BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 196964 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#197615 Aug 5, 2014
Hummm, you Libtards are to think three or four times about things you wish for because you might just get it. Case in point is here in Florida where a judge has declared TWO Congressional Districts to be UNCONSTITUTIONAL because there is an imbalance between the numbers of Democrats v. Republicans
So the State of Florida will meet in an emergency secession to address the issue. Since they can not adjust just two districts they have decided to redistrict ALL 27 districts. Currently there are THREE Black districts and one of them, Corrine Brown, is very upset. In her district 52.2% of her constants are black and since black/white is not the major concern, as per this court ruling, WE plan on carving up her district. Now look at her current district!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florida%27s_5th_...
Talk about a Gerrymander!!!
Oh, there are more REGISTERED Democrats in Florida than Republicans but a majority of NPAs, like myself, usually vote Republican and the State of Florida legislature knows what precincts vote majority Republican so in the next month, Corrine Brown, Frederica Williams and Alcee Hasting may end up with a black MINORITY district.
Can you hear the Loony-Lefties howl then?!?
I just love them Libtard activist judges as they think they can fix anything!!!!

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#197616 Aug 5, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Beavis wrote:
Yep, once Dirty Hairy Reed and the Democrats are no longer in power next January, we can go ahead and impeach Obama.
Nate Silver: Republicans still favored to retake the Senate
Wikimedia Commons
With three months to go until the midterm elections, Republicans maintain a slight edge in their quest to retake the Senate for the first time since 2006, according to FiveThirtyEight prognosticator Nate Silver.
In his latest look at the races, Silver estimates Republicans are likely to pick up the six seats necessary to flip the Senate. Though voters don't really like the GOP, they also don't care much for President Obama — whose approval ratings have slumped back to the low 40s — nor Democrats in general. Plus Democrats have more territory to defend this year, some of it in states that leaned toward Romney in 2012, giving the GOP a built-in advantage.
"This may not be a 'wave' election as 2010 was, but Republicans don't need a wave to take over the Senate," Silver writes.
<quoted text>
And another Libtard throws out another RACE CARD.
How come Obama is not "semi-white"? I call people like him racially-mixed. Now I am less than 2% American Indian but I do not claim to be mixed-race. Now my father and paternal-grandfather looked like they had American Indian features but I think my grandfather was less than 10% which would make my father a 5%er.
The family history (story) is that a g-g-g-grandmother of mine from the early 19th Century was half Micmac. Oh, and my fathers side of the family is from Aroostook Co., Northern Maine.
Aroostook Band of Micmacs
http://www.micmac-nsn.gov/
"And another Libtard throws out another RACE CARD." dixit the non-racist Rogue, OMG. And then proceeds with another Hitler-like analysis on races.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#197617 Aug 5, 2014
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Poor Jacqtard, must you make your misery so obvious? You do realize no one cares, right? And, remember I corrected YOU last time, Mr. Percentage. LMAO! If you enjoy keeping up with rasslin', then be my guest. I bet your a season ticket holder on the front row! Must be a hot pick-up site for ya! LMAO! rodent scat
You corrected me, I acknowledged. You've been corrected a hundred times on your percentages, not to mention climate, the economy, politics, geography, history, race, sports and never one acknowledgement. Start with the percentages, and then slowly, proceed with the rest and acknowledge all of them. The truth will set you free. Oh, it won't? Okay. Stew and twist in the wind, LOSER.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#197618 Aug 5, 2014
loose cannon wrote:
Jacques,
Strange as it may seem, the northwest side of Chicago is actually east of O'Hare airport.
You don't build 7 billion dollars worth of new runways and not use them as intended unless there is some pre-election political arm twisting going on around town.
Remember that the next time that your regularly scheduled airline flight is delayed for no apparent reason.
Well dah, Chicago's Midway AP is in South Central Chicago and it was THE Chicago airport. In fact it was not until 1961 that air operation at O'Hare exceeded Midway's mostly because Midway lacked expansion capability.
As I have said many times before, you need to stay far away from any aviation subject as you are not only totally clueless, you are a clueless BIGOT!

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#197619 Aug 5, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Prior to about 1970 there were about 500 recognize American Indian tribes here in the U.S. but as soon as small groups figure out they could open tax-free smoke shoppes and casinos on "tribal lands" a bunch of them applied for U.S. tribal status. I "think" they are between 562 and 566 recognized tribes in America today.
Now I wonder if they will start selling wicked weed?
On November 26, 1991 after complex legal maneuvering and political lobbying the Aroostook Band of Micmacs finally achieved Federal Recognition with the passage of the Aroostook Band of Micmacs Settlement Act. This act provided the Community with acknowledgment of its tribal status in the United States. The Aroostook Band of Micmacs have succeeded in rejuvenating a part of the Micmac Nation.
Rogue, is there no stop to your plagiarizing? And don't tell me you "forgot" to include the source after you blocked the text and copied it onto Topix. That'd be THE lie.

http://www.micmac-nsn.gov/

Extract from the above. Take a glance and compare it to your post, stealer :

On November 26, 1991 after complex legal maneuvering and political lobbying the Aroostook Band of Micmacs finally achieved Federal Recognition with the passage of the Aroostook Band of Micmacs Settlement Act. This act provided the Community with acknowledgment of its tribal status in the United States. The Aroostook Band of Micmacs have succeeded in rejuvenating a part of the Micmac Nation.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#197620 Aug 5, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Prior to about 1970 there were about 500 recognize American Indian tribes here in the U.S. but as soon as small groups figure out they could open tax-free smoke shoppes and casinos on "tribal lands" a bunch of them applied for U.S. tribal status. I "think" they are between 562 and 566 recognized tribes in America today.
Now I wonder if they will start selling wicked weed?
On November 26, 1991 after complex legal maneuvering and political lobbying the Aroostook Band of Micmacs finally achieved Federal Recognition with the passage of the Aroostook Band of Micmacs Settlement Act. This act provided the Community with acknowledgment of its tribal status in the United States. The Aroostook Band of Micmacs have succeeded in rejuvenating a part of the Micmac Nation.
But not only that, in your haste to post hate material, this time against native Americans and their tobacco selling and weeds and what not, you post a second paragraph that contradicts your first hate paragraph. You just don't know, do you? I wouldn't go up with you for any amount of money. Hell, you can't read a simple text, how're you expected to read a simple flight plan?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#197621 Aug 5, 2014
Until 1968 Jacksonville's Imeson Field has the municipal airport. Imeson lacked expansion capabilities and Jacksonville wanted an international airport so they build JAX in the 1960.
Imeson closed as an airport in 1968 and has become an industrial park.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#197623 Aug 5, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Prior to about 1970 there were about 500 recognize American Indian tribes here in the U.S. but as soon as small groups figure out they could open tax-free smoke shoppes and casinos on "tribal lands" a bunch of them applied for U.S. tribal status. I "think" they are between 562 and 566 recognized tribes in America today.
Now I wonder if they will start selling wicked weed?
On November 26, 1991 after complex legal maneuvering and political lobbying the Aroostook Band of Micmacs finally achieved Federal Recognition with the passage of the Aroostook Band of Micmacs Settlement Act. This act provided the Community with acknowledgment of its tribal status in the United States. The Aroostook Band of Micmacs have succeeded in rejuvenating a part of the Micmac Nation.
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Rogue, is there no stop to your plagiarizing? And don't tell me you "forgot" to include the source after you blocked the text and copied it onto Topix. That'd be THE lie.
http://www.micmac-nsn.gov/
Extract from the above. Take a glance and compare it to your post, stealer :
On November 26, 1991 after complex legal maneuvering and political lobbying the Aroostook Band of Micmacs finally achieved Federal Recognition with the passage of the Aroostook Band of Micmacs Settlement Act. This act provided the Community with acknowledgment of its tribal status in the United States. The Aroostook Band of Micmacs have succeeded in rejuvenating a part of the Micmac Nation.
So I forgot to post a link ONCE. Bite my azz!
Oh, the Micmacs (known as Mi'kmaq in Canada) have long been recognized as a tribe in Canada. The ONLY reason why they pushed for tribal status in America is so they could open a casino and smoke shops!!!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mi%27kmaq
Beavis

