Hmm, I notice from your above post that we have LMAO at the beginning and LMAO at the end. What's this, Dale, er, LRS? Should you not thread carefully and avoid juggling the two in the same time frame?<quoted text>
LMAO! Doogie!!!! You're the one talking about the goal in Iraq, not me. I made a simple comment that you can't understand. Simple as that. See, my statement was absolutely true but that doesn't give Doogie anything to argue about. So, he must create another point and hope no one catches on. Sorry Doogie, you lose! However, if you wish, argue this: One country invades another, you with me, so far? Now, depending on what the invading country hopes to accomplish, will be pivotal in how long their mission lasts. There's a big old brick for ya, get to gnawing, Doogie! LMAO!!!
As to your 8 years of uselessly killing American boys in Iraq, and maiming American boys, and killing Iraqis civilians mostly, injuring scores, do take a deep breath and tell us, and yes, we know Saddam was a S.O.B. tyrant-killer, tell us if Iraq is now better off and, most of all, what was the reason for the U.S.'s invasion , the exit strategy and goals. Start with that and, oh, BTW, the more you argue swinishly, oafishly, ignorantly, filthily , coarsely, gayly, anally, with wojar, the more pitiful worst you look. To think that by the grace of whoever's up there, you were born to the south of me and not here. Sorry, wojar, you're stuck with the scum.