If the drafters of the Constitution only wanted citizens to be subject to the jurisdiction of the US Constitution they would have written WE THE CITIZENS instead of WE THE PEOPLE.<quoted text>LMAO!!! All you have to do is read the preamble, it tells you who is subject to the jurisdiction of the US Constitution. Who are "We the People", it sure isn't the aliens, they are subjects of their country of origin. This is why we make treaties, one can't have jurisdiction over something that he doesn't own.
Please explain why the drafters of the civil right amendments to the constitution written the words "RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE" instead of RIGHT OF THE CITIZENS" in the First, Second,
Fourth, Fifth, Ninth and Tenth?
Pleas explain why US Supreme Court has held that aliens are PERSONS and are entited to the protection of these amendments? Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 369 (1886); Wong Wing v. U.S. 163 U.S. 228,238 (1896) ; Shaughnessy v. Mezei, 345 U.S. 206, 212 (1953);
Mathews v. Diaz, 426 U.S. 67, 77 (1976). Pyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202, 211 (1982)
As for your legal analysis that jurisdiction only applies to something that is owned, then you assumed that people are owned by the government.