Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>Your assertion is even more incredulous than any birther fantasy.
From up here and across the border, the whole Constitutional thing appears to be so ridiculous, outdated and passÃ©.
Typical Libtardian Logic 101. "I disagree so it is not relevant"!!! I wonder why we have a U.S. Supreme Court?
BTW, it looks like Chief Justice Roberts has sided against the Obama administration in the Hobby Lobby case. You can tell from the rhetoric coming out of the White House.
I knew you'd bite at that one. You would think you would choke on that foot-long red herring. Have you been practicing in the men's room? Maybe I should start calling you "Deep Throat"?<quoted text>
Ha ha, you are so funny. Who will forget your "inside information" , the one that said John Roberts nixed Obamacare the very moment the brief was handed to him. Will you deny that? Well,we know how that turned out, don't we? This time, you wrote :
"BTW, it looks like Chief Justice Roberts has sided against the Obama administration in the Hobby Lobby case. You can tell from the rhetoric coming out of the White House."
In the Obamacare thing, you accused Roberts of being bought out by Obama. If you're wrong (again), what's your excuse gonna be? More payola?