BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 240314 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

LRS

Shreveport, LA

#191136 May 21, 2014
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay, how about buffoons? Rhymes with tycoons, LMAO (LRS-Dale tm reg'd)
You and Rogue, and Dale, keep dropping little inside "words" related to your professions. And you think everyone should know what they mean. I don't always and freely admit it instead of replying with STFU of FO or FU. I'd ask you to explain what the some of the procedures I did in my lifetime, but hey, apart from the fact that you know zilch about ANYthing, you would go to your standard modus operandi in your replies.
Grammarian, right? LMAO!!! I'll give you this much, you're the goofiest SOB I've ever had the displeasure of running across. You're a true loon from the fringe, joko! Seriously!
Dale

Wichita, KS

#191137 May 21, 2014
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay, how about buffoons? Rhymes with tycoons, LMAO (LRS-Dale tm reg'd)
You and Rogue, and Dale, keep dropping little inside "words" related to your professions. And you think everyone should know what they mean. I don't always and freely admit it instead of replying with STFU of FO or FU. I'd ask you to explain what the some of the procedures I did in my lifetime, but hey, apart from the fact that you know zilch about ANYthing, you would go to your standard modus operandi in your replies.
LMAO!!! I haven't been on here for sometime, but you still keep referring to me.
Thanks for keeping me in mind.

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#191138 May 21, 2014
loose cannon wrote:
Couldn't they find someone who doesn't have such a thick and accentuated southern drawl?
I know exactly what you mean. It doesn't matter what the quality of your ideas are... if they are communicated in such a fashion where people dismiss them because you sound like sling blade.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#191139 May 21, 2014
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Grammarian, right? LMAO!!! I'll give you this much, you're the goofiest SOB I've ever had the displeasure of running across. You're a true loon from the fringe, joko! Seriously!
Well, waiting for your grammar, and why not, spelling hints and corrections of my text. Go ahead.

Notice I've been very tolerant with you lately†because you've not commented on my grammar or spelling. But you just did, right?

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#191140 May 21, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you know the difference between E=mc2 and E-mv2? Probably knot? But why should eye as eye es jest a stew-ped small plain pilot who nose nuttin' abouts nuttin'!
Trick question.

They are the same.(It's the reflexive property of equations). E=E.

E=1/2mv^2 describes how much velocity changes in a given extraction of whatever energy a mass has to offer. Example: a 1kg ball traveling at 100mps hits the wall. How much energy is given off when it hits the wall? Initial is 100mps, final is 0. We use 100-0 =0 for v. If we wanted to extract only part of the balls energy then we would just slow it down. V in this case would be 100-50 = 50mps (say). The first eqn E=mc2 presumes the same thing, but using c as a standard velocity. The only difference between the two is that mc2 is the "all or nothing" version of 1/2mv^2.

In addition, I have to give you kudos for the perplexing line of authentic gibberish generated after the question.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#191141 May 21, 2014
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Grammarian, right? LMAO!!! I'll give you this much, you're the goofiest SOB I've ever had the displeasure of running across. You're a true loon from the fringe, joko! Seriously!
One "the" too many in my text. Guilty.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#191142 May 21, 2014
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
1. Ttue, one pilot required. However, and in commercial airline operations, they usually have two pilots. In the case of the Fuddy one, I don't know how many pilots.Let's say there was one only. That would mean he was, apart from the undercover agent1passenger, only 3 people knew about the plan to kill Fuddy : The pilot, the agent and you. Wow.
What does the rest of your post have to do with what the hell we are talking about, and your total inability to catch the gist of my made-up scenario.
Under 19 passengers, no flight attendant. Is why De Havilland limited its seats on the Twin Otter to 19. Could've been 20, 21 even, but the price of the extra seats would not pay for a flight attendant. Your turn : Why do some A-319s have one mid-plane emergency exit and some two? If you don't know, and I'm sure you don't, good luck finding the answer on Google.
You need to stay away from aviation questions. Here in the U.S. FAA Part 25 requires planes to be able to evacuate in 90 seconds. There are two versions of the A-319s. One can carry up to 124 passengers while the stretched version can carry 156 so I am sure the 156 passenger need extra exits to comply with the 90 second evac rule.
Oh, since Dr. Fuddy's plane was not recovered, they will probably never know what caused the plane to lose power. Oh, the Hawaiian Islands are just mountains sitting on the ocean floor. The Big Island is the "tallest"mountain in the world as measured from the sea floor and just a mile or so off every island you are in thousands of feet of water. No continental shelf out there.
And because the ocean currents have to pass through these very steep and deep mountain valleys, even on a good day it is not unusual to have 20 plus foot waves mid-channel. But then again what should eye nose as eye nose nuttin' abouts nuttin' as eye es jest a stew-ped small plain pilot.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#191143 May 21, 2014
Mauna Kea
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mauna Kea; Hawaiian: is a dormant volcano on the island of Hawaii. Standing 13,803 ft (4,207 m) above sea level, its peak is the highest point in the U.S. state of Hawaii. However, much of Mauna Kea is below sea level; when measured from its oceanic base, its height is 33,100 ft (10,100 m)ómore than twice Mount Everest's base-to-peak height of 11,980 to 15,260 ft (3,650 to 4,650 m).
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#191144 May 21, 2014
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, waiting for your grammar, and why not, spelling hints and corrections of my text. Go ahead.
Notice I've been very tolerant with you lately†because you've not commented on my grammar or spelling. But you just did, right?
HaHaHaHa! No one cares if you've been tolerant or not. We simply dismiss you. LMAO!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#191145 May 21, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you know the difference between E=mc2 and E-mv2? Probably knot? But why should eye as eye es jest a stew-ped small plain pilot who nose nuttin' abouts nuttin'!
Scrutiny wrote:
<quoted text>
Trick question.
They are the same.(It's the reflexive property of equations). E=E.
E=1/2mv^2 describes how much velocity changes in a given extraction of whatever energy a mass has to offer. Example: a 1kg ball traveling at 100mps hits the wall. How much energy is given off when it hits the wall? Initial is 100mps, final is 0. We use 100-0 =0 for v. If we wanted to extract only part of the balls energy then we would just slow it down. V in this case would be 100-50 = 50mps (say). The first eqn E=mc2 presumes the same thing, but using c as a standard velocity. The only difference between the two is that mc2 is the "all or nothing" version of 1/2mv^2.
In addition, I have to give you kudos for the perplexing line of authentic gibberish generated after the question.
Close but as Bill says, "no cigar"! C = speed of Light whereas V = Velocity.
If you double the speed of anything you quadruple the amount of kinetic energy. That is why a car's braking distance speed at 100 km/h is four times of the braking distance of 50 km/p, all other variables being constant.

Speed of light
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#191146 May 21, 2014
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
One "the" too many in my text. Guilty.
What in the world are you talking about, madman? Loony for sure.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#191147 May 21, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
You need to stay away from aviation questions. Here in the U.S. FAA Part 25 requires planes to be able to evacuate in 90 seconds. There are two versions of the A-319s. One can carry up to 124 passengers while the stretched version can carry 156 so I am sure the 156 passenger need extra exits to comply with the 90 second evac rule.
Oh, since Dr. Fuddy's plane was not recovered, they will probably never know what caused the plane to lose power. Oh, the Hawaiian Islands are just mountains sitting on the ocean floor. The Big Island is the "tallest"mountain in the world as measured from the sea floor and just a mile or so off every island you are in thousands of feet of water. No continental shelf out there.
And because the ocean currents have to pass through these very steep and deep mountain valleys, even on a good day it is not unusual to have 20 plus foot waves mid-channel. But then again what should eye nose as eye nose nuttin' abouts nuttin' as eye es jest a stew-ped small plain pilot.
No, YOU need to stay away from civil AND military aviation unless you meant army helicopters and small civilian aircraft. What does the evacuation time have to do with what we are talking about? And the A319 has no stretch version, same for the A320. Reason they carry 156+ instead of 124+ is tht the airplane is configured in a single economy class. THAT'S why you require to middle exits.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#191148 May 21, 2014
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
No, YOU need to stay away from civil AND military aviation unless you meant army helicopters and small civilian aircraft. What does the evacuation time have to do with what we are talking about? And the A319 has no stretch version, same for the A320. Reason they carry 156+ instead of 124+ is tht the airplane is configured in a single economy class. THAT'S why you require to middle exits.
Now shut the f-up!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:A32XFAMILYv...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#191149 May 21, 2014
In Sep. 1973 I was flying from Montgomery, AL to Corpus Christy, TX to pick up an overhauled Huey and fly it back to Fort Rucker, AL and we changed planes several times. One the the Army pilots I was traveling with remarked about the Douglas DC-9 we where on and I told him we were on a BAC 1-11.
Yep, even pilots get confused on aircraft types between different manufacturers and some can not tell between a A-318, A-319, A-320 and a A-321 which ARE made by the same company. Why Deep Throat Jacqueau probably did not know he has flown on different versions of the A-320 FAMILY!!!!
And he claims I have no idea what I am talking about!!!!

BAC One-Eleven
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The British Aircraft Corporation One-Eleven, also known as the BAC-111 or BAC 1-11, was a British short-range jet airliner of the 1960s and 1970s. It was the second short-haul jet airliner to enter service, following the French Sud Aviation Caravelle. The aircraft was also licence-produced in Romania during the 1980s as the ROMBAC One-Eleven.

The One-Eleven was originally conceived by Hunting Aircraft and was subsequently developed by the British Aircraft Corporation when Hunting merged into BAC along with several other British aircraft manufacturers in 1960. The One-Eleven was aimed at replacing the role of the earlier turboprop-powered Vickers Viscount on short-range routes. The One-Eleven made it to market ahead of rivals such as the McDonnell Douglas DC-9, which gave it a temporary edge on the market.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#191150 May 21, 2014
A flight school classmate I have known since 1969 sent this to me and said it was a Cessna and I informed him that it was actually a Maule M5-235. But what should he know, he is just a helicopter pilot.

Beer Stop

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#191151 May 21, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Did YOU see them engaged in any sexual activity? We did not see Bill and Monica but there is "evidence" that ended up on Monica's blue dress!!!
Oh, did he "give" those things to her or just allow her to use them? But in any event, they both got what they wanted and it was accentual.
And I seriously doubt if she is still riding in the Bentley or living in that $1.8 M home. If she had kept her mouth shut he probably would have paid her off but now she just got the boot in the azz,
C'mon, rougetard, Sterling has had a string of mistresses over the years. Only the Rougetard would be fooled. Tom didn't know his wife was playing around for how long?

Get real.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
There's no evidence if you're blind. Oh, that's right, she's just his "silly rabbit." Sterling gave her a $1.8 M home because she's his "silly rabbit"? And a Bentley, etc.
Yeah, just friends. And I'm Prince Harry.
<quoted text>

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#191152 May 21, 2014
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
If you could only comprehend what you read, you'd be much further along in life. I said everything that happened after the tapes were released were a by-product. The part that interests me is the legality of her actions. BTW, don't open the window and you don't get stung!
Ha ha ha ha ha ha. Sorry Romper, if you keep trying to defend the position that the bottom line was not the base motivation of the NBA taking action against Sterling, you're hopelessly insane.

BTW, moron, if you open the window, it's still not the CAUSE of the sting.

Moron.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Silly troll.
Sorry Romper, if the publicity didn't affect their finances they wouldn't give a crap. It's their bottom line that counts. Their motivation is profit driven; that is why they are involved.$$$, the motive force. Romper does not understand the difference between a triggering event and a cause or motivation.
Romper, if you open a window and a bee flies in and stings you on your butt, your butt hurts because you got stung by a bee, not because you opened a window.
Capisce?

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#191153 May 21, 2014
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
If you could only comprehend what you read, you'd be much further along in life. I said everything that happened after the tapes were released were a by-product. The part that interests me is the legality of her actions. BTW, don't open the window and you don't get stung!
Wowee-Zowee - a byproduct! So if your gf made public your admission that you killed your father, by releasing a tape, everything that happens afterward, is "just a byproduct." Hey man, it doesn't count, it's a BYPRODUCT! That's the ticket!!!!!

The legality of her actions, vis-a-vis the NBA is irrelevant. IRRELEVANT; That describes Romper to a Tee.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#191154 May 21, 2014
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>Ha ha ha ha ha ha. Sorry Romper, if you keep trying to defend the position that the bottom line was not the base motivation of the NBA taking action against Sterling, you're hopelessly insane.

BTW, moron, if you open the window, it's still not the CAUSE of the sting.

Moron.

wojar wrote, "
<quoted text>
Silly troll.
Sorry Romper, if the publicity didn't affect their finances they wouldn't give a crap. It's their bottom line that counts. Their motivation is profit driven; that is why they are involved.$$$, the motive force. Romper does not understand the difference between a triggering event and a cause or motivation.
Romper, if you open a window and a bee flies in and stings you on your butt, your butt hurts because you got stung by a bee, not because you opened a window.
Capisce?"
Well Romper is most certainly hopeless. Insane. Ignorant. Incompetent. Insecure. Take your pick

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#191155 May 21, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you know the difference between E=mc2 and E-mv2? Probably knot? But why should eye as eye es jest a stew-ped small plain pilot who nose nuttin' abouts nuttin'!
I learned that KE = 1.2 mv^2 in high school.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min VetnorsGate 1,521,428
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 2 hr TRD 71,284
News Chicago Restaurants Rally Against Trump Immigra... 3 hr Defeat Nancy Pelosi 7
Obumbler Back To Community Organizing 4 hr Defeat Nancy Pelosi 4
News Scenes from Saturday's March for Science 7 hr Trump is the man 1
Four letter word game (Dec '11) 8 hr honeymylove 2,526
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 10 hr SweLL GirL 10,573

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages