Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1236519 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#773512 Oct 16, 2012
And so it goes wrote:
Reporter: "Is Hillary to blame for Benghazi?" Obama: Silence. Kept walking.
Throws a woman under the buss and then does nothing to help her -that is Obama
Hillary Clinton and most women in the democrat party are always treated as doormats. According to this new situation-Hillary is now one of the most incompetent women in the world. Welcome to O'bama's war against women. Beautiful.

Since: May 11

Newville, PA

#773514 Oct 16, 2012
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
Prove it.
Transparency.
Show us the figures-then show us which of those FAILED OUT.
ROMNEY/RYAN 2012!
"29 billion for energy efficiency, of which $5 billion involved improvements in the homes and apartments of low-income households."

http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/04/90-...

Romney is a liar.

He lied about the money being spent.

He lied what it was spent on & he lied about the number of companies no longer in business.

And you're an idiot for being so freaking uninformed that you had no idea of this.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#773515 Oct 16, 2012
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
I did not run away.
I proved you lied.
1) Ho Chi Mihn did not spend WWII in France
2) He spent it in Vietnam working with the US to fight the Japanese there.
You forgot to answer the post again. You continually run away from the fact that you've been indoctrinated with a fraudulent history invented by the Democrats to hide the fact that they collectively committed treason and joined the enemy during the Cold War.
You are well versed in the system of lies the Democrats invented about Vietnam.
Here's the truth:
Ho Chi Minh didn't become a concern until he asked the Soviet Union to help him in the war he started against the French after he went to Paris and asked them to come back to Veitnam. The Soviet Union used this as an opportunity to expand their influence during the Cold War. He didn't become significant until the Soviet Union was supporting his invasions of South Vietnam. If he never invaded South Vietnam, he'd be about as significant as some other small-pond bullshit dictator with too big of an ego in the world.
Listen carefully to this. This is the key ingredient to understanding the US involvement in Vietnam:
As the Soviet Union increased its involvement in the invasions of South Vietnam, the US increased its involvement in the defense of South Vietnam.
That means the US involvement didn't become significant until after Ho Chi Minh asked the Soviet Union to petition the UN to divide the country.
Let's say that again:
Ho Chi Minh asked the Soviet Union to petition the UN to divide the country.
Immediately after the UN authorized the creation of North Vietnam and South Vietnam, Ho Chi Minh began invading South Vietnam.
This is exactly like how the proxy war in Korea started.
Now, idiot, here's the key:
As the Soviet involvement in the communist invasions of South Vietnam increased, the US involvement in the defense of South Vietnam increased.
US involvement didn't become direct until AFTER the UN divided the country.
The Soviet Union involvement was already at a significant level prior to this. In fact, as I told your ignorant ass previously, the communist used Soviet weapons at the battle of Dien Bien Phu, which was before the Soviet Union petitioned the UN to divide Vietnam into two separate countries.
The Cold War is a global war.
The Soviet Union is engaged in Vietnam.
The communists divide Vietnam into two countries.
The communists begin invading free South Vietnam.
The US assists South Vietnam.
The strategy of the United States during the Cold War was not to abandon our allies and run away.
You seem to be ignorant of all of this.
As for Nixon winning the war, the war was all but over in 1970 when the NVA ran away to avoid destruction when the US forces entered the Parrot's Beak in 1970. They waited until US ground forces left Vietnam in 1971 to launch the largest communist invasion of the war. They were defeated by the South Vietnamese WITHOUT ASSISTANCE FROM US GROUND COMBAT UNITS.
Now, I want you to begin your next post with one of the lies in the system of lies the Democrats invented about Vietnam:
"The South Vietnamese wouldn't fight for themselves."
Then tell us about how the communists defeated the South Vietnamese in 1972 when they mounted the single largest invasion of the war, the Easter Offensive of 1972.
... got a problem, don't you....
It seems the single largest invasion of the war wasn't successful, and there is no history of any US ground combat units fighting against the communists.
Was it aliens from space that beat the communists?
Or, was it the South Vietnamese?
Now, tell us how the Democrat-controlled congress of 1973 helped the ally of the United States after they defeated a massive communist invasion during the Cold War.
Peppy

Greensboro, NC

#773518 Oct 16, 2012
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
You are asking academics, union employees, and government workers to feel sorry for business leaders?
Why is it that you feel like businesses need anyone to feel sorry for them?
The people that make those business grow and make money are the people who put their blood and sweat into those businesses, the academics, union workers, receptionist, mechanics, clerks, laborors, basically - the front line. Why should they feel sorry for their boss who in 95% of businesses are making 6-7 figures a year?
I'm not saying that we make them into bad people, because that they are not. Do they need to pay higher payroll and taxes for their business, no. Should they be individually responsible for the income they earn? YES. Just like everyone else is, down to that receptionist.
Okay.

Nothing to argue with here so let me just move on. Homer, you can have that donut if you want it.
Lily Boca Raton FL

Boca Raton, FL

#773519 Oct 16, 2012
Phil wrote:
Romney maintains that he won't make cuts to social security ($778 billion) or defense spending ($902 billion) and will continue to pay the interest on the national debt to avoid default ($225 billion). Just these three line items would cost $1.9 trillion, leaving just $564 billion left over for everything else. Health spending, Medicare and Medicaid, cost $864 billion this year, so Romney's proposed voucher system, which would replace President Obama's health care plan, would need to achieve $300 billion in annual savings for the budget to balance -- three times the amount expected.
But let's assume he solves the healthcare problems and is able to cut spending and maintain care (again a very generous assumption), there would still be nothing left over to pay for anything else. Not only would this entail unrealistic cuts in health care spending it also would require wiping out total federal support for education ($153 billion); all social welfare projects - including unemployment benefits ($452 billion), civil protection - including federal grants for local police & firefighters ($62 billion), all government agencies and regulators ($33.6 billion), transportation like interstate highway maintenance ($102 billion), and every other government program you can think of from stimulus funds to research grants ($199 billion). In this case, much of the $219 billion in saving the Romney campaign identified would ultimately not be necessary here because the government would essentially no longer exist.
President Obama promised to cut the budget deficit in half by the end of his first term in office – he missed his target by about $700 billion. While voters loyal to the President will probably excuse him for not shrinking the budget gap, Romney's core constituency won't be as forgiving. Unless the Romney campaign presents a clear vision of its plans, then many of those fiscally conservative Republicans might not bother showing up at the polls
Again, I may be wrong, but I do not think that any of the above matters. They'll vote for him anyway. Which republicans will stay home? Maybe the Christians who can't seem to bring themselves to vote for a Mormon. But then again, anyone can say anything and vote anyway.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#773520 Oct 16, 2012
keyedup wrote:
Jesus would turn the pentagon into housing for the homeless
Like the White House is today?(if everyone working there had to actually have a real job their entire lives)
Obamasharpton

Lakewood, NJ

#773521 Oct 16, 2012
leosnana wrote:
<quoted text>Having never attended churches that didn't include rattlesnakes in the service, many of the Grumpy Old Pricks tend to worship a Rambo or Dirty Harry Jesus--stabs the poor with machete crosses and carries a 100 magazine for his Glock 6...
Illigitimate babymama advice
Jane Says

New York, NY

#773522 Oct 16, 2012
Jane Says wrote:
It occurs to me that Tarzan had a sister named Jane, and she liked to stand down at the bottom of the tree looking up whenever Tarzan landed... coincidence?
Idle time is a Democrat's workshop.
And so it goes

Gering, NE

#773523 Oct 16, 2012
Women voters push Romney into the lead. It would seem that when told to vote with their ladyparts, women get all PMS-y and use their brains instead. It also appears, according to the article, that women are into weird things like budgeting, deficit reduction, and math.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2...

What a surprise treating women like their vaginas only is not a popular concept.
Peppy

Greensboro, NC

#773525 Oct 16, 2012
Lily Boca Raton FL wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly! Then they don't have to contend with safe working conditions, providing health insurance, retirement funds, minimum wages, raises, workmans compensation, sexual harrassment, 40 hour work weeks, overtime pay, income taxes, unemployment insurance, liability insurance...
Go to China! Have kids work 7 days a week and sleep at the factories with no breaks and 10-12 hour days for $20.00 a month!
Eff the American workers! Pure profit, that's the American Capitalist way! Ask Mitt! He'll give seminars on how to avoid all US taxes, filter the profits through Luxembourg and Switzerland, then to the Cayman Islands, and back here to filter through the Mormon Church! Elect Mitt Romney!
What a crock. Obama has done nothing to keep jobs from moving overseas. Nada, zilch, squat, zippo.

Only tax reform will stem the tide. Raising taxes on the rich will not.
Jimmy

Newington, CT

#773526 Oct 16, 2012
Phil wrote:
So Romney is letting some of the details out. He is capping deductions at $17,000. Who do you think that will hurt, a middle class person or a rich person?
It will cap people who have excess write-offs regardless of if they are wealthy or not.

