#786157 Oct 27, 2012
Who is it trying to sell Homosexuality as a safe practice?....DEMOCRATS!
WHO ARE THE LIARS?
Homosexuals make up less than 2% of the population .
"The rate of homosexual versus heterosexual child sexual abuse is staggering," "Abel’s data of 150.2 boys abused per male homosexual offender finds no equal (yet) in heterosexual violations of 19.8 girls."
Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays, counters that federal crime data refute claims that homosexuals molest children at higher rates than heterosexuals.
"According to data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), this claim is false,".
In terms of numbers of children abused per offender, homosexuals abuse with far greater frequency; and boys, research shows, are the much-preferred target.
Authorities say evidence examined disproves the assertion that child molestation is more prevalent among heterosexuals.
#786158 Oct 27, 2012
Who is it trying to sell Homosexuality as a safe practice?....DEMOCRATS!
WHO ARE THE LIARS?
FDA: Gay Men Still Banned from Donating Blood Over Documented Risk Concerns
WASHINGTON, D.C.,– Despite attempts by pro-homosexual advocates to paint the homosexual lifestyle as just another, normal, and healthy lifestyle choice, the FDA has renewed its 1983 policy that gay men cannot donate blood, due to the high-risk nature of living an active homosexual lifestyle.
This past Wednesday the FDA stated that, despite mounting opposition to the policy, it will for medical reasons continue to uphold its ban on men who live or who have lived an active homosexual life from donating blood.
According to the FDA, the ban is in place because,“A history of male-to-male sex is associated with an increased risk for the presence of and transmission of certain infectious diseases, including HIV, the virus that causes AIDS.”
The FDA policy relating to homosexual men is unique in its severity. While there is a lengthy list of criteria by which a potential donor may be deferred from donating blood (such as visiting particular African countries), such bans usually expire after a certain period of time. The ban on homosexual men, however, applies to any man who has ever had sex with another man, even once, subsequent to 1977.
The Administration, however, argues that the strictness of the ban is justified, pointing out that the “policy is intended to protect all people who receive blood transfusions from an increased risk of exposure to potentially infected blood and blood products.”
Some, however, are arguing that the FDA’s policy is discriminatory against homosexual men. Arthur Caplan, in an editorial for NBC6 argues that new testing technologies alleviate any fear that patients may contract AIDS by receiving a tainted transfusion.“At one time, long ago, the gay-blood ban may have made sense. But it no longer does,” he said.
“If a man has sex with a high risk woman, he’s allowed back into the donation pool after 12 months,” complained Joel Ginsberg, the executive director of the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association.“If he has safe sex with another man, he’s banned for life.”
Recognizing that the area of homosexuality is a controversial realm, however, with pro-homosexual activists on the watch for any signs of discrimination, the FDA responded to accusations of discrimination in its updated official policy in the matter. The “deferral policy is based on the documented increased risk of certain transfusion transmissible infections, such as HIV, associated with male-to-male sex and is not based on any judgment concerning the donor’s sexual orientation,” reads the FDA’s policy.
“Surveillance data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicate that men who have sex with men and would be likely to donate have a HIV prevalence that is at present over 15 fold higher than the general population, and over 2000 fold higher than current repeat blood donors (i.e., those who have been negatively screened and tested) in the USA.”
Dr. Robertson Davenport, who is an associate professor of pathology at the University of Michigan Hospital, agrees with the decision of the FDA.“The data are clear that men who engage in sexual contact with other men, as a whole, have a significantly higher risk of HIV,” he said.“Given our testing is not perfect, we will increase the risk to patients.”
A number of European countries have similar bans pertaining to homosexual man. Canada also forbids homosexual men from donating blood, due to similar concerns.
Read the full text of “FDA Policy on Blood Donations from Men Who Have Sex with Other Men”:
“What goes around, comes around”
Since: Sep 08
#786159 Oct 27, 2012
And number four: Mr President, who gave Susan Rice her talking points concerning no evidence of terrorist activity and blaming the video as the sole cause of the situation and sent her out on 6 Sunday talk shows?
#786160 Oct 27, 2012
You and Trump!!!!
oh yeah in your crazy head the President of the United States answers to a moron wearing a rug on his head?
this is why Republicans lose again!
Everytime the Republicans got the ball:
THEY FFFFFFCKKKKKED THE COUNTRY OVER.
all the national debt: 70% Republican!
Recessions? Republicans! Greedy azzzzzzholes!
