Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1264093 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Lily Boca Raton FL

Boca Raton, FL

#771604 Oct 14, 2012
And so it goes wrote:
The Obama team still won't answer why they blamed the Benghazi attacks on a video instead of terrorism.
Maybe you should write them a letter; I'm sure they will provide you with top security bulletins.
FIRE THE GOP

Lillington, NC

#771605 Oct 14, 2012
Are you asking me dumbffffck?

I just filled up for $3.50

A refinery outages saw a temporary rise?

Global warming?

How about staying on topic.

Mitt Romney Serial Liar

Republicans: we borrowed 70% of the debt, now we cry about it non stop?

They borrowed to hand rich guys $50 million each.

Know this truth: Republicans ruined the USA!

fred? Just another dumbffffck!

---------
fred wrote:
<quoted text>
Why is gas $6? To transfer political power from oil to green energy cronies? Nahhhhhhh
Global warming stopped 16 years ago, reveals Met Office report quietly released...
Sunday, October 14, 2012
Daily Mail ^| October 13, 2012 | By David Rose
The world stopped getting warmer almost 16 years ago, according to new data released last week. The figures, which have triggered debate among climate scientists, reveal that from the beginning of 1997 until August 2012,there was no discernible rise in aggregate global temperatures

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Conroe, TX

#771606 Oct 14, 2012
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Marines stationed at US embassies serve in the role of bellhops__if the Benghazi mission needed security it would have had real security. Where was Lt Colonel Andy Wood's crackerjack special forces team during the attack on the consulate building?
NUTS, CLUELESS, FUNNY.

... bellhops from hell, wouldn't you say?

They did a nice job of carrying baggage in Fallujah, don't you think?
;-)

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#771607 Oct 14, 2012
FIRE THE GOP wrote:
Are you asking me dumbffffck?
I just filled up for $3.50

---------
<quoted text>
You can't find that price anywhere in California.
Lily Boca Raton FL

Boca Raton, FL

#771608 Oct 14, 2012
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Marines stationed at US embassies serve in the role of bellhops__if the Benghazi mission needed security it would have had real security. Where was Lt Colonel Andy Wood's crackerjack special forces team during the attack on the consulate building?
Super article in this months Vanity Fair:

The Hunt For “Geronimo”

President Obama saw it as a “50–50” proposition. Admiral Bill McRaven, mission commander, knew something would go wrong. So how did the raid that killed bin Laden get green-lighted? In an adaptation from his new book, Mark Bowden weaves together accounts from Obama and top decision-makers for the full story behind the daring operation.

By Mark Bowden

http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/2012/11/in...

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#771609 Oct 14, 2012
EasyEed wrote:
<quoted text>
"re3al dumb"
You just keep getting dumber and sicker. You have nothing of note to post so you attack some one's mother. You are a real man. Wrong, you are a real stoopid sick.
Peace
KMA
Standing O, Easy!
And so it goes

Gering, NE

#771610 Oct 14, 2012
Osama Bin Laden is being dragged out and propped up so much, it’s like Obama Weekend At Bernies Campaign.

When reality becomes a parody.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Conroe, TX

#771611 Oct 14, 2012
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
Such a tired old song.
Like I keep pointing out, you will not find right wing fiction in a college textbook other than in a journalism class about right wing fiction. So play that song all you want, but like most obscure genres, it's a one hit wonder.
And it seems that 2001 to 2006 have been erased from conservative memory. By necessity of course.
How about you remind us of those numbers. Why don't you post the numbers from 2000 to 2006, then post the numbers from 2007 to today.
.... <waiting>
Then, compare the numbers you find to the numbers in the post you ignorantly responded to. You may need to reference the exact numbers I posted without taking the time to page back and look at each page. I'll help you. Here's the post again with real numbers.
How about you answer, and this time put some real numbers in your post.
... we'll get to the FACT that the people the Democrats call "rich" don't even have enough money to pay for the Democrats' hippy pipe dream Marxist socialism plan if you taxed them at 100 percent, and you actually have to tell the American people who else has to pay for the Democrats' plan later.

Now, just answer the post with real numbers.
... dupe.

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#771612 Oct 14, 2012
Lily Boca Raton FL wrote:
<quoted text>
Super article in this months Vanity Fair:
The Hunt For “Geronimo”
President Obama saw it as a “50–50” proposition. Admiral Bill McRaven, mission commander, knew something would go wrong. So how did the raid that killed bin Laden get green-lighted? In an adaptation from his new book, Mark Bowden weaves together accounts from Obama and top decision-makers for the full story behind the daring operation.
By Mark Bowden
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/2012/11/in...
"The reported use of "Geronimo" as a codeword in the operation that led to Osama bin Laden's killing has angered some native Americans and threatens to become an embarrassment for the Obama administration."

