Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#789133 Oct 31, 2012
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
No coverup at all.
You you right whiners making up sh*t.
All this crap smacks of political games.
My God, you elected a man that lied to kill 4000 soldiers & you say nothing. You had no ground to play politics with this event.
The Ambassador was in a dangerous place doing dangerous work. You & your right whiner buddies do this brave man a disservice by being such lying POS about his sacrifice.
Talk about making sh** up? Your entire post is a fabrication of your small mind? You are a unionized thug, who sat in union meetings and shouted "yesir, let's git 'um". You fool no one except yourself Davey? You are so small minded, you and 'Obama Money' should be required to read your Dick & Jane book to the poll workers, before they hand you a ballot?
carol

Orlando, FL

#789134 Oct 31, 2012
Picture a Republican president the day after a foreign embassy attack on the anniversary of 9/11 with four dead going to Los Vegas to fundraise and party.

Maybe some perspective is all that's needed.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#789135 Oct 31, 2012
Aphelion wrote:
<quoted text>
In addition to the footage from the consulate cameras, the U.S. government is also poring over video taken from an overhead U.S. surveillance drone that arrived for the final hour of the night battle at the consulate compound and nearby annex.
Video from the compound’s cameras debunk the initial line from the Obama administration that there was a protest in front of the consulate on the night of the attacks, according to one of the U.S. intelligence officials who has seen the footage, and a senior Obama administration official familiar with what they show
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/10...
Newer story...

Report: CIA Documents Support Rice's Account

CIA documents that will be the basis of testimony to the House Intelligence Committee this week support United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice's early account of the attacks the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, writes columnist David Ignatius in The Washington Post.

“Talking points” prepared by the CIA on Sept. 15, the same day that Rice taped three television appearances, support her description of the Sept. 11 attack as a reaction to Arab anger about an anti-Muslim video prepared in the United States, Ignatius reported on Saturday.

Citing CIA documents, he wrote that a senior intelligence official said the analysts’ judgment was based in part on monitoring of some of the Benghazi attackers, which showed they had been watching the Cairo protests live on television and talking about them before they assaulted the consulate.

His reporting supports Obama administration claims that early intelligence reports pointed to a connection between the attacks and a crude, anti-Islam video published online by an amateur U.S. filmmaker once convicted of bank fraud.

According to the CIA account,“The currently available information suggests that the demonstrations in Benghazi were spontaneously inspired by the protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo and evolved into a direct assault against the U.S. Consulate and subsequently its annex. There are indications that extremists participated in the violent demonstrations.”

“We believe the timing of the attack was influenced by events in Cairo,” a senior official said, Ignatius reported, reaffirming the Cairo-Benghazi link. The officie said that judgment is repeated in a new report prepared this week for the House Intelligence Committee.

http://www.nationaljournal.com/2012-president...
Lincoln Duncan

Griffin, GA

#789136 Oct 31, 2012
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
We just want the same answers that were asked during the Watergate coverup. What did the president know and when did he know it.
The same two questions, by the way, that brought President Nixon down.
You and I both know that if a republican president had seemed as out of the loop weeks after an attack on a foreign embassy as this president was with mixed messages coming out of this administration long after the State Department knew it was an organized terorist attack, the black out media would have had pitchforks and torches and stormed the castle crying for heads to roll long before now.
Admit it, Homer. You know it's true.
When did the people decide the government was needed to clean up hurricane Sandy?
Gov, Christie seems on board
the rest is fox news whining points
TheIndependentMa jority

London, KY

#789137 Oct 31, 2012
flack wrote:
Commodities skyrocket as the dollar plunges.
Some one take nobrainas mr playskewl phone away-he's begging again LOL.
Lincoln Duncan

Griffin, GA

#789138 Oct 31, 2012
carol wrote:
Picture a Republican president the day after a foreign embassy attack on the anniversary of 9/11 with four dead going to Los Vegas to fundraise and party.
Maybe some perspective is all that's needed.
9-11 republican president lied us into two wars.
You seem clueless member of the 47% shilling for the rich
LOL

Sparta, NJ

#789139 Oct 31, 2012
Real-Jimmy wrote:
Hopefully, the sun will rise in America in the moring one week from now.
If Obama wins, it will be darkness for a long time.
It will be an extended time of no hope, no change.
If Da Bammy is re-elected, America deserves to fail. Go ahead, suckers, vote for failure, then sit back and wonder what the hell happened.
TheIndependentMa jority

London, KY

#789140 Oct 31, 2012
sonicfilter wrote:
Benghazi
False: Administration officials watched the attack unfold in real time but did nothing to intervene.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/bengh...
Benghazi

Just answer questions ONE and TWO first, please.

"Bigga, black flag-uhs"

ROMNEY/RYAN 2012!
SAVE America!
kuda

Cincinnati, OH

#789141 Oct 31, 2012
Countdown to election day...
Only 7 days!
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#789143 Oct 31, 2012
Another 'reasoned' discussion on FOX.

Discussing Sandy's Effect On Election, Tucker Carlson Blames Obama For Not "Lowering The Level Of The Ocean"

http://mediamatters.org/video/2012/10/30/disc...

Since: May 11

New Oxford, PA

#789144 Oct 31, 2012
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
I hate to introduce facts into your diatribe, but you're so ignorant, I can't help but let my philanthropist alter ego out and help you.
Obama had a super majority in the Senate and a dominant majority in the House for the first two years he was in office.(no budget)
Today, harry Reid is obstructing all legislation coming from the House (no budget)
Obama's entire tenure is characterized by absolute fiscal insanity.(no budget)
In four years, Obama has submitted only 2 budgets to Congress.
The sum total of votes in Congress for the combined 2 budgets he submitted in the 4 years he was supposed to submit budgets is ZERO. That's NADA, NOTHING, ZILCH. Obama is so far removed from reality, he couldn't get even one, not one single vote from even the Congressional Black Caucus.
It's obvious every Democrat in Congress thinks Obama is a nut.
So, since it's obvious every Democrat in Congress thinks Obama is an idiot, why do they put him on the ballot to be president again?
I just love it when one of the pompous right whiners claim to have the facts &then tell a whopper of lie.

The exact same lie they were caught telling before over & over.

The Democrats dd NOT have a super majority for two years.

Are you really this uninformed?

They got their super majority in early July when Al Franken was sworn in.

That lasted until late August wen Ted Kennedy died.

That's about 6 weeks.

Then a Replacement for Kennedy was named a month later & the super majority returned.

In early Feb, that ended when Scott Brown was sworn in.

So calender wise, the Democrats held that super majority about 6 months.

Not two years.

sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#789145 Oct 31, 2012
What Happened in Benghazi

Though I am in no way a fan of President Obama’s foreign and security policies, the flailing that the Republican Party is engaging in at the moment to demonstrate some kind of cover-up in the aftermath of the Benghazi attack reveals a complete lack of understanding of how intelligence collection and analysis works. David Ignatius explores the subject in an op-ed,“CIA documents supported Susan Rice’s description of Benghazi attacks.”

Ignatius observes that intelligence is developed when something happens and that evidence is frequently “fragmentary and conflicting.” While there may be such a thing as incontrovertible facts relating to any incident, that solid information is something that frequently cannot be easily discerned. Ignatius notes that Republicans have been beating Obama over the head most recently with the assertion that there was a CIA Station Chief cable the day after the killing of the ambassador that indicated that the attack had been planned and organized by a militant group. But I would bet that there were at least 15 other reports that went out the same day that provided alternative scenarios. If you intercept a cell phone call in which someone is claiming credit for organizing an attack, is he speaking the truth or is he boasting and trying to take credit for some reason or other? If a source in a militia is claiming that he knows who ordered the attack, does he have an agenda that is driving his claim? All of that has to be sorted out, which takes time and cross checking. At the present time, it does appear that the “Innocence of Muslims” video did play a role in the attack and the contention that it was a fully-orchestrated al-Qaeda event seems unlikely.

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/intell...
TheIndependentMa jority

London, KY

#789146 Oct 31, 2012
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
So you wanted a air gunship to fly over at night, in the dark, & kill terrorists but not civilians or the Libyans who came to help.
Did you take your ADHD medicine today DUH A VEY?

We'll make it simple for ya---in case not.

1.Why were the special ops/tactile groups pulled out just weeks before the Sept 11 terrorist attack on the consulate, decreasing security, with prior trouble already apparent?

2. Why were the repeated requests for increased security measures overtly ignored, repeatedly?

ROMNEY/RYAN 2012!
SAVE America!
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#789147 Oct 31, 2012
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
Benghazi
Just answer questions ONE and TWO first, please.
"Bigga, black flag-uhs"
ROMNEY/RYAN 2012!
SAVE America!
What? You don't have the answers? Are you playing the birther game?

Since: May 11

New Oxford, PA

#789148 Oct 31, 2012
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
"Barack Obama's policies have added $4 billion in debt each day he's been in office. Americans can't afford this debt."
That sounds accurate. What do you disagree with?
ABO
What Obama policies create 4 billion day in debt?

The vast majority of the debt added was due to the recession & continuation of Bush policies like two wars &unfunded expansions to government.

It is a blatant lie to blame everything on Obama policies.
Lincoln Duncan

Griffin, GA

#789150 Oct 31, 2012
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
IRRELEVENT-start at question one.
1.Why were the special ops/tactile groups pulled out just weeks before the Sept 11 terrorist attack on the consulate, decreasing security, with prior trouble already apparent?
Then go to question two.
2. Why were the repeated requests for increased security measures overtly ignored, repeatedly?
THEN move on to all other questions-pertaining to the
FOREIGN POLICY FAILURE in Libya.
ROMNEY/RYAN 2012!
SAVE AMERICA!
Osama bin Laden and leadership of al-Qaeda are dead under the administration of President Obama.
TheIndependentMa jority

London, KY

#789151 Oct 31, 2012
Homer wrote:
Happy Halloween jackwagons.
Hedonist pagan alert!!!

Shame on you, slopping out such "evile indoctrination" Homer!

Someone call the commieTic federation of FweeDUHm of harmless weligion haters!(and tell them to hurry-and choke on their OWN vile caca!!)

ROMNEY/RYAN 2012!!!
SAVE America!!!

Since: May 11

New Oxford, PA

#789152 Oct 31, 2012
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Typical Democrat. Hiding behind those who volunteer to serve their country. Here's the real world facts, dufus.
So, the regional commander, who has standing orders to support his units that become engaged, and is given assets to execute these standing orders like AC-130 gunships and a Marine Force Recon unit, disobeys those standing orders, and it wasn't the White House who were watching the attack real-time that ordered him to disobey those standing orders, right?
What idiot believes that bullshit?
Your contention is, the White House was watching the attack real-time, and the regional commander disobeyed standing orders and hung the Americans in Benghazi out to dry, and the White House just sat on their useless asses and did nothing, right?
Again, what idiot believes this bullshit?
Somebody higher than the regional commander has to give the order to the regional commander to disobey the standing orders the regional commander is bound to and support the American consulate during the battle, and order him to not deploy the AC-130 gunship and the Force Recon Marines.
Who is the person in the White House giving the orders the president should be giving?
My contention is that you are a lying POS. I contend they were not watching the attack real time because a drone was not directed there until hours afterwards.
TheIndependentMa jority

London, KY

#789153 Oct 31, 2012
sonicfilter wrote:
What Happened in Benghazi
Though I am in no way a fan of President Obama’s foreign and security policies, the flailing that the Republican Party is engaging in at the moment to demonstrate some kind of cover-up in the aftermath of the Benghazi attack reveals a complete lack of understanding of how intelligence collection and analysis works. David Ignatius explores the subject in an op-ed,“CIA documents supported Susan Rice’s description of Benghazi attacks.”
Ignatius observes that intelligence is developed when something happens and that evidence is frequently “fragmentary and conflicting.” While there may be such a thing as incontrovertible facts relating to any incident, that solid information is something that frequently cannot be easily discerned. Ignatius notes that Republicans have been beating Obama over the head most recently with the assertion that there was a CIA Station Chief cable the day after the killing of the ambassador that indicated that the attack had been planned and organized by a militant group. But I would bet that there were at least 15 other reports that went out the same day that provided alternative scenarios. If you intercept a cell phone call in which someone is claiming credit for organizing an attack, is he speaking the truth or is he boasting and trying to take credit for some reason or other? If a source in a militia is claiming that he knows who ordered the attack, does he have an agenda that is driving his claim? All of that has to be sorted out, which takes time and cross checking. At the present time, it does appear that the “Innocence of Muslims” video did play a role in the attack and the contention that it was a fully-orchestrated al-Qaeda event seems unlikely.
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/intell...
IRRELEVENT.

But since you mentioned it--
"We are Osama" (ie: eye for an eye dark age, anarchial, barbaric,-any excuse/blame anyone else credo crud will do, extremist nutcases.)

Answer the questions please.

Start with question ONE.

ROMNEY/RYAN 2012!
SAVE America!
TheIndependentMa jority

London, KY

#789155 Oct 31, 2012
Lincoln Duncan wrote:
<quoted text>
Osama bin Laden and leadership of al-Qaeda are dead under the administration of President Obama.
Answer the questions please.

Start with question ONE.

FOREIGN POLICY FAILURE or...???????

ROMNEY/RYAN 2012!
LEADERSHIP FOR Americans again-NOT against it!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 7 min Barack the Yellow 50,352
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 26 min wojar 183,802
daughter/father appropriate physical contact (Mar '12) 1 hr chanelle 20
amy 1-27 1 hr tiredofit 13
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 2 hr Mister Tonka 98,974
abby 1-26 4 hr Mister Tonka 45
Word (Dec '08) 5 hr Red_Forman 4,961
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 10:04 am PST

NFL10:04AM
Richardson was suspended for two Colts playoff games
ESPN10:58 AM
Colts won't commit to RB Richardson for 2015
Yahoo! Sports11:49 AM
League conducts nearly 40 interviews into 'deflate-gate'
Yahoo! Sports11:50 AM
NFL: No decision yet on deflated balls
NBC Sports12:54 PM
Grigson goes silent on NFL investigation into Patriots