BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Full story: Chicago Tribune

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...
Comments
158,921 - 158,940 of 177,461 Comments Last updated 6 hrs ago
Grand Birther

Painesville, OH

#179896 Nov 18, 2013
dont snow me wrote:
<quoted text>
worked for me,sorry you're still behind the counter at Burger King.
Trickle down economics worked for you? Maybe you should let Fwank know?

“no one told me”

Since: Dec 07

Denver

#179897 Nov 18, 2013
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Trickle down economics worked for you? Maybe you should let Fwank know?
Probably worked fine for all those willing to work, Burger King boy. Someone is living in the tens of thousands of fines homes we have here in Colorado.

“no one told me”

Since: Dec 07

Denver

#179898 Nov 18, 2013
Libs are soooo stupid,they think uneducated slackers are going to do as well as the ambitious and educated who strive for a good life.It's called hard work.
Idiots.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#179899 Nov 18, 2013
Atticus Tiberius Finch wrote:
<quoted text>
Wong.
1. Cost of Living. From 2008 to 2013 the cost of living has risen only 8.8% in five years. In comparison in during Bush's administration from 2003 to 2008 the cost of living rose 17% in five years. Almost a 200% increase.
2. Salary. Average hourly earnings rose from 22.01 in January 2009 to 24.10 in October 2013. An increase of 9.49%. As such, average hourly earnings kept pace with cost of living during the Obama's administration.
Excellent reply, and buttressed with facts - birthers and Frank hate that, much like Lucifer recoils when sprinkled with holy water.

I had asked Frank to prove his wild oafish statement. Still waiting.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#179900 Nov 18, 2013
dont snow me wrote:
<quoted text>
Theye're doing a bang up job at the Post Office and the IRS, I'm sure Oblamkare will be a smashing success as well.
Again talking through your hat. The Post Office has been bankrupted by the Republican congress, making it impossible to turn it around by refusing to halt stupid Saturday mail delivery which is a huge loss leader - not to mention the horrendous pension obligations foisted upon it,(no other federal arm of the gov't has had that done to them) in order to force privatization of the best and juiciest parts like parcel post, leaving losing money-loser home mail delivery to the gov't. And they'll keep repeating "see how the pvt guys are making money with parcel post and how the gov't loses money with home mail delivery? I'd like to see FedEx hand deliver a letter from Portland Maine to Fairbanks Alaska on a Saturday for 55 cents .

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#179901 Nov 18, 2013
Truth Detector wrote:
Just what should be expected from a fraud!
The U.S. government in the final months leading up to the 2012 presidential election released “faked” unemployment data, according to a bombshell report from the New York Post.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/11/18/if...
The New York Post is Murdoch-owned. It's trash. The media IS the message.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#179902 Nov 18, 2013
dont snow me wrote:
<quoted text>
It was payback time for the dems who didn't get what they wanted for years, that's when spending and debt skyrocketed.
Obscene!$3.7 Trillion Spent On Welfare Since Obama Took Office ...
www.thegatewaypundit.com/.../obscene-3-7-tril... ;
Oct 24, 2013 - Obscene!... Under Obama's reign of Socialism, the amount spent on welfare was almost 5 times ... To Democrats, lifestyle is a human right.
The facts about the growth of spending under Obama - The ...
www.washingtonpost.com/...spending.../gJQAIJh... ;
May 25, 2012 - Under these figures, and using this calculator, with 2008 as the base year and ending with ... So in every case, the president wanted to spend more money than he ended up getting..... Spam; Obscene; Duplicate .... Both died in the Dem-controlled Senate without so much as being debated, I suspect to ...
£3.7 billion on welfare, eh? That's it? How much in tax rebates to giant corporation, commonly called corporate welfare? Should be interesting.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#179903 Nov 18, 2013
dont snow me wrote:
<quoted text>
I have a difficult time understanding why libs love a guy who is giving out $85 billion a month to Wall Street and fatcat bankers. Maybe you can tell me.
It's called corporate welfare, Moe. That is in addition to tax cuts, tax incentives and a very low tax rate, WHEN they do pay taxes. And you mention people on welfare earlier on? And you think Obama started it?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#179906 Nov 18, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong on the Jacksonville mayoralty race. Fault : The press
Wrong on the last presidential election.Fault : The polls
Wrong on the Obamacare supreme court decision. Fault : Obama bought Roberts out
Wrong on the stock market,totally wrong . Frault : Stockbroker.
And so it goes.
Since when have "I" polled people?
As far as the stock market, we will see what happens when Bernanke stops printing money and it it was anything like happened after they stopped QE1 and QE2, we are in for a correction of at least 10% drop in the stock markets.
What happened in Jun-Aug 2010 after QE1 ended? What happened in Aug-Sep 2011? And now that Bernanke has been printing Obama Bucks for 14 straight months you think it will be different when he stops printing money?!?Bernanke has printed $1.2 Trillion in 14 months and the bigger the bubble the bigger the pop!
And I have quoted people like Carl Icahn whom all I did was quote him. I guess if he is wrong, I will be wrong. But are you smarter than Carl Icahn? I'm not because if I was I would be richer than he is and I am not!
Now, how many people does Obama have to kill before you get upset?!?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#179907 Nov 18, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
It's called corporate welfare, Moe. That is in addition to tax cuts, tax incentives and a very low tax rate, WHEN they do pay taxes. And you mention people on welfare earlier on? And you think Obama started it?
No, but Obama doubled the number of people on welfare! He doubled the number of people on food stamps! And what is sad is that you think that this is progress. I think it is progress when more people have jobs and can take care of themselves and their families!!!
Grand Birther