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Conroe, TX

#771613 Oct 14, 2012
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
2007. Hmmmmmm.....
Isn't that the same year the Democrats took full control of the purse strings of the US government? Isn't that the same year the Democrats were given a declining 0.16 (that's zero point one six) trillion dollar deficit before they exploded it by ONE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED PERCENT to 2.4 trillion dollars? Isn't that the same year the Democrats were given a 5 trillion dollar debt before they more than tripled it to 16 trillion dollars?
Isn't that the same year the Democrats took control of all oversight of the financial system that, after 2 years of oversight by the Democrats, collapsed our economy?
Isn't that the same year the Democrats began spewing a system of lies about the economy that they continue to spew to this very day?
... and you expect anyone with any sense to give the Democrats any credibility when you make ludicrous accusations like this....
FIRE THE GOP

Lillington, NC

#771614 Oct 14, 2012
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
You can't find that price anywhere in California.
Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!! Dooooofus!!!

Keep up!

A refinery outage caused a TEMPORARY supply problem in one state!!!

Still, your boss Mitt Romney can't fix schitttt!

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Conroe, TX

#771615 Oct 14, 2012
FIRE THE GOP wrote:
Are you asking me dumbffffck?
I just filled up for $3.50
A refinery outages saw a temporary rise?
Global warming?
How about staying on topic.
Mitt Romney Serial Liar
Republicans: we borrowed 70% of the debt, now we cry about it non stop?
They borrowed to hand rich guys $50 million each.
Know this truth: Republicans ruined the USA!
fred? Just another dumbffffck!
---------
<quoted text>
Please excuse me if I confuse you with facts.
The Democrats took full control of the purse strings of government when the deficit was 0.16 (that's zero point one six) trillion dollars, and the debt was 5 trillion dollars.
Please tell us what the deficit and debt grew to under control of the Democrats.

Thank you.

Since: Feb 08

Spokane, WA

#771616 Oct 14, 2012
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't read every post.
But hey, glad t see you are eager to find excuses for the right whiner racists f*cks that post here.
"real dumb"
And getting dumber. Hard to believe.
You slur and demean women. You are one of the biggest racistfucks on this thread. You are a sorry sack of manure.
Peace
KMA

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Conroe, TX

#771617 Oct 14, 2012
FIRE THE GOP wrote:
<quoted text>
Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!! Dooooofus!!!
Keep up!
A refinery outage caused a TEMPORARY supply problem in one state!!!
Still, your boss Mitt Romney can't fix schitttt!
ummmm.... Quantative Easing counterfeiting US dollars causing the value of the dollar to decrease while the value of oil remained constant, thus purchase of a barrel of oil requires more dollars?
Why don't you compare the rate Ben Bernanke is counterfeiting US dollars with the rate of change in the number of US dollars required to buy a barrel of oil, idiot.

... didn't mean to confuse you with facts.
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#771618 Oct 14, 2012
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
NUTS, CLUELESS, FUNNY.
... bellhops from hell, wouldn't you say?
They did a nice job of carrying baggage in Fallujah, don't you think?
;-)
As a rule I don't respond to fkstick, lying lunatics like you__but the Marine MSG was not assigned to combat duty in in Iraq.

The Marine Security Guards are are nice smooth faced boys who iron well along with shining that brass and those boots. They are enlisted men and commanded by enlisted men__the MSG is the only US Marine group where an enlisted man is referred to as commander. They do not carry weapons or ammo and don't even have fancy stuff on hand or even nearby, they're fkn bellboys pal__deal with it.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Conroe, TX

#771621 Oct 14, 2012
Ind 3 Jets 0
Jets need to give Tebow a full-time job.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#771622 Oct 14, 2012
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>Now, just answer the post with real numbers.
... dupe.
Blaming Obama for George W. Bush’s Policies

Bruce Bartlett

....Much of the Romney paper is taken up with reviewing the poor economic recovery, which is undeniable. Reading it, however, one is left with the impression that the recession occurred on President Obama’s watch because of policies he is responsible for.

Just to be clear, the National Bureau of Economic Research, the private research group that determines the starting and ending points of recessions, says the latest economic downturn began in December 2007 and ended in June 2009.

The report points to various causes of the recession as if they all just happened without the responsibility of one party or administration. As the report says,“No single party or administration is responsible for structural headwinds to growth.”

That is probably true. But what about cyclical changes in growth and unemployment? These are the ups and downs in the economy that occur around the trend rate of growth, which is determined by structural factors, as the report correctly asserts.

Factors affecting the business cycle are necessarily short-term in nature. They include Federal Reserve policy; international capital flows; industry-specific policies such as those affecting housing; fiscal policy and many others.

Such factors must necessarily have occurred after the previous recession, which ended in November 2001, according to the N.B.E.R. That’s the nature of business-cycle analysis; once a previous recession ends, the cyclical factors that gave rise to it are assumed to have been purged. The next recession will necessarily result from those factors that postdate the previous recession.

So whatever caused the 2007-9 recession had to have resulted from policies that the Bush administration was responsible for – either by initiating them or failing to act against them.

Space prohibits a full discussion of these issues, but certainly one factor had to be the squandering of budget surpluses that resulted from the policies of the Bill Clinton administration and their replacement by huge deficits under President Bush.

Mr. Bush inherited a budget surplus of $236 billion from Mr. Clinton in 2000, which fell to $128 billion in 2001. By 2002, the federal government ran a budget deficit of $158 billion, which rose to $377 billion in 2003, and $413 billion in 2004. The deficit fell to $318 billion in 2005,$248 billion in 2006, and $161 billion in 2007, then shot up to $459 billion in 2008.

It should be noted as well that the fiscal 2009 budget was submitted to Congress by Mr. Bush in January 2008 and took effect on Oct. 1 of that year – almost four months before President Obama took office.

Thus the government was running historically large budget deficits long after the end of the 2001 recession. As I have previously documented, these deficits resulted to a large extent from legislated tax cuts during the Bush years.

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/14/...

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#771623 Oct 14, 2012
You know it's bad when...

"Romney Gains 8 Points On Faltering Obama In California

Obama had led by 22 points in the CBS 5 tracking poll released four weeks ago. Obama now leads by only 14 points, an 8-point improvement for Romney. At the same time, the poll found U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s support for her re-election bid remained largely unchanged, month-on-month, suggesting that the erosion in Democratic support is not across-the-board, but contained to Obama."

Since: Feb 08

Spokane, WA

#771624 Oct 14, 2012
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
You said this "our boy Obama ......."
Now, evidently, your racism is so inbred into you that you don't even know you are doing it.
"real dumb"
Dumb, dumber, dumbest. You fit the bill. The poster referred to president nobama as a boy, because he is not man enough to be an effective president.
Peace
KMA
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#771625 Oct 14, 2012
It is also important to note, though one will not find it in the economists’ report, that much of the legislated increase in the deficit under President Obama resulted from tax cuts. According to the Congressional Budget Office, tax cuts in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 reduced revenues by $253 billion between 2009 and 2011 – about a third of the budgetary cost of the stimulus package.

Further tax cuts agreed to by President Obama in 2010 added another $354 billion to the deficit in 2011 and a similar amount this year. Thus about $1 trillion of the deficit since 2009 came from tax cuts.

Most economists believe that running large deficits during cyclical upturns is a bad idea because they overstimulate the economy when it’s not needed and thus sow the seeds of economic imbalances that lead to subsequent recessions. One can argue that George W. Bush’s budgetary profligacy was a major cause of the 2007-9 recession – the longest and deepest of the postwar era.

Even if one isn’t willing to go that far, it is apparent that had Mr. Bush reduced budget deficits rather than enlarging them through tax cuts and spending increases for wars, pork-barrel projects and a new entitlement program (Medicare Part D), the federal government would have had more fiscal ammunition available to fight the recession that President Obama inherited from President Bush.

Because of the large deficits Mr. Bush bequeathed Mr. Obama – on Jan. 8, 2009, the C.B.O. projected a deficit for the year of $1.3 trillion that didn’t include any Obama policies – Congress was deeply reluctant to enact a stimulus larger than $787 billion, even though President Obama’s economic advisers thought that one at least twice as large was necessary to turn the economy around. The opposition of every Republican to the 2009 stimulus was a major factor in its inadequate size.

By way of analogy, suppose you go to your doctor with an illness. He correctly diagnoses it and prescribes the right medicine, but for some reason you are given a dosage only half as large as required. The medicine was enough to improve your condition, but not enough to cure you. You remain sick although you feel better and will remain so until you finally get a full dosage of the proper medicine or your body is able to cure itself, which might take years.

Note that in this analogy the medicine was properly prescribed; only the dosage was wrong. It would be incorrect to blame the medicine because you are still sick.

The Republican economists nevertheless blame the medicine itself for the failure of the economy to respond to President Obama’s prescription.

But it was Republican policies during the Bush administration that brought on the sickness and Republicans in Congress who have denied the economy an adequate dosage of the cure. Now they want to implicitly blame President Obama for causing the recession and the failure of stimulus to fix the problem, asserting that fiscal stimulus is per se ineffective.

There is a word for this: chutzpah.

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/14/...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 4 min jimi-yank 54,339
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 12 min Jacques Ottawa 194,650
News Lollapalooza day two marked by angst, apathy-an... 1 hr chimpcago 1
Please SUBSCRIBE to my YOUTUBE channel for awes... 3 hr The Cloud 1
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 4 hr CrunchyBacon 100,287
News Fatal heat wave 20 years ago changed Chicago's ... 7 hr No8isClassic 8
Can't these people do better? 7 hr Magonigol 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages