Keep it up slug, I really enjoy watching you and your fellow slugs make fools of yourselves regarding the attack of the US consulate and nearby CIA base.<quoted text>
You must have missed the part when Lamb, woman in charge of security, denied that refusal of security for Libya was due to budgetary concerns.
*sigh* the uninformed.
Stop playing politics this was a major failure that resulted in the death of an ambassador despite repeated request to maintain at minimum the current security that was there in August. The St Dept removed them.
The Brits closed their Benghazi mission in June after the ambassadors motorcade was attacked leaving their weapons and vehicles at the US consulate. The weapons are currently described as missing and/or unaccounted for. In other words the Brits knew that Benghazi was extremely dangerous and hauled azz leaving the US as the last Western diplomatic mission in Eastern Libya.
Why was the US ambassador inside the consulate building alone and unguarded? Was the consulate the "main" target or was the annex housing CIA agents and operatives the main target.
How is the State Department responsible for providing security for the CIA___is the CIA incapable of requesting additional security? It is after all providing the intel.