BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 196951 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#196447 Jul 22, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
And who does DoD report to? We The People or to Pres. Obama? Tell us, can you tell if a plane is armed when it is coming at you at 500 mph?
But then again the Russians do not seem to be able to tell a AN-26 turbo prop from a Boeing 777 jet airliner.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Birfoons lapped up the fake story that the press release included 27 letters of resignation from crying sailors.
Incidentally, you can tell if a 500 mph SU 24 is armed with missiles. Duh!
<quoted text>
Hummm, did I say I could tell if a COMBAT plane doing 500 mph is armed? Well no but I assume they are. How many of you assumed that all F-15s and F-16s in the US are armed prior to 9/11/2001? You do they lunched to UNarmed F-16 to intercept UAL Flt 93 and where ordered to bring it down and the twp pilots had decided to RAM their aircraft into it as they had no weapons of their aircraft.
From Wiki: Two F-16 fighter jets from the 121st Fighter Squadron of the D.C. Air National Guard were scrambled and ordered to intercept Flight 93; the pilots intended to ram it since they did not have time to arm the jets. They never reached Flight 93 and did not learn of its crash until hours afterwards.
But what is sad is that in two seconds this post will self destruct in the back of you brain as it conflicts with what you think you know as the truth.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#196448 Jul 22, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
If ""We are not working on or drawing up articles of impeachment.", but he sees no criminal act, then why are "we" doing that?
Oh, Rep. Goodlatte is sitting on the Agriculture Committee so why is "we" investigating Obama for possible impeachment?
<quoted text>
Now Speaker Bonehead is investigating a civil lawsuit and that is what is upsetting the Democrats as a FEDERAL judge and issue subpoenas and sworn depositions.
Hummm, didn't two federal judges order the IRS to make sworn depositions? Does that bother you?!?
Oh forse it does as you would not be talking about impeachment while the House is not!!!!
If Rougetard could read, when asked if they are drawing up article of impeachment, and the answer is "NO", it means they are not "doing that."

Incidentally, Goodlatte is chair of the JUDICIARY COMMITTEE.

Duh!
jacques Mont Tremblant

Saint-hyacinthe, Canada

#196449 Jul 22, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, I have NO president. MY COUNTRY has a president. I was equally critical of Bush-43, Bush-41 and a little of Reagan. Tell us, why are YOU never critical of anything Obama does? Whaz it kike to be an Obamabot?
Oh, and show me where I accused them of anything much less resigning?
Tell us, do YOU own a Canadian flag? I have a dozen or so!!! Everything from a 4" X 6" decal on each one of my cars (three each), two for my boat and two for my plane. Then a 4' X6' gold fringed parade flag, a 4' X 6' yard flag for special holidays and the 6' X 8' flag that draped my father's coffin!
Oh, the one on the back window of my Honda Ridgeline is a 6" X 8" as we are not allowed to display yard flags except on certain holidays but there is nothing about a flag on a car.
Oh, I also have a few small flag pins for my suit, fishing hat, etc.!
Sorry, no white flag nor commie flag though.
How true and thanks for confirming that indeed "the flag IS the refuge of the scoundrel" Can't in a million years find a better example than you.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#196450 Jul 22, 2014
Roge Scholar 05 wrote:
If ""We are not working on or drawing up articles of impeachment.", but he sees no criminal act, then why are "we" doing that?
Oh, Rep. Goodlatte is sitting on the Agriculture Committee so why is "we" investigating Obama for possible impeachment?

December 2013
On December 3, 2013,'the House Judiciary committee held a hearing on Obama, formally titled "The President's Constitutional Duty to Faithfully Execute the Laws," that has been viewed as an attempt to begin justifying impeachment proceedings.[QUOTE]
[QUOTE who="Learn to Read"]<quoted text>
http://goodlatte.house.gov/pages/committee-as...
Bob currently serves as a member of the following House Committees:
House Committee on the Judiciary – Chairman
Gee Rouge- maybe you should tell Rep Goodlatte that he's not the Chair of the Judiciary Comm
But in DECEMBER 2013 he was NOT! That is why Speaker Bonehead reassigned him to the Judiciary Committee, to stop any talk of impeachment. As as Chair of that committee, he can stop it but that does not mean the subject does not come up.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#196451 Jul 22, 2014
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>If Rougetard could read, when asked if they are drawing up article of impeachment, and the answer is "NO", it means they are not "doing that."

Incidentally, Goodlatte is chair of the JUDICIARY COMMITTEE.

Duh!
Reading AND comprehending? You're asking an awful lot from Rouge

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#196452 Jul 22, 2014
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
If Rougetard could read, when asked if they are drawing up article of impeachment, and the answer is "NO", it means they are not "doing that."
Incidentally, Goodlatte is chair of the JUDICIARY COMMITTEE.
Duh!
But in December 2013 they were and he was not on that committee back then. It was Lamar S. Smith who was the Chairman and wanted to impeach Obama but in January Speaker Bonehead had him moved out!!! Oh, and Lamas S. Smith is also a member of the TEA Party Caucus which is another reason why Bonehead has been trying to neutralize him.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#196453 Jul 22, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Hummm, did I say I could tell if a COMBAT plane doing 500 mph is armed? Well no but I assume they are. How many of you assumed that all F-15s and F-16s in the US are armed prior to 9/11/2001?
This is 2014, Rougie, not 2001.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#196455 Jul 22, 2014
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Reading AND comprehending? You're asking an awful lot from Rouge
Yep, he maybe the Chair of the Judiciary right now but he was not last year and he probably will not be next year. And Bonehead will probably not be the Speaker either.
2014 not only looks like a bad year for Democrats but a bad year for Country Club RINOs. Just look at Lame Duck Eric Cantor! He never knew what hit him!!!
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#196456 Jul 22, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>Roge Scholar 05 wrote:
If ""We are not working on or drawing up articles of impeachment.", but he sees no criminal act, then why are "we" doing that?
Oh, Rep. Goodlatte is sitting on the Agriculture Committee so why is "we" investigating Obama for possible impeachment?

[QUOTE] December 2013
On December 3, 2013,'the House Judiciary committee held a hearing on Obama, formally titled "The President's Constitutional Duty to Faithfully Execute the Laws," that has been viewed as an attempt to begin justifying impeachment proceedings.[QUOTE]

But in DECEMBER 2013 he was NOT! That is why Speaker Bonehead reassigned him to the Judiciary Committee, to stop any talk of impeachment. As as Chair of that committee, he can stop it but that does not mean the subject does not come up.
So you celebrate a complete failure? Romper appreciates your support

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#196457 Jul 22, 2014
But Bob is leading the lawsuit against Obama which has a much better chance of beating up Obummer Boy.

Bob Goodlatte: GOP Lawsuit Against President 'Not a Stunt'

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/goodlatte-law...
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/goodlatte-law...
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#196458 Jul 22, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
But Bob is leading the lawsuit against Obama which has a much better chance of beating up Obummer Boy.

Bob Goodlatte: GOP Lawsuit Against President 'Not a Stunt'

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/goodlatte-law...
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/goodlatte-law...
Better chance than impeachment? Well since impeachment has Zero chance you technically be right for a change. Again - let me know when (if) they actually stop yammering and file their suit. I may care.(At least it will be good for a few laughs)

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#196459 Jul 22, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Hummm, I wonder if any of the low-information Libtards have noticed this in the Lame Stream Media? NBC finally posted on this issue. Only three hours after Fox News did!!!

Appeals Courts Disagree Over Obamacare
By Maggie Fox

Obamacare got taken for a roller-coaster ride on Tuesday when two different appeals courts took completely different takes on the latest challenges to the law.

In a potentially lethal blow, a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C. ruled that the federal government may not subsidize health insurance plans for people in 34 states that decided not to set up their own marketplaces under the law.
http://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/app...
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#196460 Jul 22, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>But in December 2013 they were and he was not on that committee back then. It was Lamar S. Smith who was the Chairman and wanted to impeach Obama but in January Speaker Bonehead had him moved out!!! Oh, and Lamas S. Smith is also a member of the TEA Party Caucus which is another reason why Bonehead has been trying to neutralize him.
He wasn't on the committee in 2013? OReaLY? Care to issue a retraction?

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#196461 Jul 22, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Roge Scholar 05 wrote:
If ""We are not working on or drawing up articles of impeachment.", but he sees no criminal act, then why are "we" doing that?
Oh, Rep. Goodlatte is sitting on the Agriculture Committee so why is "we" investigating Obama for possible impeachment?
<quoted text>
But in DECEMBER 2013 he was NOT! That is why Speaker Bonehead reassigned him to the Judiciary Committee, to stop any talk of impeachment. As as Chair of that committee, he can stop it but that does not mean the subject does not come up.
Yeah, right, and he's going to sue in order to prevent impeachment?

Rougetard is too much.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#196462 Jul 22, 2014
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
He wasn't on the committee in 2013? OReaLY? Care to issue a retraction?
Silly LTR, according to Play Law, any member of an Agriculture committee is banned from the Judiciary Committee.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#196463 Jul 22, 2014
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>Silly LTR, according to Play Law, any member of an Agriculture committee is banned from the Judiciary Committee.
So many rules under play law. Who can keep track?

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#196464 Jul 22, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Hummm, I wonder if any of the low-information Libtards have noticed this in the Lame Stream Media? NBC finally posted on this issue. Only three hours after Fox News did!!!
Appeals Courts Disagree Over Obamacare
By Maggie Fox
Obamacare got taken for a roller-coaster ride on Tuesday when two different appeals courts took completely different takes on the latest challenges to the law.
In a potentially lethal blow, a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C. ruled that the federal government may not subsidize health insurance plans for people in 34 states that decided not to set up their own marketplaces under the law.
http://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/app...
99% likely that the DC Circuit Court will hear en banc, meaning that today's decision will become invalid, and must wait until the full court reviews the case.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#196465 Jul 22, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Roge Scholar 05 wrote:
If ""We are not working on or drawing up articles of impeachment.", but he sees no criminal act, then why are "we" doing that?
Oh, Rep. Goodlatte is sitting on the Agriculture Committee so why is "we" investigating Obama for possible impeachment?
<quoted text>
But in DECEMBER 2013 he was NOT! That is why Speaker Bonehead reassigned him to the Judiciary Committee, to stop any talk of impeachment. As as Chair of that committee, he can stop it but that does not mean the subject does not come up.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, right, and he's going to sue in order to prevent impeachment?
Rougetard is too much.
Are you really that dense? Even Speaker Bonehead knows that even if the House passes Bill of Impeachment against Obama that the Senate is controlled by the Democrats and Dirty Hariy Read will sit on it.
But Dirty Hairy can not stop the House from a civil lawsuit against the Obama Administration. But during a civil lawsuit discovery process they may get more than enough ammo to impeach the half-white guy in the White House.
Say, how about those two civil lawsuits against the IRS and that the IRS now has just two weeks to provide sworn affidavits to the courts? Then what?
Oh, care to comment about the other federal lawsuit rulings TODAY?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#196466 Jul 22, 2014
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
99% likely that the DC Circuit Court will hear en banc, meaning that today's decision will become invalid, and must wait until the full court reviews the case.
And even if the full court rules in favor of Obama there is a 99.9% chance it will still end up at the SCOTUS!!! And Obama has had real bad luck with the Supremes lately!!!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#196467 Jul 22, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Roge Scholar 05 wrote:
If ""We are not working on or drawing up articles of impeachment.", but he sees no criminal act, then why are "we" doing that?
Oh, Rep. Goodlatte is sitting on the Agriculture Committee so why is "we" investigating Obama for possible impeachment?
<quoted text>
But in DECEMBER 2013 he was NOT! That is why Speaker Bonehead reassigned him to the Judiciary Committee, to stop any talk of impeachment. As as Chair of that committee, he can stop it but that does not mean the subject does not come up.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, right, and he's going to sue in order to prevent impeachment?
Rougetard is too much.
Minor correct. He was not the CHAIRMAN od the Judiciary Committee until this January.and the Chair is the power behind any committee.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Clare rios 8 min Lol dumbaz 2
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 12 min John Galt 1,277,113
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 45 min Ferrerman 100,648
Double Word Game (Dec '11) 1 hr RACE 1,723
Word (Dec '08) 1 hr RACE 5,428
a teachers lament. 1 hr Ferrerman 7
Need help from current chicago expert 1 hr PEllen 2
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages