Barack Obama, our next President

[dem]

carol wrote:

<quoted text>Yes, I am embarassed by some of the remarks on here by those on my side of the fence.

But you should call them on it like I do with those on your side of the fence.

Just say to them, "Your party should be embarrassed by you. Unless you're the best representative they have."

That's about all either of us can do to shame them into knocking off their crude posts. Right?

Excuse me dumb carol but Yawkie is a proud republican.
She's just not insane like you baggers.

[Lily Boca Raton FL]

carol wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes, I am embarassed by some of the remarks on here by those on my side of the fence.
But you should call them on it like I do with those on your side of the fence.
Just say to them, "Your party should be embarrassed by you. Unless you're the best representative they have."
That's about all either of us can do to shame them into knocking off their crude posts. Right?

Probably best to just ignore them. Any attention gives them fuel.

[dem]

Jeff T in MPLS wrote:

<quoted text>Poor, ignorant RealDUMB.

Fact is, bonehead, that if you had sales people making $60 a year, I would congratulate you on somehow finding people more stupid than you that would stay at a job like that.

Jeffy makes a dollar for every penis he sucks.
Already has two in his mouth before noon.

[Homer]

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>
60K with fill benefits & job security ain't bad. Sitting at a desk, answering calls & quoting & taking orders.
In rural areas, that is a good job.
Like you do better in Minneapolis.Ave sales salary is under $50k.

Come on Dave, all the rightwingers posting on here are millionaires.

[Lily Boca Raton FL]

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>
60K with fill benefits & job security ain't bad. Sitting at a desk, answering calls & quoting & taking orders.
In rural areas, that is a good job.
Like you do better in Minneapolis.Ave sales salary is under $50k.

I guess he's another member of the 1% club. Like Romney, out of touch with mainstream middle class America.
$60, 000 compared to a person trying to survive on minimum wage would be like living large.

[dem]

carol wrote:

<quoted text>Yes, I am embarassed by some of the remarks on here by those on my side of the fence.

But you should call them on it like I do with those on your side of the fence.

Just say to them, "Your party should be embarrassed by you. Unless you're the best representative they have."

That's about all either of us can do to shame them into knocking off their crude posts. Right?

Where's your son gunner?

Waiting for the spin before showing his sloping forehead?

[RealDave]

flack wrote:

<quoted text> Being a business owner(sic) you would think he would understand that. I'm beginning to wonder what kind of business he owns. Paper routes don't count of course.

So if I own bunch of stores, I invest in buildings, employees, merchandize that might or might not get sold & get taxed at the corporate rate of 35% on my profits.

Romney buys pieces of paper & pays 15% on those profits when he sells.

So yes, lets not encourage people to start businesses that actually makes a product & provides services. Lets instead reward the paper traders.

The CEO of Sears gets his salary taxed as in the top bracket.

Romney as CEO of Bain got taxed at 15%.

This is fair?

A home builder build a home & sells it for a profit that he would pay corporates rates. Others buy a home & resell it for more & pay 15%.

This is fair?

I have news. Unless that stock is purchased from that company, you are not investing in that company, they get nothing when you buy stock from outside sources.

[Phil]

Jeff T in MPLS wrote:

<quoted text>
That was a HILARIOUS post!
Thank you!
I laughed for 5 minutes and shared it with co-workers.
Hope you don't mind!
Have a GREAT day!

Oh so funny, you shared it with co-workers. How dumb can you be? You just let everyone know you are getting paid at your work for posting BS on Topix. Not only here, but at your work!

[Homer]

carol wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes, I am embarassed by some of the remarks on here by those on my side of the fence.
But you should call them on it like I do with those on your side of the fence.
Just say to them, "Your party should be embarrassed by you. Unless you're the best representative they have."
That's about all either of us can do to shame them into knocking off their crude posts. Right?

Are you picking on dem again? If you manage to have him removed from this thread Homer will never speak to you again.

[dem]

Lily Boca Raton FL wrote:

<quoted text>Probably best to just ignore them. Any attention gives them fuel.

That's my motto.
Hee hee hee

[dem]

I apologize profusely for my many instances of offensive language and boorish posts. It all started with too late toilet training and many instances of abuse in my childhood. Freud would have a field day. I can only hope I can be cured of Obamatitus. This condition prevents me from working and cripples my social life. The symptoms are similar to tourettes and also compel me to steal from others in order to give to Democrats

[RealDave]

Jimmy wrote:

<quoted text>
What are you a flocking Owl? Update your avatar, dingleberry.

Hoo are you to say?

[Homer]

Lily Boca Raton FL wrote:

<quoted text>
Probably best to just ignore them. Any attention gives them fuel.

Well if you ignored all the insulting rightwingers, who's left from the right side to debate with?

[Alloramadai]

Jimmy wrote:

<quoted text>You have your candidates confused, libtard.

Yo, Jimmy. What's up with the childish name calling? And, no. Obama is not changing policies. Romney, on the other hand, has hardly been consistent.

[Nobama]

Homer wrote:

<quoted text>Two people, same job, one male on female, same production. Where do you stand on equal pay for women?

re-thinking your question....my response is that each person is judged as an individual, and gender is not a factor in salary...nor is there a need for equality of salary between any two employees even if they perform the same function....

[Lily Boca Raton FL]

Obama is a joke wrote:

<quoted text>
You are sooo clueless. Romney didn't all men so he went out and looking for women that were qualified.

No one asked him that question dummy. The question was, are you in favor of equal pay for women.
Yes or no.
Instead he blabbered on about himself in Mass.
Answer the effing question.

Same with the assault weapon question; are you in favor of an assault weapons ban; yes or no.

What did Mitt say? Blabbering on and on about violent gun deaths are the result of single parents!

What is wrong with him?

[Lily Boca Raton FL]

dem wrote:

<quoted text>
Where's your son gunner?
Waiting for the spin before showing his sloping forehead?

Hi Dem,
I forgot to tell you that I loved your post yesterday about the doctors in ER's and absolutely agree that it would be a real eye opener to the candidates, congressmen/women and senators to spend a couple of days in one.
It should be a requirement; in addition to spending a day in prison and living on minimum wage and foodstamps.

[Homer]

Lily Boca Raton FL wrote:

<quoted text>
I guess he's another member of the 1% club. Like Romney, out of touch with mainstream middle class America.
$60, 000 compared to a person trying to survive on minimum wage would be like living large.

Bah, most Republicans won't leave the house for less than 100K, they'll just live off their inheritance or sell some more property, dump some stock, or if in real dire straits sell some of their (gulp)gold.

[Nobama]

Homer wrote:

<quoted text>Two people, same job, one male on female, same production. Where do you stand on equal pay for women?

our company requires new employees to agree, as a condition of employment, to be willing to accept temporary assignments and relocations, including overseas assignments....some might say this tends to discriminate against women.....what does Homer think???....

[dem]

Okay, look, I'm not naive. I know that even the plainest of things can't possibly get through to the Romney campaign and the conservative base. But hey, that's a good thing! The more time they spend in a tizzy over "act of terror" ≠ "act of terror," the longer they'll look like fools trying to politicize the deaths of Americans who died in the service of their country. Meanwhile, Barack Obama will continue to look like something Mitt Romney simply isn't: a president.