BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#180456 Nov 26, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
And what qualifies you are an expert on the matter? The reason why conducting anti terrorism would be a bad idea is because Libya is an oil exporting nation, whereas Yemen is NOT. And Europe gets a lot of oil from Libya.
And you can selectively drone terrorist targets without bombing the Libyan, so called, military. And if a few civilians are killed, oh well. Their relatives can file a collateral damage complaint with the nearest U.S. embassy and if they are truly innocent, we should pay blood money!!!
What I love is that Libtards think they are military experts as if playing guitar makes them one.
I'm no expert, just stating facts whereas you state your opinion. No one need be an expert to state facts). In spite of yourself, you've again proven me right as you bring no response to my post. None, for example, as to whether Iraq is better off post-Saddam and whether Libya is better off post-Gaddafi. Nothing.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#180457 Nov 26, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Isn't it funny how Libtards like to compare things to Republican when it is to their favor but not when it is against them.
Heritage Plan equals ObamaCare!!! But Bush was evil for killing innocent people but even though three quarters of the people killed in Obama's drone campaign are civilians, that is okay with the Libtards.
And that is why most Libtards are atheists too. The Bible says homosexuality and bestiality are bad so they tear out the pages until there is not much left. What part of "Thou shall not" do you not understand?
Tell me and tell me now. How many innocent people have been killed by drones (too many) and how many U.S. military have been killed and maimed and how many Iraqi civilians have been killed and maimed since "Mission Accomplished?" Why do you persist? Why do you like to look like a no-knowing birther?
wojar

Bristol, CT

#180458 Nov 26, 2013
Slick Willie wrote:
<quoted text>
Sooo, will you get upset when the Repubs use the Nuclear Option when they gain control of the Senate? What is good for the goose is good for the gander what ever that means?
The Dems didn't know the risks? Really?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#180459 Nov 26, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Now, if you want to compare the Boeing 707 to the Convair 880, that would be a fair comparison. The only reason why the Boeing product took off was because the Air Force ordered the KC-135 version of the Boeing 707 thus reducing R&D expenses and Convair could not make up the difference. Now if you want to compare the Boeing 707 to the Boeing 747, that is not a fair comparison.
Saying the Heritage Plan was the same as RomneyCare was the same as PelosiCare if like comparing a cat to a dog to a rat. Oh course I can understand that someone like you, using Libtardian Logic, can make a twisted comparison. And that is why you think homosexuality is NORMAL.
Only partly right. The Convair was much thirstier than the 707, early versions were medium range only and seating was in a 3-2 configuration, 120 tops in single class economy as compared to up to 190 in the 707 in similar seating plan. Only the first-year 707 versions had to refuel in Gander on east-west transatlantic flights. Also, the Convair had wing problems (not unlike the early-version DC8) which forced the airlines that had bought it to have them in the "shop" too often.

The KC-135 programme certainly gave a good early lead to the 707, but that was only part of the reason is eclipsed both the 880 and 990 and for a while, the DC8, which though successful, only sold half as many as the 707. Etc etc.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#180460 Nov 26, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
WTF is on her hands?
by Breitbart News 25 Nov 2013
Roseanne Barr may be to the left of even Howard Dean, but she will call out progressive hypocrisy when she sees it.
And the former sitcom queen saw plenty over the weekend as liberal outlets and talking heads praised the Democrats for driving a stake through the heart of filibusters with the "nuclear" option. Naturally, Barr blew the whistle on her fellow progressive via Twitter using over the top language to hammer home her point.
.... if bush had gotten rid of the filibuster all the fake US leftys would be shitting w rage.#DictatorObama by Taboola
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Hollywood/2013/1...
Except for what your harbour in your delusional mind, there is nothing there. Nothing.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#180461 Nov 26, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Yep, Obama is systematically castrating our military. Remember eleven months ago when they inactivated the USS Enterprise two years early and I asked myself why? Well a few months later I had my answer.
The Navy is short over 200 fighter pilots and that is enough for TWO aircraft carriers. Sure, we have enough for ten carriers but we have ZERO reserves. And it takes two years and five million dollars to train each new pilot. So even if the Enterprise was still in service, it would be nothing more than an empty ship.
So Obama is also doing this to the Air Force, the Marines and the Army too. God save us if we get into a real war as it will be another Pearl Harbor!!!
TEN aircraft carriers. China has one that is not yet sailing, and same for the Russians. France has one nuclear powered carrier. The rest of the world, like Italy, India, Spain, have old rusty crates that , well, are they a threat to the U.S.? What do you intend doing with TEN carriers, who you going to attack or defend against, Rogue? Where were your B2s, B1s, F-15s, F-22s, nuclear submarines, carriers, cruisers, tanks, etc on 9/11? When are you gonna wake up?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#180462 Nov 26, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Hummm, Just like when Pres. Obama recited Lincoln's Gettysburg Address and left out "God", could he also recite Lincoln's Thanksgiving Proclamation without leaving off any words?
By the President of the United States of America.
A Proclamation.
The year that is drawing towards its close, has been filled with the blessings of fruitful fields and healthful skies. To these bounties, which are so constantly enjoyed that we are prone to forget the source from which they come, others have been added, which are of so extraordinary a nature, that they cannot fail to penetrate and soften even the heart which is habitually insensible to the ever watchful providence of Almighty God. In the midst of a civil war of unequaled magnitude and severity, which has sometimes seemed to foreign States to invite and to provoke their aggression, peace has been preserved with all nations, order has been maintained, the laws have been respected and obeyed, and harmony has prevailed everywhere except in the theatre of military conflict; while that theatre has been greatly contracted by the advancing armies and navies of the Union. Needful diversions of wealth and of strength from the fields of peaceful industry to the national defence, have not arrested the plough, the shuttle or the ship; the axe has enlarged the borders of our settlements, and the mines, as well of iron and coal as of the precious metals, have yielded even more abundantly than heretofore. Population has steadily increased, notwithstanding the waste that has been made in the camp, the siege and the battle-field; and the country, rejoicing in the consiousness of augmented strength and vigor, is permitted to expect continuance of years with large increase of freedom. No human counsel hath devised nor hath any mortal hand worked out these great things. They are the gracious gifts of the Most High God, who, while dealing with us in anger for our sins, hath nevertheless remembered mercy. It has seemed to me fit and proper that they should be solemnly, reverently and gratefully acknowledged as with one heart and one voice by the whole American People. I do therefore invite my fellow citizens in every part of the United States, and also those who are at sea and those who are sojourning in foreign lands, to set apart and observe the last Thursday of November next, as a day of Thanksgiving and Praise to our beneficent Father who dwelleth in the Heavens. And I recommend to them that while offering up the ascriptions justly due to Him for such singular deliverances and blessings, they do also, with humble penitence for our national perverseness and disobedience, commend to His tender care all those who have become widows, orphans, mourners or sufferers in the lamentable civil strife in which we are unavoidably engaged, and fervently implore the interposition of the Almighty Hand to heal the wounds of the nation and to restore it as soon as may be consistent with the Divine purposes to the full enjoyment of peace, harmony, tranquillity and Union.
In testimony whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the United States to be affixed.
Done at the City of Washington, this Third day of October, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-three, and of the Independence of the Unites States the Eighty-eighth.
By the President: Abraham Lincoln
William H. Seward,
Secretary of State
Funny, he left out "God" but kept "turkey" when he mentioned the right for his thanksgiving speech.
Dale

Wichita, KS

#180463 Nov 26, 2013
Well, well!! Looks like the National Socialist party finally got one of their members into the presidency.
Obama is following the same tactics as Hitler, tell lies long enough, they will become the truth.
I expect anytime to see him in a photo op wrapped in the Nazi flag.
Dale

Wichita, KS

#180464 Nov 26, 2013
HEIL, OBAMA!!!

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#180465 Nov 26, 2013
Slick Willie wrote:
<quoted text>
I didn't know you where Catholic? Do you agree with him on the abortion issue?
Who cares whether he's Catholic or not? He just threw YOUR phoney faith up yours and you can't answer him. At least try.
Grand Birther

Painesville, OH

#180466 Nov 26, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Yep, Obama is systematically castrating our military.
Remember when the Republicans voted for sequestration and hailed it as a major step in the right direction? Remember when given the chance to repeal the sequestration Republicans threw a hissy fit and demanded even deeper cuts and then shut down the government, making sure that a condition of reopening the government was that it was at sequestration levels or lower?

L O L, of course Tommy Boy doesn't remember.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#180467 Nov 26, 2013
Slick Willie wrote:
<quoted text>
But the Republicans never tried to cover up Congressional investigations like the Obama Administration is doing.
Case in point, Ronald Reagan told everyone in his administration who knew anything about Iran-Contra to come forward where as Obama has done everything in his power to prevent people from testifying before Congress about Benghazi Gate, IRS Gate, Fast and Furious Gate, etc. Obama promised the most transparent administration in history when in fact it white=washed everything.
Did Reagan tell everyone in his administration and the American public that he was ignoring Pakistan's development of the a nuclear weapon at the time of the Russians' invasion/occupation of Afghanistan? Yes, ignoring it because he needed, wanted Pakistan's cooperation in fighting the Ruskies. He looked the other way. And poof, Pakistan is in the nuclear weapons club. Thank you, Ronnie. Give me Obama's "negotiations" with Iran any time.
wojar

Bristol, CT

#180468 Nov 26, 2013
Slick Willie wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you know what that means? I mean, do you really know what that means? If you are on Medicaid to how much you make!!! You have to be on Medicaid FIRST! And if you can afford to pay YOUR FAIR SHARE, you should be made to.
Again you cherry pick your points ..... as if you do not comprehend what they mean.
Totally illiterate Rouge tries to read into a statement what he incoherently wishes it said. Reworking eligibility so that it is tied to poverty rather than welfare was their plan to expand Medicaid.

Whatever is Rouge smoking?
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>There he goes again: making up facts to suit his delusions.
Right from the Heritage plan:
"a new index of eligibility would be developed to link Medicaid coverage to poverty instead of welfare.
wojar

Bristol, CT

#180469 Nov 26, 2013
Slick Willie wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you know what that means? I mean, do you really know what that means? If you are on Medicaid to how much you make!!! You have to be on Medicaid FIRST! And if you can afford to pay YOUR FAIR SHARE, you should be made to.
Again you cherry pick your points ..... as if you do not comprehend what they mean.
It means, Rouge, working poor not eligible for Medicaid under what were the current rules could become eligible since eligibility would be linked to poverty rather than welfare.

What do you think "to link Medicaid coverage to poverty instead of welfare" means? Eh?
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>There he goes again: making up facts to suit his delusions.
Right from the Heritage plan:
"a new index of eligibility would be developed to link Medicaid coverage to poverty instead of welfare."
wojar

Bristol, CT

#180470 Nov 26, 2013
Expansion of Medicaid to working poor right from Heritage plan: "because many poor families struggling to keep off welfare currently risk enormous and uncovered medical bills because they are not eligible, or do not seek, to go on to the welfare rolls."

But a new index of eligibility linked to poverty rather than welfare means something else to the illiterate.
wojar

Bristol, CT

#180471 Nov 26, 2013
WelbyMD wrote:
<quoted text>Kenyan-born Obama the Antichrist wasn't born in Hawaii. duh
Kapiolani is not Kenyan.
Frank

Spokane, WA

#180472 Nov 26, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Doesn't change the fact that they disowned the individual mandate as soon as Dems adopted it.
<quoted text>
The individual mandate is only one very small part of ObamaKare's thousands of regulations,rules,and taxes. There is nothing in ObamaKare that will reduce health care costs of health insurance costs. Most of ObamaKare has little of nothing to do with health care,it is designed to take money out of the pockets of hard working people and to control the population.
wojar

Bristol, CT

#180473 Nov 26, 2013
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>The individual mandate is only one very small part of ObamaKare's thousands of regulations,rules,and taxes. There is nothing in ObamaKare that will reduce health care costs of health insurance costs. Most of ObamaKare has little of nothing to do with health care,it is designed to take money out of the pockets of hard working people and to control the population.
In Frank's mind, "they disowned the individual mandate as soon as Dems adopted it" really means "the ACA is wholly comprised of the individual mandate." Grow up Frank.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Doesn't change the fact that they disowned the individual mandate as soon as Dems adopted it.
<quoted text>
wojar

Bristol, CT

#180474 Nov 27, 2013
Here's what Heritage said:[T]the government plan would likely capture a large percentage of the insurance market, marginalizing and undermining private insurance."

That's right, the public option was so awful people would preferrentially chose it according to the conservative oracle. Perish the thought Americans would have a choice.
angel

Boise, ID

#180475 Nov 27, 2013
Dale wrote:
Well, well!! Looks like the National Socialist party finally got one of their members into the presidency.
Obama is following the same tactics as Hitler, tell lies long enough, they will become the truth.
I expect anytime to see him in a photo op wrapped in the Nazi flag.
Isnt hilarious(but kind of sad) to listen to some Tea Bag Hysteric who doesnt have the brains to realize Hitler comparisons are the biggest short cut to thinking in ANY debate?
Not to mention the sheer offensiveness of trivializing the Holocaust and the millions who died in it by equivocating their Petty, Pissy Faux Tea Bagger Angst with the sufferinging inflicted by the Third Reich.
Dispicable in their sheer banal idiocy.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 6 min Tony Rome 1,108,947
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 36 min Mister Tonka 98,196
IL Illinois Governor Recall Amendment (Oct '10) 50 min NevadaBob 1,918
IL Who do you support for Governor in Illinois in ... (Oct '10) 2 hr Blwlgo 4,016
Abby 9-13-14 2 hr cheluzal 19
Ask Amy 9-13-14 2 hr cheluzal 15
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 2 hr KiMerde 49,788
Amy 9-15 7 hr liner 10
•••
Chicago Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••