Barack Obama, our next President

[fetch almighty]

Jane Says wrote:

<quoted text>If Obama is defending Big Bird it must mean Big Bird's really green, too big to fail or an illegal alien. Or, since Big Bird usually acts clueless, a stand-in for Obama in the next debate.

Big Bird would be an improvement. And Michelle can give us the run down on what Big Bird can eat. She was out campaigning for Bird Big yesterday also. What a joke these democrats are.

[RealDave]

shinningelectr0n wrote:

<quoted text>
Using an extremely popular children's show character for political gain makes a good entry for Socialist scum to lie to the masses. Liberal sycophants have forever been working stealthily with childhood propaganda. This is nothing new. Another page of the same dirty book.

Romney brought it up. It must be really important. It was the only specific he mentioned in the debate.

Mitt Romney wants to deny poorer rural areas watching one of the most successful educational programs ever.

[sonicfilter]

Big Bird is Richer than Romney
http://nation.foxnews.com/big-bird/2012/10/09...

Mitt Romney is worth $250 million. Why so little?

No surprise, Romney has not made it easy to figure out the precise size of his fortune, and any inferences drawn from the available data are necessarily speculative....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/mitt-r...

Speculation becomes fact in FOXbot land. As usual.

[fetch almighty]

sonicfilter wrote:

<quoted text>
Defending Romney's lies will have him feeling like he's in chains.

Biden has a choice to run on O'bama's record. ROTFLMAO. Big Bird is pissed. It is time for Big Bird and Biden to spread their wings and fly on their own---right out of the White House.

[Chicagoan by Birth]

sonicfilter wrote:

<quoted text>
Defending Romney's lies will have him feeling like he's in chains.

No, Ryan will take "Plugs" to school on budgetary matters. He knows it inside and out. Biden as lived in the Beltway for too many years, 29 is probably close, he doesn't have a clue what goes on outside?

[TheIndependentMa jority]

Homer wrote:

<quoted text>The president showed decent leadership and lost the debate. Romney turned the debate into The O'Reily Factor. If they won't play by the rules, why should Joe?

Impressionable young minds.

I don't think Ryan is the type to play nasty anyway, he seems quite respectful of others, so maybe it'll work out okay.

Remember that OLD quip, it's not "win or lose"...O did himself a favor, by playing decently. Good for him!!

(now if he could just get the lemming herd pack minions armed w/phat crayons-- out of the butts of ignorance-that Big Bird stuff really is pathetic.)

ROMNEY/RYAN 2012!

[sonicfilter]

But some critics said that the foreign policy themes that Romney enunciated relied heavily on repeated yet vague assertions that he’ll be a better leader than Obama. Also, they said, his actual policies hew fairly closely to existing US positions.

As to US relations with Israel, it does seem clear that a Romney administration would take a different tack, in that Romney vows to align the US more closely with Israeli interests.“The world must never see any daylight between our two nations,” he said.

On Syria, however, Romney said he’d work with allies to make sure rebels who “share our values” get the arms they need. That’s pretty much what’s going on now, though Romney might urge the transfer of more powerful weapons.

In Afghanistan, Romney hinted that Obama had pulled out troops too fast, but added,”I will pursue a real and successful transition to Afghan security forces by the end of 2014.”

That’s the current Afghanistan timetable.

As for Iran, Romney has said that it should not get nuclear weapons capability. The Obama administration has been vaguer about exactly what line Iran should not cross. But Romney did not rattle sabers here, saying only that he’d impose new sanctions on Iran and tighten ones already in place.

Those are the tools the current administration says it will rely on for the time being to try to curb Tehran.

Both Obama and Romney have the same foreign policy goals, writes Daniel Drezner, a blogger for Foreign Policy magazine. They want a peaceful, stable Middle East, for example. That’s unsurprising.

It’s in the means where they should differ.“And – in op-ed after op-ed, in speech after speech – Romney either elides the means altogether, mentions means that the Obama administration is already using, or just says the word ‘resolve’ a lot,” Mr. Drezner writes.“That’s insufficient.”

http://news.yahoo.com/romney-foreign-policy-d...

[fetch almighty]

sonicfilter wrote:

<quoted text>
So how does it feel knowing that Mitt is an Obama foreign policy clone?

While O'bama is on Sesame Street, President Romney is ready to lead the free world on day one.

[sonicfilter]

Obama and Romney: different rhetoric but foreign policies are the same

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/oct/08/u...

[TheIndependentMa jority]

fetch almighty wrote:

<quoted text>So you are saying the package was toxic. Are you kidding me? It was a compounding pharmacy. O'bama buried the regulating of them to keep the drugs cheap. Meanwhile, the company shipped across state lines, which further opened the door for the FDA to take action. The FDA did nothing.

"big pharma pandering"
SHAME ON THE FDA-more government FAILURE!

(Duh A Vey thinks all Ford (NO bail outs for Fail outs required) employees were yewneyun too though so....)

ROMNEY/RYAN 2012!

[fetch almighty]

sonicfilter wrote:

Big Bird is Richer than Romney
http://nation.foxnews.com/big-bird/2012/10/09...
Mitt Romney is worth $250 million. Why so little?
No surprise, Romney has not made it easy to figure out the precise size of his fortune, and any inferences drawn from the available data are necessarily speculative....
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/mitt-r...
Speculation becomes fact in FOXbot land. As usual.

I laughed when I heard the liberals saying this yesterday--now Romney isn't rich enough to be President? Do you libs listen to your stupidity???
The only reason O'bama has any money at all is because Moochelle asked William Ayers to write his first book. ROTFLMAO.
O'bama--you didn't write that!

[LOL]

X Obama Supporter wrote:

<quoted text>
He actually told by what standard he would use to decide what to cut, but gave Big Bird as part of an EXAMPLE of the cuts to fund PBS because the moderator was from PBS and so it was a good time to mention it and a perfect example to give.
It took those brilliant Obama campaign thinkers to grab onto Big Bird and run with it. Of course what else can they do after the epic fail of Obama and embarressing debate performance.
The ONLY thing libs had to hold on to was the playground mentality of saying "you lied, and you want to kill Big Bird".
I can't imagine the pride you must have knowing that your perferred candidate's entire campaign has withered down to nothing more than acting like they are in third grade and lost a race at recess. Beaming, I bet you're just beaming!!!! And because you really are and the mentality of the entire progressive voter population is to be beaming with pride over Obama is EXACTLY why you are getting your ass' handed to you in this election. Our country is in far to bad of a condition to be bothered with the likes of Big Bird, and Big Bird even knows it, that is why even he is telling Obama's campaign to leave him out of it.

<sounds of enthusiastic applause>

[LOL]

Shiny Bauble of the Week: Big Bird ... LOL

Let the "Angry Negro" defend what has NOT accomplished during the last 4 years.

Why is an American Ambassador dead? Why the cover-up for political points? Huh, Bammy, huh?

[TheIndependentMa jority]

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>
Romney brought it up. It must be really important. It was the only specific he mentioned in the debate.
Mitt Romney wants to deny poorer rural areas watching one of the most successful educational programs ever.

Now pay attention DUH A VEY-

The next time one of you lemming herd pack bootlicker bobbleheads LIE and try to spin off the LIES--remember-there are SOME actual viable cadidates w/ REAL ideas, to steady out the economy, and steer it back to free market supply and demand, rather than givverment dependency and drain, again, by cutting WASTEFULNESS where it would be just fine to do so.

Remember THAT--next time you crave to holler "lies...they're liars" okay?

ROMNEY/RYAN 2012!
REAL FISCAL Experience FOR all of America again!!

[Homer]

TheIndependentMajority wrote:

<quoted text>
Impressionable young minds.
I don't think Ryan is the type to play nasty anyway, he seems quite respectful of others, so maybe it'll work out okay.
Remember that OLD quip, it's not "win or lose"...O did himself a favor, by playing decently. Good for him!!
(now if he could just get the lemming herd pack minions armed w/phat crayons-- out of the butts of ignorance-that Big Bird stuff really is pathetic.)
ROMNEY/RYAN 2012!

Ryan is a career politician, I'm sure he has smooth talking down to a science. At least you recognized that the president acted decently. Your hero Romney brought Big Bird into the discussion.

[LOL]

fetch almighty wrote:

<quoted text>I laughed when I heard the liberals saying this yesterday--now Romney isn't rich enough to be President? Do you libs listen to your stupidity???
The only reason O'bama has any money at all is because Moochelle asked William Ayers to write his first book. ROTFLMAO.
O'bama--you didn't write that!

Looks like they're down to the bottom of the barrel and only hearing the echo. LOL

Are Americas stupid enough to re-elect this failure? If so, America deserves to fail.

[Chicagoan by Birth]

Homer wrote:

<quoted text>Paul Ryan, career politican?

Guess he took lessons from 'Plugs'? Although if... Ryan is a career politician he has more experience in budgetary matters than 'career politician' Biden? Don't believe I want 83 yr.old Biden receiving the 'second call' at 3am, they wouldn't be able to wake him up?

[TheIndependentMa jority]

Chicagoan by Birth wrote:

<quoted text>No, Ryan will take "Plugs" to school on budgetary matters. He knows it inside and out. Biden as lived in the Beltway for too many years, 29 is probably close, he doesn't have a clue what goes on outside?

I kinda feel sorry for Uncle Joe... the territory is, well..not exactly EPA friendly ...even WAY less so these days!(even if it is demo bootlicking soft)

Poor guy lol.

ROMNEY/RYAN 2012!

[LOL]

Homer wrote:

<quoted text>Ryan is a career politician, I'm sure he has smooth talking down to a science. At least you recognized that the president acted decently. Your hero Romney brought Big Bird into the discussion.

Yep, Greaseball, 42-year old Ryan will have a tough time going up against Biden who has only 40 years in government ... never had a real job in his life ... like you. LOL

[Homer]

Chicagoan by Birth wrote:

<quoted text>No, Ryan will take "Plugs" to school on budgetary matters. He knows it inside and out. Biden as lived in the Beltway for too many years, 29 is probably close, he doesn't have a clue what goes on outside?

Well, he did vote for every piece of spending legislation put forth when Bush was in office and voted to raise the debt ceiling as well so suppose he does know about budgets.

During 14 years in Congress, Ryan consistently and loyally voted to increase the debt. He did not take political risks or buck his party to combat “our exploding deficits” then. Instead, he voted for 65 different pieces of legislation to expand the debt. He requested earmarks.(Another pricey problem that he now opposes.)

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0812/803...

A leopard doesn't change his spots.