BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#180316 Nov 24, 2013
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>Only because Obama gave them a one year or a two year extension. What do you think will happy after the 2014 election?
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>Sorry, but most Americans receive insurance through employer or Medicare. Prior to ACA most people in individual market kept same policy less than 2 yrs. If they got sick they were cancelled with no comparable plan offered.
Bill Gates needs insurance? What for? If he had insurance the insurance company would tell him what doctors he could NOT be seen by, what hospitals he could NOT go to and what medical procedures they would NOT pay for. He is rich enough to make his own decisions without the tax payers picking up the tab.
And there are a lot of other Americans who are rich enough to do the same, so why should they be apart of Pelosi-Care?
The British footballer star David Beckham did not go home to the U.K. to have his torn Achilles repaired, he we to the best doctor he could afford who was in Finland! Have you noticed that the best surgeons and doctor have left the U.K. and Canada to work in countries where their skills are appreciated?
Slick Willie

Jacksonville, FL

#180317 Nov 24, 2013
Dale wrote:
Happy, happy, happy!!! It isn't everyday one sees a political party hang themselves with the rope they stole.
Yep, you democrats keep pushing for Obamacare, you are accomplishing something that the repubs couldn't, the demise of the democrat party.
Oh, I forgot! The democrat party died log ago, it is now just a front for the socialist, marxist and communist individuals (pest) that infests the USA.
Yah know, Obama just thinks he was slick when he changed the date for the EmpoyER mandate sign-in to start AFTER next years election because anyone with half-a-brain knows it is a blatant political move. Look at me, most people did knot no I was being slick when I was because I don't make it look slick.
And another thing. Slicky Obama does not realize that it is the individual state laws which make insurance companies give 90 DAYS notice when changing, or cancelling, policies and that means, AGAIN, OCTOBER 1, 2014 these people will get their noticed but now they will have to wait six weeks before they can sign up?!? I mean, how stupid can Slicky Obama get?!?
This year we had a little over five million INDIVIDUAL policies, which affected over ten million people, were cancelled but next October it will be 50-75 MILLION policies which will be cancelled affecting 100-150 MILLION people. Hey Slicky Obama, WTF were you thinking???
Obama give 'Slick' a bad name!!!

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#180318 Nov 24, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Crystal Mangum, Duke lacrosse accuser, convicted of murder
Crystal Mangum: In 2006, the Duke lacrosse accuser lied that she was raped by three lacrosse players. Now Crystal Mangum has been convicted of murdering her boyfriend. Mangum claimed self defense.
By Staff, Associated Press / November 23, 2013
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Latest-News-Wire...
Why are you posting this crap? This is not your favourite publication, The National Enquirer, the Globe or WND.com . Wouldn't be because she's black? Nooooo, you'd never ever do that.
OpenSecrets org

West Sayville, NY

#180319 Nov 24, 2013
Scrutiny wrote:
<quoted text>
Nicolas Cage in one of his few decent roles.
He is an arms dealer and a large part of his product came from a connection in Russia as the USSR fell apart.
Didn't deal with nukes but is a decent examination how how arms dealers work.
Definitely worth the time to watch.
Thanks for the movie and I watched it yesterday.

I enjoy movies based on factual events.

If there were more Viktor Bout's at the time of Christopher Columbus the Native Americans might of had a chance.

Sincerely,
Joseph Dominick Pistone

lol

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#180320 Nov 24, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>Only because Obama gave them a one year or a two year extension. What do you think will happy after the 2014 election?
<quoted text>
Bill Gates needs insurance? What for? If he had insurance the insurance company would tell him what doctors he could NOT be seen by, what hospitals he could NOT go to and what medical procedures they would NOT pay for. He is rich enough to make his own decisions without the tax payers picking up the tab.
And there are a lot of other Americans who are rich enough to do the same, so why should they be apart of Pelosi-Care?
The British footballer star David Beckham did not go home to the U.K. to have his torn Achilles repaired, he we to the best doctor he could afford who was in Finland! Have you noticed that the best surgeons and doctor have left the U.K. and Canada to work in countries where their skills are appreciated?
That's what insurance companies do, Rogue, they tell you which doctor, which hospital, which clinic, which laboratory you should consult as they are all in cahoots, sharing YOUR money. In a universal health gov't system, they do NOT tell you who and what to consult, you're free to choose. System's not perfect, but it certainly reflects what true freedom of choice is, namely, democracy.

Would you care to PROVE (sigh, you won't as usual, just another wild hate statement) that , as you wrote "Have you noticed that the best surgeons and doctor have left the U.K. and Canada to work in countries where their skills are appreciated? ". Try to prove that statement, not opinion, statement without telling me to STFU.
OpenSecrets org

West Sayville, NY

#180321 Nov 24, 2013
Slick Willie wrote:
<quoted text>
Yah know, Obama just thinks he was slick when he changed the date for the EmpoyER mandate sign-in to start AFTER next years election because anyone with half-a-brain knows it is a blatant political move. Look at me, most people did knot no I was being slick when I was because I don't make it look slick.
And another thing. Slicky Obama does not realize that it is the individual state laws which make insurance companies give 90 DAYS notice when changing, or cancelling, policies and that means, AGAIN, OCTOBER 1, 2014 these people will get their noticed but now they will have to wait six weeks before they can sign up?!? I mean, how stupid can Slicky Obama get?!?
This year we had a little over five million INDIVIDUAL policies, which affected over ten million people, were cancelled but next October it will be 50-75 MILLION policies which will be cancelled affecting 100-150 MILLION people. Hey Slicky Obama, WTF were you thinking???
Obama give 'Slick' a bad name!!!
Maybe Obama wanted it all to fail so President Hillary Clinton could implement Medicare For All Americans ( Single Payer )?

ROTFL

P.S. Our friend Jacques caught you on camera yesterday flying remote control planes.

LOL

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#180322 Nov 24, 2013
OpenSecrets org wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks for the movie and I watched it yesterday.
I enjoy movies based on factual events.
If there were more Viktor Bout's at the time of Christopher Columbus the Native Americans might of had a chance.
Sincerely,
Joseph Dominick Pistone
lol
Well, blame that on poor radar and GPS on Columbus's flagship, the Santa Maria. Otherwise, Chris would've de landed in Mumbai and today's North and South American natives would still be living in peace and harmony without the dreaded white man.
OpenSecrets org

West Sayville, NY

#180323 Nov 24, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, blame that on poor radar and GPS on Columbus's flagship, the Santa Maria. Otherwise, Chris would've de landed in Mumbai and today's North and South American natives would still be living in peace and harmony without the dreaded white man.
And all this time I thought the Vikings discovered America.

Go figure?

lol

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#180324 Nov 24, 2013
OpenSecrets org wrote:
<quoted text>
And all this time I thought the Vikings discovered America.
Go figure?
lol
So they say. But rumour has it ,the Vikings actually landed in Canada. As is well known, Vikings were Republican tea partyers, and as soon as they had a peek at Canada's socialist and communist universal health care system, the were horrified, turned around and raided England instead.
OpenSecrets org

West Sayville, NY

#180325 Nov 24, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
So they say. But rumour has it ,the Vikings actually landed in Canada. As is well known, Vikings were Republican tea partyers, and as soon as they had a peek at Canada's socialist and communist universal health care system, the were horrified, turned around and raided England instead.
Yes, the Vikings are the original tea bags.

Could be that is why England loves their tea?

I wonder if Rogue likes Erik the Red as much as he likes The Red Baron?

lol
Obskeptic

Farmington, MI

#180326 Nov 24, 2013
CHAPTER X


FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF CITIZENS

ARTICLE 118. Citizens of the U.S.S.R. have the right to work, that is, are guaranteed the right to employment and payment for their work in accordance With its quantity and quality.

The right to work is ensured by the socialist organization of the national economy, the steady growth of the productive forces of Soviet society, the elimination of the possibility of economic crises, and the abolition of unemployment.
ARTICLE 119. Citizens of the U.S.S.R. have the right to rest and leisure. The right to rest and leisure is ensured by the reduction of the working day to seven hours for the overwhelming majority of the workers, the institution of annual vacations with full pay for workers and employees and the provision of a wide network of sanatoria, rest homes and clubs for the accommodation of the working people.

ARTICLE 120. Citizens of the U.S.S.R. have the right to maintenance in old age and also in case of sickness or loss of capacity to work. This right is ensured by the extensive development of social insurance of workers and employees at state expense, free medical service for the working people and the provision of a wide network of health resorts for the use of the working people.

ARTICLE 121. Citizens of the U.S.S.R. have the right to education. This right is ensured by universal, compulsory elementary education; by education, including higher education, being free of charge; by the system of state stipends for the overwhelming majority of students in the universities and colleges; by instruction in schools being conducted in the native Ianguage, and by the organization in the factories, state farms, machine and tractor stations and collective farms of free vocational, technical and agronomic training for the working people.

ARTICLE 122. Women in the U.S.S.R. are accorded equal rights with men in all spheres of economic, state, cultural, social and political life. The possibility of exercising these rights is ensured to women by granting them an equal right with men to work, payment for work, rest and leisure, social insurance and education, and by state protection of the interests of mother and child, prematernity and maternity leave with full pay, and the provision of a wide network of maternity homes, nurseries and kindergartens.

ARTICLE 123. Equality of rights of citizens of the U.S.S.R., irrespective of their nationality or race, in all spheres of economic, state, cultural, social and political life, is an indefeasible law. Any direct or indirect restriction of the rights of, or, conversely, any establishment of direct or indirect privileges for, citizens on account of their race or nationality, as well as any advocacy of racial or national exclusiveness or hatred and contempt, is punishable by law.

