I don't care what they wrote, the F-14s were not involved in the Vietnam War. Flying offshore and not engaging in combat of any sort is not COMBAT!!!
You probably think the U-2 was/is a spy plane? Spy planes can be a Pam Am 747 landing at Moscow with hidden cameras. A U-2 is a military marked RECONNAISSANCE aircraft. Spies don't want people to even suspect they are spies!!!
Sorry, a U-2 is a reconnaissance aircraft and is marked as such. A Cessna 172 can be a "spy" plane but a U-2 can never be as we all know what the U-2's are used for!<quoted text>
You are shown proof, and in this case, 4 different ones and you are still in denial. Sad. Pathetic.
Then, you attempt to change the subject, very clumsy, very awkward, by going to the U-2? Yes, it was a spy plane. Ask Gary Powers. As to the PanAm 747s with cameras landing at Moscow, you are repeating another of your archived platitidunous posts which I replied to, but you ignore the truth.. Well, here is is again, Putin boot-licker, Air France was flying to Moscow long before PanAm , equipped with cameras that filmed the whole installations, all done and shared with the CIA. Try again.
Oh, do you know what a TR-1 is? That is the REAL designation for the U-2. "U" means Utitity" as in U-1 which is a De Havilland Otter. The U-3 is a Cessna 203 (Sky King for the 1950s)
The CIA called their TR-1s "U-2s" to confuse the Soviet Russians. And it worked too as all you Libtard Commies believe it also!!!