BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 239507 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Therealnews com

Edison, NJ

#188999 Apr 20, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Compared to you they are radical rightists but you are so far left, you have fallen of the edge of the Earth.
To you and your comrades, perjury is okay if it is down by someone I like (Bill Clinton) but if I think someone like Bush lied, why he should be executed!!!
Oh, the difference between a lie and perjury is perjury is a lie while under oath like in a court or grand jury and it has nothing to do with the political party you are affiliated with.
Rogue, you are so very far in right field that you are not even in the ball park if you think O'Lielly and Smith are liberal.

LOL

BTW: Perjury is wrong and Bush should have let Libby serve his jail time.

==========

JUDGE AGREED PLAME WAS COVERT
Was She or Wasn't She?
Arguing that Libby deserves jail time, Fitzgerald says Plame was a covert agent.
May 29, 2007 / http://tinyurl.com/6yokupx
In new court filings, special counsel Patrick Fitzgerald has finally resolved one of the most disputed issues at the core of the long-running CIA leak controversy: Valerie Plame Wilson, he asserts, was a “covert” CIA officer who repeatedly traveled overseas using a “cover identity” in order to disguise her relationship with the agency.
http://www.newsweek.com/2007/05/28/was-she-or...

----------

Libby Says Bush Authorized Leaks
http://tinyurl.com/zgjtq April 6, 2006
Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff has testified that President Bush authorized him to disclose the contents of a highly classified intelligence assessment to the media to defend the Bush administration's decision to go to war with Iraq, according to papers filed in federal court [PDF] on Wednesday by Patrick J. Fitzgerald, the special prosecutor in the CIA leak case. http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0406...

----------

Libby judge 'perplexed' by clemency
His 30-month sentence was appropriate for the former Cheney aide, he writes in his first public comments on the issue.
July 13, 2007 / http://tinyurl.com/3ds8xvn
WASHINGTON — In an unusual expression of frustration, the judge who sentenced former White House aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby to 30 months in jail, only to see the sentence commuted by President Bush, said he was "perplexed" by the act of clemency.

In his first public comments on the matter, U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton took issue with Bush's statement that the prison sentence ordered for Libby last month was "excessive." Walton defended the sentence, saying that he followed established legal precedents as well as a strict interpretation of federal sentencing guidelines that has been supported by Bush's own administration.
http://articles.latimes.com/2007/jul/13/natio...

------

Some Iraq Analysts Felt Pressure From Cheney Visits
June 5, 2003 / http://tinyurl.com/kjcxxys
Vice President Cheney and his most senior aide made multiple trips to the CIA over the past year to question analysts studying Iraq's weapons programs and alleged links to al Qaeda, creating an environment in which some analysts felt they were being pressured to make their assessments fit with the Bush administration's policy objectives, according to senior intelligence officials.
With Cheney taking the lead in the administration last August in advocating military action against Iraq by claiming it had weapons of mass destruction, the visits by the vice president and his chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, "sent signals, intended or otherwise, that a certain output was desired from here," one senior agency official said yesterday.
http://www.chron.com/news/article/CIA-brass-t...

------

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#189000 Apr 20, 2014
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
Your problem has nothing to do with a link Rogue because links have been there in one form or another since 2008. The birfoon's confusion has always been on the comprehension end.
So for instance when the HDoH posts “On April 27, 2011 President Barack Obama posted a certified copy of his original Certificate of Live Birth”
For information go to  http://www.whitehouse.gov/blo g/2011/04/27/president-obamas- long-form-birth-certificate the birfoon somehow reads something different, but to everyone else in the world save the ignorant birfoon it means exactly what it says.
 "I have witnessed the copying of the certificate and attest to the authenticity of these copies." link has been there since April, 2011.
Page four, last paragraph. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files...
Did you read it? I mean did you really read it??? She said it was a Computer COPY which means it is NOT a PHOTO COPY like the ones the Nordyke twins were given?!? Who gave the Nordyke twins PHOTO COPIES of their BCs? But they could not make a photo copy of Pres. Obama's?!? WHY NOT!!!!
A computer copy is not a copy of the actual document!!! Hey-Zeuz!!!! And that is why I call you Libtards as you do not seem to know the difference!!!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#189001 Apr 20, 2014
Here we go again as another loony-left organization tries to explain away what is happening to Global Warming. Of course they site another loony-left site, Nature Communications, which has been around only about four years which publishes "peer reviewed" articles.
Now, what does "peer review" actually mean? It should mean they send the draft copy to all other groups studying the same field but loony-lefty groups only send their drafts to LIKE MINDED groups who's gawd is Owl Gore.
Like it or not, about 2020 we will know if we are still in Global Warming, or on the verge of another Little Ice Age.
I don't know myself but I am not hoping for another Little Ice Age as that would cause wide spread famine and social unrest which could result in wars!!!
Ya know, war is one of the ways to control populations!!!

Frigid Winter? Blame 4,000 Years of Wild Jet Streams
LiveScience.com
By By Becky Oskin, Senior Writer April 18, 2014 1:42 PM

This winter's wild weather got its start 4,000 years ago, a new study finds.

The roaring jet stream, whose swooping winds drove frigid cold in the East and record warmth in the West this winter, first started twisting and turning about 4,000 years ago, according to a new analysis of ancient rainfall records from North America. Jet stream winds race from west to east, and kinks in the narrow atmospheric current can suck Arctic cold south or hold warm air in place.

The study shows the jet stream's plunging pattern is a long-standing natural phenomenon. However, the findings also suggest that global warming may boost the frequency or intensity of the curves, which would mean more winter extremes in the United States and Canada, the researchers said. The study was published today (April 16) in the journal Nature Communications.

http://news.yahoo.com/frigid-winter-blame-4-0...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#189002 Apr 20, 2014
Although this chart stops at June 2013 it still shows a trend. That between about 1997 and 2007 there was no real trend (no Global Warming or Cooling) but between 2007 and 2013 we have been in a slight cooling trend (please note I did not say Global Cooling)
If Global carbon dioxide levels have continued to go UP, why is the Global temps trending down?
Now, why in 2007 did they change the term "Global Warming" to "Climate Change"? I think even the loony-lefty scientist are not sure and they want to give themselves an out. "We told you we were going through climate change"!!!!

http://bobtisdale.files.wordpress.com/2013/07...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#189003 Apr 20, 2014
Why the NOAA Global Temperature Product Doesn’t Comply With WMO Standards
Posted on July 22, 2013 by Bob Tisdale

The opening paragraph of NOAA’s press release NCDC Releases June 2013 Global Climate Report begins with alarmist statistics and an error (my boldface):

According to NOAA scientists, the globally averaged temperature for June 2013 tied with 2006 as the fifth warmest June since record keeping began in 1880. It also marked the 37th consecutive June and 340th consecutive month (more than 28 years) with a global temperature above the 20th century average. The last below-average June temperature was June 1976 and the last below-average temperature for any month was February 1985.

First, the error: According to the NOAA Monthly Global (land and ocean combined into an anomaly) Index (°C), the “last below-average temperature for any month was” in reality was December 1984, not February 1985. Makes one wonder, if they can’t read a list of temperature anomalies, should we believe they can read thermometers?

Second, it’s very obvious that NOAA press releases have degraded to nothing but alarmist babble. More than two years ago, NOAA revised the base years they use for anomalies for most of their climate metrics. The CPC Update to Climatologies Notice webpage includes the following statement (my boldface):

Beginning with the January 2011 monthly data, all climatologies, anomalies, and indices presented within and related to the monthly Climate Diagnostics Bulletin will be updated according to current WMO standards. For datasets that span at least the past 30 years (such as atmospheric winds and pressure), the new anomalies will be based on the most recent 30-year climatology period 1981-2010.

Apparently, the NCDC didn’t get the same memo as the CPC. The Japanese Meteorological Agency (JMA) got the memo.

The following graph compares the NCDC global surface temperature product from January 1979 to June 2013, with the base years of 1901-2000 used by the NCDC and the base years of 1981-2010 recommended by the WMO.

If the NCDC had revised their base years to comply with WMO recommendations, the press release wouldn’t have the same alarm-bell ring to it:

According to NOAA scientists, the globally averaged temperature for June 2013 tied with 2006 as the fifth warmest June since record keeping began in 1880. It also marked the 17th consecutive June and 16th consecutive month (less than two years) with a global temperature above the 1981-2010 average. The last below-average June temperature was June 1996 and the last below-average temperature for any month was February 2012, though December 2012 was basically zero.

The monthly global surface temperature stats would be pretty boring if NOAA complied with WMO standards. Pretty boring indeed.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/07/22/why-the...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#189004 Apr 20, 2014
Therealnews com wrote:
<quoted text>
Rogue, you are so very far in right field that you are not even in the ball park if you think O'Lielly and Smith are liberal.
LOL
BTW: Perjury is wrong and Bush should have let Libby serve his jail time.
==========
JUDGE AGREED PLAME WAS COVERT
Was She or Wasn't She?
Arguing that Libby deserves jail time, Fitzgerald says Plame was a covert agent.
May 29, 2007 / http://tinyurl.com/6yokupx
In new court filings, special counsel Patrick Fitzgerald has finally resolved one of the most disputed issues at the core of the long-running CIA leak controversy: Valerie Plame Wilson, he asserts, was a “covert” CIA officer who repeatedly traveled overseas using a “cover identity” in order to disguise her relationship with the agency.
http://www.newsweek.com/2007/05/28/was-she-or...
----------
Libby Says Bush Authorized Leaks
http://tinyurl.com/zgjtq April 6, 2006
Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff has testified that President Bush authorized him to disclose the contents of a highly classified intelligence assessment to the media to defend the Bush administration's decision to go to war with Iraq, according to papers filed in federal court [PDF] on Wednesday by Patrick J. Fitzgerald, the special prosecutor in the CIA leak case. http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0406...
----------
Libby judge 'perplexed' by clemency
His 30-month sentence was appropriate for the former Cheney aide, he writes in his first public comments on the issue.
July 13, 2007 / http://tinyurl.com/3ds8xvn
WASHINGTON — In an unusual expression of frustration, the judge who sentenced former White House aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby to 30 months in jail, only to see the sentence commuted by President Bush, said he was "perplexed" by the act of clemency.
In his first public comments on the matter, U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton took issue with Bush's statement that the prison sentence ordered for Libby last month was "excessive." Walton defended the sentence, saying that he followed established legal precedents as well as a strict interpretation of federal sentencing guidelines that has been supported by Bush's own administration.
http://articles.latimes.com/2007/jul/13/natio...
------
Some Iraq Analysts Felt Pressure From Cheney Visits
June 5, 2003 / http://tinyurl.com/kjcxxys
Vice President Cheney and his most senior aide made multiple trips to the CIA over the past year to question analysts studying Iraq's weapons programs and alleged links to al Qaeda, creating an environment in which some analysts felt they were being pressured to make their assessments fit with the Bush administration's policy objectives, according to senior intelligence officials.
With Cheney taking the lead in the administration last August in advocating military action against Iraq by claiming it had weapons of mass destruction, the visits by the vice president and his chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, "sent signals, intended or otherwise, that a certain output was desired from here," one senior agency official said yesterday.
http://www.chron.com/news/article/CIA-brass-t...
------
Oh wow, all of you souses are from loony-left rags. I wonder why?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#189005 Apr 20, 2014
Therealnews com wrote:
<quoted text>
Rogue, you are so very far in right field that you are not even in the ball park if you think O'Lielly and Smith are liberal.
LOL
BTW: Perjury is wrong and Bush should have let Libby serve his jail time.
==========
JUDGE AGREED PLAME WAS COVERT
Was She or Wasn't She?
Arguing that Libby deserves jail time, Fitzgerald says Plame was a covert agent.
May 29, 2007 / http://tinyurl.com/6yokupx
In new court filings, special counsel Patrick Fitzgerald has finally resolved one of the most disputed issues at the core of the long-running CIA leak controversy: Valerie Plame Wilson, he asserts, was a “covert” CIA officer who repeatedly traveled overseas using a “cover identity” in order to disguise her relationship with the agency.
http://www.newsweek.com/2007/05/28/was-she-or...
----------
Libby Says Bush Authorized Leaks
http://tinyurl.com/zgjtq April 6, 2006
Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff has testified that President Bush authorized him to disclose the contents of a highly classified intelligence assessment to the media to defend the Bush administration's decision to go to war with Iraq, according to papers filed in federal court [PDF] on Wednesday by Patrick J. Fitzgerald, the special prosecutor in the CIA leak case. http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0406...
----------
Libby judge 'perplexed' by clemency
His 30-month sentence was appropriate for the former Cheney aide, he writes in his first public comments on the issue.
July 13, 2007 / http://tinyurl.com/3ds8xvn
WASHINGTON — In an unusual expression of frustration, the judge who sentenced former White House aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby to 30 months in jail, only to see the sentence commuted by President Bush, said he was "perplexed" by the act of clemency.
In his first public comments on the matter, U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton took issue with Bush's statement that the prison sentence ordered for Libby last month was "excessive." Walton defended the sentence, saying that he followed established legal precedents as well as a strict interpretation of federal sentencing guidelines that has been supported by Bush's own administration.
http://articles.latimes.com/2007/jul/13/natio...
------
Some Iraq Analysts Felt Pressure From Cheney Visits
June 5, 2003 / http://tinyurl.com/kjcxxys
Vice President Cheney and his most senior aide made multiple trips to the CIA over the past year to question analysts studying Iraq's weapons programs and alleged links to al Qaeda, creating an environment in which some analysts felt they were being pressured to make their assessments fit with the Bush administration's policy objectives, according to senior intelligence officials.
With Cheney taking the lead in the administration last August in advocating military action against Iraq by claiming it had weapons of mass destruction, the visits by the vice president and his chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, "sent signals, intended or otherwise, that a certain output was desired from here," one senior agency official said yesterday.
http://www.chron.com/news/article/CIA-brass-t...
------
Several points here. Just because ONE judges makes it a particular ruling, does not mean it would have been upheld on appeal.
Next, even though this was a NON-violent crime the judge ordered Scooter to prison before his appeal could be heard. WHY?
Next, Scooter was expecting a PARDON and not a commutation for Pres. Bush. In fact VP Cheney criticized Bush for not giving hi a pardon.
Oh, "Some Iraq Analysts"? Why you can always find "some" on either side of ANY issue. ANY ISSUE!!! Get over it!!!
Remember, VP Cheney wanted a FULL PARDON for Scooter!!!!!!!!!!

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#189006 Apr 20, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you read it? I mean did you really read it??? She said it was a Computer COPY which means it is NOT a PHOTO COPY like the ones the Nordyke twins were given?!? Who gave the Nordyke twins PHOTO COPIES of their BCs? But they could not make a photo copy of Pres. Obama's?!? WHY NOT!!!!
A computer copy is not a copy of the actual document!!! Hey-Zeuz!!!! And that is why I call you Libtards as you do not seem to know the difference!!!
It would appear that 535 congress and senate persons, 9 suprerme court judges, 50 state governors, the whole top GOP leadership, 210 courts, etc. DO NOT KNOW THE DIFFERENCE. between a photocopy and a computer copy. But birthers and so-called experts do. Go figure.

Explain that away along with the F-14 mystery, Rogue.
wojar

Bristol, CT

#189007 Apr 20, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Several points here. Just because ONE judges makes it a particular ruling, does not mean it would have been upheld on appeal.
Next, even though this was a NON-violent crime the judge ordered Scooter to prison before his appeal could be heard. WHY?
Next, Scooter was expecting a PARDON and not a commutation for Pres. Bush. In fact VP Cheney criticized Bush for not giving hi a pardon.
Oh, "Some Iraq Analysts"? Why you can always find "some" on either side of ANY issue. ANY ISSUE!!! Get over it!!!
Remember, VP Cheney wanted a FULL PARDON for Scooter!!!!!!!!!!
Points? Scooter was convicted of a very serious crime and was found guilty by a jury. His conviction was never overturned and still stands.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#189008 Apr 20, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you read it? I mean did you really read it??? She said it was a Computer COPY which means it is NOT a PHOTO COPY like the ones the Nordyke twins were given?!? Who gave the Nordyke twins PHOTO COPIES of their BCs? But they could not make a photo copy of Pres. Obama's?!? WHY NOT!!!!
A computer copy is not a copy of the actual document!!! Hey-Zeuz!!!! And that is why I call you Libtards as you do not seem to know the difference!!!
A computer copy is not a copy of the actual document? RU on drugs?

Only photocopies are real copies? RU serious?

These were the old rules:

"Method of preparation. Standard copies of vital records may
be prepared by photographic, dry copy reproduction process or
by typing. If prepared by standard photographic process, the
copy must not be smaller than one-half the size of the original.
If prepared by dry copy process, heavy grade safety paper or
specially treated paper must be used."

A standard copy made by typing is not a copy?

And if it is a photocopy is it not a real copy unless done by a genuine Xerox copier?

Rogue is a loony piece of work.
Learn to Read

Scottsburg, IN

#189009 Apr 20, 2014
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>A computer copy is not a copy of the actual document? RU on drugs?

Only photocopies are real copies? RU serious?

These were the old rules:

"Method of preparation. Standard copies of vital records may
be prepared by photographic, dry copy reproduction process or
by typing. If prepared by standard photographic process, the
copy must not be smaller than one-half the size of the original.
If prepared by dry copy process, heavy grade safety paper or
specially treated paper must be used."

A standard copy made by typing is not a copy?

And if it is a photocopy is it not a real copy unless done by a genuine Xerox copier?

Rogue is a loony piece of work.
I never trust anything that didn't come off a mimeograph .... You can smell the authenticity

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#189010 Apr 20, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Here we go again as another loony-left organization tries to explain away what is happening to Global Warming. Of course they site another loony-left site, Nature Communications, which has been around only about four years which publishes "peer reviewed" articles.
Now, what does "peer review" actually mean? It should mean they send the draft copy to all other groups studying the same field but loony-lefty groups only send their drafts to LIKE MINDED groups who's gawd is Owl Gore.
Does Rogue know that Nature Publishing Group is the publisher of Nature, the most prestigious scientific journal in the world?

Here is one of my favorite papers published in that "loony lefty" science journal in 1953.

http://www.fossilmuseum.net/Biology/WatsonCri...
http://tinyurl.com/mkrs6gb

It was a one page article by J.D. Watson and F.H.C. Crick.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#189011 Apr 20, 2014
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
It would appear that 535 congress and senate persons, 9 suprerme court judges, 50 state governors, the whole top GOP leadership, 210 courts, etc. DO NOT KNOW THE DIFFERENCE. between a photocopy and a computer copy. But birthers and so-called experts do. Go figure.
Explain that away along with the F-14 mystery, Rogue.
No mystery with the F-14s. No U.S. aircraft flew any combat missions in SEA after August 1973 and there were no F-14s in service before that date. Ergo, no F-14s ever flew into S. Vietnamese airspace much less were involved in any combat operations.
Oh, the U.S.S.C has never heard one case about Obama. NONE. When there is a petition, five out of the nine must first agree for the case to be heard before the case will be heard.

Supreme Court refuses to hear Kerchner v. Obama
Clarence Thomas, "we are avoiding that issue".

Yep, unless 5 out of the 9 judges agree to hear a case, it is dead!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#189012 Apr 20, 2014
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Does Rogue know that Nature Publishing Group is the publisher of Nature, the most prestigious scientific journal in the world?
Here is one of my favorite papers published in that "loony lefty" science journal in 1953.
http://www.fossilmuseum.net/Biology/WatsonCri...
http://tinyurl.com/mkrs6gb
It was a one page article by J.D. Watson and F.H.C. Crick.
And how long has "Nature Communications been published?

Nature Communications
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Nature Communications is a bimonthly peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the Nature Publishing Group since 2010.

Next, is it Nature Publishing Group's work or are they just publishing anything a loony-lefty source hands them?

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#189013 Apr 20, 2014
[QUOTE who='Rogue Scholar 05"]
Here we go again as another loony-left organization tries to explain away what is happening to Global Warming. Of course they site another loony-left site, Nature Communications, which has been around only about four years which publishes "peer reviewed" articles.
Now, what does "peer review" actually mean? It should mean they send the draft copy to all other groups studying the same field but loony-lefty groups only send their drafts to LIKE MINDED groups who's gawd is Owl Gore.[/QUOTE]

The irony is that the illiterate buffoon decries peer review but is the guy who claimed that a 1979-2000 arctic ice extent baseline for SUMMER months is evidence that the "books were cooked" because it was different than a 1981-2010 baseline in WINTER months.

But birfoons don't understand irony.

Scientist review science. Does Rogue think truck drivers should review clinical trial data before publication?

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#189014 Apr 20, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
And how long has "Nature Communications been published?
Nature Communications
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Nature Communications is a bimonthly peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the Nature Publishing Group since 2010.
Next, is it Nature Publishing Group's work or are they just publishing anything a loony-lefty source hands them?
From a recent paper in nature Communications. Real Loony Lefty stuff, eh?

Cellular protection using Flt3 and PI3K&#945; inhibitors demonstrates multiple mechanisms of oxidative glutamate toxicity.

AuthorsYunyi Kang, Stefano Tiziani, Goonho Park, Marcus Kaul, Giovanni Paternostro

Summary
Cellular oxidative stress is implicated in neurodegeneration. Here, Kang et al. show that the receptor tyrosine kinase Flt3 and the signalling molecule PI3K&#945; play key roles in glutamate-mediated oxidative stress in neuronal cells, which can be prevented by Flt3- or PI3K&#945;-specific inhibitors.

Or how about this one?

"IKK&#945; restoration via EZH2 suppression induces nasopharyngeal carcinoma differentiation"

Or this one?
"Polymeric molecular sieve membranes via in situ cross-linking of non-porous polymer membrane templates "

Does Rogue Moron think truck drivers should be reviewers who decide whether these pass muster and should be published?
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Does Rogue know that Nature Publishing Group is the publisher of Nature, the most prestigious scientific journal in the world?
Here is one of my favorite papers published in that "loony lefty" science journal in 1953.
http://www.fossilmuseum.net/Biology/WatsonCri ...
http://tinyurl.com/mkrs6gb
It was a one page article by J.D. Watson and F.H.C. Crick.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#189015 Apr 20, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
No mystery with the F-14s. No U.S. aircraft flew any combat missions in SEA after August 1973 and there were no F-14s in service before that date. Ergo, no F-14s ever flew into S. Vietnamese airspace much less were involved in any combat operations.
Oh, the U.S.S.C has never heard one case about Obama. NONE. When there is a petition, five out of the nine must first agree for the case to be heard before the case will be heard.
Supreme Court refuses to hear Kerchner v. Obama
Clarence Thomas, "we are avoiding that issue".
Yep, unless 5 out of the 9 judges agree to hear a case, it is dead!
In denial once more , I see. What about "Operation Frequent Wind?". Do you or do you not trust Wikipedia? Here it is again :

"F-14 Tomcat operational history
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Main article: Grumman F-14 Tomcat

American withdrawal from Saigon (1975)[edit]
Main article: Operation Frequent Wind
The Tomcat made its combat debut during Operation Frequent Wind, the evacuation of American citizens from Saigon, in April 1975. F-14As from Fighter Squadron 1 (VF-1) and VF-2, operating from the USS Enterprise (CVN-65), flew combat air patrols over South Vietnam to provide fighter cover for the evacuation route.[2]"

==========

Ðo you at least realise you look like an idiot?

And , well, the Supreme Court refused to hear the absurd cases. What does that mean to you? That they had no merit. You quote Clarence Thomas? Really? Those must have been the first words the esteemed justice has uttered in a long long time, seeing as it is on record that never, ever, in his long , too-long tenure on the court, he has never said one word for or against in any case.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#189016 Apr 20, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
And how long has "Nature Communications been published?
Nature Communications
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Nature Communications is a bimonthly peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the Nature Publishing Group since 2010.
Next, is it Nature Publishing Group's work or are they just publishing anything a loony-lefty source hands them?
Relationship to other Nature journals

Nature Communications is editorially independent, and its editors will make their own decisions independently of the other Nature journals. It is for authors alone to decide where to submit their manuscripts. Nature will continue to publish the most significant advances in science and the Nature research journals will publish landmark papers of interest to their specific communities. Nature Communications will publish high-quality papers from all areas of science that represent important advances within specific scientific disciplines, but that might not necessarily have the scientific reach of papers published in Nature and the Nature research journals. For papers that could satisfy the scope of more than one Nature journal, the choice of which journal to submit to first lies with the authors.

http://www.nature.com/ncomms/about/index.html

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#189017 Apr 20, 2014
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
In denial once more , I see. What about "Operation Frequent Wind?". Do you or do you not trust Wikipedia? Here it is again :
"F-14 Tomcat operational history
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Main article: Grumman F-14 Tomcat
American withdrawal from Saigon (1975)[edit]
Main article: Operation Frequent Wind
The Tomcat made its combat debut during Operation Frequent Wind, the evacuation of American citizens from Saigon, in April 1975. F-14As from Fighter Squadron 1 (VF-1) and VF-2, operating from the USS Enterprise (CVN-65), flew combat air patrols over South Vietnam to provide fighter cover for the evacuation route.[2]"
==========
Ðo you at least realise you look like an idiot?
And , well, the Supreme Court refused to hear the absurd cases. What does that mean to you? That they had no merit. You quote Clarence Thomas? Really? Those must have been the first words the esteemed justice has uttered in a long long time, seeing as it is on record that never, ever, in his long , too-long tenure on the court, he has never said one word for or against in any case.
Oh, and did not the 210 courts, or most of them, ruled against the depositions, or dismissed them with guffaws of laughter, specially after the "empty chair" farce, to be repeated later on by ole buddy Clint at the GOP convention.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#189018 Apr 20, 2014
corr : rule grrr

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 min Horatio 1,508,959
Local Politics Do you approve of Michael Madigan as ? 3 min tom 1
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 2 hr mdbuilder 63,559
Obama has LEAK under sink. 3 hr TroyTheTruePlumber 38
Graduation in Detroit. 5 hr De Bow 2
The Scoop on Weiner. 10 hr Is he Circumcised 3
Look at Minn. Maine & Michigan. 10 hr Halal-muslims 3

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages