BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story
Dale

Wichita, KS

#182767 Dec 22, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
I mentioned that one also, can't your read? Remember the condoms and cellulars?
LMAO!!! Silly boy, you can't remember who you post, much less what you post!!!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#182768 Dec 22, 2013
loose cannon wrote:
Jacques,
Over 7,000 flights have been delayed or cancled due to typical wintery weather again this weekend.
loose
Hummmm, must be Global Warming!!00,000 cattle killed in South Dakota during a blizzard in ....... early October?!?

South Dakota ranchers reel after 'catastrophic' storm leaves up to 100,000 cattle dead

By Joshua Rhett Miller - Published October 13, 2013 - FoxNews.com
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/10/13/south-da...
Dale

Wichita, KS

#182770 Dec 22, 2013
Miller time!! Hope this gotdam POS works better tomorrow. Hell, it only took 4 minutes to type this!!!

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#182771 Dec 22, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Crazy Frenchies
http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup...
You crazy Brit.
wojar

Bristol, CT

#182773 Dec 22, 2013
Atticus Tiberius Finch wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong. It seems that the US Supreme Court feels that the protection under the US Constitution applies equally to citizens and aliens within the United States.
The US Supreme Court has held numerous times that an alien has the same Constitutional rights as those of a US citizen.(Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 369 (1886) "rights of every citizen of the United States equally with those of the strangers and aliens who now invoke the jurisdiction of the court.");(Pyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202, 211 (1982) Whatever his status under the immigration laws, an alien is surely a "person" in any ordinary sense of that term. Aliens, even aliens whose presence in this country is unlawful, have long been recognized as "persons" guaranteed due process of law by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.)
Since the US Supreme Court has held that an alien is a "person" with the same Constitutional rights as a US citizen then why isn't the alien under the jurisdiction of the Constitution? Since if he weren't under the jurisdiction of the Constitution then he would not be protected by the same Constitutional rights as those of a US citizen.
The only time that an alien as not subject to the rights of the Constitution is if that alien was OUTSIDE THE boundaries of the United States.("There is likewise no indication that the Fourth Amendment was understood by contemporaries of the Framers to apply to activities of the United States directed against aliens in foreign territory or in international waters" United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez, 494 US 259, 267 (1990))
As such, as long as alien is within the boundaries of the United States he or she is afforded the same Constitutional protections as those of a US citizen.
That will go right over the head of Dale.
wojar

Bristol, CT

#182774 Dec 22, 2013
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! Dummy, we could boil him in oil, if we wanted and without a trial, since there are no reciprocal treaties.
We couldn't do a thing (legally) without jurisdiction. Moron.
wojar

Bristol, CT

#182775 Dec 22, 2013
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! Sorry, but that is not the case, only citizens are "subject to the jurisdiction, thereof", remember "We the People".
Ha ha! Dufus Dale insists that "all persons" as recited in the Constitution doesn't mean "all persons."

This is because he seems to realize that if a = a, Dufus 's Pathetic fantasy is a -- Pathetic fantasy.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>"All persons" in the Constitution refers to all persons. Not just citizens.

“ad maiora nati sumus ”

Since: Sep 09

Justice Scalia is an Oxymoron

#182776 Dec 22, 2013
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! So, you haven't an answer! I have plainly show you that alien are controlled/protected by treaties and never subject to the jurisdiction, thereof (US Constitution) and all you can do is obfuscate.
If aliens were subject to the jurisdiction, thereof (US Constitution), they would have the same rights as a US citizen, yes/no!
Simple answer is yes. Aliens have the same rights as citizens that are set forth in the U.S. Constitution.

Don't take my word for it. Take US Supreme Court word for it:

1.“The fourteenth amendment to the constitution is not confined to the protection of citizens......' These provisions are universal in their application, to all persons within the territorial jurisdiction, without regard to any differences of race, of color, or of nationality;" Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 369 (1886)

2. "[I]t must be concluded that all persons within the territory of the United States are entitled to the protection guaranteed by those amendments, and that even aliens shall not be held to answer for a capital or other infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law." Wong Wing v. U.S. 163 U.S. 228,238 (1896)

3. " Aliens, even aliens whose presence in this country is unlawful, have long been recognized as "persons" guaranteed due process of law by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments." ). Pyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202, 211 (1982)

4. "Chinese laborers, therefore, like all other aliens residing in the United States for a shorter or longer time, are entitled, so long as they are permitted by the government of the United States to remain in the country, to the safeguards of the Constitution," Fong Yue Ting v. United Sates, 149 U.S. 6698, 724 (1893)

5. "There are literally millions of aliens within the jurisdiction of the United States. The Fifth Amendment, as well as the Fourteenth Amendment, protects every one of these persons from deprivation of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.(internal citations omitted) Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection." Mathews v. Diaz, 426 U.S. 67, 77,(1976)

6. "We know from more than a century of Supreme Court case law that foreign citizens in the United States enjoy many of the same constitutional rights that U.S. citizens do. Luman v. Federal Election Com’n , 800 F. Supp. 2d 281, 286 (D.C. 2011)

I have given you five Supreme Court cases along with one District Court case that state that
an alien has the same constitutuional rights as that of a U.S. citizen. Now all you have to do is simple to find any case law that suports your argument that an alien is not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and as such doesn't have the same constitutional rights as that of a U.S. citizen.
wojar

Bristol, CT

#182777 Dec 22, 2013
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! Sorry, but that is not the case, only citizens are "subject to the jurisdiction, thereof", remember "We the People".
Wowee Zowee, according to Dufus logic, "We the people" means that all"all persons" doesn't mean all persons.

Moron.
wojar

Bristol, CT

#182778 Dec 22, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you still hoping for change? We Conservatives are hoping to return to the future of America.
I don't want gay people to be beheaded.
Returning to the future? Do you have a time machine? You cannot return to the past and certain.ly not to the future.
wojar

Bristol, CT

#182779 Dec 22, 2013
Atticus Tiberius Finch wrote:
<quoted text>
United States makes treaties with foreign nations not with aliens.
In LMAO Dale's world, US makes a treaty with each and every alien residing in the US. It is a dilemma for LMAO Dale.
Ha!
wojar

Bristol, CT

#182780 Dec 22, 2013
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! If an alien is subject to the jurisdiction, thereof (US Constitution), then he has all the rights as a US citizen.
If a felon is subject to the jurisdiction, thereof (US Constitution), then he has all the rights of a US citizen?
Moron.
The Honorable Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#182781 Dec 22, 2013
Observer

Clearlake, CA

#182782 Dec 22, 2013
Told ya the snowball was forming...Even Orly got a victory from a Judge...They are sick of Little Barry and he must be removed..
et ready birthers, Orly Taitz has won a small victory for those of you who think Obama is not a U.S. citizen. It seems that the US government may have to answer to why it seems that the Social Security number the President is using doesn’t quite seem legitimate.

Birther queen Orly Taitz has been filing one lawsuit after another to try to “learn the truth,” she says, of Obama’s true background. Is he a U.S. citizen? Taitz says no and has been trying for years to find the smoking gun that proves it.

But this time she has a small opening toward that end. Taitz contends that Barack Obama is using the Social Security number of a man named Harry Bounel. Taitz has filed with the Social Security Administration to get these records but the SSA has stonewalled Taitz when she has filed for Freedom of Information Act requests saying there is “no information” in their records to send to her.

Taitz went to court over the SSA’s stonewalling and has found a judge who has ruled that the government must respond to her requests on Obama’s and this Harry Bounel’s SS number records.

Read more at http://minutemennews.com/2013/12/barack-obama...
Observer

Clearlake, CA

#182783 Dec 22, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>If a felon is subject to the jurisdiction, thereof (US Constitution), then he has all the rights of a US citizen?
Moron.
Love how you use the constitution when it suits you... You rip on it normally so you are dismissed stupid stupid fool....
Observer

Clearlake, CA

#182784 Dec 22, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
You would have thought people would have learned after the Chick-fil-A incident where their customers stand!!!
Cracker Barrel: We screwed up big time
By Todd Starnes - Published December 22, 2013 - FoxNews.com
“We were flat out wrong."
That’s the message Cracker Barrel is sending to enraged customers after the restaurant chain removed Duck Dynasty items from its stores over fears it might offend people.
“Our intent was to avoid offending but that’s just what we’ve done,” Cracker Barrel said in a statement posted on its Facebook page.“You told us we made a mistake. And, you weren’t shy about it. You wrote, you called and you took to social media to express your thoughts and feelings.”
One of those customers was Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council. He said his family has eaten in nearly every Cracker Barrel in the country.
“Cracker Barrel must be off their rocker,” he said in a statement to Fox News.“For Cracker Barrel to take the bait of an organization like GLAAD, which has led the attack on Phil Robertson, they are betraying the values of the vast majority of their customers.”
The restaurant chain known for its country cooking admitted they were wrong and not only offered an apology, but ordered Duck Dynasty products be returned to their stores immediately.
“Today, we are putting all our Duck Dynasty products back in our stores,” Cracker Barrel stated.“And, we apologize for offending you.”
Cracker Barrel took action on Friday after Duck Dynasty patriarch Phil Robertson was indefinitely suspended from the popular A&E show for making comments the network found offensive to homosexuals.
Workers were instructed to remove all merchandise that featured Robertson, local reports alleged.
The outrage and condemnation from loyal Cracker Barrel customers was swift. Thousands posted messages on Facebook vowing to eat their biscuits and country fried steak somewhere else.
Among those who took offense was former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee.
“I have no respect for a company that bows to the slightest pressure from the politically correct,” Huckabee wrote on Facebook.
Todd Starnes is host of Fox News & Commentary, heard on hundreds of radio stations. Sign up for his American Dispatch newsletter, be sure to join his Facebook page, and follow him on Twitter. His latest book is Dispatches From Bitter America.
Todd Starnes
The "Commander" sold his right to free speech when he signed the dotted line for the all mighty dollar...

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#182785 Dec 22, 2013
Dale wrote:
Miller time!! Hope this gotdam POS works better tomorrow. Hell, it only took 4 minutes to type this!!!
So you're finally picking up the pace.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#182786 Dec 22, 2013
Observer wrote:
Told ya the snowball was forming...Even Orly got a victory from a Judge...They are sick of Little Barry and he must be removed..
et ready birthers, Orly Taitz has won a small victory for those of you who think Obama is not a U.S. citizen. It seems that the US government may have to answer to why it seems that the Social Security number the President is using doesn’t quite seem legitimate.
Birther queen Orly Taitz has been filing one lawsuit after another to try to “learn the truth,” she says, of Obama’s true background. Is he a U.S. citizen? Taitz says no and has been trying for years to find the smoking gun that proves it.
But this time she has a small opening toward that end. Taitz contends that Barack Obama is using the Social Security number of a man named Harry Bounel. Taitz has filed with the Social Security Administration to get these records but the SSA has stonewalled Taitz when she has filed for Freedom of Information Act requests saying there is “no information” in their records to send to her.
Taitz went to court over the SSA’s stonewalling and has found a judge who has ruled that the government must respond to her requests on Obama’s and this Harry Bounel’s SS number records.
Read more at http://minutemennews.com/2013/12/barack-obama...
Ha ha, http://minutemennews.com . Yes, these birfoon buffoon birthers are sullying the real and honoured minutemen by stealing their name. Shameless hacks.
The Honorable Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#182787 Dec 22, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Ha ha, http://minutemennews.com . Yes, these birfoon buffoon birthers are sullying the real and honoured minutemen by stealing their name. Shameless hacks.
No rebuttal so you attack the messenger. How unique! LMAO!!!
JBH

Richmond, Canada

#182788 Dec 22, 2013
Yeah, someone might think he has flocked up and picked up some sideline English words by using others' labels calling birfoon, buffoon, dufus, sheeple, so that he thinks he identifies them.

Yet, the contradiction is that when one also refers the Queen as the frame of reference as the authority of the English language (and not necessarily Shakespeare all the time), he thinks he fits in to talk politics then in the American way.

However, as that someone is uncertain who and what he is as he writes vapour and not vapor, labour and not labor, this furthers the contradiction of wanting to talk like US folks, since he mainly follows the Queen as not an American, who would obviously write every word as vapor and labor and so on.

Now just to move along, it isn't so bad that one does have one's own language speaking, in addition to advocate some substance and issue which may seem of interests to others, for that is merely to mean to say something to communicate to people.

If people do look into one's eyes, they know better the meaning of things and true facts, that no one is really real if one does not have version of advocacy, provocation, or depiction of origin of the English language identification usage.

As they keep calling the word fake, that seems to be more like it.

That definitely ascertains that it is so great then and flawless that International English can only be served as the best, in the conduct of dialogue and communication.

Because people do and want to transfer demonstrating the real selves, they would show the real things in such English so communicated, together with the concepts, topics and contents so reached across the planet -- this says that the world is very diverse from seeing vast people speaking their own English of having their broad opinions.
This is the only way to reflect the truths.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Santa Claus delayed in Chicago after getting th... 2 hr ChicagOpinion 1
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 4 hr ChicagOpinion 98,871
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 5 hr johnplustwomore 1,155,536
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 8 hr J RULES 71,188
Chicago Pizza Blows 10 hr joey 2
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 10 hr KiMare 51,279
AP Exclusive: Union members appointed after $10... (Mar '08) 10 hr IUEC 7,564
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 11:49 am PST

NBC Sports11:49AM
Reggie Wayne needs offseason triceps surgery
NBC Sports 1:29 PM
Colts say they will be all business despite nothing to gain - NBC Sports
NBC Sports 1:40 PM
Cutler realizes Bears could be in for changes - NBC Sports
NBC Sports 8:22 PM
Bears re-sign Austen Lane to replace Willie Young
Bleacher Report10:09 PM
Bears vs. Vikings: Breaking Down Minnesota's Game Plan