BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 242752 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#182106 Dec 13, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
It looks like Ms Fuddy killed herself!!! The first thing the flight attendant tells you is NOT to inflate your PFD inside the cabin but wait until you exit the aircraft. Ms Fuddy, being a Libtard, immediately inflated her PFD while inside the cabin and then got pined on the ceiling and could not get out.
I just love Darwin unfortunately she was old enough to have reproduced her defective jeans.<quoted text>
Well,,,,,,,, the other eight people did not make that stupid mistake,,,,,, did they!!!
Oh, It is nice to no you no the difference between "jeans" and genes" but you are to stupid to recognize a red herring when you smell won.
I get upset when children do not know any better and get hurt. Adults should know better and I bet more Libtards kill themselves because of simple mistakes than do Conservatives.
There IS no red herring. What there is, though, is a poor-taste joke about a poor woman who may have made a mistake and is now dead? You think it's tasteful to mock a dead person who was an ordinary law-abiding citizen like you and me? Mock her intelligence and that of her children? You hate her so much, you're glad she died stupidly because she dealt with Obama's B.C. and you didn't like the results?

And stop misspelling on purpose. You do it naturally enough.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#182107 Dec 13, 2013
Yep, instead of "dancing on the ceiling", MS Fuddy was "floating of the ceiling"!
Dale

United States

#182108 Dec 13, 2013
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
How about a heavy machine gun? A bazooka? A tank?
LMAO!!! You gotdam right, responsible people know what they are for and those that don't, death would be a vacation from the punishment!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#182109 Dec 13, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
You incredibly (for the 1000th time):
"Again, a police officer is more likely to commit a felony with a gun than the general population at large. Oh, this is yesterday's news here in Jacksonville. Please note he was a 20 year veteran of the police."
There were approximately 10,500 gun kilIings in the U.S. last year, correct? How many people were killed by law enforcement officers? Do you know?
I was talking about UNLAWFULLY killing people and cops are more likely to commit murder than the general population. Oh, cops also have higher divorce rates because many of them are control freak jerks!
I have no problem with anyone using deadly force to defend themselves or others. Trayvon never would have been shot if he had not assaulted GZ!!!
Dale

United States

#182110 Dec 13, 2013
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
He was born a dual citizen, like many US-born children. That does not affect his Natural Born Citizen status in the slightest.
LMAO!!! No such thing as a dual-citizen according to the 14th amendment, you either come under the complete jurisdiction of the US or you are an alien.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#182111 Dec 13, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh yeah?
1. Constitution clearly mentions "belonging to a militia". What militia did this gun nut in the park beloing to? What militia do YOU belong to that allow you to have an arsenal at home?
2. Do you know that, and these are but a few examples, in places like London, Paris, Milan, Geneva, Berlin, Madrid, Sydney, Auckland, Brussels, etc etc, this nut with the gun on his hip would've been ARRESTED forthwith, dragged before a judge who would've thrown the book at him? You see nothing strange, weird, DANGEROUS, about a gun nut, like he was in Tombstone or OK Corral in 1860, with a gun in a holster, on his hip a day after a theatre massacre and with a gay festival is going on a few metres away? If you think that's par for the course, then you can't tell me there's nothing wrong with you.
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
1. Twelve people get shot by a gun-toting nut at movie theatre;
2. One day later, police spot a gun-toting nut with a pistol on his hip at a HOMOSEXUAL PRIDE FESTIVAL;
3. Police take the nut into custody;
4. Nut files a suit, nut wins as nutty and insane judge awards him $23,000.
People, what is wrong with that picture?
It's really not for you to worry your little foreign head about, Mr. Canada! Is there any subject you don't cry and bytch about? joke

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#182112 Dec 13, 2013
Hitler's health insurance is cancelled
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#182113 Dec 13, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong again, and thank you for pointing out that I targeted no individual ( but, if the shoe fits...) and admitting that your vocabulary is vulgar and un-presentable and mine is NOT vulgar and presentable to ANYone.
Big SHYT! There is no difference, moron! joke
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#182114 Dec 13, 2013
Dale wrote:
The 2nd Amendment has taxed each citizen with the responsibility of protecting this Constitutional Republic, from both foreign and domestic attacks.
Now with that said, where do you Socialists, Marxists and Communists stand, as I see it, on the wrong end of the gun.!!!
Watch out Dale, Path will declare you have issued a death threat against him! LMAO!
Dale

United States

#182115 Dec 13, 2013
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
The only children born in the USA who are subject to a foreign power under US law are the children of foreign diplomats.
You cannot read into the US Constitution something that it DOES NOT SAY. And it does not say that two US citizen parents are required to be president. In fact, there is not a word in the US Constitution that says either that the US-born children of foreigners or that US-born dual citizens are not eligible to become president. Not a word.
Under strict construction (remember that?) you cannot interpret the Constitution as saying something unless it actually does says it-----and it does NOT say that two citizen parents are required or that a dual citizen is barred from becoming president. It does not say either of those things.
Under libertarian principles neither a law nor the Constitution can take away a right or a privilege unless the Constitution specifically allows that thing to be taken away. And, the Constitution does not specifically take away the right or privilege of the US-born children of foreigners to become president, and it does not take away the right or privilege of the US-born dual citizens either. It does not take away either of those things. It does not SAY any such thing.
And yet slimy Dale wants gullible people to ignore good conservative legal principles such as strict construction and good conservative moral principles such as libertarianism. Why?
Why? What is slimy Dale's motive? Why, violate strict construction AND libertarian principles? Why does he do it? Why throw away such principles based solely on hatred of Obama?
.
And yet slimy Dale thinks that he can convince a few gullible people that the writers of the US Constitution (who never said any such thing) really believed that the US-born children of foreigners (such as perhaps your father or grandfather) are really not as good citizens as the US-born children of US-citizens.
Well, do you think that you are any better a US citizen than your father or grandfather? Do you think that George Washington, who never said any such thing, thought that your US-born ancestors who had foreign parents should be lower-level citizens than the children of US parents at the time? If Washington did think so, he could have said so--but he never did. So why assume that he did? Why does slimy Dale want you to think that George Washington, who was not afraid of much, or Ben Franklin or Alexander Hamilton was afraid of the US-born children of foreigners-------such as your ancestors?
IF the writers of the Constitution had been afraid of the US-born children of foreigners, they would have said so, but they never said so, so why assume that they were afraid? Why does slimy Dale want to throw out strict construction judicial interpretation AND libertarian principles, and ALSO throw out "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal"? Who says that the US-born children of foreigners are not created equal with the US born children of US citizens in terms of being eligible to be president? Only slimy Dale.
LMAO!!! So, now how can the US have complete jurisdiction over a dual-citizen, that is an impossibility, just what is ones allegiance, is it the US or the other country?? This is exactly why we do not recognize a dual-citizenship status in the Constitution. Who knows, we might elect someone to be POTUS, like Obama.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#182116 Dec 13, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Great. Explain the latest one, today, Colorado again.
Says v: "would be Unconstitutional, that is plainly states in the 2nd amendment." Sorry, where's the militia?
Deeply embedded in the woodwork. In other words, all around you! joke
Dale

United States

#182117 Dec 13, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! It is our Constitutional Right to carry a weapon and to even think of changing that, would be Unconstitutional, that is plainly states in the 2nd amendment.
Now, those that use a firearm in the commitment of a crime should face the harshest punishment that a man can think of, prior to their death.
<quoted text>
The Second Amendment says "ARMS" which is a personal weapon. It could be a knife, sword, brass knuckles, hand gun, long gun, semi-automatic, fully automatic, single shot, etc. An ARM is not a tank, heavy machine-gun (requires a crew), same for a bazooka. Crew served weapons are not "arms" which are personal weapons.
The Second Amendment also says your rights to bear arms "shall not be infringed": which means 90+% of all personal weapons laws are UNCONSTITUTIONAL regardless of how the USSC has ruled. And any judge who has ruled otherwise should be executed as a traitor!
You are very correct, anything you can protect yourself with, you will be considered as armed, makes no difference if it is a penknife or a nuke.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#182118 Dec 13, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
She made a mistake and you deride her, mock her as a "libtard" (Žogue tm reg'd) because she prematurely inflated her vest? She's dead, she drowned and you talk about Darwin and her defective jeans (SIC)? What a sorry unchristian sicko you are. Shame on you and your ilk who probably think she got her just desserts.
Maybe someone inflated it for her? Hmmmm?
Grand Birther

Painesville, OH

#182119 Dec 13, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Yep, instead of "dancing on the ceiling", MS Fuddy was "floating of the ceiling"!
Tommy Boy, you're a huge gaping azzhole for making jokes about another humans death.
Not only that, but this is a repeated behaviour from you. You really are a bad person. No wonder your family hates you.

“On Deck”

Since: Aug 08

French Polynesia

#182120 Dec 13, 2013
Don't make me drag the Inhofe name through the mud again.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#182121 Dec 13, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Columbine, Newton, and today, Colorado and so many more - someone tell me how these nuts are protecting the constitution And moreover, the 2nd amendment was enacted to protect against a British invasion. Do you fear a British invasion tomorrow?
F&F, NSA, IRS, Benghazi and so many more - someone tell me how this fool is protecting the Constitution or the U.S.A. Moreover, why is this man not in prison?
Dale

United States

#182122 Dec 13, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Columbine, Newton, and today, Colorado and so many more - someone tell me how these nuts are protecting the constitution And moreover, the 2nd amendment was enacted to protect against a British invasion. Do you fear a British invasion tomorrow?
LMAO!!! If you would read my posts, you would understand where I stand on the unlawful use of firearms.
Hell, if we went to war with the UK , one third of our population would be on their side, a third would sit it out and a third would kick their asses and two thirds would be banished from the US.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#182123 Dec 13, 2013
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Tommy Boy, you're a huge gaping azzhole for making jokes about another humans death.
Not only that, but this is a repeated behaviour from you. You really are a bad person. No wonder your family hates you.
Someone who has grown roots to his toilet shouldn't be talking about gaping holes! LMAO!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#182124 Dec 13, 2013
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! If you would read my posts, you would understand where I stand on the unlawful use of firearms.
Hell, if we went to war with the UK , one third of our population would be on their side, a third would sit it out and a third would kick their asses and two thirds would be banished from the US.
Excellent clownstomp! LMAO!

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#182125 Dec 13, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
I was talking about UNLAWFULLY killing people and cops are more likely to commit murder than the general population. Oh, cops also have higher divorce rates because many of them are control freak jerks!
I have no problem with anyone using deadly force to defend themselves or others. Trayvon never would have been shot if he had not assaulted GZ!!!
Okay, so if I understand correctly, police officers kill more people UNLAWFULLY than ordinary Joes. They commit more murders than the general population. I see. Would you care to back that up with proof as I find it hard to believe that out of the approx. 10,500 gun killings in the U.S. in 2012, the great majority were committed by cops. How're you gonna avoid this one?

You also have date on cops' divorce rates? I'd like to see those. Bear in mind, they do have greater stress than most occupations. But let's have a source, Rogue.

How do you figure, again, that Martin was the aggressor? You don't seem to understand that just because witnesses saw him on top of Zimmerman, that does not mean he attacked Z, it may mean Z attacked him and Martin just got the better of him. Let's say someone jumps you, and you manage to subdue him, pin him down. Will we conclude YOU jumped him just because you got the better of him?

Were you there when the A-M thing happened? If not, how do you know who attacked who?
The jury didn't know, didn't resolve who the aggressor was, and no doubt had to bring him a "not guilty" verdict. But strangely enough , YOU do. You were there after all, right?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 26 min Yeah 1,616,834
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 2 hr _Zoey_ 11,416
Jonny's Towing is Chicagoland's Most Crooked Co... (Feb '17) 4 hr Imagine 80
Child Molestation at Chicago Cult 5 hr John Trott 42
Film on Sex Crimes at Jesus People USA 5 hr John Trott 9
News Jeff Sessions claims sanctuary city policies 'e... 5 hr Underground Railroad 24
where to score h in chicago (Jul '12) 8 hr Missouri 6

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages