Barack Obama, our next President

[RealDave]

DBWriter wrote:

<quoted text>
Well, most people happen to agree with Ryan. The problem isn't not enough revenue for the government. The problem is the government spends too much money. So, the answer is for the government to spend less money.
But, let's talk about what the Democrats propose:
If you listened to the debate, you heard the central point from Ryan that proves the Democrats are lying bullshitters with the alterior motive of taking over the government.
If the government goes bankrupt, the Democrats will attempt to take control of everything using that as an excuse to claim "emergency measures" are necessary. So, how do you make the US government go bankrupt?
Create a situation where it is impossible for the government to generate enough revenue to pay for the programs instituted. The only plan for revenue the Democrats have is to make the so-called "rich" pay more taxes.
How about this fact:
The total earnings of the top 10 percent do not equal the deficit the Democrats created. Thus, in accordance with the Democrats' "plan" (they really don't have a plan for government. If they had a plan, they'd have a budget for that plan. An idiot knows this) the government will never be paid for and the debt continues to grow until it becomes impossible to pay.
So, here's the question no Democrat has answered:
Since it's a fact that the people the Democrats want to tax to pay for the government they created don't have enough money to pay even if the Democrats tax them at 100 percent and make them destitute, from whom will the Democrats get the money they need to pay for the government they created?
You actually have to identify the people who will pay more to the government to pay for what the Democrats are doing to answer this post.
Who will the Democrats raise the taxes on when it becomes obvious the so-called "rich" don't even have that much money to be taxed?

I think you forgot something.

Paul Ryan voted for the debt under Bush.

If Paul Ryan really was against debt &U deficits & balanced budgets, why did he vote for:

unfunded Bush Tax Cuts
Unfunded wars
unfunded government expansion
unfunded expansion to medicare
unfunded record earmarks

Why did Paul Ryan vote for increased spending & reduced revenues.

Was he just to f*cking stupid to know that it would create debt?

This is YOUR budget guru, the financial expert the ONE when it comes to responsible government? Really??

[Obamasharpton]

Lily Boca Raton FL wrote:

<quoted text>
Elect Romney and rape will be legal

Lyin' lily still drooling for those sexual fantasies.

[Jane Says]

fetch almighty wrote:

<quoted text>why did O'bama under the guise of NATO attack Libya in the first place? must of been for political gain. Because Libya and Qaddafi, were not a threat to US security were they?

it must have been for oil, as Bush was always accused of (LOL, i guess that's not working out very well is it?)

[Gunner]

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>
So yes, a different President would have likely paid more attention to that Clinton formed Commission report.

Algore??? LOL

Yeah...right.

No doubt a box cutter alert would also have been a top priority.

[mdbuilder]

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>
Look, those fellas whose names on on that bill - all Republican. Passed primarily by Republicans.
The repeal of Glass Steagall was what the Republicans wanted.
This is another "NAfta" argument by the uninformed. Blaming Clinton for signing a Republican action.
Blame your own party for this one.

Like the invasion of Iraq?

[carol]

Jane Says wrote:

After Team Obama’s horrid handling of the terrible tragedy in Benghazi, does anyone out there really cling to the left’s quickly unraveling yarn that this administration has a strong record on foreign policy and national security?
Sure, the prez and veep continue to chant the mantra that “Osama bin Laden is dead”— and, without a doubt, that’s a good thing. Problem is: al Qaeda is very much alive.
Indeed, the US intelligence community told us that the “demonstrators” who murdered four Americans last month in Libya are a pro-al Qaeda group, likely associated with al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb.
But the al Qaeda threat is increasing elsewhere in Africa, too, in places like Mali and Nigeria. And in the Middle East, it’s making a comeback in Iraq and running rampant next door in Syria, which is becoming “Islamist Central.”
Al Qaeda is just part of the problem in Syria: After nearly 20 months of US passivity in that nation’s civil war, the death toll now tops 30,000. And “Basher” Assad, no friend of ours, is still running the place.
Meanwhile, there’s Syria’s ally, the Islamic Republic of Isotopes, er, Iran. After four years of Obama-plomacy, the ayatollahs are closer to their atomic aspirations than ever — despite the “hope” they’d “change” their course on nukes.

Joe says bin Laden is dead and GM is very much alive.

No mention of al Qaeda.

The cover up by this administration clearly proves they want us to believe whatever they tell us.

[Gunner]

dem wrote:

<quoted text>
A job he has stolen from someone out of work.

I didn't hire myself, idiot.

[leosnana]

And so it goes wrote:

<quoted text>
Her and leo are left with outrageously stupid allegations as a defense for Obama's failed policies.

"Her and leo"??? Look, stupid Jason-Jay Hydra head, I ignore you and a lot of the other illiterates on here although most appear too stupid to have caught on. Please return the favor. You, Gummer, Bounced Czech, fried fred, etc., should go out more and discuss vaginas on the dead pecker benches in front of your local Cracker Barrel...just a thought.

[TheIndependentMa jority]

leosnana wrote:

<quoted text>Pre or post mortem might be a better question.

KEYSTONE on moratorium....and LOCKHEED?

Verifiability
We define electoral manipulation broadly as any action by the government or a political party intended to produce an unfair electoral advantage.
(4 For more on the definition of electoral manipulation see Elklit and Svensson (1997), Simpser (2005).)

Simpser, A. and Donno-Panayides, D. Unintended Consequences of Monitoring Regimes:The Case of International Election Monitoring. Yale.edu . 10/17/2008. last accessed 10/15/2012.

ROMNEY/RYAN 2012!

[Jane Says]

FIRE THE GOP wrote:

<quoted text>
I just saw a report on the news:
Has Ryan saying "It's not the right time to disclose facts about our tax cut plan during the election."
WTF!
LOOPY!
INSANE!
CRAZY!
you will vote for this turd?
(ftg thanks fred for not resorting to commie Kenyan crappppp in two posts today! ;)

i heard an accurate comparison about the VP debate:

Ryan was the smart nerdy kid doing Calculus on the blackboard

while Biden was the misbehaving kid in the back of the room making fart noises to interrupt the class.

[fetch almighty]

FIRE THE GOP wrote:

<quoted text>
I just saw a report on the news:
Has Ryan saying "It's not the right time to disclose facts about our tax cut plan during the election."
WTF!
LOOPY!
INSANE!
CRAZY!
you will vote for this turd?
(ftg thanks fred for not resorting to commie Kenyan crappppp in two posts today! ;)

Is O'bama going to continue campaigning for Big Bird or is he going to have another plan?

[Gunner]

Obamasharpton wrote:

<quoted text> Lyin' lily still drooling for those sexual fantasies.

Sad fact?

Lily really does believe Romney will legalize rape.

[dim]

Obamasharpton wrote:

<quoted text>Why is Obama losing?

Because he sucks?

[dim]

Three more weeks!

[carol]

fetch almighty wrote:

<quoted text>How about Hillary Clinton is the master-mind behind Benghazi in her secret attack to get rid of O'bama? because if we have 4 more years of O'bama-she will never be able to run for President.

Poor ole' Bill sure has found himself between that liberal rock and a hard place, huh?

[TheIndependentMa jority]

FIRE THE GOP wrote:

<quoted text>
Are you a racist Mormon who married your uncle Jimmy at 12 years of age?
I noticed your in SLC, Utah and support the weekends racial slur against the President.
Calling an adult black male who is married with two children "your boy Obama" is racist!

You been monitering th jr high school kiddie crowd?

Sounds exactly like the stuffof their (clueless) comprehension levels!!!

KEYSTONE? LOCKHEED? LIBYA?

ROMNEY/RYAN 2012!

[kuda]

Jimmy wrote:

<quoted text>
What matters is the economy and Obama's miserable record. The Food Stamp President now has a coverup where people died due to his malfeasance. The USA is really hurting because of Obama & the Democrats. The debate is redundant.

Your reaction to my post is not a response to its content. Instead, you changed the subject to another questionable, yet familiar, Fox “News” slant on President Obama.

[Gunner]

dem wrote:

<quoted text>
Yep you baggers obstructed the shit out of our recovery.
It's in your DNA to be useless racist azzholes.

Yeah, sure they did, dumbazz.

Maybe a republican/conservative hating, incompetent, hyper-partisan president? Nah.

[glennm69]

Brad wrote:

<quoted text>
Where did Oblamer say the buck stops again?

Lol.... whoever he can blame it on.

[TheIndependentMa jority]

dem wrote:

<quoted text>
Yep you baggers obstructed the shit out of our recovery.
It's in your DNA to be useless racist azzholes.

Keystone?

( Please do not make us stoop to absolute utter ignorance of bottom scraping guttersnipe stupidity and holler "vote all Republerkin ticket".)

ROMNEY/RYAN 2012!!