Point by point :Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
I will do a Terri Tunna on you. Bush did not use B17s.
But he only bombed MILITARY targets. One of the Military bunkers that were bombed was full of military families. Is it our problem that civilians were in military bunkers?
Obama is ONLY bombing civilians. Not one of them that has been killed was in the military!!!
Yes, I knew it was most probably a typo and I knew you probably meant "B1" and I normally do not comment about typos or other minor issues.
My POINT is that you continue to bash Bush at every chance you get but when I point out that Obama is doing the same thing you will NOT bash him.
You simply excuse it by saying, Bush was worse! But, how many innocent deaths are too many? Come on now, put a value to it, if you dare too.
How many unnecessarily deaths did LBJ contribute to my tying the hands of our military?
If we mined Haiphong Harbor in 1962 instead of 1972, would we have saved lives on all sides? You do not win a war by killing people but by demoralizing them into stop fighting! A concept you Libtards have a hard time grasping!!!
1. Yes, civilians killed in military bunkers and loads of civilians killed in the fields, at home, in stores, at work. Don't tell me those bombs were THAT smart because they were not/ Specially the biggest culprits, the B52s that just plunked bombs, no guidance. Carpet bombing on things military and unfortunately, civilian;
2. I don't bash Bush, I just recite facts. And they are undeniable. He waged a phoney war in Afghanistan, and, particularly, in Iraq where he fudged his reasons for invading and cost over 200,000 killed and over 1 million maimed. That is not bashing , that is telling it like it is. Obama is NOT trying to do the same thing, as he has yet to invade TWO sovereign countries. The GWB/Obama kill ratio is about 400 to 1, assuming Obama has killed over 400 terrorists and civilians, which I believe is a bit high;
3. LBJ contributed too many deaths uselessly in Vietnam, both American and Vietnamese, and the WOUNDED! How many handicapped/maimed U.S. servicemen affected for the rest of their lives, either physiologically or psychologically? LBJ was as wrong as GWB, he had no business in Vietnam any more than Iraq or Afghanistan. What did the Vietnamese or Iraqis ever do to the U.S. to merit invasion and occupation? You want me to criticize LBJ? I won't 'cuz I'm not American but I will do the same a I do with GWB, I will cite facts and the facts don't back up their participation in either war. Cripes, even McNamara made an open confession concerning his guilt on Vietnam;
4. Come off it, Rogue. Mine Haiphong when you like, at the beginning or at the end, you would still have lost the war. Plenty of ways to ship through land from Russia and China. War may have agonized a bit longer but that's it.
Did you know, Rogue, that more bombs were dropped on North Vietnam than by the entire combatants in WWII in Europe? And you think mining Haiphong harbour would've made a difference? Good lord, even chemical warfare was used on the North, way before Saddam did it. Again, not criticizing, just a fact. Dream on.