Painesville, OH

#179908 Nov 19, 2013
dont snow me wrote:
<quoted text>
Probably worked fine for all those willing to work, Burger King boy. Someone is living in the tens of thousands of fines homes we have here in Colorado.
"Probably?"

Good one, snow job. You're a real hoot. What a rousing defense of economic policies you clearly understand very well.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#179909 Nov 19, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Since when have "I" polled people?
As far as the stock market, we will see what happens when Bernanke stops printing money and it it was anything like happened after they stopped QE1 and QE2, we are in for a correction of at least 10% drop in the stock markets.
What happened in Jun-Aug 2010 after QE1 ended? What happened in Aug-Sep 2011? And now that Bernanke has been printing Obama Bucks for 14 straight months you think it will be different when he stops printing money?!?Bernanke has printed $1.2 Trillion in 14 months and the bigger the bubble the bigger the pop!
And I have quoted people like Carl Icahn whom all I did was quote him. I guess if he is wrong, I will be wrong. But are you smarter than Carl Icahn? I'm not because if I was I would be richer than he is and I am not!
Now, how many people does Obama have to kill before you get upset?!?
So, you agree with pollsters, the media, make wild predictions and when nothing comes true, you blame them. It's never your doing. Well, well.

As to the DJIA, well, it's risen so quickly and so well, it'll still be high even if it loses 1,500 points at stimulus end. Do you get it? Example : If my newspaper says my man/woman will win such and such an election, and he/she does not, according to your reasoning, I would not have been wrong, the media would. Correct?

You wrote : "Now, how many people does Obama have to kill before you get upset?!?" Well, what is it about the word "regrettable" you don't understand? And, how many people? One is too many, BUT how about 400 times the number of people? How often have you written that the 1 million+ Vietnamese and American deaths and millions maimed have upset you? How often have you written that the hundreds of thousands Iraqis and Afghans have upset you?
Obskeptic

Farmington, MI

#179910 Nov 19, 2013
dont snow me wrote:
<quoted text>
I have a difficult time understanding why libs love a guy who is giving out $85 billion a month to Wall Street and fatcat bankers. Maybe you can tell me.
Because the reality is that the lib's are the party of and for the rich. The poor lib's are just the useful idiots being tossed someone else's dime to keep them on the plantation and dependent and voting for the santa that brings them the presents.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#179911 Nov 19, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
No, but Obama doubled the number of people on welfare! He doubled the number of people on food stamps! And what is sad is that you think that this is progress. I think it is progress when more people have jobs and can take care of themselves and their families!!!
How many people on food stamps have a job, Rogue? With a minimum wage ranging anywhere from $3.00 to $5.00 an hour, what do you expect? With unions being bashed and battered by republicans, and workers losing wages and rights, what DO you expect?
Obskeptic

Farmington, MI

#179912 Nov 19, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Again talking through your hat. The Post Office has been bankrupted by the Republican congress, making it impossible to turn it around by refusing to halt stupid Saturday mail delivery which is a huge loss leader - not to mention the horrendous pension obligations foisted upon it,(no other federal arm of the gov't has had that done to them) in order to force privatization of the best and juiciest parts like parcel post, leaving losing money-loser home mail delivery to the gov't. And they'll keep repeating "see how the pvt guys are making money with parcel post and how the gov't loses money with home mail delivery? I'd like to see FedEx hand deliver a letter from Portland Maine to Fairbanks Alaska on a Saturday for 55 cents .
In the 2006 elections the congress went to the democrats and they did nothing to correct the "pension fix" that was passed earlier that year. That "fix" is the reason most say the post office is in trouble more then any thing else. Then in 2008-2010, the congress and the presidency was in total control of the democrats, and what did they do to correct the problem? That would be a big zero, nada, zilch! In other words, not a damn thing. So again Jacques, why is it the republicans fault the USPS is in such dire straights?
angel

Boise, ID

#179913 Nov 19, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
Because the reality is that the lib's are the party of and for the rich. The poor lib's are just the useful idiots being tossed someone else's dime to keep them on the plantation and dependent and voting for the santa that brings them the presents.
'The Libs are the party of the Rich' right...are you an idiot or just another Teabagging Liar hoping that if you claim something and someone is dumb enough to beleive it its worthwhile?
angel

Boise, ID

#179915 Nov 19, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
No you did not answer my question. Answering a question with another question is not an answer. And you call them "parables"? I call it shifting the blame.
In your sick mind it is okay for Obama to kill innocent civilians because ..... Bush did it. But you will bash Bush on the issue but ignore the fact that three our of four people killed in Obama's drone attacks are innocent civilians.
Now, how many deaths are you okay with? None if it was Bush but how many for Obama?
At least Bush tried to capture them and put them in GITMO while Obama would rather kill them than capture them.
I know, reality is tuff for you Libtards, but try.
Its really amazing that Teabagging fools such as yourself are so Bankrupt in the Self Knowledge Dept.you cant see how incredibly transparent and hypocritical your Faux concern for the Human Rights of AlQueda Terrorists truly is.
It is Laughable at best Contemptous at worst.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#179916 Nov 19, 2013
I have been talking about this for a long time. That under G.W. Bush, about a third of the monthly jobs reports were revised upwards, a third downward and a third were not changed.
But during Obama's first four years NOT ONE report was revised DOWNWARD, only a few were not changed and all the rest were revised UPWARDS.
Statistically this is impossible yet the Libtards have summarily dismissed this issue simply saying that modern computers have reduced the errors. But if that was true, why were NONE revised DOWNWARD in Obama's first four years?
Now, was Obama complicit in this scandal? Probably not but the Libtards who were not only not punished, they were PROMOTED. Yep, Lie-up for Obama and Move-UP!!!

Census 'faked' 2012 Election Jobs Report

By John Crudele November 18, 2013

In the home stretch of the 2012 presidential campaign, from August to September, the unemployment rate fell sharply — raising eyebrows from Wall Street to Washington.

The decline — from 8.1 percent in August to 7.8 percent in September — might not have been all it seemed. The numbers, according to a reliable source, were manipulated.

And the Census Bureau, which does the unemployment survey, knew it.

Just two years before the presidential election, the Census Bureau had caught an employee fabricating data that went into the unemployment report, which is one of the most closely watched measures of the economy.

And a knowledgeable source says the deception went beyond that one employee — that it escalated at the time President Obama was seeking reelection in 2012.
http://nypost.com/2013/11/18/census-faked-201...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#179917 Nov 19, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
Because the reality is that the lib's are the party of and for the rich. The poor lib's are just the useful idiots being tossed someone else's dime to keep them on the plantation and dependent and voting for the santa that brings them the presents.
angel wrote:
<quoted text>
'The Libs are the party of the Rich' right...are you an idiot or just another Teabagging Liar hoping that if you claim something and someone is dumb enough to beleive it its worthwhile?
Hard to admit it, but it is true. Is Nancy Pelosi poor? You see, the Progressives put poor people in ghettos, educated their children in ghetto schools so they will become good domestic servants, give they free stuff like Obama phones, and they are happy and will vote for Obama.
All the Democrats have none is figured out a way to re-enslave black people and Hispanics and other minorities. The Liberals do not want to solve racial issues because once they do, they will no longer be needed and they can't have that as they will be out of a job.
Oh, most sport teams owners are Conservatives and they will go out and find the best athletes they can afford regardless of their skin color or how many times they have been arrested so long as they, the owners, can make money.
For every Magic Johnson or Michael Gordon who make it rich, there are a hundred that burn out and end up bankrupt two years after they leave the majors.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#179918 Nov 19, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
No you did not answer my question. Answering a question with another question is not an answer. And you call them "parables"? I call it shifting the blame.
In your sick mind it is okay for Obama to kill innocent civilians because ..... Bush did it. But you will bash Bush on the issue but ignore the fact that three our of four people killed in Obama's drone attacks are innocent civilians.
Now, how many deaths are you okay with? None if it was Bush but how many for Obama?
At least Bush tried to capture them and put them in GITMO while Obama would rather kill them than capture them.
I know, reality is tuff for you Libtards, but try.
angel wrote:
<quoted text>Its really amazing that Teabagging fools such as yourself are so Bankrupt in the Self Knowledge Dept.you cant see how incredibly transparent and hypocritical your Faux concern for the Human Rights of AlQueda Terrorists truly is.
It is Laughable at best Contemptous at worst.
While you Libtards would rather kill suspected terrorist rather than capture them and put them in GITMO.
Imagine you are a soldier and you know Obama is releasing enemy combatants who are now trying to kill you and you have a chance to capture them again and you ask yourself, "If I capture this guy and Obama lets him go, he may return to kill me or my buddies". So you decide not to try and capture him and just go ahead and kill him.
Yep, you Libtards are always doing things that have unintended consequences.
Like when Jimmy Carter turned his back on the Shah of Iran allowing Iran to become a theocracy who's goal is to kill Americans. Personally I didn't care how many Iranian people the Shah killed or tortured so long as we Americans are safer.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 56 min the wandering girl 4,681
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 hr NMx 1,100,983
Word (Dec '08) 2 hr andet1987 4,662
Ping G20 Irons Compared With Cheap G15 Irons (May '12) 2 hr lucy 2
chief keef 2 hr sd 1
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 3 hr voice of peace 68,393
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 4 hr JOEL 69,030
•••
•••
Chicago Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••