ARTICLE 124. In order to ensure to citizens freedom of conscience, the church in the U.S.S.R. is separated from the state, and the school from the church. Freedom of religious worship and freedom of antireligious propaganda is recognized for all citizens.

ARTICLE 125. In conformity with the interests of the working people, and in order to strengthen the socialist system, the citizens of the U.S.S.R. are guaranteed by law:

freedom of speech;
freedom of the press;
freedom of assembly, including the holding of mass meetings;
reedom of street processions and demonstrations.

This is what a constitution of affirmative powers of government looks like, which is what Barack Obama thinks we should have, rather then what we have now which is a negative or limiting constitution based on what he thinks.
Obskeptic

Farmington, MI

#180327 Nov 24, 2013
On January 18, 2001, then-state senator Barack Obama appeared on WBEZ-FM out of Chicago to discuss the federal courts and civil rights. During the interview, Mr. Obama found himself engaged in a subject that stirs up his leftwing passions. Below are some of his bombshell comments (emphasis added):

"The Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society. And to that extent, as radical as I think people tried to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn't that radical. It didn't break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, as least as it's been interpreted, and [sic] Warren Court interpreted in the same way that, generally, the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties, says what the states can't do to you, says what the federal government can't do to you, but it doesn't say what the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf.

That straightforward excerpt provides a clear window into the constitutional philosophy of Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. As radical as "people tried to characterize" the Warren Court, Mr. Obama hints that the Constitution may be interpreted even more radically: in a way which would give the federal government power to tell the people what the feds (and states) must do on their behalf."

And now the dictator in chief, in between rounds of golf has declared by fiat that he will postpone certain parts of the ACA until Late November of 2014. Anyone think that time frame is chosen just by chance, or was it decided subjectively to provide cover for the democrats in the upcoming election? Of course there will be the usual bunch of useful idiots that will continue to support democrats in spite of the transparent hypocrisy on full display by this fool we elected to lead us. The one common element of anything "to big" is corruption and absolute power, which is why the democrats want even bigger government, bigger education controlled by the fed's, and bigger unions, all of which must be funded with the help of the very people they desire to enslave to their socialist ideology. Mob rule democracy was something the founders tried to avoid, hence the checks and balances of which Harry Reid and the democrats have just blown to smithereens.
Obskeptic

Farmington, MI

#180328 Nov 24, 2013
One thing Lyndon Johnson adopted from Kennedy was the effort to stem the tide of communist advancement in the world, which is why, like all democrats do, he concocted the colossal lie history knows as the Gulf of Tonkin attack, which was the catalyst for Johnson exploding the US intervention in Vietnam.

http://fair.org/media-beat-column/30-year-ann...

Whether this was done to satisfy the industrial military complex or not, it was as deceitful and destructive a lie to millions of Americans just as "you can keep your doctor, you can keep your current insurance if you like it, and your costs will go down by $2500 per year" has proven to be. I doubt the current move by the liar in Chief to postpone this until after the 2014 election will deflect the responsibility the American people will hold the democrat party too for their deception they perpetrated on all of us, including rank and file democrats. Of course that is speculation on my part and I could be wrong, but I don't think so.
Frank

Spokane, WA

#180329 Nov 24, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>Sorry, but most Americans receive insurance through employer or Medicare. Prior to ACA most people in individual market kept same policy less than 2 yrs. If they got sick they were cancelled with no comparable plan offered.
Obama stated that he would be able to force 60%-80% of the population to lose their health insurance by 2017.
Slick Willie

Jacksonville, FL

#180330 Nov 24, 2013
Dale wrote:
Happy, happy, happy!!! It isn't everyday one sees a political party hang themselves with the rope they stole.
Yep, you democrats keep pushing for Obamacare, you are accomplishing something that the repubs couldn't, the demise of the democrat party.
Oh, I forgot! The democrat party died log ago, it is now just a front for the socialist, marxist and communist individuals (pest) that infests the USA.
Yah know, Obama just thinks he was slick when he changed the date for the EmpoyER mandate sign-in to start AFTER next years election because anyone with half-a-brain knows it is a blatant political move. Look at me, most people did knot no I was being slick when I was because I don't make it look slick.
And another thing. Slicky Obama does not realize that it is the individual state laws which make insurance companies give 90 DAYS notice when changing, or cancelling, policies and that means, AGAIN, OCTOBER 1, 2014 these people will get their noticed but now they will have to wait six weeks before they can sign up?!? I mean, how stupid can Slicky Obama get?!?
This year we had a little over five million INDIVIDUAL policies, which affected over ten million people, were cancelled but next October it will be 50-75 MILLION policies which will be cancelled affecting 100-150 MILLION people. Hey Slicky Obama, WTF were you thinking???
Obama gives 'Slick' a bad name!!!
Frank

Spokane, WA

#180331 Nov 24, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>Sorry, but most Americans receive insurance through employer or Medicare. Prior to ACA most people in individual market kept same policy less than 2 yrs. If they got sick they were cancelled with no comparable plan offered.
ObamaKare won't be fully implemented until 2017. By then Obama will have completed his term in The White House and will be able to go back home and laugh at all the ignorant people.
Frank

Spokane, WA

#180332 Nov 24, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>Sorry, but most Americans receive insurance through employer or Medicare. Prior to ACA most people in individual market kept same policy less than 2 yrs. If they got sick they were cancelled with no comparable plan offered.
In 2008, when Obama was campaigning he said that there were 10 million people that needed health insurance. Due to Obama policies by September 2013 that number has been driven to 44 million. In September Obama stated that by March he would get 7 million people signed up for ObamaKare,that is a net loss of 37 million people without health insurance.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#180333 Nov 24, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Crystal Mangum, Duke lacrosse accuser, convicted of murder
Crystal Mangum: In 2006, the Duke lacrosse accuser lied that she was raped by three lacrosse players. Now Crystal Mangum has been convicted of murdering her boyfriend. Mangum claimed self defense.
By Staff, Associated Press / November 23, 2013
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Latest-News-Wire ...
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Why are you posting this crap? This is not your favourite publication, The National Enquirer, the Globe or WND.com . Wouldn't be because she's black? Nooooo, you'd never ever do that.
I did NOT make this a racial issue, The DEMOCRAT prosecutor did!!! A black stripper/prostitute claimed sge was RAPED by three WHITE boys and the Libtard DA wanted to make it an issue. Just like the RACIST Obama wanted to make Trayvon Martin a poster boy ("If I had a son, he would be just like Trayvon"). But just like this black whore, the black thug-kid turned out bad and only exposed you Libtards as the racists you really are.
It is you Libtards who want to push the racial issues when often, they are anything but!!!
Frank

Spokane, WA

#180334 Nov 24, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>Sorry, but most Americans receive insurance through employer or Medicare. Prior to ACA most people in individual market kept same policy less than 2 yrs. If they got sick they were cancelled with no comparable plan offered.
Last week when Obama claimed that 100 million people signed up for ObamaKare, he not only was telling more lies,but he was dishonest. The states that provided the highest numbers only had extremely small numbers,small enough for a young child to count on their fingers. The states with he highest numbers have reported that 90% of those that were included in those numbers had enrolled in Medicaid.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#180335 Nov 24, 2013
Slick Willie wrote:
<quoted text>
Yah know, Obama just thinks he was slick when he changed the date for the EmpoyER mandate sign-in to start AFTER next years election because anyone with half-a-brain knows it is a blatant political move. Look at me, most people did knot no I was being slick when I was because I don't make it look slick.
And another thing. Slicky Obama does not realize that it is the individual state laws which make insurance companies give 90 DAYS notice when changing, or cancelling, policies and that means, AGAIN, OCTOBER 1, 2014 these people will get their noticed but now they will have to wait six weeks before they can sign up?!? I mean, how stupid can Slicky Obama get?!?
This year we had a little over five million INDIVIDUAL policies, which affected over ten million people, were cancelled but next October it will be 50-75 MILLION policies which will be cancelled affecting 100-150 MILLION people. Hey Slicky Obama, WTF were you thinking???
Obama give 'Slick' a bad name!!!
OpenSecrets org wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe Obama wanted it all to fail so President Hillary Clinton could implement Medicare For All Americans ( Single Payer )?
ROTFL
P.S. Our friend Jacques caught you on camera yesterday flying remote control planes.
LOL
I have been saying all that along but I really don't Hillary will be in the White House in 2017!
Just wait until next year this time and Obama maybe lucky if he is not tarred, feathered and run out of town on a rail.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Santa Claus delayed in Chicago after getting th... 3 hr ChicagOpinion 1
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 4 hr ChicagOpinion 98,871
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 5 hr johnplustwomore 1,155,536
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 8 hr J RULES 71,188
Chicago Pizza Blows 10 hr joey 2
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 10 hr KiMare 51,279
AP Exclusive: Union members appointed after $10... (Mar '08) 11 hr IUEC 7,564
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 11:49 am PST

NBC Sports11:49AM
Reggie Wayne needs offseason triceps surgery
NBC Sports 1:29 PM
Colts say they will be all business despite nothing to gain - NBC Sports
NBC Sports 1:40 PM
Cutler realizes Bears could be in for changes - NBC Sports
NBC Sports 8:22 PM
Bears re-sign Austen Lane to replace Willie Young
Bleacher Report10:09 PM
Bears vs. Vikings: Breaking Down Minnesota's Game Plan