Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story
Cool Hand Luke

Scranton, PA

#773892 Oct 16, 2012
Democrats have been telling the same joke for 60 years!

Trickle Down Economics, Right! I got to say you have gotten away with it, TILL NOW!

People today are smart enough to know that if you raise taxes on the rich bread maker, the price of a loaf of bread goes up!

So who pays? We do! And for what? For the Democrats to give the money to put shrimp on tread mills and tom teach safe methods of feces eating?!

.

Recommended New York sex ed site offers middle schoolers tips on eating feces

.

WARNING: very explicit content.

NEW YORK - The recommended curriculum for a mandatory sex education course to be implemented in New York middle and high schools next year directs students to a website that details “safe sex” practices regarding bestiality, coprophagia, and other extreme sexual fetishes.

The New York Post reported on Saturday that assignments in a workbook recommended by city education officials included giving middle schoolers “risk cards” to rate the safety of such activities as anal sex, oral sex, and “intercourse using a condom and an oil-based lubricant.”

Teens are also told to learn the route from school to the nearest family planning clinic and research its confidentiality policy, or to report on condom brands and features such as lubrication.

But one of the most extreme aspects of the curriculum is its referral to “Go Ask Alice,” a website run by Columbia University that offers comprehensive analysis of sex fetishes and their hygienic pitfalls.

“The idea of experimenting with scat play might heat things up in the bedroom (or bathroom, or anywhere else you choose), but it’s always a good idea to consider the risks of a behavior before acting upon (or getting action from) it,” states the website in one page entitled “‘Scat’ play — is eating feces safe?” Other areas discuss pornography, drinking urine, and “favorite sexual positions.” One page proposes to overcome lack of information on the bestiality due to “stigmatization” of the practice.

Mayor Bloomberg defended the sex curriculum as necessary to combat the city’s STD infections and out-of-wedlock births.“We have a responsibility, when you have an out of wedlock birthrate and a sexually transmitted disease rate that we have in this city, to try to do something about it,” said the mayor on Monday.“Shame on us if we don’t.”

CNN reports that the NYC Department of Education will mandate that all schools have a sexual education curriculum by next spring.
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
The best years of trickle-down economics came under Reagan who inherited an economy in serious trouble. Some would say by virtue of his tax cuts he helped save the country and turn the economy around. Few mention however that Reagan ran an average top tax rate of 48.5% over his eight year term; five of those years saw a top tax bracket of 50%. Still it was a huge improvement over the 70% rate that those in the highest tax bracket were paying. Under Reagan capital gains tax was 28% compared to 15% today. Another key point that many nostalgic Americans forget is that under Reagan he raised taxes several times including payroll taxes. What happened next is amazing considering that trickle down was supposed to save the economy. Social security began operating at a surplus and the administration took the surplus to spend on other government programs all the while replacing the funds with IOU’s. Not all American are aware that social security has a cap on contribution for those earning roughly $100,000 per year or more. In other words a citizen making less than $100,000 per year contributes a higher percentage of his income for the program than a person making (for example)$300,000 per year since he only contributes on his 1st $100,000, the remaining $200,000 is not subject to contribution.
Read more at http://www.business2community.com/government-...
REPUBLICANS FOR USA

Woodbridge, VA

#773893 Oct 16, 2012
Pinot wrote:
<quoted text>
Another pathetic, factless, feckless rant from the left.
Impeach Obama and Biden.
YEAH, AND DON'T FORGET CLINTON TOO!!

Since: May 11

Newville, PA

#773894 Oct 16, 2012
Chicagoan by Birth wrote:
<quoted text>BS, plain and simple BS, Davey you wouldn't know Frank Davis, or Billy Ayres if they passed you, on your way to the food pantry? Everybody in and out of politics in Chicago, knows or knew those Communists. So your 'aquaintances' holcomb holds about as much water as a colender.
I seriously doubt Frank Davis is passing anyone on the street.

So everyone in Chicago is a communist. Good to know.
Homer

Bethlehem, PA

#773895 Oct 16, 2012
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Ho Chi Minh became statistically the worst mass murderer in the history of civilization. The United States was right to oppose him. The Democrats... well, you can say the same thing about them that you say about associates of othe rmass murderers in history, like those who joined Hitler.
You have been indoctrinated with the lies generated by the Democrats. Post the lies you've bneen indoctrinated with. I'll help you. Here's the post again:
You are well versed in the system of lies the Democrats invented about Vietnam.
Here's the truth:
Ho Chi Minh didn't become a concern until he asked the Soviet Union to help him in the war he started against the French after he went to Paris and asked them to come back to Veitnam. The Soviet Union used this as an opportunity to expand their influence during the Cold War. He didn't become significant until the Soviet Union was supporting his invasions of South Vietnam. If he never invaded South Vietnam, he'd be about as significant as some other small-pond bullshit dictator with too big of an ego in the world.
Listen carefully to this. This is the key ingredient to understanding the US involvement in Vietnam:
As the Soviet Union increased its involvement in the invasions of South Vietnam, the US increased its involvement in the defense of South Vietnam.
That means the US involvement didn't become significant until after Ho Chi Minh asked the Soviet Union to petition the UN to divide the country.
Let's say that again:
Ho Chi Minh asked the Soviet Union to petition the UN to divide the country.
Immediately after the UN authorized the creation of North Vietnam and South Vietnam, Ho Chi Minh began invading South Vietnam.
This is exactly like how the proxy war in Korea started.
Now, idiot, here's the key:
As the Soviet involvement in the communist invasions of South Vietnam increased, the US involvement in the defense of South Vietnam increased.
US involvement didn't become direct until AFTER the UN divided the country.
The Soviet Union involvement was already at a significant level prior to this. In fact, as I told your ignorant ass previously, the communist used Soviet weapons at the battle of Dien Bien Phu, which was before the Soviet Union petitioned the UN to divide Vietnam into two separate countries.
The Soviet Union is engaged in Vietnam.
The US assists South Vietnam.
The strategy of the United States during the Cold War was not to abandon our allies and run away.
The war was all but over in 1970 when the NVA ran away to avoid destruction when the US forces entered the Parrot's Beak in 1970. They waited until US ground forces left Vietnam in 1971 to launch the largest communist invasion of the war. They were defeated by the South Vietnamese WITHOUT ASSISTANCE FROM US GROUND COMBAT UNITS.
Now, I want you to begin your next post with one of the lies in the system of lies the Democrats invented about Vietnam:
"The South Vietnamese wouldn't fight for themselves."
Then tell us about how the communists defeated the South Vietnamese in 1972 when they mounted the single largest invasion of the war, the Easter Offensive of 1972.
... got a problem, don't you....
It seems the single largest invasion of the war wasn't successful, and there is no history of any US ground combat units fighting against the communists.
It was the South Vietnamese that defeated the communists without assistance from US ground combat units.
Now, tell us how the Democrat-controlled congress of 1973 helped the ally of the United States after they defeated a massive communist invasion during the Cold War.
I'm starting to think you don't like Democrats. What is your take on Republicans? You should become an Independent like Homer.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#773896 Oct 16, 2012
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
I never condoned any of it.
I wouldn't call oreo & Uncle Tom as racist. It refers more to one that has seemingly abandoned his race.
"An organizer working in and for an open society is in an ideological dilemma to begin with, he does not have a fixed truth -- truth to him is relative and changing"
Saul Alinsky
Romney is a Moron

Lenoir, NC

#773897 Oct 16, 2012
REPUBLICANS FOR USA wrote:
<quoted text>
Romeny? we are desperate here, dude!!
*

Republicans in Virginia ????

*

Just so you will know in 2008 the state of Virginia, your state, voted overwhelmingly for Obama. Virginia is a Democrat state and will vote Obama again.

*
If your a Republican in V.A. and vote romney, the outcome will be like you didn't even vote at all. How does that make you feel?

*
roMNey - what a joke

I understand your desperation and shame, the whole rEpublIcan party is a joke too.

*
*
*
*
Homer

Bethlehem, PA

#773898 Oct 16, 2012
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Saul Alinsky rule number 5. "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counteract ridicule."
I disagree. Besides he WAS just visiting his factory in the DR, so why would he see that as ridicule? If the shoe fits...

This Saul guy doesn't like anything.

How long have you been a disciple of his?
Patriot

Denver, CO

#773900 Oct 16, 2012
AGENDA 21 IN AMERICA

Colorado Agenda 21 Promoters Use Embedded Judge to Take Away Local Opponent's Only Child

http://educate-yourself.org/cn/stacylynnestor...
dem

Chicago, IL

#773901 Oct 16, 2012
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Saul Alinsky rule number 2. "Never go outside the expertise of your people. When an action or tactic is outside the experience of the people, the result is confusion, fear and retreat and the collapse of communication."
dont try your bullshit on me, tiny.
ill make you cry again.

Since: May 11

Newville, PA

#773902 Oct 16, 2012
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Ho Chi Minh became statistically the worst mass murderer in the history of civilization. The United States was right to oppose him. The Democrats... well, you can say the same thing about them that you say about associates of othe rmass murderers in history, like those who joined Hitler.
You have been indoctrinated with the lies generated by the Democrats. Post the lies you've bneen indoctrinated with. I'll help you. Here's the post again:
You are well versed in the system of lies the Democrats invented about Vietnam.
Here's the truth:
Ho Chi Minh didn't become a concern until he asked the Soviet Union to help him in the war he started against the French after he went to Paris and asked them to come back to Veitnam. The Soviet Union used this as an opportunity to expand their influence during the Cold War. He didn't become significant until the Soviet Union was supporting his invasions of South Vietnam. If he never invaded South Vietnam, he'd be about as significant as some other small-pond bullshit dictator with too big of an ego in the world.
Listen carefully to this. This is the key ingredient to understanding the US involvement in Vietnam:
As the Soviet Union increased its involvement in the invasions of South Vietnam, the US increased its involvement in the defense of South Vietnam.
That means the US involvement didn't become significant until after Ho Chi Minh asked the Soviet Union to petition the UN to divide the country.
Let's say that again:
Ho Chi Minh asked the Soviet Union to petition the UN to divide the country.
Immediately after the UN authorized the creation of North Vietnam and South Vietnam, Ho Chi Minh began invading South Vietnam.
This is exactly like how the proxy war in Korea started.
Now, idiot, here's the key:
As the Soviet involvement in the communist invasions of South Vietnam increased, the US involvement in the defense of South Vietnam increased.
US involvement didn't become direct until AFTER the UN divided the country.
The Soviet Union involvement was already at a significant level prior to this. In fact, as I told your ignorant ass previously, the communist used Soviet weapons at the battle of Dien Bien Phu, which was before the Soviet Union petitioned the UN to divide Vietnam into two separate countries.
The Soviet Union is engaged in Vietnam.
The US assists South Vietnam.
The strategy of the United States during the Cold War was not to abandon our allies and run away.
The war was all but over in 1970 when the NVA ran away to avoid destruction when the US forces entered the Parrot's Beak in 1970. They waited until US ground forces left Vietnam in 1971 to launch the largest communist invasion of the war. They were defeated by the South Vietnamese WITHOUT ASSISTANCE FROM US GROUND COMBAT UNITS.
Now, I want you to begin your next post with one of the lies in the system of lies the Democrats invented about Vietnam:
"The South Vietnamese wouldn't fight for themselves."
Then tell us about how the communists defeated the South Vietnamese in 1972 when they mounted the single largest invasion of the war, the Easter Offensive of 1972.
... got a problem, don't you....
It seems the single largest invasion of the war wasn't successful, and there is no history of any US ground combat units fighting against the communists.
It was the South Vietnamese that defeated the communists without assistance from US ground combat units.
Now, tell us how the Democrat-controlled congress of 1973 helped the ally of the United States after they defeated a massive communist invasion during the Cold War.
By opposing Mihn, the US drive him to the communists.

Supporting Mihn would likely have led to a peaceful Vietnam without communist ties.
fred

Newington, CT

#773903 Oct 16, 2012
Phil wrote:
In 2001 and again in 2003 George W Bush passed more tax breaks, primarily for wealthy Americans, reversing the policy Bill Clinton had adopted previously. Bush’s legacy is very fresh in the minds of Americans so a recap will be all that is needed. George W Bush had the worst job creation record of any President in modern history with some of the lowest top tax rates in history. In addition to this fact, he was able to take a budget surplus and turn it into a deficit in the span of just 1 year, undoing all of the work Clinton and congress took eight years to do.
Read more at http://www.business2community.com/government-...
W was a great president who led America to recovery after the dot com bust, 9/11, and war on terror. Democrats took control of congress2 in 2007 and sabotaged the economy.

