BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 242530 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#185936 Mar 2, 2014
Slick Willie wrote:
<quoted text>Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>Isn't it hilarious how these fools pretend that things like Frank Marshal Davis book does not exist or that Frank himself made the claims about how he broke in Barry's young mother?
I'm not sure if you've heard about this one, but it is even more interesting as to whether Barry's real father is the Kenyan socialist or not. The resemblance to Barry is striking.

http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCRqBaPzpyh3LG ...

Are you calling a fellow comrade communist like Frank Marshal Davis a liar?

Did I pull your chain. I soooo sorry you are upset with the truth. Next time I will lie so you will be happy camper! Kum ba yah
Truth? Chain?

No bigot - You just proved who and what you are. You want to lazy to criticize policy and want to attack family members? Why not just wear an "I am a moron" t-shirt and move to Canada?
Slick Willie

Jacksonville, FL

#185937 Mar 2, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Oh Jacqueau, it is okay for Muslims in Canada to refuse service to someone based on their religious beliefs? Or is the law applied only to Christians?!?
Lesbian Denied Haircut by Male Muslim Barbers
Posted on March 1, 2014 by Gary DeMar
Read more at http://godfatherpolitics.com/14563/lesbian-de ..
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
It is NOT okay. Muslims cannot deny service to ANY one as long as they are not threatening, menacing or covered with sh*t. If bill of rights, if the law is not respected by authorities, aand that's happening too often in U.S., Canada and other places, that does not mean it's okay to discriminate. Your examples are no good. I'll give you a better one,: Just because O.J. was found not guilty doesn't mean he didn't do it , but more important, it doesn't make murder okay.
Yes, but Canada, like America, will not prosecute a Muslim unless it is an honor killing!
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#185938 Mar 2, 2014
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>Truth? Chain?

No bigot - You just proved who and what you are. You want to lazy to criticize policy and want to attack family members? Why not just wear an "I am a moron" t-shirt and move to Canada?
To be too lazy ....

Wouldn't want to incur the ire of the typing cops

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#185939 Mar 2, 2014
Slick Willie wrote:
<quoted text>
Using your Libtardian Logic, Obama has president in 2008 so HE must have rigged the votes?
I was a DEMOCRAT they caught in Palm Beach Count with a Vote-a-Matic in the trunk of his car but they did not prosecute him because they did not catch him using it. Why would a voting official of any party have a voting machine in his private car?
Sigh. The more you blatter on, the less you comprehend, the more your discourse becomes irrelevant.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#185940 Mar 2, 2014
Slick Willie wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Oh Jacqueau, it is okay for Muslims in Canada to refuse service to someone based on their religious beliefs? Or is the law applied only to Christians?!?
Lesbian Denied Haircut by Male Muslim Barbers
Posted on March 1, 2014 by Gary DeMar
Read more at http://godfatherpolitics.com/14563/lesbian-de... text>
Yes, but Canada, like America, will not prosecute a Muslim unless it is an honor killing!
You still don't get it. It doesn't matter. The law is the law but often it will not be applied. Blame the authorities who are supposed to enforce it, not the law itself. If you have the right the refuse service to gays and married gays, that is unconstitutional in both my country and yours. It then opens the door to refusal to serve blacks, Jews, native Americans , etc. May I remind you that the governor of Arizona, a woman, has more balls than its legislature.? May I also remind you that Arizona is the state that initially refused to follow Washington's lead and declare a Martin Luther Key Day? Only threats of witholding federal grants forced Arizona's hand. Finally, Arizona is Joe Arpaio's and his stick horse posse' s home. Need I say more?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#185941 Mar 2, 2014
Slick Willie wrote:
Yep. Frank Marshal Davis liked that young white meat.
Sex Rebel: Black (Memoirs of a Gash Gourmet),(written under pseudonym "Bob Greene"); Greenleaf Publishing Company (Evanston, IL), 1968
Rogue aka Slick Willie : "Yep. Frank Marshal Davis liked that young white meat. " Yup, nothing racist there, not even slightly. How about "Sick Willie, Rogue?

