Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story
Peppy

Greensboro, NC

#773560 Oct 16, 2012
Lily Boca Raton FL wrote:
<quoted text>
Who is in favor of tax reform? Companies who outsource jobs should have their products heavily taxed if they import them into the US.
How can there be tax reform when the corporations employ lobbyists who work on creating more tax loopholes for the wealthy on a daily basis? As long as our elected officials must spend the majority of their time begging for money from corporate donors; and corporations can contribute unlimited funds to political campaigns; it will never happen.
Well maybe so. Keep in mind, I am one of those guys sending jobs overseas. It pains me to do so, but that is where my customers are moving their facilities. So I either follow or lose the business.

My only point is that it does not have to this way. Lobbyists be damned, if Congress had the balls, they could stem the flow of jobs leaving. In my lifetime, no politician has made a serious run at this problem.
Homer

Bethlehem, PA

#773561 Oct 16, 2012
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay, here we go, Homer. Hold on to your britches.
"Beloved, I pray that you may PROSEPER IN ALL THINGS and be in health, just as your soul prosper."
"The Lord takes pleasure in the prosperity of his servant."
"And God is able to bless you abundantly, so that in all things at all times, having all that you need, you will abound in every good."
"Give, and it will be given to you; good measure, pressed down, shaken together, running over, they will pour into your lap. For by your standard of measure it will be measured to you in return."
"Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you."
"You have not, because you ask not."
We are to give what has been given to us. The promise in return is a prosperous and spiritually fulfilled life.
Sure, all good. It's when you go to far so...

"Again I say to you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God."

Jesus would not be happy to see the desparity between the haves and the have nots.
Obamasharpton

Lakewood, NJ

#773563 Oct 16, 2012
Lily Boca Raton FL wrote:
<quoted text>
What a smackdown!
Romney gave to Obama!
FIRE THE GOP

Lillington, NC

#773565 Oct 16, 2012
fred wrote:
<quoted text>
Mass murdering commies are on route 666 to hell
ps
Alinksy rule 4 Yawn
fred likes Romney.

ROMNEY is a Mormon.

Other Mormons arranged marriages to 12 year olds for their 50 year old male members deviant sxxxxxxx play?

FLDS.

do they pray to the same God on Uranus? Do they collect payment for the same fake Jesus? Is it just one big sxxxxxx cult for baby rapers?

You seem to be the Romney expert.
carol

Orlando, FL

#773566 Oct 16, 2012
Homer wrote:
<quoted text>That's great. However that in no way relates to this -
"Again I say to you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God."
Matthew 19:24
All true Christians believe this.
It's all about context, Homer, something that always trips up some of you.

This was said right after a rich man asked Jesus what he must do to be saved. Jesus was testing him to see where his treasure was. When the rich man proved he valued his treasure here on earth more than in heaven, Jesus used him as an example of how difficult it would be for those who put earthly wealth ahead of spiritual wealth as being "easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle" which, by the way, was a different term back then than what we think of today.
Peppy

Greensboro, NC

#773567 Oct 16, 2012
Homer wrote:
<quoted text> Well it sure didn't stop you Mr. I'm-just-back-from-visiting-my -factory-in-the-DR, now did it?
I brought you back some plantains, that should count for something.
LOL

Sparta, NJ

#773568 Oct 16, 2012
Lily Boca Raton FL wrote:
<quoted text>
What a smackdown!
Is yo husban beaten yo daughter a'gin?
RUSH10ME

Warsaw, VA

#773569 Oct 16, 2012
obama's new campaign ad, a vote for me = a shelter dog in every pot !!
Iam booorak obumma and I approve this message .
Lily Boca Raton FL

Boca Raton, FL

#773570 Oct 16, 2012
Peppy wrote:
<quoted text>
You have a grossly distorted view of how private equity groups operate. Sounds mostly like liberal talking points. The key premise is to take companies in financial distress (losing money), then restructure to make the company healthy again (profitable) and then sell the business off. If not for intervention these companies are mostly doomed for failure. Bain did much more good than harm, but it is not a painless process.
Private equity is one thing; however,leveraged buyout is another, if a firm knowingly purchases a failing company and loads it with debt, fires all its employees, raids the pension funds, charges exhorbitant management fees, takes it public and then bankrupts it; well, who gets hurt?
The banks, the suppliers, the employees. Bain walks away with a profit.
Most of the time if a company is failing, the first thing that is looked at is the labor costs; however, it is usually the result of top heavy management costs. If you want to cut the fat, that's where you should start. The hundreds of VP's of departments that produce nothing.
LOL

Sparta, NJ

#773571 Oct 16, 2012
carol wrote:
Hey Homer, the scriptures have a lot to say about lying and theft too.
"You shall not steal."
"If a man steals an ox or a sheep...he must pay back five head of cattle for the ox and four sheep for the sheep."
"Do not lie. Do not deceive one another."
"Keep falsehood and lies far from me."
Think of redistribution as stealing and covering up a terror attack as lying.
If that helps put things into perspective....
Watch out! Lilybitch is writin' sumpin''bout eatin' shrimp. LOL
FOX-Jewish media n WARS

Chicago, IL

#773572 Oct 16, 2012
Romney = wars = American kids dead
And so it goes

Gering, NE

#773573 Oct 16, 2012
It's national boss day!!!

Those with jobs thank those greedy jerks for having a one.

In all seriousness, thank your bosses.
Homer

Bethlehem, PA

#773574 Oct 16, 2012
Jane Says wrote:
<quoted text>it will be like the exodus we've had in NY where for every taxpayer who leaves the state because of taxes, 2 nonpaying leeches move here.
for every wealthy person who easily relocates to a tax friendly place, two entitlement seeking illegals will be grantd amnesty to ensure future Democratic voters dependent on government.
Your 1 room studio apartment must be getting pretty crowded.
Homer

Bethlehem, PA

#773577 Oct 16, 2012
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
It's all about context, Homer, something that always trips up some of you.
This was said right after a rich man asked Jesus what he must do to be saved. Jesus was testing him to see where his treasure was. When the rich man proved he valued his treasure here on earth more than in heaven, Jesus used him as an example of how difficult it would be for those who put earthly wealth ahead of spiritual wealth as being "easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle" which, by the way, was a different term back then than what we think of today.
Bullcrap, the same applies today as it did 2,000 years ago. Quit defending the rich, I'm trying to eat my lunch.
Razors Edge

Oak Lawn, IL

#773579 Oct 16, 2012
dem wrote:
Hey gunner your guy has a 34% chance of winning the electoral vote.
Lucky you.
As they say in Chicago,The home of the POTUS

He got more excuses than a n***er going
to Jail!!!
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#773580 Oct 16, 2012
Romney’s Bush 2.0 Foreign Policy and America’s International Reputation

Another story Bret Stephens tells his “wavering voter” is that U.S. favorability around the world will not decline under Romney:

No, America will not once again become the global pariah it supposedly was under George W. Bush if Mr. Romney is elected.

It’s possible that Romney won’t wreck U.S. favorability and relationships with other governments as badly as Bush did during his tenure, but that isn’t saying much. The early signs haven’t been promising. Between his taking gratuitous, ill-informed swipes at European allies and generally ignoring allied governments the rest of the time (except when he wants to use them as props for his campaign), it seems unlikely that there will be many foreign governments eager to work with a Romney administration. At the popular level, many Europeans reportedly have no idea who Romney is, and those that do know tend to dislike him.

A lot of this will ultimately depend on what a Romney administration does. If Romney starts any new wars, that would almost certainly damage relationships with many rising powers. Would Romney bring back torture, as some of his advisers have reportedly suggested? If so, that will strain relationships with allied governments, especially those that are coping with the legacy of Bush-era torture on their territory. European governments aren’t interested in a more antagonistic U.S.-Russian relationship, and an administration that is even more uncritically supportive of everything Israel does is bound to be more unpopular worldwide.

Someone might object that this doesn’t really matter, but this isn’t simply a matter of popularity. High U.S. unfavorability in the Bush era was largely a reaction to the substance of Bush’s policies and the manner in which he carried them out. If an administration has little interest in diplomatic engagement and has little use for multilateral cooperation, its relationships with other states will inevitably suffer. If it tends to dictate terms to other states, that arrogance breeds resentments and tensions that aren’t necessary. If an administration assumes that American and allied interests are identical, it will tend to commit the U.S. to positions that aren’t in America’s interest or drag allies into conflicts that have nothing to do with them. Many states are going to bristle if the U.S. defines its “leadership” role in an anachronistic way that doesn’t take account of the changed international political landscape, and Romney’s understanding of American “leadership” is rooted in just such an outdated view.

It isn’t written anywhere that a Republican administration has to behave this way, but it is how Romney has campaigned so far. He shows every sign that he thinks this is the sort of “leadership” that the world supposedly craves. If elected, he will be in for a very rude shock when he discovers that an added dollop of resolve doesn’t have the effect he expects. One can imagine a Republican administration that values diplomacy as an important tool, exercises restraint when responding to international crises, and tries to improve relations with traditionally difficult or antagonistic states, but it would be an administration with very different foreign policy views from the one Romney’s will almost certainly have. Indeed, it would be the opposite of the Bush “version 2.0&#8243; foreign policy that Romney favors.

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/lariso...
Obamasharpton

Lakewood, NJ

#773581 Oct 16, 2012
FIRE THE GOP wrote:
<quoted text>
fred likes Romney.
ROMNEY is a Mormon.
Other Mormons arranged marriages to 12 year olds for their 50 year old male members deviant sxxxxxxx play?
FLDS.
do they pray to the same God on Uranus? Do they collect payment for the same fake Jesus? Is it just one big sxxxxxx cult for baby rapers?
You seem to be the Romney expert.
Why is Obama losing?
Homer

Bethlehem, PA

#773583 Oct 16, 2012
I do not think Jesus would be looking to add an additional 2 trillion dollars to our military budget.
Lily Boca Raton FL

Boca Raton, FL

#773584 Oct 16, 2012
And so it goes wrote:
Dems: The party that defends John Edwards, Bill Clinton, Dominic Strauss-Kahn,......
Explains why they think women are just lady parts.
No one defended John Edwards; every Democrat, including myself that I knew felt he should have dropped out when his wife was diagnosed with cancer. Did he fool people? Yes, I used to like him myself, but to think that he thought he could run for President with that scandal looming in the background in addition to his wife knowing about it as well and still campaigned for him was ludicrous.
I think Dominic Strauss Kahn was a cad and a womanizer, but he may have been set up by Sarkozy; nevertheless the way the police handled that case was just pure showmanship and unnecessary.
Bill Clinton should have told the people that that was his personal life and that's it.$50 million wasted on that was ridiculous. But you rightwingers always waste the peoples money on stupid hearings. Everyone knew Bill Clinton was a cad, so what? Who did he hurt besides his wife and daughter?
Homer

Bethlehem, PA

#773585 Oct 16, 2012
Romney is part of the problem and you people want to put him (the fox) in charge of guarding the henhouse.

Fine, you get what you deserve, just don't blame Homer.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 43 min Fair Game 46,709
Amy 9-20 53 min edogxxx 2
Abby 9-20 59 min Pippa 3
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 1 hr edogxxx 98,233
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 2 hr Scary Mooooooslim 178,073
The Official Vanessa Hudgens Chat Room (Aug '07) 2 hr mikayla tisdale 3,784
Word (Dec '08) 5 hr andet1987 4,719
•••
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••