BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 196919 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#178014 Nov 5, 2013
Correction : 27th of 34, with Mexico, Czech Republic, Slovania etc fast catching up. 33rd in the world. And universal health care is not a factor?

“On Deck”

Since: Aug 08

French Polynesia

#178015 Nov 5, 2013
Jacques,
Civilization is a very thin veneer.
loose

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#178016 Nov 5, 2013
loose cannon wrote:
Jacques,
Civilization is a very thin veneer.
loose
Very profound. Meaning?
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#178017 Nov 5, 2013
Scrutiny wrote:
<quoted text>
Sounds about right... The reps putting all their eggs in the Ted basket.
When a guys natural facial expression is a bewildered Joe McArthy and it doesn't seem to raise any red flags....
I wouldn't exactly call Hillary bitch slapping another corporate GOP candidate payback.... or lovely.
Killary? The one responsible for four Americans being killed? That Killary? The one that said, "what difference does it make"? That Killary? She's right up your alley. There is a study going on to determine, or attempt to determine, the last time she spoke the truth. So far, they're lost with no clue! The woman lies more than a lady of the night. Scruff will move from one liar to the next. Now, that is brilliant, skippy.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#178018 Nov 5, 2013
Fluffybritches, that's five posts on one page and you managed to say absolutely nothing! Then again, you never post anything of substance, just BS drivel. Tell us, why do you support a liar? None of you gum-flapping fools seem to be able to answer this, how come? LMAO!

Repeat after me: OBOBBLEHEAD IS A PROVEN LIAR.

Justify it! You can't!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#178019 Nov 5, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Stubborn, aren't you? We've been over this aspect a million times. Do you know of any president, except Jimmy Carter, who did not use religion to further their ambitions? Told you many times that intelligent presidents, and there were a few of them, were/are not religious. They just use/used religion. But you keep coming back to Obama and Obama alone. Why?
Because he's Muslim.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#178020 Nov 5, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>Stubborn, aren't you? We've been over this aspect a million times. Do you know of any president, except Jimmy Carter, who did not use religion to further their ambitions? Told you many times that intelligent presidents, and there were a few of them, were/are not religious. They just use/used religion. But you keep coming back to Obama and Obama alone. Why?
Ford?
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#178021 Nov 5, 2013
Gum-Flappers, you support liars......why?

Since: Feb 11

Nearer than you would like

#178022 Nov 5, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
That "Mission Accomplished" really bugs you Libtards, doesn't it?!?
No. I find it really funny that it is a perfect example of that administration's duplicity. You see, those words were the backdrop for these.
"My fellow Americans: Major combat operations in Iraq have ended." ~ 05/01/2003, George W. Bush, President
Incidentally, the next three years saw the casualty rate climb, along with combat operations.
Could you see Obummer Boy landing on board a carrier? If he did, he would be in the back of a COD!
Why would the President land on one of our carriers to lie to the world? That is what his predecessor did.
I wonder if any of the Libtards knows what a COD is without looking it up!
I do, I do...pick me, come on...I know, I know. I'll put my service up against yours any day. I am still a nephew and had boots in the sand in both recent fronts. You?
By the way, do you remember this?
11/01/2002, George W. Bush, President
"... for the sake of protecting our friends and allies, the United States will lead a mighty coalition of freedom-loving nations and disarm Saddam Hussein. See, I can't imagine what was going through the mind of this enemy when they hit us. They probably thought the national religion was materialism, that we were so selfish and so self-absorbed that after 9/11/2001 this mighty nation would take a couple of steps back and file a lawsuit."
Two years later...
09/17/2003
Question from reporter: Mr. President, Dr. Rice and Secretary Rumsfeld both said yesterday that they have seen no evidence that Iraq had anything to do with September 11th.
President George W. Bush: "We've had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with the September 11th."
Doh!
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#178023 Nov 5, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
Fluffybritches, that's five posts on one page and you managed to say absolutely nothing! Then again, you never post anything of substance, just BS drivel. Tell us, why do you support a liar?!
Show me where I have. You can't!

(Romper blathering about sbstance? A Morrisette would have a field day)
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#178024 Nov 5, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>Because he's Muslim.
Because he's semi-black

Since: Feb 11

Nearer than you would like

#178025 Nov 5, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Because he's Muslim.
So, that whole, "He's a member of that crazy and racist Reverend Wright's Christian Church!" is moot?

Let us know when you want to flip flop again.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#178026 Nov 5, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Show me where I have. You can't!
(Romper blathering about sbstance? A Morrisette would have a field day)
So, you don't support ObobbleHead?
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#178027 Nov 5, 2013
ChaunceyGardiner wrote:
<quoted text>
So, that whole, "He's a member of that crazy and racist Reverend Wright's Christian Church!" is moot?
Let us know when you want to flip flop again.
Who flip-flopped? I've always thought he's Muslim. dumbazzbastard
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#178028 Nov 5, 2013
ChaunceyGardiner wrote:
<quoted text>
So, that whole, "He's a member of that crazy and racist Reverend Wright's Christian Church!" is moot?
Let us know when you want to flip flop again.
Ya know, your lack of any form of memory, reminds me of Path! I haven't mentioned Rev. Wright since you've been here! That's interesting, isn't it? LMAO! dumbazzbastard
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#178029 Nov 5, 2013
I love the smell of rotting gum-flappers in the morning!

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#178030 Nov 5, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Killary? The one responsible for four Americans being killed? That Killary? The one that said, "what difference does it make"? That Killary? She's right up your alley. There is a study going on to determine, or attempt to determine, the last time she spoke the truth. So far, they're lost with no clue! The woman lies more than a lady of the night. Scruff will move from one liar to the next. Now, that is brilliant, skippy.
You are duped by sensationalism again. The video doesn't lie.

Johnson kept implying that they were told there were protest.

She correctly informed him that they didn't get to interview anyone there for days after the event. There were other agencies that were running investigations that had to be completed before she could talk to any of them. In short... they knew when she knew.

If you watched the line of questioning... she is dead on correct.

What difference does it make what they were doing before the attacks? Protesters or 4 guys walking down the street it makes no difference... it was an attack.

What matters is apprehending them.

The right would have you think she was questioning why it matters that they are dead. Couldn't be further from reality.

She is 100% correct. Who gives a shit what they were doing before? The attacks happened and catching those responsible is all that matters.

If this
is what you think is going to keep Hillary's heels off the GOP's neck in 2016... You are sadly mistaken.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#178031 Nov 5, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>So, you don't support ObobbleHead?
I support the constitution and the rule of law. As part of this I recognize that Obama is a natural born citizen and duly elected POTUS. I find Birfoon fables to be the lowest common denominator of hate and ignorance.

I oppose a good number of Obama's policies. I also oppose a number of the actions and policies of both the Republicans and Democrats in Congress. Unlike you I have no blind allegiance (or blind opposition) to "either side"
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#178032 Nov 5, 2013
Scrutiny wrote:
<quoted text>
You are duped by sensationalism again. The video doesn't lie.
Johnson kept implying that they were told there were protest.
She correctly informed him that they didn't get to interview anyone there for days after the event. There were other agencies that were running investigations that had to be completed before she could talk to any of them. In short... they knew when she knew.
If you watched the line of questioning... she is dead on correct.
What difference does it make what they were doing before the attacks? Protesters or 4 guys walking down the street it makes no difference... it was an attack.
What matters is apprehending them.
The right would have you think she was questioning why it matters that they are dead. Couldn't be further from reality.
She is 100% correct. Who gives a shit what they were doing before? The attacks happened and catching those responsible is all that matters.
If this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =ow2bl5BQsFEXX is what you think is going to keep Hillary's heels off the GOP's neck in 2016... You are sadly mistaken.
Spin that BS elsewhere, moron. Youtube? LMAO! What a joke you are!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#178033 Nov 5, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
I support the constitution and the rule of law. As part of this I recognize that Obama is a natural born citizen and duly elected POTUS. I find Birfoon fables to be the lowest common denominator of hate and ignorance.
I oppose a good number of Obama's policies. I also oppose a number of the actions and policies of both the Republicans and Democrats in Congress. Unlike you I have no blind allegiance (or blind opposition) to "either side"
And you still haven't answered the question, have you? Why do you support a known liar? Easy question....for most, anyway. You have no answer because you haven't been able to justify it. Admit it already. It's plain to see.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 50 min Trey LaTrache 54,531
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 hr nanoanomaly 1,276,633
Steve Wilkos : talk show host ? or simple mi... (Feb '08) 3 hr mila123 407
ask amy 8-29-15 4 hr Mister Tonka 7
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 6 hr Perrie Winkle 6,424
How to get into the USA. 7 hr New Beach Boys Song 3
a teachers lament. 7 hr Flubadub 6
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages