BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 213262 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#180522 Nov 27, 2013
Dale wrote:
The world is ours for the taking, our reign will be indefinite, not for just a thousand years!!!
HEIL, OBAMA!!!!
To basket head Dale, two terms,(2x4=8)is a thousand years +. And Dale is actually proud, yes, proud, to be a birther tea partyer.

Hail to Moe.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#180523 Nov 27, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
Hmmmm......LMAO! There is no excuse for supporting this man!
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/poll-obamacare-su...
To support this joke, one is either an idiot or an enemy! And to the twin 'tards, GET A LIFE, LOSERS!!! LMAO!!!
Obama : WINNER
Romney : LOSER
LRS : DOUBLE LOSER

Polls? Who cares? Oh! Is Obama running in 2016? Have they amended the Constitution?

"Can you hear us coming?" LMAO (LRS-Dale tm reg').

P.S.: Return of absent Dale and LRS almost simultaneous. Oh, c'mon, guys, I'm sure it's just a coincidence. LMAO (LRS-joined-at-the-hip Dale tm reg'd).

Where oh where do you get the effronterie (gall) to come back here? Your absence made you look better and better every day.
Dale

Wichita, KS

#180524 Nov 27, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Why, and not unlike LRS, Frank, American Lady, GB KFC, Rogue, and birthers et al, do you not even hesitate to look like a fool, a clown, a, a ...birther.
Unionized workers make up 11.4% of the American workforce. 11.4%!! If indeed those 11.4% control the whole industrial might of the United States, as you so "deftly" put it, I would say, the industrial might's not too bright and perhaps its CEOs should be replaced forthwith.
Why don't you get some education and find out what "socialist" means ? Oh, did you know that Switzerland has a socialist gov't? Been socialist as far back as I can remember. How's the Swiss economy working out?
HEIL, OBAMA!!!
Dale

Wichita, KS

#180525 Nov 27, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
To basket head Dale, two terms,(2x4=8)is a thousand years +. And Dale is actually proud, yes, proud, to be a birther tea partyer.
Hail to Moe.
Your resistance is futile!

HEIL, OBAMA!!!

“Kenyan-born Obama=Antichrist”

Since: Sep 09

Casper, WY

#180526 Nov 27, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
The People elected him, moron. Get over it.
"He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law...."
<quoted text>
First he would have to be a "natural-born" citizen of the United States of America. Kenyan-born Obama the Antichrist is lower than the fecal-matter of a mongrel-dog that eats the fecal-matter of other mongrel-dogs.
The NWO is almost complete. WW3, Rapture, economic collapse, tribulation and the rest. Ultimately BHO will be cast into the lake-of-fire with his minions. So get born-again NOW if you haven't already.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#180527 Nov 27, 2013
wojar wrote:
He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, except if a birfoon bumpkin from Florida construes judicial vacancies as "stacking".
Do you deny that FDR tried to create two additional Supreme Court Justices so he could stack the USSC with his picks? Please note the link is an official government link so there is no way you can deny it!!! It sucks to be a brain washed Libtard.

Recess Reading: An Occasional Feature From The Judiciary Committee

Franklin Delano Roosevelt's "Court Packing" Plan

President Franklin Delano Roosevelt's "New Deal" - a series of economic programs designed to counter the devastating effects of the Great Depression - faced many challenges in the courts. During President Roosevelt's first term in office, the Supreme Court struck down several provisions and statutes included in New Deal programs, including the National Industrial Recovery Act, the Railroad Retirement Act, and the Agricultural Adjustment Act.

To counter the impact of the Court's decisions on the New Deal reforms, President Roosevelt proposed legislation that would have altered the makeup of the Supreme Court. The Judiciary Reorganization Bill of 1937, which provided for broad reform of the federal judicial system, allowed President Roosevelt to appoint an additional member to the Supreme Court for every sitting justice over the age of 70, which would have resulted in a total of six new justices at the time the bill was introduced. Despite the fact that the Constitution does not limit the size of the Supreme Court, the legislation immediately came under sharp criticism from legislators, bar associations, and the public.
http://www.judiciary.senate.gov/about/history...

“Kenyan-born Obama=Antichrist”

Since: Sep 09

Casper, WY

#180528 Nov 27, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Mitt Romney's father was multi-millionaire George Romney. Son did quite well, but he did have a head start;
Barack Obama's father scrammed soon after his son's birth, mother and grandmother were not poor, but certainly not rich in the Romney sense. However, Barack didn't do too badly, he became PRESIDENT. How? By beating rich influential venture capitalist guru and "smart guy" Mitt Romney.
Now tell me, tell us, Rogue. What would Mitt Romney prefer? Being rich or President?
P.S.: Oh , BTW, Obama is both rich AND president.
Like Paul Ryan, Obama, McCain, Mike Pence, Bush, Clinton, etc. Romney too is a puppet for the Illuminati-Freemasons. Their world order is almost complete. I hate Big Brother Kenyan-born Obama the Antichrist. Come quickly Lord Jesus!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#180529 Nov 27, 2013
Ted Cruz accuses Senate of stacking courts to protect Obamacare
BY Cheryl K. Chumley - The Washington Times, November 22, 2013

Sen. Ted Cruz cut to the chase and gave his view of the real reason fellow Democrats wanted to ban filibusters against certain court nominees: It’s all aimed at protecting the long-term fate of Obamacare, he said.

“The heart of this action is directed at packing the D.C. Circuit because that is the court that will review the lawless behavior of the Obama administration implementing Obamacare,” he said, in The Hill.“President Obama and the administration refuse to follow the plain text of the law, and the D.C. Circuit is the court of appeals that has been holding the administration accountable.”

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/nov/...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#180530 Nov 27, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Ya know, if Mitt Romney was as incompetent as Obama is on venture capitalism, Mitt would have gone bankrupt decades ago and we never would have heard of him!
Fisker Automotive Files for Bankruptcy
http://www.webpronews.com/fisker-automotive-f ...
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Mitt Romney's father was multi-millionaire George Romney. Son did quite well, but he did have a head start;
Barack Obama's father scrammed soon after his son's birth, mother and grandmother were not poor, but certainly not rich in the Romney sense. However, Barack didn't do too badly, he became PRESIDENT. How? By beating rich influential venture capitalist guru and "smart guy" Mitt Romney.
Now tell me, tell us, Rogue. What would Mitt Romney prefer? Being rich or President?
P.S.: Oh , BTW, Obama is both rich AND president.
Is Mitt Romney the only child from Geo. Romney? Are the other brothers and sisters as successful as Mitt is? If Mitt was an idiot like Obama is, do you think he would be as successful?
Now, without US taxpayers backing up Pres. Obama's investments, would he still be solvent?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#180531 Nov 27, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you deny that FDR tried to create two additional Supreme Court Justices so he could stack the USSC with his picks? Please note the link is an official government link so there is no way you can deny it!!! It sucks to be a brain washed Libtard.
Recess Reading: An Occasional Feature From The Judiciary Committee
Franklin Delano Roosevelt's "Court Packing" Plan
President Franklin Delano Roosevelt's "New Deal" - a series of economic programs designed to counter the devastating effects of the Great Depression - faced many challenges in the courts. During President Roosevelt's first term in office, the Supreme Court struck down several provisions and statutes included in New Deal programs, including the National Industrial Recovery Act, the Railroad Retirement Act, and the Agricultural Adjustment Act.
To counter the impact of the Court's decisions on the New Deal reforms, President Roosevelt proposed legislation that would have altered the makeup of the Supreme Court. The Judiciary Reorganization Bill of 1937, which provided for broad reform of the federal judicial system, allowed President Roosevelt to appoint an additional member to the Supreme Court for every sitting justice over the age of 70, which would have resulted in a total of six new justices at the time the bill was introduced. Despite the fact that the Constitution does not limit the size of the Supreme Court, the legislation immediately came under sharp criticism from legislators, bar associations, and the public.
http://www.judiciary.senate.gov/about/history...
So, rogue, let me get this straight. You complain when GWB's disastrous tenure is brought up. You tell "libtards" (Rogue, tm reg'd) to get over it, hey, you say, that was FIVE years ago. Ancient history.

Well, you forget you keep bringing up Jimmy Carter, which harks back to 33 years ago. But, as if that was not bad enough, you now bring us back to FDR, the year of our Lord NINETEEN HUNDRED AND THIRTY-SEVEN (1937). And his proposal did not even pass!! Do you know just how full of "it" you are? How silly you look when you complain about 5-yr old references to GWB? You do make people laugh, and that is a plus, I suppose.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#180532 Nov 27, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Why, and not unlike LRS, Frank, American Lady, GB KFC, Rogue, and birthers et al, do you not even hesitate to look like a fool, a clown, a, a ...birther.
Unionized workers make up 11.4% of the American workforce. 11.4%!! If indeed those 11.4% control the whole industrial might of the United States, as you so "deftly" put it, I would say, the industrial might's not too bright and perhaps its CEOs should be replaced forthwith.
Why don't you get some education and find out what "socialist" means ? Oh, did you know that Switzerland has a socialist gov't? Been socialist as far back as I can remember. How's the Swiss economy working out?
And what percentage of workers were union members 50 years ago? In 1954 it was .... 35%. What happened??? Oh, I, unlike you, post another link.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labor_unions_in_...

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#180533 Nov 27, 2013
WelbyMD wrote:
<quoted text>Like Paul Ryan, Obama, McCain, Mike Pence, Bush, Clinton, etc. Romney too is a puppet for the Illuminati-Freemasons. Their world order is almost complete. I hate Big Brother Kenyan-born Obama the Antichrist. Come quickly Lord Jesus!
Careful, you Lord Jesus takes great pleasure in smiting idiots like you.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#180534 Nov 27, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Ted Cruz accuses Senate of stacking courts to protect Obamacare
BY Cheryl K. Chumley - The Washington Times, November 22, 2013
Sen. Ted Cruz cut to the chase and gave his view of the real reason fellow Democrats wanted to ban filibusters against certain court nominees: It’s all aimed at protecting the long-term fate of Obamacare, he said.
“The heart of this action is directed at packing the D.C. Circuit because that is the court that will review the lawless behavior of the Obama administration implementing Obamacare,” he said, in The Hill.“President Obama and the administration refuse to follow the plain text of the law, and the D.C. Circuit is the court of appeals that has been holding the administration accountable.”
Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/nov/...
Why is Cruz meddling in internal U.S. politics? He's Canadian-Cuban and perhaps U.S. citizen. Has he renounced his Canadian and Cuban citizenships yet? If not, isn't it you guys who say double citizenship is illegal under the constitution?

“Kenyan-born Obama=Antichrist”

Since: Sep 09

Casper, WY

#180535 Nov 27, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
And what percentage of workers were union members 50 years ago? In 1954 it was .... 35%. What happened??? Oh, I, unlike you, post another link.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labor_unions_in_...
Thanks for that. Wikipedia is more fair and balanced than most news sources. FOX & NPR are both Illuminati/Freemason-controlle d. I have ALWAYS been against the teachers union but I must admit even public-union busting isn't pretty.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#180536 Nov 27, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
So, rogue, let me get this straight. You complain when GWB's disastrous tenure is brought up. You tell "libtards" (Rogue, tm reg'd) to get over it, hey, you say, that was FIVE years ago. Ancient history.
Well, you forget you keep bringing up Jimmy Carter, which harks back to 33 years ago. But, as if that was not bad enough, you now bring us back to FDR, the year of our Lord NINETEEN HUNDRED AND THIRTY-SEVEN (1937). And his proposal did not even pass!! Do you know just how full of "it" you are? How silly you look when you complain about 5-yr old references to GWB? You do make people laugh, and that is a plus, I suppose.
The SUBJECT was STACKING THE COURT so why should I bring up Bush or Carter when it was FDR that last tried to stack the courts and now that Obama is trying, you point your finger at .... Bush???

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#180537 Nov 27, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
And what percentage of workers were union members 50 years ago? In 1954 it was .... 35%. What happened??? Oh, I, unlike you, post another link.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labor_unions_in_...
I don't get it. Why'd you post that link? It goes against YOUR grain, as it proves that industry and gov't have broken unions, down from 35% to 11.4%. Why are you incriminating yourself?

You posted a link which I did not request. How about posting one of the 10 links or proofs I've asked you for the last 2 weeks instead?

I prove by links everything I STATE when asked, Rogue, as what I post is mostly from experience and memory. When links I supply occasionally do not work, I post the whole damn story. You never do. You just now proved something that turns against you and you don't even realize it. Are you in a position to dispute my 11.4% percentage? Want me to prove it? Are you in a position to state that unions representing 11.4% of workers are running big business? If so, don't you think that big business needs to review its operations? Don't you agree that unions, right or wrong, have seen their influence diminished considerably in the last 50 years?

Incidentally, the 880-990 Convair remains, to this day, the fastest subsonic commercial airplane on record. All I told you about this airplane (on which I've travelled a number of times) was from memory. Swissair was one of the main users. I don't need to ravage Google and pretend I know stuff I've cherry-picked from there. When I don't know, I ask questions. But you, you STATE things you haven't a clue about. Like not knowing Germany's currency is the Euro! Laughable.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#180538 Nov 27, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
The SUBJECT was STACKING THE COURT so why should I bring up Bush or Carter when it was FDR that last tried to stack the courts and now that Obama is trying, you point your finger at .... Bush???
Have you been smoking? I just said you called out people for mentioning GWB yet you come back to Carter, 33 years ago, now to FDR, 76 years ago and the other day to , omg, Woodrow Wilson, 93 years ago.

You know, and I worry, you just showed once more that you don't understand what you read. Your response is completely out of whack, out of tune, totally irrelevant.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#180539 Nov 27, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you deny that FDR tried to create two additional Supreme Court Justices so he could stack the USSC with his picks? Please note the link is an official government link so there is no way you can deny it!!! It sucks to be a brain washed Libtard.
Recess Reading: An Occasional Feature From The Judiciary Committee
Franklin Delano Roosevelt's "Court Packing" Plan
President Franklin Delano Roosevelt's "New Deal" - a series of economic programs designed to counter the devastating effects of the Great Depression - faced many challenges in the courts. During President Roosevelt's first term in office, the Supreme Court struck down several provisions and statutes included in New Deal programs, including the National Industrial Recovery Act, the Railroad Retirement Act, and the Agricultural Adjustment Act.
To counter the impact of the Court's decisions on the New Deal reforms, President Roosevelt proposed legislation that would have altered the makeup of the Supreme Court. The Judiciary Reorganization Bill of 1937, which provided for broad reform of the federal judicial system, allowed President Roosevelt to appoint an additional member to the Supreme Court for every sitting justice over the age of 70, which would have resulted in a total of six new justices at the time the bill was introduced. Despite the fact that the Constitution does not limit the size of the Supreme Court, the legislation immediately came under sharp criticism from legislators, bar associations, and the public.
http://www.judiciary.senate.gov/about/history...
Clue Rogue, Obama is not FDR, and the vacancies on the 3rd Circuit were not created by Obama. What are you smoking?
wojar wrote:
He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, except if a birfoon bumpkin from Florida construes judicial vacancies as "stacking".

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#180540 Nov 27, 2013
Rouge Bumpkin: Now Obama wants to stack the 3rd Circuit Court

wojar: Obama did not create the vacancies at the 3rd Circuit.

Rouge Bumpkin: Do you deny that FDR tried to stack the Supreme Court?

wojar: Huh?

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#180542 Nov 27, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
The SUBJECT was STACKING THE COURT so why should I bring up Bush or Carter when it was FDR that last tried to stack the courts and now that Obama is trying, you point your finger at .... Bush???
Huh? Obama expanded the bench at the 3rd Circuit?

Three vacancies occurred during his administration and Republicans blocked EVERY one of his appointments. Stacking?

If Mitt were making the three appointments, it wouldn't be stacking, correct?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
last post wins! (Apr '13) 2 min nag 933
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min positronium 1,375,409
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 3 min TRD 70,481
Song Title Game (Dec '11) 5 min nag 1,231
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 7 min Sublime1 101,749
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 8 min SweLL GirL 8,118
Amy May 5 9 min Mrs Gladys Kravitz 2
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages