BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 214570 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#181007 Dec 2, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
If you understood you would not have so stupidly said: "5.6T is 76% of 10.025T?"
Hahahahahahahahahahahahah. You don't have a clue. You don't even understand middle school math.
Foot on brake vs foot on pedal does not reflect reality? Really Romper?
You need to get your medication adjusted.
<quoted text>
Hey, know what my mirror told me? YOU'RE LOSING! LMAO!!!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#181008 Dec 2, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure sounds like an excuse to me! LMAO! Back to the cellar, igor.
Sounds like an excuse to an illiterate birfoon moron who cannot calculate a percentage. A guy who thinks April Fool's jokes are Harvard studies, and who believes "geologic evidence" of Noah's flood from a young earth site?

WOW!
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
That's not an excuse. It's based on straightforward math that flies over the birfoon head.
His comment is laughable coming from a fool who cannot distinguish between the accelerator and the brake pedal.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#181009 Dec 2, 2013
The original wording:

Under Bush, the National Debt rose from 5,674 Trillion in 2000 to 10,025 Trillion by 2008. An increase of 76% in eight years.

It doesn't fairly represent the situation. You really don't think it does, do you? Look at the years and debt added, moron. Might I suggest the book "Biznis Arithmetik 101 for DUMMIES"?????? LMAO!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#181010 Dec 2, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Sounds like an excuse to an illiterate birfoon moron who cannot calculate a percentage. A guy who thinks April Fool's jokes are Harvard studies, and who believes "geologic evidence" of Noah's flood from a young earth site?
WOW!
<quoted text>
Speaking of that:

http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/evidence-sug...

Enjoy. Nite nite, twinkerbelle

“no one told me”

Since: Dec 07

Denver

#181011 Dec 2, 2013
wojar wrote:
The drunken engineer is asleep at the switch, during a time interval t1 to t2, it's speed increases from 86 to 95 mph (Out of control). When a sober person takes over the controls, he manages to slow down the train from 95 to 87 mph over the same size time interval (t2 to t3). The distance traveled under the second engineer (during t2 to t3) is greater than that traveled by the train in the interval t1 to t2.
According to birfoon physics, that means the train was speeding up under the second engineer (Obama) and slowing down under the first (Bush). This is despite the fact that it was accelerating out of control under Dubya and decelerating under Obama.
This is because birfoons cannot understand what a derivitave is. Instantaneous velocity ( ds/dt is the first derivative. The rate of change of velocity dv/dt is the second derivative.
Brilliant, yet amazingly stupid at the same time.

“no one told me”

Since: Dec 07

Denver

#181012 Dec 2, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Sounds like an excuse to an illiterate birfoon moron who cannot calculate a percentage. A guy who thinks April Fool's jokes are Harvard studies, and who believes "geologic evidence" of Noah's flood from a young earth site?
WOW!
<quoted text>
Hey, queerbait, remember a little thing called 9/11? Was that expensive?
angel

Boise, ID

#181014 Dec 3, 2013
dont snow me wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey, queerbait, remember a little thing called 9/11? Was that expensive?
Oh!I do! That was that Terrorist attack on U.S.soil that Happened on George W.'s watch!
And then he decided the proper response was to invade a country that had nothing to do with it!Right?
angel

Boise, ID

#181015 Dec 3, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah, typical squid thinking. No one is "defaming" our president, he does that all by himself on a daily basis.
You havent refered to anyone as a Squid in a hell of a long time!

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#181016 Dec 3, 2013
dont snow me wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey, queerbait, remember a little thing called 9/11? Was that expensive?
Compared to what?

It not happening?
Then yes, rather costly.

Compared to say... a banker bailout under threat of martial law?
Then the figure barely registers.

Compared to Katrina?
Pocket change.

Our response to 9-11 however... is one of the final nails in our economic coffin.

This was one of two primary objectives in Bin Laden's scheme.(Change the American way of life forever and destroy our financial ability to maintain our edge over the world.)

We have lost our freedoms we thought were protected by our Constitution...and we are far beyond broke.

Well played America.
Guess we showed them!
angel

Boise, ID

#181017 Dec 3, 2013
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! He could have been born in the White House, since at the moment of birth he was a citizen of his father's country.
Yep, Obama was subject to the jurisdiction of a foreign nation and there is only one way for him to be a US citizen, that would be through naturalization.
Just curious....how does it feel to know that not one single person that matters agrees with you on this issue?
I mean the guy is a year into his second term.....OTHER TEABAGGERS are embarrassed by you and seek to distance themselves from 'birthers'..yet you still keep beating a dead horse.
It kind of sad.(in an utterly hilarious way.)

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#181018 Dec 3, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Burn brightly lil ember.
Because you will be in heaven while the rest of us burn in hell?

St Peter : "Welcome to heaven, LRS".

LRS : "Yer darn tootin', dumbazzbastard, get outta my way, butt- flapper".

