Barack Obama, our next President

[Morons4Mitt]

Obama in 4 years has increased spending ONLY 1.7%. ALL the rest has been caused by budget spending of the Bush years. No Budget has been passed to correct any of it because the Repubs keep adding amendments that are too stupid to be voted on.
The Bowles/Simpson Plan would have been great. But there was someone on the committee that voted against it. That vote prevented it from coming to a vote on the House floor. Wonder who that Dumbass could have been that stopped the BEST plan there has been to get America out of this mess. Oh, I know. It was PAUL RYAN that voted to stop a vote on it in the full House.
You Repubs are such hypocrites.
.
Who Is The Smallest Government Spender Since Eisenhower? Would You Believe It's Barack Obama?
http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/05...

[Homer]

Nobama wrote:

<quoted text>
human nature is for self-preservation, not for self-sacrifice in a hopeless cause.....such as the Obama economic program.....

The plan was good, the failure was his inability to get dickheads like you onboard. Romney if elected will succeed if only because Democrats are more patriotic and will want him and by extension America, to succeed.

[Nobama]

fred wrote:

<quoted text>
Hindenburg homer doesn't watch enough Fox News
GOP hints at 'massive cover-up' over Libya attack...

real Americans are repulsed by Obama's abandonment of our men in Benghazi....for political purposes to kiss Muslim ass.....

the boy is toast.....

[Tournefort]

Homer wrote:

<quoted text>Bah, Obama is killing terrorists with those drones, you didn't really believe Saddam when he claimed Bush blew up that milk factory. Why do you succumb to Fox news and terrorist propaganda? Bush's failed policies drove people into poverty, Obama's policies have been trying to get them out of it. And please as a Republican do not claim to give a sh!t about the poor now.

"Obama is killing terrorists with those drones"

My, my, my, what can the Nobel Committee be thinking?

"Nobel Committee Asks Obama “Nicely” To Return Peace Prize?

"Thorbjorn Jagland, chairman of the Nobel Peace Prize Committee, said today that President Obama “really ought to consider” returning his Nobel Peace Prize Medal immediately, including the “really nice” case it came in....

Jagland, flanked by the other four members of the Committee, said they’d never before asked for the return of a Peace Prize,“even from a damnable war-criminal like Kissinger,” but that the 10% drawdown in US troops in Afghanistan the President announced last week capped a period of “non-Peace-Prize-winner-type behavior” in 2011.“Guantanamo’s still open. There's bombing Libya. There's blowing bin Laden away rather than putting him on trial. Now a few US troops go home, but the US will be occupying Afghanistan until 2014 and beyond. Don’t even get me started on Yemen!”...

The chairman said the committee weren’t “going to be pills” about getting the Prize back because they still “basically really liked” Mr. Obama and that sending it back in a plain package by regular mail would fine if it would save him the embarrassment of a public return....

The White House had no comment. It later announced an aggressive new covert CIA initiative to identify and apprehend Al Qaeda operatives in Scandinavia."

http://www.thefinaledition.com/article/nobel-...

(Yes, it's satire...)

[Homer]

new yawk wrote:

Too much ASS-U-MPTION. I listen to radio news.
What are you bizy watching. Chrissy Matthews?
Sharing the tingles up and down the legs, eh? Lol!
ASS-U-MPTION ... Makes an ASS out of U and MPTION.
<quoted text>

I don't watch anything.

[RealDave]

Nobama wrote:

<quoted text>
human nature is for self-preservation, not for self-sacrifice in a hopeless cause.....such as the Obama economic program.....

Typical right whiner, save themselves & f*ck their country.

[Nobama]

Morons4Mitt wrote:

Obama in 4 years has increased spending ONLY 1.7%. ALL the rest has been caused by budget spending of the Bush years. No Budget has been passed to correct any of it because the Repubs keep adding amendments that are too stupid to be voted on.
The Bowles/Simpson Plan would have been great. But there was someone on the committee that voted against it. That vote prevented it from coming to a vote on the House floor. Wonder who that Dumbass could have been that stopped the BEST plan there has been to get America out of this mess. Oh, I know. It was PAUL RYAN that voted to stop a vote on it in the full House.
You Repubs are such hypocrites.
.
Who Is The Smallest Government Spender Since Eisenhower? Would You Believe It's Barack Obama?
http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/05...

your half-ass math charges Porkulus to Bush....and then uses Porkulus as a base for later Obama spending......

and Obama rejected Simpson-Bowles out-of-hand before Congress could even consider it....

but none of this BS matters....because your boy is toast in eight days.....

[Morons4Mitt]

Nobama wrote:

<quoted text>
Benghazi is the final nail in Obama's political coffin....the boy is toast.....

FauxNews has decided to run block for Mitt in the last days before election. Instead of any coverage on Mitt or that of Obama. They have done NOTHING but 24/7 coverage of Benghazi. Lies from them are being told each hour. Where were ALL you hypocritical bastards when Bush got 4000 American troops killed looking for WMDs that were never there?
,
With Sandy getting ready to hit the east coast instead of asking Mitt what he would do they cover something else due to this FACT.
The Romney campaign said early Monday morning that Romney stood behind a statement first made during a 2011 Republican debate, in which Romney said that the Federal Emergency Management Agency should be disbanded, and its powers either privatized or given to the states.

Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/axe-fema-romney-s...

[Nobama]

Homer wrote:

<quoted text>The plan was good, the failure was his inability to get dickheads like you onboard. Romney if elected will succeed if only because Democrats are more patriotic and will want him and by extension America, to succeed.

Obama's plan (Porkulus) was based on hiring more government employees and green energy boondoggles, both losing strategies.....

the economy sucks because there is no consumer demand....

most people, myself included, bought everything that they needed....so don't blame us for your failures....

Obama needs to re-write his economic comic book....

[Nobama]

Homer wrote:

<quoted text>I don't watch anything.

figures, considering your ignorance.....

[GOD IS 4 THE REPUBLICANS]

cway wrote:

<quoted text>
The truth is, your party left office with a recession in full swing and the economy on the verge of collapse.
What makes you "sick" is that Obama is slowly bailing us out of the mess your side created

The truth is, your guy is a immature acting President that we have ever had in office. Proved it at the WH dinner party.
Truth is, if Obama wasn't hiding something, he wouldn't go to a lot of trouble running a kids film of his birth. No, he acted like a little kid trying to get another little kid (Trump) back. lol
The truth is, Obama wasn't qualified for the job.
The truth is, blacks voted not based on issues, and what he will do for this country as President. They voted to get their black Presidnet. This is true, because I heard some blacks say it when he won. The blacks said smartly to the white people when they walked pass them..WE GOT OUR BLACK PRESIDENT!!
Not.. Obama won yahoo, or I am so happy Obama won.

OK, YOU STILL BLAME BUSH, BUT YOUR GUY IS SPENDING A SHIT LOAD OF MONEY TOO,AND HAS DONE THINGS WRONG, BUT THAT IS OVERLOOKED BY YOU, WHY IS THAT?

[Nobama]

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>
Typical right whiner, save themselves & f*ck their country.

to the contrary, we are saving the country by f*cking Obama and the Socialist-Democrat party.....treasonous dogs, the lot of you....

[Nobama]

Morons4Mitt wrote:

<quoted text>
The Romney campaign said early Monday morning that Romney stood behind a statement first made during a 2011 Republican debate, in which Romney said that the Federal Emergency Management Agency should be disbanded, and its powers either privatized or given to the states.

sounds like a good idea...Pennsylvania has its own Emergency Management Agency....no need for FEMA....except to return some of our federal tax dollars after skimming off the top.....

FEMA is extra-Constitutional.....

[flack]

Actually I ran out to get supper. Roads and businesses deserted.

I have no memory of Bush standing in front of them yellow curtains. must be photoshopped.

[EasyEed]

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>
Here you go again. Blaming Obama for the effects of the Bush generated recession.
Obama has improved the economy.
Why will you vote for Paul Ryan when you just admitted the recession is part his fault?

"real dumb"
I have already voted and I can assure you the vote was not for the lying loser now in office. president nobama has had 4 years, made numerous promises and has proven to be a failure.
Peace
KMA

[fred]

Homer wrote:

<quoted text>The plan was good, the failure was his inability to get dickheads like you onboard. Romney if elected will succeed if only because Democrats are more patriotic and will want him and by extension America, to succeed.

The Kenyan left them to die and flewq to Vegas to party with Beyonce.

Breaking News! Military Officers and CIA Corroborate: Obama gave Stand Down Order in Benghazi Attack. RT @LeaderChat

[Homer]

Nobama wrote:

<quoted text>
figures, considering your ignorance.....

That was harsh.

[GOD IS 4 THE REPUBLICANS]

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>
Typical right whiner, save themselves & f*ck their country.

LOL This said by a stupid leftwinger Demonbrat that the only true thing his side did in telling the truth is by giving themselves a picture of a Donkey as their symbol. Another word for a Donkey is a Jackass, and you people act just like one, and kick and stomp when truth is said about you or your side, or you don't get your way. LOL

[RealDave]

Mike G wrote:

I voted for Barack Obama in 2008. To understand why I’m switching, it helps to understand why I backed him four years ago. I am a Democrat, but vote as an independent. I see people, not parties, so Obama’s label played no role.
My choice involved a simple calculation. Would John McCain or Obama be more likely to forge a consensus on big issues? America was dangerously polarized, and unable to act in ways that even 60 percent of the public could support. History shows that paralysis leads to disaster.
The war on terror was falling out of favor, despite the continuing threat. Good ideas were getting thrown out with the bad and Republicans had squandered the chance to govern.
When the financial crisis hit, McCain stumbled. He wanted to postpone a debate and rushed back to Washington — but had nothing to say or do. Obama kept silent and followed the lead of congressional Democrats. While not exactly great statesmanship, he at least looked steady.
McCain, a genuine American hero, often revealed his maverick streak, his choice of Sarah Palin being Exhibit A. Despite doubts about her readiness, I found myself defending her against the vicious attacks from the left, especially by women.
McCain was my real problem. Mavericks make good whistleblowers and lousy CEOs. Upsetting the apple cart is not a qualification for the Oval Office.
Obama’s soaring rhetoric enticed me at first, and I got a jolt of Messiah Alert when he said his rise marked the moment “when the p....s us to Romney. A year ago, I thought he might be acceptable, maybe the only one in the GOP field. Now I see him as much more than acceptable.
During the long slog, Romney revealed qualities that could make him a very good president. There is not a hint of scandal in his life or career, and his economic policies could spark real growth in jobs, not in food stamps.
He keenly recognizes the danger of the growing debt. With Paul Ryan, he chose a youthful, smart No. 2 who possesses deep knowledge of the budget mess and yet an optimistic view of America’s future.
On the foreign stage, Romney is a novice, but his instincts about American power are right and his remarks in the last debate about Obama’s apology tour were a defining difference. It is impossible to imagine Romney going abroad to criticize his country, or lying about the murder of an ambassador. The challenger is right when he says Obama has made the nation less safe.
Romney is no “movement conservative,” but is moderate and prudent in the everyday ways of most Americans. As he proved in Massachusetts, he can work with Democrats to get things done.
As for being a Mormon, to hold that against Romney is pure bigotry. His election would knock down one more barrier to equality of opportunity.
Finally, there is temperament. Romney’s firm, steady demeanor during Obama’s rancid attempts at character assassination demonstrates the presidential character lacking in the incumbent.
That’s the change I want for my country.

What a rock. To sit there and not recognize Romney to be a liar - to say whatever to get elected is way beyong belief.

If you are this rational voter, you would see right through Mitt Romney.

Pointing out Romney's ever changing views on the issues is identifying his character.

Obamahad two choices, sit there & watch Romney tell lie adter lie or call him out.

You go ahead & vote for Romney. You basically admit that he is a liar. & yet you don't care?

If Mitt Romney worked so well with the Democrats why did he veto over 6 aspects of his healthcare plan????? Why did Democrats have to over ride his veto??? I thought they were so chummy?

Oh that's right. Romney told you he worked so well with Democrats & you just believed him.

[leosnana]

Homer wrote:

<quoted text>Getting real windy here, Jane just blew by on her broom.

Yep, that Trump,Romney, Rovian blimp blow gonna' take no one anywhere good.