Jacksonville, FL

#197624 Aug 5, 2014
Beavis wrote:
Yep, once Dirty Hairy Reed and the Democrats are no longer in power next January, we can go ahead and impeach Obama.
Nate Silver: Republicans still favored to retake the Senate
Wikimedia Commons
With three months to go until the midterm elections, Republicans maintain a slight edge in their quest to retake the Senate for the first time since 2006, according to FiveThirtyEight prognosticator Nate Silver.
In his latest look at the races, Silver estimates Republicans are likely to pick up the six seats necessary to flip the Senate. Though voters don't really like the GOP, they also don't care much for President Obama whose approval ratings have slumped back to the low 40s nor Democrats in general. Plus Democrats have more territory to defend this year, some of it in states that leaned toward Romney in 2012, giving the GOP a built-in advantage.
"This may not be a 'wave' election as 2010 was, but Republicans don't need a wave to take over the Senate," Silver writes.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>It's a fantasy to think Obama could be removed. No way to get a 2/3 majority in the senate.
Isn't it phunny that is 2008 and again in 2012 Nate Silver was the darling of the Democrat Party. But now that he is predicting a Republican win, you deny ever knowing his name. Sort of the St. Peter denying knowing Christ three times before the cock crows, ain't it?
Beavis

Jacksonville, FL

#197625 Aug 5, 2014
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
So you're going to sue over ObamaCare and when that fails miserably and completely use the information gathered during your failure as the reason to impeach? Brilliant! He'll never see you coming.
There are several lawsuits that were successful and a few more pending so I would not declare victory just yet if I were you.
And when did I say Obama would be CONVICTED during a Senate impeachment trial? You seem to read into things I did not say. Like the Affordable Care Act will be .... actually affordable?!?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#197626 Aug 5, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Prior to about 1970 there were about 500 recognize American Indian tribes here in the U.S. but as soon as small groups figure out they could open tax-free smoke shoppes and casinos on "tribal lands" a bunch of them applied for U.S. tribal status. I "think" they are between 562 and 566 recognized tribes in America today.
Now I wonder if they will start selling wicked weed?
On November 26, 1991 after complex legal maneuvering and political lobbying the Aroostook Band of Micmacs finally achieved Federal Recognition with the passage of the Aroostook Band of Micmacs Settlement Act. This act provided the Community with acknowledgment of its tribal status in the United States. The Aroostook Band of Micmacs have succeeded in rejuvenating a part of the Micmac Nation.
<quoted text>
So I forgot to post a link ONCE. Bite my azz!
Oh, the Micmacs (known as Mi'kmaq in Canada) have long been recognized as a tribe in Canada. The ONLY reason why they pushed for tribal status in America is so they could open a casino and smoke shops!!!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mi%27kmaq
ONCE ? What about two weeks ago? No comment from you on that one,even after two reminders. I even commented it was too well done to have been written by you. So, you don't remember? How convenient. Oh, another reminder. Your insane birther colleage, LRS-Dale, even came to your rescue, claiming that anything on the internet is "fair game". Still don't recall?

And Rogue, since I've been coming to this thread , you've plagiarized a number of times and been caught often. If you are able to block and "copy" a whole article, it becomes almost impossible to refer to the link. Once, even twice,maybe,but as often as you do it? I could STFUP, but I'm not simplistically vulgar like you and I don't steal other people's work.

Bite you ass? I don't each shit, no thanks.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#197627 Aug 5, 2014
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
You corrected me, I acknowledged. You've been corrected a hundred times on your percentages, not to mention climate, the economy, politics, geography, history, race, sports and never one acknowledgement. Start with the percentages, and then slowly, proceed with the rest and acknowledge all of them. The truth will set you free. Oh, it won't? Okay. Stew and twist in the wind, LOSER.
Why do you insist on using up perfectly good cyberspace with your sub-par intelligence? And Jacqtard, you're so mentally warped and biased you couldn't referee a coin flip fairly! Your biased "opinions" on the subjects mentioned above are nothing short of laughable. You've never seen both sides of an issue, only your demented and vile view. You allow hatred to rule your life. Sad. Very sad. All that hatred coupled with a man of your BMI, can only spell H E A R T A T T A C K! Throw in the fact that you're also a winehead and you don't have much hope. Good luck with that! Cha Ching! Bright sunny day here, beautiful!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#197628 Aug 5, 2014
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
ONCE ? What about two weeks ago? No comment from you on that one,even after two reminders. I even commented it was too well done to have been written by you. So, you don't remember? How convenient. Oh, another reminder. Your insane birther colleage, LRS-Dale, even came to your rescue, claiming that anything on the internet is "fair game". Still don't recall?
And Rogue, since I've been coming to this thread , you've plagiarized a number of times and been caught often. If you are able to block and "copy" a whole article, it becomes almost impossible to refer to the link. Once, even twice,maybe,but as often as you do it? I could STFUP, but I'm not simplistically vulgar like you and I don't steal other people's work.
Bite you ass? I don't each shit, no thanks.
Noooo Noooo Noooo, Jacqtard face! We settled the issue of plagiarism, remember? You said you didn't need to post links because you knew what you were talking about, remember? Of course you do. And, I replied, fine with me, anything I post must be taken as fact, also! So, which is it, Jacqtard? Links or no links? BSer. Can't have it both ways. What a Daryl, you are!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#197629 Aug 5, 2014
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
ONCE ? What about two weeks ago? No comment from you on that one,even after two reminders. I even commented it was too well done to have been written by you. So, you don't remember? How convenient. Oh, another reminder. Your insane birther colleage, LRS-Dale, even came to your rescue, claiming that anything on the internet is "fair game". Still don't recall?
And Rogue, since I've been coming to this thread , you've plagiarized a number of times and been caught often. If you are able to block and "copy" a whole article, it becomes almost impossible to refer to the link. Once, even twice,maybe,but as often as you do it? I could STFUP, but I'm not simplistically vulgar like you and I don't steal other people's work.
Bite you ass? I don't each shit, no thanks.
Brilliant work from the grammarian! NOT!!! LMAO! Jacqtard, you're such a dyck.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#197630 Aug 5, 2014
Beavis wrote:
<quoted text>There are several lawsuits that were successful and a few more pending so I would not declare victory just yet if I were you.
And when did I say Obama would be CONVICTED during a Senate impeachment trial? You seem to read into things I did not say. Like the Affordable Care Act will be .... actually affordable?!?
There were no lawsuits against Obama that have succeeded. Nor will there be. Over the history of our country there have been many lawsuits against policies, rules and laws. No one ever pretended these signaled imminent impeachment - or basis for impeachment

Convicted? Who said convicted? Talk about reading things that aren't there. The House will not bring forth articles of impeachment. There aren't enough TPublican Reps ignorant enough to pursue impeachment without something to charge him with. "We don't like him" is not impeachable - and the TPublicabs certainly don't want to see it ever become so ....

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#197631 Aug 5, 2014
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Noooo Noooo Noooo, Jacqtard face! We settled the issue of plagiarism, remember? You said you didn't need to post links because you knew what you were talking about, remember? Of course you do. And, I replied, fine with me, anything I post must be taken as fact, also! So, which is it, Jacqtard? Links or no links? BSer. Can't have it both ways. What a Daryl, you are!
Name me ONE instance where and when I plagiarized. If I state a fact, ask me for a link, I'll gladly supply it, as I've invariably done EVERY SINGLE TIME. Plagiarizing is copying word for word, loser, or posting someone's credo or and stealing it for oneself, which is what Rogue did and which you wholeheartedly approve, stating that everything on the web is fair game. An opinion is NOT plagiarism, LOSER.

Yes, I said I didn't need to post links, which I rarely do so as not to bore posters. But I also said I'd supply one instantly if I stated a fact. How convenient you would forget that part.

Plagiarism is stealing someone's words or body of work. Rogue does it all the time , and I've caught you doing it redhanded. Dishonest crook LOSER.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#197632 Aug 5, 2014
Romper's heroes:

During The Sarah Palin Channels launch event on Sunday evening, Palin sat down for a live 'Real America interview with George Seymour, 58, a coal miner from Bowling Green, Kentucky, as a part of what Palin had hoped would be a series of interviews with real Americans, from real America, offering real American perspectives.'

But when she asked Seymour what he thought about Barack Obamas presidency, the networks first real scandal broke.

'I hate that n*,' Seymour said angrily.'I call him N* Hitler. He wants to stick everyone that dont agree with him in concentration camps [and] make us wear the mark of the beast. Hes a Muslim, gay-loving n* Hitler and theres not a day that goes by where I dont wish he was dead or in jail.'
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#197634 Aug 5, 2014
wojar wrote:
Romper's heroes:

“During The Sarah Palin Channel’s launch event on Sunday evening, Palin sat down for a live 'Real America” interview with George Seymour, 58, a coal miner from Bowling Green, Kentucky, as a part of what Palin had hoped would be “a series of interviews with real Americans, from real America, offering real American perspectives.'”

“But when she asked Seymour what he thought about Barack Obama’s presidency, the network’s first real scandal broke.”

“'I hate that n*,' Seymour said angrily.'I call him N* Hitler. He wants to stick everyone that don’t agree with him in concentration camps [and] make us wear the mark of the beast. He’s a Muslim, gay-loving n* Hitler and there’s not a day that goes by where I don’t wish he was dead or in jail.'”
Sister Sarah's fan base tends to eat a steady diet of paste and spam

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#197635 Aug 5, 2014
Beavis wrote:
<quoted text>
There are several lawsuits that were successful and a few more pending so I would not declare victory just yet if I were you.
And when did I say Obama would be CONVICTED during a Senate impeachment trial? You seem to read into things I did not say. Like the Affordable Care Act will be .... actually affordable?!?
My corporate supplied insurance is better under ACA that it was before (company is already in compliance with all provosions). I had a $3000 procedure yesterday with no copay, and previously it would have been 10% copay.

Thanks Obama!

Real companies in the professional world don't nickel and dime their employees on health insurance. So when a faux conservative says that Obamacare is the reason why he's not going to expand his business and "buy another truck providing a job for a driver", I laugh. Businesses expand on the basis of demand because there is profit to be made, not health insurance. LOL.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#197636 Aug 5, 2014
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>Only Romper would go on vacation or move to the slum. He could bring his dumpster with him.
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Hmm. Good luck! LMAO!!!
http://www.vice.com/read/philipino-v13n10
Does Romper think that gang bangers live near the luxury beachfront condos where the Japanese and Korean tourist pay top prices? Fortunately, the police keep undesirables away from the areas where the 1% live. I had a friend who owned an apartment on 5th Avenue in NYC; over $1M. Does Romper think gang violence in the slum has any bearing on the lifestyle on 5th Avenue? Or people living in the tony sections of Brentwood, are they affected by slum conditions in Watts?

As usual. Romper is out in left field.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min Incognito4Ever 1,275,370
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 2 hr Red_Forman 6,409
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 4 hr Earthling-1 54,503
Black lives matter 4 hr Pride in ones self 1
ask amy 8-29-15 11 hr Julie 4
abby 8-28-15 12 hr Mister Tonka 4
Steve Wilkos : talk show host ? or simple mi... (Feb '08) 13 hr Tvlover 406
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages