BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 240354 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#196462 Jul 22, 2014
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
He wasn't on the committee in 2013? OReaLY? Care to issue a retraction?
Silly LTR, according to Play Law, any member of an Agriculture committee is banned from the Judiciary Committee.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#196463 Jul 22, 2014
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>Silly LTR, according to Play Law, any member of an Agriculture committee is banned from the Judiciary Committee.
So many rules under play law. Who can keep track?

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#196464 Jul 22, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Hummm, I wonder if any of the low-information Libtards have noticed this in the Lame Stream Media? NBC finally posted on this issue. Only three hours after Fox News did!!!
Appeals Courts Disagree Over Obamacare
By Maggie Fox
Obamacare got taken for a roller-coaster ride on Tuesday when two different appeals courts took completely different takes on the latest challenges to the law.
In a potentially lethal blow, a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C. ruled that the federal government may not subsidize health insurance plans for people in 34 states that decided not to set up their own marketplaces under the law.
http://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/app...
99% likely that the DC Circuit Court will hear en banc, meaning that today's decision will become invalid, and must wait until the full court reviews the case.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#196465 Jul 22, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Roge Scholar 05 wrote:
If ""We are not working on or drawing up articles of impeachment.", but he sees no criminal act, then why are "we" doing that?
Oh, Rep. Goodlatte is sitting on the Agriculture Committee so why is "we" investigating Obama for possible impeachment?
<quoted text>
But in DECEMBER 2013 he was NOT! That is why Speaker Bonehead reassigned him to the Judiciary Committee, to stop any talk of impeachment. As as Chair of that committee, he can stop it but that does not mean the subject does not come up.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, right, and he's going to sue in order to prevent impeachment?
Rougetard is too much.
Are you really that dense? Even Speaker Bonehead knows that even if the House passes Bill of Impeachment against Obama that the Senate is controlled by the Democrats and Dirty Hariy Read will sit on it.
But Dirty Hairy can not stop the House from a civil lawsuit against the Obama Administration. But during a civil lawsuit discovery process they may get more than enough ammo to impeach the half-white guy in the White House.
Say, how about those two civil lawsuits against the IRS and that the IRS now has just two weeks to provide sworn affidavits to the courts? Then what?
Oh, care to comment about the other federal lawsuit rulings TODAY?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#196466 Jul 22, 2014
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
99% likely that the DC Circuit Court will hear en banc, meaning that today's decision will become invalid, and must wait until the full court reviews the case.
And even if the full court rules in favor of Obama there is a 99.9% chance it will still end up at the SCOTUS!!! And Obama has had real bad luck with the Supremes lately!!!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#196467 Jul 22, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Roge Scholar 05 wrote:
If ""We are not working on or drawing up articles of impeachment.", but he sees no criminal act, then why are "we" doing that?
Oh, Rep. Goodlatte is sitting on the Agriculture Committee so why is "we" investigating Obama for possible impeachment?
<quoted text>
But in DECEMBER 2013 he was NOT! That is why Speaker Bonehead reassigned him to the Judiciary Committee, to stop any talk of impeachment. As as Chair of that committee, he can stop it but that does not mean the subject does not come up.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, right, and he's going to sue in order to prevent impeachment?
Rougetard is too much.
Minor correct. He was not the CHAIRMAN od the Judiciary Committee until this January.and the Chair is the power behind any committee.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#196468 Jul 22, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Roge Scholar 05 wrote:
If ""We are not working on or drawing up articles of impeachment.", but he sees no criminal act, then why are "we" doing that?
Oh, Rep. Goodlatte is sitting on the Agriculture Committee so why is "we" investigating Obama for possible impeachment?
<quoted text>
But in DECEMBER 2013 he was NOT! That is why Speaker Bonehead reassigned him to the Judiciary Committee, to stop any talk of impeachment. As as Chair of that committee, he can stop it but that does not mean the subject does not come up.

Minor correct. He was not the CHAIRMAN od the Judiciary Committee until this January.and the Chair is the power behind any committee.
You're welcome

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#196469 Jul 22, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Roge Scholar 05 wrote:
If ""We are not working on or drawing up articles of impeachment.", but he sees no criminal act, then why are "we" doing that?
Oh, Rep. Goodlatte is sitting on the Agriculture Committee so why is "we" investigating Obama for possible impeachment?
<quoted text>
But in DECEMBER 2013 he was NOT! That is why Speaker Bonehead reassigned him to the Judiciary Committee, to stop any talk of impeachment. As as Chair of that committee, he can stop it but that does not mean the subject does not come up.
<quoted text>
Are you really that dense? Even Speaker Bonehead knows that even if the House passes Bill of Impeachment against Obama that the Senate is controlled by the Democrats and Dirty Hariy Read will sit on it.
But Dirty Hairy can not stop the House from a civil lawsuit against the Obama Administration. But during a civil lawsuit discovery process they may get more than enough ammo to impeach the half-white guy in the White House.
Say, how about those two civil lawsuits against the IRS and that the IRS now has just two weeks to provide sworn affidavits to the courts? Then what?
Oh, care to comment about the other federal lawsuit rulings TODAY?
Another one flies right over Rougetard's head.

Ignorant fool playing race card: "But during a civil lawsuit discovery process they may get more than enough ammo to impeach the half-white guy in the White House."

Discovery for a bunch of generalities? Look up Rules 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(1). Hahahahahahaha!

What a friggin' joke.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, right, and he's going to sue in order to prevent impeachment?
Rougetard is too much.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#196470 Jul 22, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Roge Scholar 05 wrote:
If ""We are not working on or drawing up articles of impeachment.", but he sees no criminal act, then why are "we" doing that?
Oh, Rep. Goodlatte is sitting on the Agriculture Committee so why is "we" investigating Obama for possible impeachment?
<quoted text>
But in DECEMBER 2013 he was NOT! That is why Speaker Bonehead reassigned him to the Judiciary Committee, to stop any talk of impeachment. As as Chair of that committee, he can stop it but that does not mean the subject does not come up.
<quoted text>
Minor correct. He was not the CHAIRMAN od the Judiciary Committee until this January.and the Chair is the power behind any committee.
Yeah, right, and Rougie still doesn't have a clue.

Boehner is going to sue in order to prevent impeachment as evidenced by Goodlatte's appointment?

Look up "hopelessly convoluted" in the dictionary.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#196471 Jul 22, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
And even if the full court rules in favor of Obama there is a 99.9% chance it will still end up at the SCOTUS!!! And Obama has had real bad luck with the Supremes lately!!!
If the DC circuit rules en banc in favor of the Administration, there will be no conflict among the circuits. Sorry Rouge, yet there is still the possibility that the USSC would hear the case, but that would be a possibility, not a probability.

wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
99% likely that the DC Circuit Court will hear en banc, meaning that today's decision will become invalid, and must wait until the full court reviews the case.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#196472 Jul 22, 2014
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
You're welcome
Oh oh, is their a mutiny in the military? It looks like the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff has just openly criticized the President! Will Obama can General Martin Dempsey like Truman did to MacArthur?
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#196473 Jul 22, 2014
Learn to Read wrote:
Psssst Hey Romper. More rejection. More failure. Just business as usual for Romper.
GOODLATTE: "We are not working on or drawing up articles of impeachment. The Constitution is very clear as to what constitutes grounds for impeachment of the president of the United States. He has not committed the kind of criminal acts that call for that."
http://www.politicususa.com/2014/07/13/top-ho...
HaHaHa! Good one!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#196474 Jul 22, 2014
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
If Rougetard could read, when asked if they are drawing up article of impeachment, and the answer is "NO", it means they are not "doing that."
Incidentally, Goodlatte is chair of the JUDICIARY COMMITTEE.
Duh!
At least that's what they say. hee hee hee

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#196475 Jul 22, 2014
Oh, is was General James F. Amos who is a member of the Joints Chiefs. Now, will Pres. Obama have the gonads to can him?!? Or will he continue to be a flaccid penis???
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#196476 Jul 22, 2014
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Reading AND comprehending? You're asking an awful lot from Rouge
You really serve no purpose in life at all, do ya?
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#196477 Jul 22, 2014
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
This is 2014, Rougie, not 2001.
You have no idea whether the SU's ordnances were "live" or not. None. Just blowin' smoke as usual.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#196478 Jul 22, 2014
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
At least that's what they say. hee hee hee
So Righteous Romper thinks his heroes are liars and approves (even though they have ZERO chance)?
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
If Rougetard could read, when asked if they are drawing up article of impeachment, and the answer is "NO", it means they are not "doing that."
Incidentally, Goodlatte is chair of the JUDICIARY COMMITTEE.
Duh!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#196479 Jul 22, 2014
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
You have no idea whether the SU's ordnances were "live" or not. None. Just blowin' smoke as usual.
Moron, it had no missiles. A non-misile cannot be live.
Mark

Japan

#196480 Jul 22, 2014
Lol
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#196481 Jul 22, 2014
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
So Righteous Romper thinks his heroes are liars and approves (even though they have ZERO chance)?
<quoted text>
You just described Lil "o" supporters! Perfectly, I might add. Lil "o" lies and you approve!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 7 min Grey Ghostmoron 1,521,960
I think she is pissed. From a few years ago. 18 min SENIORS READ-THIS 6
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 23 min RACE 105,131
Look at Minn. Maine & Michigan. 23 min OUTLAW-HALAL-FOODS 13
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 25 min RACE 10,582
Scary Obituary 30 min DITTTTTTTTOS 11
News Why Aren't There More Gender-Neutral, Trans-Fri... 2 hr max 1

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages