Typical Democrat. Hiding behind those who volunteer to serve their country. Here's the real world facts, dufus.<quoted text>
COMMANDER IN CHIEF is a military rank, dufus.
Obama IS in the military, dufus.
He's the goddam Commander in Chief, dufus.
I'd like to see what would have happened if that Force Recon unit in Sigonella, Italy, were put into the fight.
Marine Force Recon will be armed and ready to deploy 10 minutes after waking them.
Why were they stood down?
And who told Susan Rice what to say all over the television networks and at the UN?
It obviously wasn't Obama.
Who's the person in the White House making the decisions the president should be making?
Reality-challenged Dave wrote:
The decision was made by the regional commander you GD dufus.
So, the regional commander, who has standing orders to support his units that become engaged, and is given assets to execute these standing orders like AC-130 gunships and a Marine Force Recon unit, disobeys those standing orders, and it wasn't the White House who were watching the attack real-time that ordered him to disobey those standing orders, right?
What idiot believes that bullshit?
Your contention is, the White House was watching the attack real-time, and the regional commander disobeyed standing orders and hung the Americans in Benghazi out to dry, and the White House just sat on their useless asses and did nothing, right?
Again, what idiot believes this bullshit?
Somebody higher than the regional commander has to give the order to the regional commander to disobey the standing orders the regional commander is bound to and support the American consulate during the battle, and order him to not deploy the AC-130 gunship and the Force Recon Marines.
Who is the person in the White House giving the orders the president should be giving?