The Kenyan had huge filibuster proof majorities in congress in 2009 and 2010. Why didn't he let the Bush tax rates expire? duh

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#773904 Oct 16, 2012
Homer wrote:
<quoted text>I'm starting to think you don't like Democrats. What is your take on Republicans? You should become an Independent like Homer.
I have been registered as an independent since 1992.
I just wish there was a viable alternative other than a party that built itself around lies and treason, and didn't have Marxist communism (with the inevitable ruling elite exempted) as their ultimate goal.
dem

Chicago, IL

#773905 Oct 16, 2012
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
I seriously doubt Frank Davis is passing anyone on the street.
So everyone in Chicago is a communist. Good to know.
ive lived in chicago my entire life and never heard of either of them till i spotted tea bag azzholes whining on topix
dem

Chicago, IL

#773906 Oct 16, 2012
speaking of banned.
i see a little tea bag kkkweer getting removed.
Homer

Bethlehem, PA

#773907 Oct 16, 2012
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
"An organizer working in and for an open society is in an ideological dilemma to begin with, he does not have a fixed truth -- truth to him is relative and changing"
Saul Alinsky
Fck Saul Alinsky, shouldn't you be working on your manifesto?
And so it goes

Gering, NE

#773908 Oct 16, 2012
Phil wrote:
Today corporations are making record profits; the Dow Jones is near record highs and despite these facts, job growth remains low, proving there is little to no correlation between incomes at the top and job growth in the middle and bottom. If that were the case, based on this theory we should also be experiencing record employment numbers instead of struggling with 8%+ unemployment.
While the GOP continues to discuss the virtues of trickle down, the claims do not pass an examination of the facts. The only part of the trickle-down theory that is true is that the benefit to the middle class does come in a trickle, a very slow, barely visible trickle.
Read more at http://www.business2community.com/government-...
The fault is at the WH. Uncertainty about regulations, taxes and the effects of Obamacare has stifled growth.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#773909 Oct 16, 2012
dem wrote:
<quoted text>
dont try your bullshit on me, tiny.
ill make you cry again.
And this one is especially for you.))))

Saul Alinsky rule number 9. "The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself."

:-D
dem

Chicago, IL

#773910 Oct 16, 2012
Romney is a Moron wrote:
<quoted text>
*
Republicans in Virginia ????
*
Just so you will know in 2008 the state of Virginia, your state, voted overwhelmingly for Obama. Virginia is a Democrat state and will vote Obama again.
*
If your a Republican in V.A. and vote romney, the outcome will be like you didn't even vote at all. How does that make you feel?
*
roMNey - what a joke
I understand your desperation and shame, the whole rEpublIcan party is a joke too.
*
*
*
*
agreed!
And so it goes

Gering, NE

#773911 Oct 16, 2012
Homer wrote:
<quoted text>I disagree. Besides he WAS just visiting his factory in the DR, so why would he see that as ridicule? If the shoe fits...
This Saul guy doesn't like anything.
How long have you been a disciple of his?
You are clueless
Obama 2012

Virginia Beach, VA

#773913 Oct 16, 2012
leosnana wrote:
<quoted text>Romney did not earn his money as a businessman--he was/is a banker. The catchphrase "You didn't build that" would certainly apply to him...it's more a "You didn't build that; you leveraged it; mortgaged it; bankrupted it, and were paid for every single action." (You think Bernie Madoff is bitter?)
Rmoney earned his money the old fashioned way. He inherited it.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 18 min JOEL 70,626
World's Best Photo Art 47 min Long Time Fan 5
EverGreen Belgrade 1 hr AqifBlytaWasShotL... 18
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 3 hr IBdaMann 48,593
Boycott all Topix Sponsors 3 hr People Please 6
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 3 hr wojar 180,944
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 5 hr TRD 68,797
Chicago Dating
Find my Match

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 4:00 pm PST

Bleacher Report 4:00PM
Breaking Down What Colt McCoy Brings to the Washington Offense in Place of RGIII
NBC Sports 4:45 PM
NFL on Thanksgiving: Bears season falls into irrelevancy
NBC Sports 4:50 PM
NFL on Thanksgiving: Megatron reaches 10,000 yards
Bleacher Report 5:33 PM
Bears vs. Lions Video Highlights
Yahoo! Sports 6:07 PM
Lions, Eagles serve up Thanksgiving Day routs