#786161 Oct 27, 2012
pfft what would a Kenyan commie occupier scum like you know about economics or addition for that matter.
President Romney will unleash the power of the free market capitalist system and restore America to prosperity and strength.
#786163 Oct 27, 2012
Home » voterecord » Vote Record
Date RC# Bill Vote Bill Name
9/21 603 H R 3409 Not Voting To Limit The Authority Of The Secretary Of The Interior To Issue Regulations Before December 31, 2013, Under The Surface Mining Control And Reclamation Act Of 1977
9/21 602 H R 3409 Not Voting To Limit The Authority Of The Secretary Of The Interior To Issue Regulations Before December 31, 2013, Under The Surface Mining Control And Reclamation Act Of 1977
9/21 601 H R 3409 Not Voting Gosar Of Arizona Amendment No. 13
9/21 600 H R 3409 Not Voting Flake Of Arizona Amendment No. 12
9/21 599 H R 3409 Not Voting DeFazio Of Oregon Amendment No. 11
9/21 598 H R 3409 Not Voting Markey Of Massachusetts Amendment No. 10
9/21 597 H R 3409 Not Voting McKinley Of West Virginia Amendment No. 9
9/21 596 H R 3409 Not Voting Jackson Lee Of Texas Amendment No. 8
9/21 595 H R 3409 Not Voting Markey Of Massachusetts Amendment No. 5
9/21 594 H R 3409 Not Voting Kelly Of Pennsylvania Amendment No. 4
9/21 593 H R 3409 Not Voting Waxman Of California Amendment No. 3
9/21 592 H R 3409 Not Voting Markey Of Massachusetts Amendment No. 1
9/20 591 H R 5987 Not Voting To Establish The Manhattan Project National Historical Park In Oak Ridge, Tennessee, Los Alamos, New Mexico, And Hanford, Washington, And For Other Purposes
9/20 590 H R 6429 Yea To Amend The Immigration And Nationality Act To Promote Innovation, Investment, And Research In The United States, To Eliminate The Diversity Immigrant Program, And For Other Purposes
9/20 589 H J Res 118 Yea Providing For Congressional Disapproval Of The Rule Submitted By The Office Of Family Assistance Of The Administration For Children And Families Of The Department Of HHS Relating To Waiver And Expenditure Authority Under The Social Security Act With Respect To The Temporary Assistance For Needy Families Program
9/20 588 H Res 788 Not Voting Providing For Consideration Of (H.J.Res. 118) And (H.R. 3409)
9/20 587 H Res 788 Not Voting Providing For Consideration Of (H.J.Res. 118) And (H.R. 3409)
9/19 586 H R 5912 Not Voting To Amend The Internal Revenue Code Of 1986 To Prohibit The Use Of Public Funds For Political Party Conventions, And To Provide For The Return Of Previously Distributed Funds For Deficit Reduction
9/19 585 H R 5044 Not Voting To Amend The Internal Revenue Code Of 1986 To Exclude From Gross Income Any Discharge Of Indebtedness Income On Education Loans Of Deceased Veterans
9/14 584 H R 6213 Not Voting No More Solyndras Act
9/14 583 H R 6213 Not Voting No More Solyndras Act
9/14 582 H R 6213 Not Voting Waxman Of California Amendment No. 2
9/14 581 H R 6213 Not Voting DeGette Of Colorado Amendment No. 1
9/13 580 S 3245 Not Voting To Extend By 3 Years The Authorization Of The EB-5 Regional Center Program, The E-Verify Program, The Special Immigrant Nonminister Religious Worker Program, And The Conrad State 30 J-1 Visa Waiver Program
9/13 579 H J Res 117 Aye Making Continuing Appropriations For Fiscal Year 2013, And For Other Purposes
9/13 578 H J Res 117 No Making Continuing Appropriations For Fiscal Year 2013, And For Other Purposes
9/13 577 H R 6365 Aye National Security And Job Protection Act
9/13 576 H R 6365 Nay National Security And Job Protection Act
See More Votes
You DO get the "picture" don't you?
#786164 Oct 27, 2012
THEY SAY LIBYAN FORCES RESCUSED STEVENS UNDER HEAVY FIRE FROM AK47S
AND TOOK HIM TO HOSP,BUT HE WAS DOA ETC..
#786165 Oct 27, 2012
ADD THE BOBBLE HEADED CARNEY,GIBBS,CLINTON ET AL??