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#181019 Dec 3, 2013
dont snow me wrote:
<quoted text>
Brilliant, yet amazingly stupid at the same time.
You're the latter, not the former.

and, that is a "nice" way to signify you didn't understand it.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#181020 Dec 3, 2013
dont snow me wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey, queerbait, remember a little thing called 9/11? Was that expensive?
It sure was, it ignited an invasion of Afghanistan to "get" Bin Laden, which Obama did, and fabrication of lies in order to invade Iraq which cost over $1.5 trillion, 150 Iraqi dead, 1 million maimed, 4,500 dead G.I.s, 32, 000 incapacitated. Yes, who'll forget 9/11 and GWB and his "crew" ignoring warnings from the CIA, the FBI, England and France and possibly Russia ? Indeed, how can anyone forget? I can't forget the 3 Stooges. At least, they were harmless and funny. GWB's 8 years were both harmful and NOT funny.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#181023 Dec 3, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
It sure was, it ignited an invasion of Afghanistan to "get" Bin Laden, which Obama did, and fabrication of lies in order to invade Iraq which cost over $1.5 trillion, 150 Iraqi dead, 1 million maimed, 4,500 dead G.I.s, 32, 000 incapacitated. Yes, who'll forget 9/11 and GWB and his "crew" ignoring warnings from the CIA, the FBI, England and France and possibly Russia ? Indeed, how can anyone forget? I can't forget the 3 Stooges. At least, they were harmless and funny. GWB's 8 years were both harmful and NOT funny.
And in your sick mind FDR did not ignore Pearl Harbor??? Ever hear of the Battle of Taranto which happened 13 months BEFORE the Pearl Harbor attack???
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Tarant...
Oh, where was Bin Laden killed? It was not in Afghanistan, was it? Pakistan violated the Laws of Neutrality and we had every right to enter their country to get Bin Laden.
And you never explained WHO killed and maimed all those Iraqis, have you?!? But you do imply the U.S. did it ALL!!!
Democracynow org

Edison, NJ

#181025 Dec 3, 2013
dont snow me wrote:
<quoted text>
Brilliant, yet amazingly stupid at the same time.
Pope Francis denounces ‘trickle-down’ economic theories in critique of inequality / November 26 2013 / http://tinyurl.com/krlpqq3
Pope Francis on Tuesday sharply criticized growing economic inequality and unfettered markets in a lengthy paper outlining a populist philosophy that he says will guide his papacy as he pushes the Catholic Church to reach out more, particularly to the disenfranchised.
Using sharply worded phrases, Francis decried an “idolatry of money” and warned it would lead to “a new tyranny.” And he invoked language with particular resonance in the United States, attacking an economic theory most affiliated with conservatives that discourages taxation and regulation.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/econom...
angel

Boise, ID

#181026 Dec 3, 2013
Dont forget 'Le Jimbo' the Tea Bagging Bubble Boy and 'Ray Donovan' the Bozeman Limbaugh fan-boy.
A couple of otehr DEEP political Patriots.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#181027 Dec 3, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
The original wording:
Under Bush, the National Debt rose from 5,674 Trillion in 2000 to 10,025 Trillion by 2008. An increase of 76% in eight years.
It doesn't fairly represent the situation. You really don't think it does, do you? Look at the years and debt added, moron. Might I suggest the book "Biznis Arithmetik 101 for DUMMIES"?????? LMAO!
And Romper thinks that will get his foot out of his mouth?

Romper: 5.6T is 76% of 10.025T?

Hahahahahahahahahaha! That's business arithmetic?

And the demented fool keeps coming back.

He cannot comprehend middle school math, and that does "fairly represent the situation."

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#181028 Dec 3, 2013
angel wrote:
<quoted text> Oh!I do! That was that Terrorist attack on U.S.soil that Happened on George W.'s watch!
And then he decided the proper response was to invade a country that had nothing to do with it!Right?
Ah Tootsie, Iraq was a different issue all together. Saddamn Hussein had violated 27 U.N. mandates and had been shooting at our aircraft. Just in case you do not know, shooting at planes is an act of WAR!!!
And you probably thing the Korean War ended in 1953 too!!! Armistices do not end wars. World War ONE ended in 3 October 2010 and you have no idea why.
World War I reparations
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

World War I reparations were the payments and transfers of property and equipment that Germany was forced to make under the Treaty of Versailles (1919) following its defeat during World War I. Article 231 of the Treaty (the 'war guilt' clause) declared Germany and its allies responsible for all 'loss and damage' suffered by the Allies during the war and provided the basis for reparations.
.....
Payments were suspended for one year in June 1931 as proposed by U.S. president Herbert Hoover in the "Hoover Moratorium", and ended at the Lausanne Conference of July 1932.[2] About one-eighth of the initial reparations had been paid. West Germany resumed payments on the debt in the London Debt Agreement of 1953. The final payments were made on 3 October 2010 the twentieth anniversary of German reunification.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#181029 Dec 3, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure sounds like an excuse to me! LMAO! Back to the cellar, igor.
There's no excuse for not knowing how to calculate a percentage.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#181030 Dec 3, 2013
Democracynow org wrote:
<quoted text>
Pope Francis denounces ‘trickle-down’ economic theories in critique of inequality / November 26 2013 / http://tinyurl.com/krlpqq3
Pope Francis on Tuesday sharply criticized growing economic inequality and unfettered markets in a lengthy paper outlining a populist philosophy that he says will guide his papacy as he pushes the Catholic Church to reach out more, particularly to the disenfranchised.
Using sharply worded phrases, Francis decried an “idolatry of money” and warned it would lead to “a new tyranny.” And he invoked language with particular resonance in the United States, attacking an economic theory most affiliated with conservatives that discourages taxation and regulation.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/econom...
Oh wow, an Atheists agree with the Socialistic Catholic Church!!!! By the way, did Jesus say the rich should be taxed to give to the poor or did he want the Rich to HELP the poor? There is a very big difference but I am sure you are clueless to what that might be.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min Incognito4Ever 1,383,784
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 33 min Chief 59,533
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 1 hr SweLL GirL 8,446
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 1 hr Ize Found 70,608
Word (Dec '08) 1 hr GEORGIA 6,174
Double Word Game (Dec '11) 1 hr GEORGIA 2,443
News Man Charged With Sex Trafficking For Second Tim... (Jun '13) 3 hr Milton 3
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 21 hr Sublime1 102,044
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages