wouldn't they be out there like they were with Bin Laden? Hell you had info that should never have gotten out being printed in the NYT every day about that, where's the pic from the situation room from that night....Obama actually made an appearance on tv to tout the Bin Laden success...but on Benghazi....crickets! And that is with the first US Ambassador being killed since 1979!!!
It's one thing to just be ignorant because of lack of knowledge of the truth, it's entirely different, and much worse to be ignorant out of choice. Which is where you libs come in.