More obsessions on blacks and nary a comment on the reasons for these statistics . But I'll ask you this : How many blacks have killed whites in Florida lately for having loud music played at them, bad-mouthing them, or throwing popcorn at them?Mmmm, and another point about Les Jacqeau's comment about "Tough white guys with guns". BLACKS are almost 8 times more likely to murder than WHITES are. So stop this evil white guy shit!!! You are the racist bigot.
From Wiki: Homicide
According to the US Department of Justice, blacks accounted for 52.5% of homicide offenders from 1980 to 2008, with whites 45.3% and Native Americans and Asians 2.2%. The offending rate for blacks was almost 8 times higher than whites, and the victim rate 6 times higher. Most murders were intraracial, with 84% of white homicide victims murdered by whites, and 93% of black victims murdered by blacks
FYI, I never said whites OR blacks were evil. I was talking about gun-toting death-wish-to-kill-blacks-with -their guns-whites, is all. Oh, you think these losers represent the majority of whites? Well and good, I never thought or wrote it.
As to one of your remarks up there, namely that Martin was the aggressor - why's that? I've been over this many times, you never have a reply, you just keep coming back to the same tired old refrain. Do you conclude that Martin aggressed Zimmerman because he was on top of him? What kind of proof is that? A man attacks another man, man reacts, pins attacker. Does overcoming him mean he is the attacker? Zimmerman had a gun, perhaps (I was not there like you and LRS. so I say "perhaps") he was probably overpowered by Martin even though Zimmerman perhaps attacked him and cowardly shot him. You don't know, now do you? Or else prove right here and now that Martin was the aggressor.