Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#788060 Oct 30, 2012
Red State Sucker wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama was not on site and has no military training. This was a military situation and should have been handled by the state department and military personnel.
This silly attempt to link Obama with Benghazi is a blatant political scam, or as you put it .....bullshit
Who told Susan Rice what to say all over the television networks and at the UN?
Obviously, it wasn't Obama.
So, who told her what to say?
Obama is an empty chair. He's not in charge of anything. The person who told Susan Rice what to say at the UN and all over television is the real president.
Who is it?
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#788061 Oct 30, 2012
Former president Bill Clinton and Vice President Joe Biden dished out a two-man rebuke of Mitt Romney's charge that Chrysler is considering moving all Jeep production to China.

"The biggest load of bull in the world," Clinton said.

"Pirouettes more than a ballerina!" Biden lilted in describing the Republican presidential nominee.

The new Romney ad airing in Ohio says "Obama took GM and Chrysler into bankruptcy and sold Chrysler to Italians who are going to build Jeeps in China. Mitt Romney will fight for every American job."

Romney took that charge further at a rally in Defiance, Ohio, on Thursday, saying Jeep is "thinking of moving all production to China."

"[Chrysler] put out a statement today saying it was the biggest load of bull in the world that they would ever consider shutting down their American operations," Clinton said at Covelli Centre to a crowd of more than 4,800. "They are roaring in America, thanks to people like the people of Ohio."

In a blog post, Chrysler said the company is in fact "adding Jeep production sites rather than shifting output from North America to China" and dismissed any suggestion they are moving all production overseas as a "leap that would be difficult even for professional acrobats."

"I've served with eight presidents. I have never seen this in my public life," Biden exclaimed at the joint event with Clinton. He contrasted Romney's effort during the third debate to close the distance with Obama on the issue of managed bankruptcy for Detroit automakers with the new ad campaign.

"Within two weeks [after the debate], he's running an ad in this state saying that President Obama made the companies go bankrupt, gave the industry to the Italians who are selling it to the Chinese," Biden said. "Whoa! Whoa! As we say in my faith,'Bless me Father for I have sinned.' I mean, what are you talking about? I have never seen anything like that."

Read more: http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/2012/10/29/...
Obamalyingzombie s

London, KY

#788062 Oct 30, 2012
Red State Sucker wrote:
<quoted text>
So "Down with COMMIETIC socialism!" is a comment you believe sets you apart from the stupid people in the dunce corner? Why would that be?
It's the only lang-uh-widge bootlicking velveteenage obamazombietics understand.

ROMNEY/RYAN 2012!
The WhiteHouse back into the hands of rational adults again!!!

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#788063 Oct 30, 2012
sonicfilter wrote:
Right-Wing Media Defend Romney's False Claim That Chrysler Is Sending Jobs To China
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2012/10/29/right...
Who told Susan Rice what to say all over the television networks and at the UN?
Obviously, it wasn't Obama.
So, who told her what to say?
Obama is an empty chair. He's not in charge of anything. The person who told Susan Rice what to say at the UN and all over television is the real president.
Who is it?
Aphelion

Melbourne, FL

#788065 Oct 30, 2012
Red State Sucker wrote:
<quoted text>
Its been nine years and Republicans are still lying about their reason for invading Iraq. Does that trouble you too?
So you believe that the indiscretion of another in the past excuses the indiscretions of the current administration.

Again is this the best you can do in your attempts to defend this failed presidency?

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#788066 Oct 30, 2012
Aphelion wrote:
<quoted text>
Using your argument ... Bush is not responsible for just about everything that the left has blamed him for over the last 4 years. Is everyone on the left this stupid?
How do you relate the deregulation of banks and using faulty intel information to lead America into an unprovoked war to Obama letting the military and state department handle a military and state department issue? Is everyone on the right this stupid?
Nobama

Allentown, PA

#788067 Oct 30, 2012
Red State Sucker wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama was not on site and has no military training. This was a military situation and should have been handled by the state department and military personnel.
This silly attempt to link Obama with Benghazi is a blatant political scam, or as you put it .....bullshit
the military wanted to rescue their people, as they always do....but were stopped by whoever controls the empty suit in the White House.....
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#788068 Oct 30, 2012
Over the last two years, Congressional Republicans have forced a 43 percent reduction in the primary FEMA grants that pay for disaster preparedness. Representatives Paul Ryan, Eric Cantor and other House Republicans have repeatedly tried to refuse FEMA’s budget requests when disasters are more expensive than predicted, or have demanded that other valuable programs be cut to pay for them. The Ryan budget, which Mr. Romney praised as “an excellent piece of work,” would result in severe cutbacks to the agency, as would the Republican-instigated sequester, which would cut disaster relief by 8.2 percent on top of earlier reductions.

Does Mr. Romney really believe that financially strapped states would do a better job than a properly functioning federal agency? Who would make decisions about where to send federal aid? Or perhaps there would be no federal aid, and every state would bear the burden of billions of dollars in damages. After Mr. Romney’s 2011 remarks recirculated on Monday, his nervous campaign announced that he does not want to abolish FEMA, though he still believes states should be in charge of emergency management. Those in Hurricane Sandy’s path are fortunate that, for now, that ideology has not replaced sound policy.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/30/opinion/a-b...
Nobama

Allentown, PA

#788069 Oct 30, 2012
sonicfilter wrote:
Former president Bill Clinton and Vice President Joe Biden dished out a two-man rebuke of Mitt Romney's charge that Chrysler is considering moving all Jeep production to China.
"The biggest load of bull in the world," Clinton said.
the day after Obama loses, Clinton will rip him a new a-hole and begin promoting Hillary.....
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#788070 Oct 30, 2012
Oh, wait. What's this? Mitt Romney isn't "campaigning" today. He's having a "storm relief event." I kid you not, that's what his campaign staff is calling it. Oh, and it's with other storm relief eventers like Richard Petty and Randy Owen. But don't mistake it for campaigning, no sirree. Not in a place like ... Ohio.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/10/30/1152...

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#788071 Oct 30, 2012
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Who told Susan Rice what to say all over the television networks and at the UN?
Obviously, it wasn't Obama.
So, who told her what to say?
Obama is an empty chair. He's not in charge of anything. The person who told Susan Rice what to say at the UN and all over television is the real president.
Who is it?
Who cares? I'm surprised you right wing FOX zombies even notice spin, if that's what the investigation proves it to be.
Aphelion

Melbourne, FL

#788072 Oct 30, 2012
Red State Sucker wrote:
<quoted text>
How do you relate the deregulation of banks and using faulty intel information to lead America into an unprovoked war to Obama letting the military and state department handle a military and state department issue? Is everyone on the right this stupid?
Using your argument:
Bush was not a finance academic nor did he work in finance so he cannot be held responsible for the deregulation of the banks.

Bush was not an intelligence officer nor did he work in the intelligence community therefore he cannot be held responsible for the intelligence that he was provided.

The sad part is that you most likely are not intelligent enough to even see the flaw in your argument or your responses. Best get back to getting your GED so someday you too will understand.
carol

Orlando, FL

#788073 Oct 30, 2012
Red State Sucker wrote:
<quoted text>
If Obama had involved himself in the security details of Benghazi Republicans would have accused him of arrogantly meddling in an area better left to the military.
This is just another case of "If Obama walked on water Republicans would say its because he can't swim.".
It's the fact that there was an obvious coverup about what really happened when everyone knew within days it wasn't because of a video. The silence on the part of this president to address the American public by going out of his way to avoid the press and, instead, speaking on entertainment shows as well as in front of the UN reiterating it was because of a video two weeks later that has cemented the assumption in people's minds that it was, in fact, a coverup. Someone told his press secretary and Rice to go in front of a camera and tell the American people it was because of a video when Obama, himself, is still saying they haven't gathered all the information yet.

If that is, indeed, the case, then why did he and they insist it was because of a video? And why hasn't one person in his administration and Obama himself spoken to the American people refuting the initial video explanation yet?

Hillary is the only one who came out in the first week and called it a terrorist attack. Where the heck is she these days anyway?

Silence can become the most convincing accuser of wrongdoing when it involves too many unanswered questions.
Florida

Tampa, FL

#788074 Oct 30, 2012
sonicfilter wrote:
Over the last two years, Congressional Republicans have forced a 43 percent reduction in the primary FEMA grants that pay for disaster preparedness. Representatives Paul Ryan, Eric Cantor and other House Republicans have repeatedly tried to refuse FEMA’s budget requests when disasters are more expensive than predicted, or have demanded that other valuable programs be cut to pay for them. The Ryan budget, which Mr. Romney praised as “an excellent piece of work,” would result in severe cutbacks to the agency, as would the Republican-instigated sequester, which would cut disaster relief by 8.2 percent on top of earlier reductions.
Does Mr. Romney really believe that financially strapped states would do a better job than a properly functioning federal agency? Who would make decisions about where to send federal aid? Or perhaps there would be no federal aid, and every state would bear the burden of billions of dollars in damages. After Mr. Romney’s 2011 remarks recirculated on Monday, his nervous campaign announced that he does not want to abolish FEMA, though he still believes states should be in charge of emergency management. Those in Hurricane Sandy’s path are fortunate that, for now, that ideology has not replaced sound policy.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/30/opinion/a-b...
What is obama hiding?
-
$5 Million dollars to a charity of obama's choice or a storm crisis center to help victims from the storm, if obama releases his sealed records.. How simple is that sonicmoron?
-
Why is obama a sellout?
-
It's the culture...
Nobama

Allentown, PA

#788075 Oct 30, 2012
sonicfilter wrote:
Over the last two years, Congressional Republicans have forced a 43 percent reduction in the primary FEMA grants that pay for disaster preparedness. Representatives Paul Ryan, Eric Cantor and other House Republicans have repeatedly tried to refuse FEMA’s budget requests when disasters are more expensive than predicted, or have demanded that other valuable programs be cut to pay for them. The Ryan budget, which Mr. Romney praised as “an excellent piece of work,” would result in severe cutbacks to the agency, as would the Republican-instigated sequester, which would cut disaster relief by 8.2 percent on top of earlier reductions.
Does Mr. Romney really believe that financially strapped states would do a better job than a properly functioning federal agency? Who would make decisions about where to send federal aid? Or perhaps there would be no federal aid, and every state would bear the burden of billions of dollars in damages. After Mr. Romney’s 2011 remarks recirculated on Monday, his nervous campaign announced that he does not want to abolish FEMA, though he still believes states should be in charge of emergency management. Those in Hurricane Sandy’s path are fortunate that, for now, that ideology has not replaced sound policy.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/30/opinion/a-b...
like any other federal program, the taxpayers of each state send $1 to Washington for FEMA....where the union slugs chew up 50 cents sitting on their butts....and then make the states beg to get back 50 cents of their dollar.....

screw the federal government, except for national defense.....
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#788076 Oct 30, 2012
Aphelion wrote:
<quoted text>
Admit that you got nothing to defend the current administration and move on. Your lack of intellect is boring to say the least.
So you want to play troll games eh. Try one of your other anonymous forums__we're full up with lying frauds here.
Florida

Tampa, FL

#788077 Oct 30, 2012
Red State Sucker wrote:
<quoted text>
Who cares? I'm surprised you right wing FOX zombies even notice spin, if that's what the investigation proves it to be.
You're not a complete idiot -- Some critical parts are just missing....
-
A sellout Obama promised you candy, but left you with cavities idiot... Uncle Sugar fed you, lead you and then bleeds you moron...
-
What is obama hiding?
-
$5 Million dollars to a charity of obama's choice or a storm crisis center to help victims from the storm, if obama releases his sealed records.. How simple is that sonicmoron?
-
Why is obama a sellout?
-
It's the culture....
Aphelion

Melbourne, FL

#788078 Oct 30, 2012
Red State Sucker wrote:
<quoted text>
Who cares? I'm surprised you right wing FOX zombies even notice spin, if that's what the investigation proves it to be.
Once again when the liberals are backed into a corner with the facts ... deny the validity of the facts, or claim that the position is inconsequential.

You are a fine product of our public school education system.
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#788079 Oct 30, 2012
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
It's the fact that there was an obvious coverup about what really happened when everyone knew within days it wasn't because of a video. The silence on the part of this president to address the American public by going out of his way to avoid the press and, instead, speaking on entertainment shows as well as in front of the UN reiterating it was because of a video two weeks later that has cemented the assumption in people's minds that it was, in fact, a coverup. Someone told his press secretary and Rice to go in front of a camera and tell the American people it was because of a video when Obama, himself, is still saying they haven't gathered all the information yet.
If that is, indeed, the case, then why did he and they insist it was because of a video? And why hasn't one person in his administration and Obama himself spoken to the American people refuting the initial video explanation yet?
Hillary is the only one who came out in the first week and called it a terrorist attack. Where the heck is she these days anyway?
Silence can become the most convincing accuser of wrongdoing when it involves too many unanswered questions.
Just speaking of lying frauds and Carol pops up with a heaping, steaming pile of bs.

“GONE FISHING”

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#788080 Oct 30, 2012
They found Fred's body this morning,,he died trying to lick a wall socket to check for power..

Fred will be buried in the tridiagonal way for his family...at the dump.....

Breaking Fred family news:
Since Fred is 91%toxic waist, his remains will be sent to china and made into sex dolls and sold cheap in Iran..

Good by Fred you won't be missed..

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Amy 9-19 2 min Sublime1 9
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 10 min Karma is a_______ 46,686
Double Word Game (Dec '11) 11 min texas pete 1,472
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 13 min loose cannon 178,065
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 18 min edogxxx 98,231
Amy 9-18 1 hr pde 33
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 1 hr texas pete 4,714
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••