We know you like to coin things to promote class warfare libtard, but not everyone is like you, thank god.

Since: May 11

Newville, PA

#773527 Oct 16, 2012
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>I say vast numbers of climatologists disagree with your assumption. See how that works. One thing I know about liberals-their main purpose is to change culture. If you tell the same lie enough-it becomes the truth. That is how culture is changed. William Ayers once said to me he is not concerned with electoral politics-he is about changing culture. Getting rid of those people that think outside the collective, of course he is a communist.
Father of Climatology Calls Manmade Global Warming Absurd
The Built-in Nonsense Detector:
Hardly a day goes by without a news article in the paper containing a reference to someone’s opinion about “Global Warming”. A quick search of the Internet uncovers literally hundreds of items about “Global Warming”. Issues of atmospheric science journals will normally have at least one article on climatic change, usually meaning “Global Warming” or some aspect thereof. Whole generations of graduate students have been trained to believe that we know the main answers about climate change and only have to work out the details.
Why then do I bother you by introducing this section with such a ludicrous title?
I do it because, as one who has spent many decades studying the subject professionally, I find that there are enormous gaps in the understanding of those making the most strident claims about climatic change. In order to read the news rationally, the educated reader needs a few keys to quickly sort the patently absurd from the possibly correct. I propose to supply some of those keys to give the reader at least a rudimentary nonsense detector.
http://www.uncommondescent.com/off-topic/fath...
So, your vast majority is one known skeptic?
Lily Boca Raton FL

Boca Raton, FL

#773528 Oct 16, 2012
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Condoning irresponsible behavior and killing the unborn because of irresonsible behavior, taking from others against their will, slavery and stripping away people's dignity by making them envious and spiteful of others is modeling after Christ's teachings?
What church do you belong to?
How do you feel about garnering a profit from promoting irresponsible behavior? Bain was instrumental and responsible for the increase of teenage smokers. They did this in Russia too, creating a brand called Vogue, and even threw in a little free bracelet with each pack. Smoking increased considerably because of it; the profits were secreted out of Russia, through Luxembourg and then to the Cayman Islands.
The closing of the Sensata plant in Fremont after forcing its employees to suffer through the indignity of training their Chinese counterparts their jobs, packing up and shipping the plant to China, thereby causing loss of jobs and devastating the town would make anyone angry and rightfully so.
Romney moved the plant to China to benefit from slave labor.
Anything for a buck.
Oh, I almost forgot the last point; then there's Stericyle; what's wrong with making a buck or two grinding up fetuses? I mean, after all he didn't kill them right? You think he baptized them as Mormons first?
That's your Mitt.
And so it goes

Gering, NE

#773529 Oct 16, 2012
Obama won’t comment on whether or not Hillary is to blame for Benghazi.

Hey Obama you threw Rice under the bus, it is not like you are a man who objects to throwing women under the bus to protect yourself.
Homer

Bethlehem, PA

#773530 Oct 16, 2012
Lily Boca Raton FL wrote:
<quoted text>
Greed is good: Gordon (Mitt) Gecko
Hoarding is good: Offshore accounts in Luxumbourg, Switzerland and the Cayman Islands
Envy: "But, but, but, it's our tuuurrrrnnnn" whined Ann Romney
That about wraps it up.
They think if they will it all away to there kids then technically they are no longer rich and will be welcomed in to heaven with open arms.

Luke 6:20-21 Then he looked up at his disciples and said:'Blessed are you who are poor, for yours is the kingdom of God.
Pinot

Rancho Cucamonga, CA

#773531 Oct 16, 2012
Phil wrote:
So Romney is letting some of the details out. He is capping deductions at $17,000. Who do you think that will hurt, a middle class person or a rich person?
Source, with context, please.

Since: May 11

Newville, PA

#773532 Oct 16, 2012
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
You forgot to answer the post again. You continually run away from the fact that you've been indoctrinated with a fraudulent history invented by the Democrats to hide the fact that they collectively committed treason and joined the enemy during the Cold War.
You are well versed in the system of lies the Democrats invented about Vietnam.
Here's the truth:
Ho Chi Minh didn't become a concern until he asked the Soviet Union to help him in the war he started against the French after he went to Paris and asked them to come back to Veitnam. The Soviet Union used this as an opportunity to expand their influence during the Cold War. He didn't become significant until the Soviet Union was supporting his invasions of South Vietnam. If he never invaded South Vietnam, he'd be about as significant as some other small-pond bullshit dictator with too big of an ego in the world.
Listen carefully to this. This is the key ingredient to understanding the US involvement in Vietnam:
As the Soviet Union increased its involvement in the invasions of South Vietnam, the US increased its involvement in the defense of South Vietnam.
That means the US involvement didn't become significant until after Ho Chi Minh asked the Soviet Union to petition the UN to divide the country.
Let's say that again:
Ho Chi Minh asked the Soviet Union to petition the UN to divide the country.
Immediately after the UN authorized the creation of North Vietnam and South Vietnam, Ho Chi Minh began invading South Vietnam.
This is exactly like how the proxy war in Korea started.
Now, idiot, here's the key:
As the Soviet involvement in the communist invasions of South Vietnam increased, the US involvement in the defense of South Vietnam increased.
US involvement didn't become direct until AFTER the UN divided the country.
The Soviet Union involvement was already at a significant level prior to this. In fact, as I told your ignorant ass previously, the communist used Soviet weapons at the battle of Dien Bien Phu, which was before the Soviet Union petitioned the UN to divide Vietnam into two separate countries.
The Cold War is a global war.
The Soviet Union is engaged in Vietnam.
The communists divide Vietnam into two countries.
The communists begin invading free South Vietnam.
The US assists South Vietnam.
The strategy of the United States during the Cold War was not to abandon our allies and run away.
You seem to be ignorant of all of this.
As for Nixon winning the war, the war was all but over in 1970 when the NVA ran away to avoid destruction when the US forces entered the Parrot's Beak in 1970. They waited until US ground forces left Vietnam in 1971 to launch the largest communist invasion of the war. They were defeated by the South Vietnamese WITHOUT ASSISTANCE FROM US GROUND COMBAT UNITS.
Now, I want you to begin your next post with one of the lies in the system of lies the Democrats invented about Vietnam:
"The South Vietnamese wouldn't fight for themselves."
Then tell us about how the communists defeated the South Vietnamese in 1972 when they mounted the single largest invasion of the war, the Easter Offensive of 1972.
... got a problem, don't you....
It seems the single largest invasion of the war wasn't successful, and there is no history of any US ground combat units fighting against the communists.
Was it aliens from space that beat the communists?
Or, was it the South Vietnamese?
Now, tell us how the Democrat-controlled congress of 1973 helped the ally of the United States after they defeated a massive communist invasion during the Cold War.
Look, you were wrong & I told you where.

I have nothing more to say about it. You can believe what you want about the Vietnam War. It was a dumb waste of human life that could have been avoided if we had only given Mihn a chance. He could have united Vietnam & not have had to seek help from the Communists.
LOL

Sparta, NJ

#773535 Oct 16, 2012
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Evidently you can't recognize a racial slur.
I can agree or disagree with any of those people without using a slur.
Something you pathetic racist friends seem to have trouble with on Topix.
Hi-Ya Da-Vey Putz,

Can you tell the difference between a black person and a n***er? I can - Chris Rock taught me.

Dr. Huxtable vs Willie Horton

Oh, and yeah, why do you think the word w***ers was invented?

Parasites!

LOL
Homer

Bethlehem, PA

#773536 Oct 16, 2012
Peppy wrote:
<quoted text>
What a crock. Obama has done nothing to keep jobs from moving overseas. Nada, zilch, squat, zippo.
Only tax reform will stem the tide. Raising taxes on the rich will not.
Well it sure didn't stop you Mr. I'm-just-back-from-visiting-my -factory-in-the-DR, now did it?

Since: May 11

Newville, PA

#773539 Oct 16, 2012
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
So how would you categorize racial slurs against black Republicans, i.e. "Uncle Tom" and "Oreo cookie"?
And these were just some of the nicer ones.
I never condoned any of it.

I wouldn't call oreo & Uncle Tom as racist. It refers more to one that has seemingly abandoned his race.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Last word + 2 (Mar '12) 16 min Red_Forman 899
Word (Dec '08) 17 min Red_Forman 5,255
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 1 hr Ratloder 70,045
@POTUS: Obama unveils new TWITTER account 2 hr Yes-I do 5
who's responsible?..........................i g... 2 hr 15 believe it 15 1
St Xavier Sex Scandal 3 hr Sandy 1
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 3 hr Earthling-1 53,604
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 4 hr FastandFurious 189,897
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]