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#185944 Mar 2, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
No it has NOT been established that man-made CO2 has an effect on Global temperatures, Less than 10% of all scientist believe that. Oh, we are still not as hot as we were during either the Medieval Warm Period or the Roman Warm Period and water did not boil then except water in a volcano.
In fact during the Medieval Warm period there was more rain in Mongolia and in the North American Southwest which provided for the population growths of the Mongols and the Anasazi Indians. In Scandinavia the Norsemen population grew and they went raiding.
During the Roman Warm Period the northern Germanic peoples population zoomed and when it turned colder they moved south and raided Rome!!!
You need to study your history.
I'm sorry Rouge but the scientists of the world, practicing scientists, not people who say they're scientists in a pathetic poll that considers anyone who took a science course in college as a scientist, but actual practicing scientists believe with an overwhelming consensus that global warming deniers are ignorant crackpots.

As for the Medieval Warm period, it was not a global event. Temperatures in Northern Europe today are about the same as during the Medieval Warm Period but the Earth was cooler during the Medieval Warm Period then it is today.

"[C]urrent global surface temperatures are hotter than at any time in the past 1,400 years (the general 'hockey stick' shape, as shown in Figure 1), and that while the Medieval Warm Period (MWP) and Little Ice Age (LIA) are clearly visible events in their reconstruction, they were not globally synchronized events."

http://www.skepticalscience.com/pages2k-confi...

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#185945 Mar 2, 2014
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
So one degree is substantial? "It could be?" Quit pretending to be such a moron Woj. I know you have to be smarter then that.
All you have to do is look at how bird range maps have changed over the past one hundred years to see that one degree is significant.

And, BTW. climate scientists have estimated probable range of temperature rise for the next 100 years, something like 2 - 5 degrees. "Could be" is supposed to relate to a sane reader that probability is involved. it could be that Obmoron simply doesn't possess basic reasoning skills.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
It could be substantially more than 1 degree in the next 100 years.
And the argument that we should not get screened for cancer because we might die in an automobile accident is simply FOS.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#185946 Mar 2, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Again you show a site that is dedicated to debunking Climate Change skeptics. but you insist his point of view is one hundred percent correct when it is an opinion. Did you notice the first commenter who claims there was no CO2 during the Little Ice Age? If that were true, how did all plants grow? Without CO2, all plants will die!!!
Yep, CO2 is as important to plants as O2 is to us animals. And plants are growing faster today because there is more plant food in our air!!! And that is a good thing!!! I would rather have Global Warming than another Little Ice Age but there is a significant number of scientists who think we are more likely to be in another Little Ice Age in the next decade than in another Medieval-type Warm Period.
The Skeptical Science article cited several peer reviewed articles showing recent data and findings. It's not simply the opinion of the author.

And what some commenter commented is irrelevant, as is Rouge's willfully uninformed opinion.

BTW, if plant growth depended on only one variable, CO2, an increase would be beneficial. That's not how it works, Bozo. For example, an increase of 1 degree in some locations will cause the land to become drier even with increased rainfall.

Debunking the CO2 is plant food so more is always better myth:

http://www.skepticalscience.com/co2-plant-foo...
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
ObMoron seems to be responding to a different post.
<quoted text>
"We're fortunate that the amount of solar radiation reaching the Earth's surface is very stable. Climate contrarians will often ask if we'd prefer if the planet were warming or cooling, suggesting that global warming is a good thing because at least the planet isn't getting colder. This is a false dichotomy - an ideal climate is a stable one. The relatively stable climate over the past 10,000 years has allowed establishment of human civilization, by making it possible to create large stationary agricultural farms because we could rely on stable weather patterns."
http://skepticalscience.com/grand-solar-minim ...
It has nothing to do with "communism", "one world government" or the bogeyman.
It has to do with responsible management of resources and leaving the planet in decent condition for our children and grandchildren.
The magnitude of global temperature increase that will occur if we do not do something about anthropogenic CO2 emissions will be unprecedented, and will be disruptive of the stable climate that has allowed civilization to develop.
Those are the facts baby. It has nothing to do with your hatred of Obama, or anything to do with Communism, socialism, or the bogeyman.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#185947 Mar 2, 2014
Incidentally I did my graduate work in a laboratory headed by a scientist who was a major contributor to studies of the enzyme, ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase (RUBISCO), which fixes CO2 in photosynthesis. My first experiment in his lab was with RUBISCO I isolated from spinach, investigating CO2-enzyme-metal complexes using electron spin resonance techniques. But Rougie thinks that "CO2 is plant food" is news.
wojar

Bristol, CT

#185948 Mar 2, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>Isn't it hilarious how these fools pretend that things like Frank Marshal Davis book does not exist or that Frank himself made the claims about how he broke in Barry's young mother?
<quoted text>
Are you calling a fellow comrade communist like Frank Marshal Davis a liar?
No he's calling you birfoons liars. Davis never knew Dunham when she was a 13 year old living with her parents in Seattle. He was nowhere near there.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#185949 Mar 3, 2014
From CBS News so it must be George Soros approved.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/03/02/th...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#185950 Mar 3, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>Isn't it hilarious how these fools pretend that things like Frank Marshal Davis book does not exist or that Frank himself made the claims about how he broke in Barry's young mother?
<quoted text>
Are you calling a fellow comrade communist like Frank Marshal Davis a liar?
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>No he's calling you birfoons liars. Davis never knew Dunham when she was a 13 year old living with her parents in Seattle. He was nowhere near there.
Dunham was just 13 when she got pregnant with Barrack?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#185952 Mar 3, 2014
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
The Skeptical Science article cited several peer reviewed articles showing recent data and findings. It's not simply the opinion of the author.
And what some commenter commented is irrelevant, as is Rouge's willfully uninformed opinion.
BTW, if plant growth depended on only one variable, CO2, an increase would be beneficial. That's not how it works, Bozo. For example, an increase of 1 degree in some locations will cause the land to become drier even with increased rainfall.
Debunking the CO2 is plant food so more is always better myth:
http://www.skepticalscience.com/co2-plant-foo...
<quoted text>
Ah Libtardian Peer groups are like circle-jerks. One Libtard hands his papers while the Libtard on the other side hands him his. They then turn and nod at each other.
How come Dr. Michael Mann, the tree-ring reader, will not let any independent person review his work?!? The same as no independent document expert has ever been allowed to examine any of BO's birther documents!!!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#185953 Mar 3, 2014
wojar wrote:
Incidentally I did my graduate work in a laboratory headed by a scientist who was a major contributor to studies of the enzyme, ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase (RUBISCO), which fixes CO2 in photosynthesis. My first experiment in his lab was with RUBISCO I isolated from spinach, investigating CO2-enzyme-metal complexes using electron spin resonance techniques. But Rougie thinks that "CO2 is plant food" is news.
Well Wotard, can you tell us which plant can live without CO2? Just like we animals can not live without oxygen, plants can not live without carbon dioxide.
Oh, and education is worthless without commonsense and you obviously have a room temperature CQ (Commonsense Quotient).

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#185954 Mar 3, 2014
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sorry Rouge but the scientists of the world, practicing scientists, not people who say they're scientists in a pathetic poll that considers anyone who took a science course in college as a scientist, but actual practicing scientists believe with an overwhelming consensus that global warming deniers are ignorant crackpots.
As for the Medieval Warm period, it was not a global event. Temperatures in Northern Europe today are about the same as during the Medieval Warm Period but the Earth was cooler during the Medieval Warm Period then it is today.
"[C]urrent global surface temperatures are hotter than at any time in the past 1,400 years (the general 'hockey stick' shape, as shown in Figure 1), and that while the Medieval Warm Period (MWP) and Little Ice Age (LIA) are clearly visible events in their reconstruction, they were not globally synchronized events."
http://www.skepticalscience.com/pages2k-confi...
Oh wow, 2007 (2006) again. By then they knew their numbers where not working so they had to reinterpret temps during the Medieval Warm period. You do know a lot of scientists do not accept that hockey slick crapola, don't you.
Also, do you remember those tree stumps in Alaska that were found recent and carbon dated to about 2,000 years ago (Roman Warm Period)? Well, why are there not NEW tree growing there now? Maybe it is still to cold for them to grow now which means during the Roman Warm Period, it was hotter than today!!!
But you lack commonsense so I do not think you can make the connection!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#185955 Mar 3, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>Isn't it hilarious how these fools pretend that things like Frank Marshal Davis book does not exist or that Frank himself made the claims about how he broke in Barry's young mother?
<quoted text>
Are you calling a fellow comrade communist like Frank Marshal Davis a liar?
<quoted text>
Dunham was just 13 when she got pregnant with Barrack?
Let me 'splain it to the very slow one again. Davis claimed to have indulged in statutory rape with a 13-year old called Anne. When Dunham was 13, she lived in Seattle with her parents and Davis was nowhere near Seattle.

Capisce?
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>No he's calling you birfoons liars. Davis never knew Dunham when she was a 13 year old living with her parents in Seattle. He was nowhere near there.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#185956 Mar 3, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah Libtardian Peer groups are like circle-jerks. One Libtard hands his papers while the Libtard on the other side hands him his. They then turn and nod at each other.
How come Dr. Michael Mann, the tree-ring reader, will not let any independent person review his work?!? The same as no independent document expert has ever been allowed to examine any of BO's birther documents!!!
Lacking a rebuttal the Rougetard attacks the messenger, the practicing scientists in their fields. Should we rather have truck drivers reviewing articles for publication in the Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine or the Journal of Organic Chemistry?

Rouge cannot even understand the peer reviewed literature that he pathetically attempts to belittle. Where does he think Kerry Mullis should have published his paper on the polymerase chain reaction? Highlights for Children?
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
The Skeptical Science article cited several peer reviewed articles showing recent data and findings. It's not simply the opinion of the author.
And what some commenter commented is irrelevant, as is Rouge's willfully uninformed opinion.
BTW, if plant growth depended on only one variable, CO2, an increase would be beneficial. That's not how it works, Bozo. For example, an increase of 1 degree in some locations will cause the land to become drier even with increased rainfall.
Debunking the CO2 is plant food so more is always better myth:
http://www.skepticalscience.com/co2-plant-foo ...

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#185957 Mar 3, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh wow, 2007 (2006) again. By then they knew their numbers where not working so they had to reinterpret temps during the Medieval Warm period. You do know a lot of scientists do not accept that hockey slick crapola, don't you.
Also, do you remember those tree stumps in Alaska that were found recent and carbon dated to about 2,000 years ago (Roman Warm Period)? Well, why are there not NEW tree growing there now? Maybe it is still to cold for them to grow now which means during the Roman Warm Period, it was hotter than today!!!
But you lack commonsense so I do not think you can make the connection!
Several studies have validated the hockey stick. Rougetards are in denial.

BTW, the Rougetard seems to be having another Alzheimer's attack. He seems to forget that he was just informed that the Roman Warm Period was not a globally synchronized event. Does the Rougetard understand what that means? It means the same as that a snow storm in Jacksonville doesn't mean that it's colder throughout the world.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sorry Rouge but the scientists of the world, practicing scientists, not people who say they're scientists in a pathetic poll that considers anyone who took a science course in college as a scientist, but actual practicing scientists believe with an overwhelming consensus that global warming deniers are ignorant crackpots.
As for the Medieval Warm period, it was not a global event. Temperatures in Northern Europe today are about the same as during the Medieval Warm Period but the Earth was cooler during the Medieval Warm Period then it is today.
"[C]urrent global surface temperatures are hotter than at any time in the past 1,400 years (the general 'hockey stick' shape, as shown in Figure 1), and that while the Medieval Warm Period (MWP) and Little Ice Age (LIA) are clearly visible events in their reconstruction, they were not globally synchronized events."
http://www.skepticalscience.com/pages2k-confi ...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#185958 Mar 3, 2014
Intro to 2014 Senate Races

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min old_moose 1,580,020
News Mayor Emanuel, City of Chicago File Federal Law... 4 min spud 93
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 20 min _Zoey_ 11,167
Depression, pain n anxiety treatment; 3 hr They cannot kill ... 2
What's the real story about Charlottsville? 4 hr Sojourner UNtruth 14
Trump Twilight Zone 6 hr ROD b Conservative 9
Meth hooker dies at dem donor home. 6 hr The Answer 12

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages