Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story

Lakewood, NJ

#773503 Oct 16, 2012
Lily Boca Raton FL wrote:
<quoted text>
Greed is good: Gordon (Mitt) Gecko
Hoarding is good: Offshore accounts in Luxumbourg, Switzerland and the Cayman Islands
Envy: "But, but, but, it's our tuuurrrrnnnn" whined Ann Romney
That about wraps it up.
Romney/Ryan will wrap it up in November; the incompetent Obama and Giggles Biden will wrap it up in January, when they return to Chicago and Delaware for good.
And so it goes

Gering, NE

#773504 Oct 16, 2012
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>One good banana harvest can cause Cuba's GDP to spike__could you have made a stupider comparison
When a good banana harvest of a tiny island can out shine the US GDP rate is not a good sign.

Lakewood, NJ

#773505 Oct 16, 2012
Lily Boca Raton FL wrote:
<quoted text>
What a visual
Obama and family taking the bus back to Chicago in January. LOL

Orlando, FL

#773507 Oct 16, 2012
Peppy wrote:
<quoted text>
Not wrong at all Carol. I meant that the primary objective in business is to make a profit, they are not nannies for the public good. I hear people whine when they cut jobs or cease hiring, like it is their civic duty to operate at a loss rather than cut jobs. It's the polyanna thinking on the left that amuses me.
Oh, okay. In other words, they're just anti-capitalism and despise having an incentive to work.

Is this correct?

Newington, CT

#773508 Oct 16, 2012
keyedup wrote:
<quoted text>
every time you post
She said where, not when, Beavis.
And so it goes

Gering, NE

#773509 Oct 16, 2012
Homer wrote:
<quoted text>That's great. However that in no way relates to this -
"Again I say to you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God."
Matthew 19:24
All true Christians believe this.
"true" Christian =Old Scotsman fallacy


“It's always darkest 'fore dawn”

Since: Jul 08

When's dawn?

#773510 Oct 16, 2012
Lily Boca Raton FL wrote:
<quoted text>
What a visual
Well, that would explain the missing eighteen minutes...probably only thirty seconds of heavy breathing followed by seventeen and a half minutes of discussing Elvis' work as a DEA agent?

Lakewood, NJ

#773511 Oct 16, 2012
Lily Boca Raton FL wrote:
<quoted text>
More homoerotic child porno fantasies from the rightwing gun nut faction
Lyin' lily, still getting it off on her perverted sexual fantasies.

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#773512 Oct 16, 2012
And so it goes wrote:
Reporter: "Is Hillary to blame for Benghazi?" Obama: Silence. Kept walking.
Throws a woman under the buss and then does nothing to help her -that is Obama
Hillary Clinton and most women in the democrat party are always treated as doormats. According to this new situation-Hillary is now one of the most incompetent women in the world. Welcome to O'bama's war against women. Beautiful.

Since: May 11

Newville, PA

#773514 Oct 16, 2012
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
Prove it.
Show us the figures-then show us which of those FAILED OUT.
"29 billion for energy efficiency, of which $5 billion involved improvements in the homes and apartments of low-income households."

Romney is a liar.

He lied about the money being spent.

He lied what it was spent on & he lied about the number of companies no longer in business.

And you're an idiot for being so freaking uninformed that you had no idea of this.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#773515 Oct 16, 2012
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
I did not run away.
I proved you lied.
1) Ho Chi Mihn did not spend WWII in France
2) He spent it in Vietnam working with the US to fight the Japanese there.
You forgot to answer the post again. You continually run away from the fact that you've been indoctrinated with a fraudulent history invented by the Democrats to hide the fact that they collectively committed treason and joined the enemy during the Cold War.
You are well versed in the system of lies the Democrats invented about Vietnam.
Here's the truth:
Ho Chi Minh didn't become a concern until he asked the Soviet Union to help him in the war he started against the French after he went to Paris and asked them to come back to Veitnam. The Soviet Union used this as an opportunity to expand their influence during the Cold War. He didn't become significant until the Soviet Union was supporting his invasions of South Vietnam. If he never invaded South Vietnam, he'd be about as significant as some other small-pond bullshit dictator with too big of an ego in the world.
Listen carefully to this. This is the key ingredient to understanding the US involvement in Vietnam:
As the Soviet Union increased its involvement in the invasions of South Vietnam, the US increased its involvement in the defense of South Vietnam.
That means the US involvement didn't become significant until after Ho Chi Minh asked the Soviet Union to petition the UN to divide the country.
Let's say that again:
Ho Chi Minh asked the Soviet Union to petition the UN to divide the country.
Immediately after the UN authorized the creation of North Vietnam and South Vietnam, Ho Chi Minh began invading South Vietnam.
This is exactly like how the proxy war in Korea started.
Now, idiot, here's the key:
As the Soviet involvement in the communist invasions of South Vietnam increased, the US involvement in the defense of South Vietnam increased.
US involvement didn't become direct until AFTER the UN divided the country.
The Soviet Union involvement was already at a significant level prior to this. In fact, as I told your ignorant ass previously, the communist used Soviet weapons at the battle of Dien Bien Phu, which was before the Soviet Union petitioned the UN to divide Vietnam into two separate countries.
The Cold War is a global war.
The Soviet Union is engaged in Vietnam.
The communists divide Vietnam into two countries.
The communists begin invading free South Vietnam.
The US assists South Vietnam.
The strategy of the United States during the Cold War was not to abandon our allies and run away.
You seem to be ignorant of all of this.
As for Nixon winning the war, the war was all but over in 1970 when the NVA ran away to avoid destruction when the US forces entered the Parrot's Beak in 1970. They waited until US ground forces left Vietnam in 1971 to launch the largest communist invasion of the war. They were defeated by the South Vietnamese WITHOUT ASSISTANCE FROM US GROUND COMBAT UNITS.
Now, I want you to begin your next post with one of the lies in the system of lies the Democrats invented about Vietnam:
"The South Vietnamese wouldn't fight for themselves."
Then tell us about how the communists defeated the South Vietnamese in 1972 when they mounted the single largest invasion of the war, the Easter Offensive of 1972.
... got a problem, don't you....
It seems the single largest invasion of the war wasn't successful, and there is no history of any US ground combat units fighting against the communists.
Was it aliens from space that beat the communists?
Or, was it the South Vietnamese?
Now, tell us how the Democrat-controlled congress of 1973 helped the ally of the United States after they defeated a massive communist invasion during the Cold War.

Greensboro, NC

#773518 Oct 16, 2012
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
You are asking academics, union employees, and government workers to feel sorry for business leaders?
Why is it that you feel like businesses need anyone to feel sorry for them?
The people that make those business grow and make money are the people who put their blood and sweat into those businesses, the academics, union workers, receptionist, mechanics, clerks, laborors, basically - the front line. Why should they feel sorry for their boss who in 95% of businesses are making 6-7 figures a year?
I'm not saying that we make them into bad people, because that they are not. Do they need to pay higher payroll and taxes for their business, no. Should they be individually responsible for the income they earn? YES. Just like everyone else is, down to that receptionist.

Nothing to argue with here so let me just move on. Homer, you can have that donut if you want it.
Lily Boca Raton FL

Boca Raton, FL

#773519 Oct 16, 2012
Phil wrote:
Romney maintains that he won't make cuts to social security ($778 billion) or defense spending ($902 billion) and will continue to pay the interest on the national debt to avoid default ($225 billion). Just these three line items would cost $1.9 trillion, leaving just $564 billion left over for everything else. Health spending, Medicare and Medicaid, cost $864 billion this year, so Romney's proposed voucher system, which would replace President Obama's health care plan, would need to achieve $300 billion in annual savings for the budget to balance -- three times the amount expected.
But let's assume he solves the healthcare problems and is able to cut spending and maintain care (again a very generous assumption), there would still be nothing left over to pay for anything else. Not only would this entail unrealistic cuts in health care spending it also would require wiping out total federal support for education ($153 billion); all social welfare projects - including unemployment benefits ($452 billion), civil protection - including federal grants for local police & firefighters ($62 billion), all government agencies and regulators ($33.6 billion), transportation like interstate highway maintenance ($102 billion), and every other government program you can think of from stimulus funds to research grants ($199 billion). In this case, much of the $219 billion in saving the Romney campaign identified would ultimately not be necessary here because the government would essentially no longer exist.
President Obama promised to cut the budget deficit in half by the end of his first term in office – he missed his target by about $700 billion. While voters loyal to the President will probably excuse him for not shrinking the budget gap, Romney's core constituency won't be as forgiving. Unless the Romney campaign presents a clear vision of its plans, then many of those fiscally conservative Republicans might not bother showing up at the polls
Again, I may be wrong, but I do not think that any of the above matters. They'll vote for him anyway. Which republicans will stay home? Maybe the Christians who can't seem to bring themselves to vote for a Mormon. But then again, anyone can say anything and vote anyway.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#773520 Oct 16, 2012
keyedup wrote:
Jesus would turn the pentagon into housing for the homeless
Like the White House is today?(if everyone working there had to actually have a real job their entire lives)

Lakewood, NJ

#773521 Oct 16, 2012
leosnana wrote:
<quoted text>Having never attended churches that didn't include rattlesnakes in the service, many of the Grumpy Old Pricks tend to worship a Rambo or Dirty Harry Jesus--stabs the poor with machete crosses and carries a 100 magazine for his Glock 6...
Illigitimate babymama advice
Jane Says

New York, NY

#773522 Oct 16, 2012
Jane Says wrote:
It occurs to me that Tarzan had a sister named Jane, and she liked to stand down at the bottom of the tree looking up whenever Tarzan landed... coincidence?
Idle time is a Democrat's workshop.
And so it goes

Gering, NE

#773523 Oct 16, 2012
Women voters push Romney into the lead. It would seem that when told to vote with their ladyparts, women get all PMS-y and use their brains instead. It also appears, according to the article, that women are into weird things like budgeting, deficit reduction, and math.

What a surprise treating women like their vaginas only is not a popular concept.

Greensboro, NC

#773525 Oct 16, 2012
Lily Boca Raton FL wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly! Then they don't have to contend with safe working conditions, providing health insurance, retirement funds, minimum wages, raises, workmans compensation, sexual harrassment, 40 hour work weeks, overtime pay, income taxes, unemployment insurance, liability insurance...
Go to China! Have kids work 7 days a week and sleep at the factories with no breaks and 10-12 hour days for $20.00 a month!
Eff the American workers! Pure profit, that's the American Capitalist way! Ask Mitt! He'll give seminars on how to avoid all US taxes, filter the profits through Luxembourg and Switzerland, then to the Cayman Islands, and back here to filter through the Mormon Church! Elect Mitt Romney!
What a crock. Obama has done nothing to keep jobs from moving overseas. Nada, zilch, squat, zippo.

Only tax reform will stem the tide. Raising taxes on the rich will not.

Newington, CT

#773526 Oct 16, 2012
Phil wrote:
So Romney is letting some of the details out. He is capping deductions at $17,000. Who do you think that will hurt, a middle class person or a rich person?
It will cap people who have excess write-offs regardless of if they are wealthy or not.

We know you like to coin things to promote class warfare libtard, but not everyone is like you, thank god.

Since: May 11

Newville, PA

#773527 Oct 16, 2012
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>I say vast numbers of climatologists disagree with your assumption. See how that works. One thing I know about liberals-their main purpose is to change culture. If you tell the same lie enough-it becomes the truth. That is how culture is changed. William Ayers once said to me he is not concerned with electoral politics-he is about changing culture. Getting rid of those people that think outside the collective, of course he is a communist.
Father of Climatology Calls Manmade Global Warming Absurd
The Built-in Nonsense Detector:
Hardly a day goes by without a news article in the paper containing a reference to someone’s opinion about “Global Warming”. A quick search of the Internet uncovers literally hundreds of items about “Global Warming”. Issues of atmospheric science journals will normally have at least one article on climatic change, usually meaning “Global Warming” or some aspect thereof. Whole generations of graduate students have been trained to believe that we know the main answers about climate change and only have to work out the details.
Why then do I bother you by introducing this section with such a ludicrous title?
I do it because, as one who has spent many decades studying the subject professionally, I find that there are enormous gaps in the understanding of those making the most strident claims about climatic change. In order to read the news rationally, the educated reader needs a few keys to quickly sort the patently absurd from the possibly correct. I propose to supply some of those keys to give the reader at least a rudimentary nonsense detector.
So, your vast majority is one known skeptic?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 5 min Mike 98,850
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr Brian_G 49,182
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 2 hr Jacques Ottawa 181,797
Obama pardons 2 Illinoisans, including former M... 2 hr barefoot2626 16
Music Artists A to Z (Feb '14) 3 hr Bulls 359
anybody know Glen Musielak? Glentech? (Mar '13) 3 hr Cracker Jack 40
Song Titles Only (group/artist in parenthesis m... (Mar '10) 4 hr _Zoey_ 7,866
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 11:17 am PST

NBC Sports11:17AM
T.Y. Hilton is questionable, but they're not ruling him out
Bleacher Report11:28 AM
Jay Cutler Rumors: Latest Details, Speculation on Bears QB's Future
Bleacher Report11:39 AM
Complete Week 16 Preview for Indianapolis
NBC Sports12:33 PM
1 thing even Rahm can't fix: Da Bears - NBC Sports
NBC Sports 1:01 PM
Cowboys' Murray listed as questionable for Colts - NBC Sports