#786166 Oct 27, 2012
Free market alive and well dkhead!
Only problem: Republicans like Romney moved all the jobs overseas.
For a few more bucks!
DON'T BE ONE!
VOTE FOR OBAMA!
#786167 Oct 27, 2012
DAIMMMMMM,YOU JUST STEPPED IT IT MANNN,IMELDT CLOSE BUDDY TO
THE OBAMAS,SHIPPED GE TO CHINA? LOLOLOLOLOLOL......
#786168 Oct 27, 2012
Nonsense. The Kenyan's communist coup has smothered the economy and killed millions of jobs.
America says. ENOUGH!
#786169 Oct 27, 2012
The Kenyan left them to die while he was in Las Vegas partying with Beyonce.
#STANDDOWN: U.S. Had Two Drones, AC-130 Gunship, and Targets Painted in #Benghazi.
RELATED:“Yesterday the CIA said they didn’t say no to a rescue mission for Ambassador Stevens and other Americans under attack. Today the White House said it wasn’t Obama. Hey DoD…the music is slowing down and you don’t have a chair.”
#786170 Oct 27, 2012
Many people say you are not greedy, but simply an Obama azzzzzzhole. I agree.
#786171 Oct 27, 2012
U.S. Embassy in Libya targeted in April & June. Security/protection requests denied. U.S. Embassy in Libya targeted on Sept. 11. Help requested denied...
Our Commander in Chief says he was not aware of previous security requests. White House Press Secretary states President regularly briefed on security issues in region. Our Commander in Chief had 5 months to do something about protecting our fellow Americans...
4 Americans dead
#786172 Oct 27, 2012
There are pictures of Steven's body being removed from the consulate__sure looks dead to me. It's said that he died of smoke inhalation__once again, that lines up with the photos which show no blood, bullet holes etc.
Not sure about Smith though.
The first story had Stevens, Smith and Doherty all dying at the consulate building and then Beck, Larson, FOX et al started rewriting the script.
It's my understanding that the Blue Mountain Security people scattered when the shooting started and then reappeared quickly after the attackers departed. The men handling Stevens body do not resemble official forces.
#786173 Oct 27, 2012
Bullshyte___go away freak.
#786174 Oct 27, 2012
bush asleep at the wheel 3000 dead.
democrats blame terrorists.
4 dead in libya
republicans blame our president.
#786175 Oct 27, 2012
Cables show security requests in Libya focused on Tripoli, not Benghazi
By ERIC SCHMITT and MARK LANDLER
The New York Times
"The Libyans were not keen to have boots on the ground," one senior State Department official said.
That forced the State Department to rely largely on its own diplomatic security arm, which officials have said lacks the resources to provide adequate protection in war zones.
#786176 Oct 27, 2012
Kenyan commie occupier scum know nothing about the treachery in Benghazi because they DON'T watch Fox News.
Ten Questions for the White House
2:35 PM, Oct 27, 2012 • By WILLIAM KRISTOL
1.) To whom did the president give the first of his "three very clear directives"—that is, "make sure that we are securing our personnel and doing whatever we need to?"
2.) How did he transmit this directive to the military and other agencies?
3.) During the time when Americans were under attack, did the president convene a formal or informal meeting of his national security council? Did the president go to the situation room?
4.) During this time, with which members of the national security team did the president speak directly?
5.) Did Obama speak by phone or teleconference with the combatant commanders who would have sent assistance to the men under attack?
6.) Did he speak with CIA director David Petraeus?
7.) Was the president made aware of the repeated requests for assistance from the men under attack? When and by whom?
8.) Did he issue any directives in response to these requests?
9.) Did the president refuse to authorize an armed drone strike on the attackers?
10.) Did the president refuse to authorize a AC-130 or MC-130 to enter Libyan airspace during the attack?
Since: Feb 08
#786177 Oct 27, 2012
PS: "real dumb" you got called out, feel like the idiot you are?
Add your comments below
|Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09)||4 min||David||98,323|
|Abby 9-30||15 min||Shari23||5|
|BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09)||20 min||Rogue Scholar 05||178,575|
|Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08)||28 min||gcaveman1||46,973|
|Amy 9-30||46 min||Mister Tonka||3|
|Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10)||1 hr||Saint Demetrius||50,006|
|Abia State University, Direct entry admission c...||1 hr||prof vicktor||1|
Find what you want!
Search Chicago Forum Now