You are wasting my time by putting up a source dated October 9.<quoted text>
The report from Reuters although breath taking detailed was a lie.
" Prior to the attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi late in the evening on Sept. 11, there was no protest outside the compound, a senior State Department official confirmed today, contradicting initial administration statements suggesting that the attack was an opportunistic reaction to unrest caused by an anti-Islam video.
In a conference call with reporters Tuesday, two senior State Department officials gave a detailed accounting of the events that lead to the death of Amb. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. The officials said that prior to the massive attack on the Benghazi compound by dozens of militants carrying heavy weaponry, there was no unrest outside the walls of the compound and no protest that anyone inside the compound was aware of."
I am not going to waste my time arguing with your theories when the St Dept has made a clear statement on this!!
I wasn't there but the owner/landlord of the building told both CNN and the freelancers (tagalongs) that there were protesters__I'm not saying that there were but that was the first best info from the site. I mention best info because the CIA folks hauled azz, evacuated was the official term.
Bottom line is that there were no US personnel on site until much later.
There's breaking news__then developing news__and then there is FOX news, sounds to me as though you favor the latter. It shows.