BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story
Chief Justice Adolf

Bristol, CT

#177053 Oct 29, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
You should go back to your other moniker....Adolt! LMAO
Yes put them to work on plantations. That will solve the crime problem. Arbiten macht frei!

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#177054 Oct 29, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Interestingly, you wrote : "I don't do the religion = war thing. That was J."
Right on. Except that I never said Hitler waged a religious war. I just said he was a Christian. Religious wars were waged, a lot of them, before he came along. Fact is, though, he suffered from the influence of the religion, pro or con,(from his very devout mother) he was brought on.
The war had zero to do with religion.
The holocaust used religion as an end run around normally thinking people.

Hitler isn't listed as a monster because he started a war. Sans holocaust in 200 years he may have been regarded as a great leader and warrior. He took more of the globe than most.

You may be able to find handfuls of men who would be twisted enough to work the death camps. But killing 6 million people is no small task. This was a well staffed production. There is only one way to convince that many people that something that awful and horrifying was acceptable. Historically speaking, the will of god is the natural culprit.

I will say it again... the guy was crazy. But whether he himself believed it or not. He used their beliefs to do his work. At least the work that made him what he will always be remembered as.

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#177055 Oct 30, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, NASA says the Earth has been cooling since 2007 and we have already lost a half of a degree Celcius and they expect Earth to lose another half degree by 2020.
What is funny is that Libtards think that mankind id more powerful than our Sun when in fact our Sun is at it's lower power level in a hundred years and they expect it to be down to it's lowest level in TWO HUNDRED YEARS by 2020 which is when the last Little Ice Age ended.
http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/images/ssn_...
Yep, at the local level mankind can really screw things up but on the global level it is like an ant trying to rape an elephant. Ain't gonna happen.
The Earth has been cooling for 4.5 Billion years. I promise. What we are discussing is the atmosphere.

Look, I told you that it is impossible to determine. We don't have the data. All of these "reports" on global warming/cooling... they are worthless. They do nothing but compare temperatures of then and now.

The problem is once you get a few decades into the past. THERE IS NO DATA. We have no idea how much CO2 was in the atmosphere. How are we supposed to see 300 years into the future with 25 years of past experience?

==========

http://climate.nasa.gov/blog/938

==========

http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/8/2/02402...

==========

Those two studies quantify the consensus.

98% of climate scientist aren't stupid.

All they can agree on is that we do affect the atmosphere. There is no one on Earth who can say with remote certainty how much.

It isn't about the Earth. It isn't about humanity.
It is about money.

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#177056 Oct 30, 2013
loose cannon wrote:
Jacques,
Rustling cattle was a hanging offence in the Old West.
You don't shoot a man's horse and you don't rustle his cattle.....
I've been reading up on cattle theft.
It's still a big problem surmounting millions of dollars annually. Some ranchers put part of the blame on the methamphetamine addicts.
Texas has stiffened the penalty to 10 years in prison.
loose
Are you saying that there are tweakers out there trying to steal cattle to pay for drugs?

That could easily gross a bundle at the box office.

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#177057 Oct 30, 2013
"Our main objective of determining to what extent CO2 concentrations in our atmosphere can cause detrimental global warming has led us to an objective conclusion that this issue is not settled science. Unfortunately, the scientific progress on this issue has been corrupted by political and special interest influences that determine where our research dollars get spent. Political influences in government sponsored research have focused climate change research on CO2 rather than a broader range of factors that need better definition."

Anthropogenic Global Warming Science Assessment report

...."this issue is not settled science."
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

#177058 Oct 30, 2013
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>You don't think that 2% of the people that voted for Obama wouldn't have voted for him if they knew he only told lies?
First, that is how the system works. Get used to it. Second, it was a LIE by Romney that Chrysler planned to shut down production in the USA and to move to China. Your side lost. More people liked Obama than Romney. In 2008 far more people liked Obama/Biden than McCain/Palin. Those are the facts. Learn to live with them. Oh, and currently there is a pretty good chance that whomever the Democrats nominate (and it will probably be Hillary) will win the presidential election in 2016. Don't like that possibility? Too bad for you. There are countries that don't have presidential elections. Maybe you'd like to move to one of them.
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

#177059 Oct 30, 2013
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>It was a Hillary Clinton move to try to get her into the White House.
Sure it was. Would you like to buy a bridge?
Obskeptic

Southfield, MI

#177060 Oct 30, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Er, you had suggested civil discourse, remember? What happened? Your successive failures at expressing yourself "civilly" have frustrated you? Your being shot down every time you bring medieval thinking into the 21st century is wearing you down?
Looks to me like "uncivil" monologue. Grateful you indicate where I or any of what you so-call "liberals" (Obsketic tm reg'd)have even come close to using the language in your above post.
I am simply doing what every liberal does Jacque, defining my intellectual opponent. To suggest that your side is civil is an even bigger lie then "if you like your health insurance and doctor, you can keep your health insurance and doctor".
Obskeptic

Southfield, MI

#177061 Oct 30, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>And we know all the liberals who control the sciences are not concerned with scientific methods but are really possessed by demons and attack truths with falsehoods such as evolution in order to foster socialism and communism. It's a fact that is what scientists want. Isn't that a FACT?
If it were science Wojar, they wouldn't use qualifiers like "may" or "could". And since when is science defined by consensus. I'm sure we could put together a substantial consensus that you are a dolt, which of course you and Jacque would disagree with and turn the finger around at those of us who have made that conclusion. The climate has been changing for millions of years, so for a bunch of "scientists" that get much of their money from government grants that are trying to get things like a carbon tax passed, so they can both collect more money to spend, which gives them more power, but also extends them more control over the winners and losers they pick in the corporate world, which gives them more power. Donate to the democrats, you win. Donate to the republicans, we destroy you with the power of government. Works the same way for scientists. If they fail to hop on the bandwagon, the money stops flowing. Back in the day, you socialists used to just gather up those who opposed you and commit them, or kill them. At least nowadays, you just ruin their careers and life.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#177062 Oct 30, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Please take note of the word "error", otay? LMAO Continue making "errors"!
Otay
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#177063 Oct 30, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>Jacques from Ottawa wrote:

<quoted text>The illiterate clod once more pouncing on an obvious (except to him), typo. Birthers applaud, rate him highly, yellow light bulbs and the works.

1. I'm not complaining, just remarking. YOU are the complainer, remember? Lonely for me? You like to take your lumps? Okay, here goes, but just once as I don't want to feed your masochistic pleasures;

2. I never ever correctded a typo in my life. Why? Simple, and for two reasons ; a) a typo is not a spelling nor grammatical error and, b) I make tons of them. I'd have to correct myself. THAT was the point of my remark, on which you of course pounced, looking for THAT opening. Well, you failed ;

3. I never correct anyone's grammar or spelling UNLESS they initiate it. Haven't you learned your lesson yet?;

4. As I've maintained and repeated, Topix corrector saved you. Your posts , never mind the typos, were chockfull of spelling and grammatical errors. The former are automatically corrected, but so far, nothing can be done about the latterè

5. There is only one irony here. YOU.

Bye bye, one-language CONservative illiterate.

Larousse dictionary definitions of CON for CONservative :

CON : Stupide, inepte (translation services available for free)

CON : Sexe de la femme.(translation services available for free)
A diatribe of whine because I commented that it seemed ironic?

Fits well with your pages of rants about name calling and how no one except you is "civil".

Another "stealth" vulgarity. Another empty promise to go away. Another day of foolishness
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#177064 Oct 30, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
Corr in 4 : latter;
Sure glad you fixed that. Your rant sounded really stupid before the correction
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#177065 Oct 30, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
So a typo doesn't result in a misspelled word? The result is the same, regardless of what you call it. It is an error.
I'd like to make him use a portable device for a day. The "errors" flowing from the North would be overwhelming

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#177066 Oct 30, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
I'd like to make him use a portable device for a day. The "errors" flowing from the North would be overwhelming
Fool. CONservative fool. I said I did not point out typos nor do I correct anyone who does not initiate such a practice. You disappoint me even more, as I didn't expect LRS-Dale, your buddy, to understand the Oxford definition of "typo". Foolishly, I thought YOU would. Oh well...Go back to mommy's basement bed.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#177067 Oct 30, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
A diatribe of whine because I commented that it seemed ironic?
Fits well with your pages of rants about name calling and how no one except you is "civil".
Another "stealth" vulgarity. Another empty promise to go away. Another day of foolishness
Admit it, you are too gross to even approach any semblance of "stealth" vulgarity. You and LRS-Dale, so clone=like.

Oh, btw, please indicate, in my post, where you detected any ""stealth" vulgarity". You can't? I see. Shall I, once more, supply you with a definition of "CON" in CONservative? Or do I have to translate? Do you even know what a sorry image you and your CONservative ilk project? No? Then carry on.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#177068 Oct 30, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
I'd like to make him use a portable device for a day. The "errors" flowing from the North would be overwhelming
Last one for a while:

LTR : "I made a typo, yes I did. I typed "you're" instead of "your". TYPO. Oh, also, I typed "its" instead of "it's". TYPO."

"Thank God, Topix now corrects my numerous spelling errors. Please, please, Topix, come up with grammar corrections."

Such a failure. And you advertise it?
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#177069 Oct 30, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>Last one for a while:

LTR : "I made a typo, yes I did. I typed "you're" instead of "your". TYPO. Oh, also, I typed "its" instead of "it's". TYPO."

"Thank God, Topix now corrects my numerous spelling errors. Please, please, Topix, come up with grammar corrections."

Such a failure. And you advertise it?
Looks like I was granted another flood of "civility".

Bad news Jercque - if you were expecting someone to read all of "you're" whining you'll need to look elsewhere

By the way - play law. Real law. Still confused?

I'm betting you are - after all it took you a month to accept the FACT that I can't delete posts. And that was after the third time that showed you where Topix told you so in plain English.

Blather on fool. Blather on
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#177070 Oct 30, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>Looks like I was granted another flood of "civility".

Bad news Jercque - if you were expecting someone to read all of "you're" whining you'll need to look elsewhere

By the way - play law. Real law. Still confused?

I'm betting you are - after all it took you a month to accept the FACT that I can't delete posts. And that was after the third time that showed you where Topix told you so in plain English.

Blather on fool. Blather on
Third time that I showed you ....

That was a close one. The meaning was almost lost
Fox News Propaganda

Sayville, NY

#177071 Oct 30, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, I find most major networks reporting it pretty much like it is. Of course, when a news channel is owned by a big corporation or Walt Disney, it will not inveigh a whole lot against either. The difference between them and Fox, although yes, they may colour-coat certain reportages in a slightly biased manner (some may give more air time to Dems, for example) they mostly leave the editorializing to their guests and their own opinion givers. With Foxnews.com , all the news, all of it, is editorialised and slanted. All of it. I've tried watching, really tried, it's impossible.
Every individual has a proclivity propensity towards something.

I agree with you Fox News is mostly rightwing propaganda, half-truths, Lies, mixed in with truth and I do not watch it either.

Corporate Mainstream media is more truthful and can be fact checked to prove one way or the other.

However Jacques, make no mistake, Mainstream media is notorious for only telling half-truths.

I will give you only one recent example with Hurricane Sandy.

The corrupt corporate mainstream media never tells who was covered by flood insurance and if they paid the homeowners or how much.

They repeat the same storylines a year later with the same nonsense and everyone still does not know what really is going on except many homes and people are still in disarray.

The United States of America is truly turning into a third world country.

I kid you not!

----------

Bush: Blackout is 'wake-up' call
Dems, GOP spar over energy policy
http://tinyurl.com/ev2nf / August 15, 2003
LOS ANGELES, California (CNN)-- President Bush said Friday the massive blackout that struck the Northeast and upper Midwest -- as well as parts of Canada -- is a "wake-up call" to modernize the electricity system.
The blackout also provided an opening for some sparring between the administration and Democrats over energy policy with the two sides trading shots over which party was more interested in developing a comprehensive plan.
http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/08/15/bus...

----------

Iraqi Power Grid Nearing Collapse
August 4, 2007 / http://tinyurl.com/pd8t7s2
Iraq's power grid is on the brink of collapse because of insurgent sabotage, rising demand, fuel shortages and provinces that are unplugging local power stations from the national grid, officials said Saturday.
Electricity Ministry spokesman Aziz al-Shimari said power generation nationally is only meeting half the demand, and there had been four nationwide blackouts over the past two days. The shortages across the country are the worst since the summer of 2003, shortly after the U.S.-led invasion to topple Saddam Hussein, he said.
Power supplies in Baghdad have been sporadic all summer and now are down to just a few hours a day, if that. The water supply in the capital has also been severely curtailed by power blackouts and cuts that have affected pumping and filtration stations.
Karbala province south of Baghdad has been without power for three days, causing water mains to go dry in the provincial capital, the Shiite holy city of Karbala.
http://seattletimes.com/html/iraq/2003822245_...
Fox News Propaganda

Sayville, NY

#177072 Oct 30, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
And I suppose that you are trying to imply that the president is the only person that establishes the budget and spending levels, and that Bill Clinton single handedly was responsible for the cuts that brought about that surplus. Assuming that, I would say that you already bought that bridge with a fistful of partisan dollars.
The surplus is meaningless because most of the 22 million jobs created was minimum wage.

The real story is Bill Clinton and all Rightwing Newt Gingrich Republicans destroyed America and 8 years of Bush/Cheney did nothing to stop it.

NAFTA, 1996 Telecommunications Act, and terminating Glass/Stegall only benefits the wealthy few who owns Washington DC.

Hey Obskeptic, guess who showed up at the Clinton/Gore White House to sell NAFTA to our masses?

Pres. Ford, Pres. Carter, Pres. Daddy Bush, and Reagan was too sick or he would have been there.

Do you remember that Ross Perot was the only truth teller about NAFTA and how both parties and the corporate media ridiculed him?

=========

Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999-Part 2
http://tinyurl.com/ccs348

Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999-Part 1
http://tinyurl.com/dfnkuu

Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999
Bill Clinton and the Republicans did away with oversight.
President Bill Clinton signed this into law with 54 Republicans voting yes and 44 Democrats voting no./ http://tinyurl.com/5lwv6z
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_ca...

On the Conference Report (S.900 Conference Report )
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_ca...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 11 min John Galt 1,126,452
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 20 min Yumpin Yimminy 68,657
Abby 10-23-14 1 hr pde 2
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 1 hr J RULES 70,087
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 1 hr Stina2 98,502
last post wins! (Apr '13) 2 hr Concerned_American 352
Hoffa tells Chicago Teamsters they play pivotal... 2 hr reality is a crutch 1
Chicago Dating
Find my Match

Chicago Jobs

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]