BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Full story: Chicago Tribune

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...
Comments
156,201 - 156,220 of 177,521 Comments Last updated 2 min ago

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#176957 Oct 29, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rupert Murdoch Net Worth
Random Celebrity Profile
How much is Rupert Murdoch worth?
$12.5 Billion
Rupert Murdoch net worth: Rupert Murdoch is a media mogul from Australia, most widely known as the head of the Fox Broadcasting Company who has a net worth of $12.5 billion dollars. Rupert Murdoch began his career with one newspaper in Adelaide and expanded into other forms of media, in other countries, in the late 1980′s.
http://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-busi...
What IS your point? He made billions, no one denies it, strong business acumen, doling out trash/crap.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#176958 Oct 29, 2013
The IRS sent my Tax Return back! AGAIN!!!

I guess it was because of my response to the question:“List all dependents?”

I replied-
“12 million illegal immigrants;
“3 million crack heads;
“42 million unemployable people on food stamps;
“2 million people in over 243 prisons;
“Half of Mexico; and
“535 fools in the U.S. House and Senate.”

Apparently, this was NOT an acceptable answer.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#176959 Oct 29, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
It is funny that all you have to do is mention one name like "Rupert","Sarah ", "Ted" or "Ronald" and Libtards start spitting blood!
That's correct. Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Mussolini, Mao all had the same effect on Liberals and, well, on many conservatives, Jews, you name it.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#176960 Oct 29, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Hummmm, Rupert does not run A company. He runs a corporation ..... and he is very $ucce$$ful at it.
<quoted text>
Opinions are like azz-holes, everyone has one.
Hey, did you watch the ABC morning news this morning? They really bash ObamaCare!!!
Yes, get used to it, rogue. ABC, NBC, CBS,CNN,CNIBC, PBS, they bash Democrats, Republicans, Tea Party, Birthers, all of them. It's called journalism. Foxnews.com bashes...er, hmmm, Obama , Democrats, Obama , Democrats, Hillary Clinton, Obama, Democrats, obamacare, Obama, democrats, Kerry, Hillary Clinton, obamacare...

Since: Feb 11

Nearer than you would like

#176961 Oct 29, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>loose cannon wrote:
More white folks were lynched it Texas than black people.
Most of them were cattle rustlers.
Put that in your pipe and smoke it.
Well, can YOU prove you statement? Or are you just flapping your gums? It took me only a few minutes to find this;
.....Texas stands third among the states, after Mississippi and Georgia, in the total number of lynching victims. Of the 468 victims in Texas between 1885 and 1942, 339 were black, 77 white, 53 Hispanic, and 1 Indian.....
http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/online/art ...
<quoted text>
Well, initially I thought that more whites had been lynched than blacks but I want the truth and I think I found a reliable source and my OPINION was incorrect.
They did say they did not have reliable information before about 1885 so we may never know what the total result will be but between 1885 and 1942 it looks like black people were singled out.
It may not be too late to get a refund from your reading teacher.

Pay attention when I wrote something here. The words are fact.

Since: Feb 11

Nearer than you would like

#176962 Oct 29, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
72.7% who were lynched were black, you state, which is even more alarming as the percentage of blacks population-wise at that time was less than 10%.
Yes. When I first read the nonsense about whites being lynched more than blacks I was compelled to respond. These assclowns love to post things and hope no one is paying attention to the veracity of their statements. Unfortunately for them, I love taking the time to humiliate them by exposing the truth.

Did President Obama bomb Syria yet?

Did the National Guard disperse all of those truckers who rallied to support the GOP shutdown?

LOL!
American Lady

Danville, KY

#176963 Oct 29, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
The IRS sent my Tax Return back! AGAIN!!!
I guess it was because of my response to the question:“List all dependents?”
I replied-
“12 million illegal immigrants;
“3 million crack heads;
“42 million unemployable people on food stamps;
“2 million people in over 243 prisons;
“Half of Mexico; and
“535 fools in the U.S. House and Senate.”
Apparently, this was NOT an acceptable answer.
Me too Wingman :)

The IRS sent my Tax Return back!
AGAIN!!!

I guess it was because of the response to the question:“List all dependents?”

Answer~

* 20 million 'Illegal' immigrants;
* Over 40 million unemployable people on food stamps;
* Millions of people in over Hundreds of prisons;
* Millions getting FRAUDULENT 'disability payments'
* Million of crack/dope heads;
* Several DAMN fools in the U.S. House and Senate, in the Halls of Congress
and
* Thousands of NON Essential government workers.

Apparently, this was NOT an acceptable answer.
Even tho it IS the TRUTH.

NOW ...
I guess I'll return it with 'MEcare' monies I'll be subject too for the Tax/FINE ...

;~)

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#176964 Oct 29, 2013
American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
Me too Wingman :)
The IRS sent my Tax Return back!
AGAIN!!!
I guess it was because of the response to the question:“List all dependents?”
Answer~
* 20 million 'Illegal' immigrants;
* Over 40 million unemployable people on food stamps;
* Millions of people in over Hundreds of prisons;
* Millions getting FRAUDULENT 'disability payments'
* Million of crack/dope heads;
* Several DAMN fools in the U.S. House and Senate, in the Halls of Congress
and
* Thousands of NON Essential government workers.
Apparently, this was NOT an acceptable answer.
Even tho it IS the TRUTH.
NOW ...
I guess I'll return it with 'MEcare' monies I'll be subject too for the Tax/FINE ...
;~)
Again, with the wingman ! LMAO (LRS-Dale tm reg'd) Is that why you're so riddled with holes?
Fox News Propaganda

Sayville, NY

#176965 Oct 29, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, get used to it, rogue. ABC, NBC, CBS,CNN,CNIBC, PBS, they bash Democrats, Republicans, Tea Party, Birthers, all of them. It's called journalism. Foxnews.com bashes...er, hmmm, Obama , Democrats, Obama , Democrats, Hillary Clinton, Obama, Democrats, obamacare, Obama, democrats, Kerry, Hillary Clinton, obamacare...
You are absolutely correct but they do mostly report half-trues and try to favor both sides, even though both sides are usually lying.

==========

Jon Stewart on crossfire telling the truth against that corporate liar rightwing Republican Tucker Carlson.


Jon Stewart on Crossfire against propaganda on CNN.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Media Deregulation
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Big Media: "The Big Six"
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#176966 Oct 29, 2013
Fox News Propaganda wrote:
<quoted text>
You are absolutely correct but they do mostly report half-trues and try to favor both sides, even though both sides are usually lying.
==========
Jon Stewart on crossfire telling the truth against that corporate liar rightwing Republican Tucker Carlson.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =aFQFB5YpDZEXX
Jon Stewart on Crossfire against propaganda on CNN.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Media Deregulation
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Big Media: "The Big Six"
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Well, I find most major networks reporting it pretty much like it is. Of course, when a news channel is owned by a big corporation or Walt Disney, it will not inveigh a whole lot against either. The difference between them and Fox, although yes, they may colour-coat certain reportages in a slightly biased manner (some may give more air time to Dems, for example) they mostly leave the editorializing to their guests and their own opinion givers. With Foxnews.com , all the news, all of it, is editorialised and slanted. All of it. I've tried watching, really tried, it's impossible.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#176967 Oct 29, 2013
American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
Me too Wingman :)
The IRS sent my Tax Return back!
AGAIN!!!
I guess it was because of the response to the question:“List all dependents?”
Answer~
* 20 million 'Illegal' immigrants;
* Over 40 million unemployable people on food stamps;
* Millions of people in over Hundreds of prisons;
* Millions getting FRAUDULENT 'disability payments'
* Million of crack/dope heads;
* Several DAMN fools in the U.S. House and Senate, in the Halls of Congress
and
* Thousands of NON Essential government workers.
Apparently, this was NOT an acceptable answer.
Even tho it IS the TRUTH.
NOW ...
I guess I'll return it with 'MEcare' monies I'll be subject too for the Tax/FINE ...
;~)
Okay, let's see if I can answer a few of the above. Numbered they will be :

1. 20 million illegal immigrants. Yes. Deport them. Then let's see who will pick fruit and vegetables , let's see who will work on farms at planting and harvesting time, let's see who'll work in hotels as cleaning staff, waiters, dishwashers, let's see who'll do the dirty dirty jobs in mines and roadwork. Let's see everyone starve for lack of food. California tried to expel Mexican pickers two years ago. The outcry from the growers was heard all over, as they knew a large portion of the state's agriculture production would be lost;

2. 40 million? Whose fault, at least partly? Union membership down. So many firms (Boeing, Lockeed-Martin, Ford, Chrysler, Hyundai, Kia, Mercedes, GM etc) moving SOUTH to Alabama, Georgia, other southern states where there are none of those pesky unions - lower wages, almost half what they pay in the north - therefore , yes, more people on food stamps. Working people on food stamps. Great.

3. All those millions in prison? Great. How many in prison thanks to the 3-strike law? How ridiculous. You shoplift once, twice, the third time, life in prison. Ever seen "Les Misérables" when the poor bastard, to feed his family, steals a loaf of bread and is imprisoned at hard labour for life? You get the picture. They released 100,000 prisoners in CA last year due to lack of space. Did you know that the US has the highest incarceration rate amongst "have" nations in the world? Does that diminish crime? Nope, it increases it.

4. Yes, millions fraudulent payments. Sadly. Oh, you know, many of them are legitimate, many also fraudulent. But tell me, tell everyone what the cost of welfare fraud amounts to as compared to Corporate welfare. I don't know the answer to that, but am willing to bet that the latter costs to the taxpayer are much higher than the former. And, Rogue will say that Corporations create jobs. Yes, they do. When they don't move them offshore. But welfare recipients create millions of job too. They buy stuff, consume, no?

5. millions crack-dope heads? Yes, but all nations are in the same boat. Why should you be different than Canada, Europe et al? DO something about it.

6. Fools in the senate, halls of congress? Yes. There are fools everywhere, no?, starting here in Topix.

7. Just pay your taxes and wow never to vote repub again, as they lower the rich taxpayers' taxes and leave yours the same or subtly increase them. Repubs have never seen a deficit they didn't like or more public servant they also didn't like. They also like to wage unfunded wars and shut their eyes and ears so their little corporate friends can bamboozle the public, see 2007-08, stock brokers, mtge brokers, banks, auto companies etc.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#176968 Oct 29, 2013
American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
Me too Wingman :)
The IRS sent my Tax Return back!
AGAIN!!!
I guess it was because of the response to the question:“List all dependents?”
Answer~
* 20 million 'Illegal' immigrants;
* Over 40 million unemployable people on food stamps;
* Millions of people in over Hundreds of prisons;
* Millions getting FRAUDULENT 'disability payments'
* Million of crack/dope heads;
* Several DAMN fools in the U.S. House and Senate, in the Halls of Congress
and
* Thousands of NON Essential government workers.
Apparently, this was NOT an acceptable answer.
Even tho it IS the TRUTH.
NOW ...
I guess I'll return it with 'MEcare' monies I'll be subject too for the Tax/FINE ...
;~)
I replied to your above idiotic post, point by point, and when I clicked "Post comment", it disappeared into cyber space (No, I am not paranoid like birthers, no one censored it,it's technical). And no, I am not repeating it, just wanted you to know your simplistic and hateful un-Christian monologues do not go unnoticed.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#176969 Oct 29, 2013
Oh, lookee, there it is after all, post number 176967. Bonne lecture.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#176970 Oct 29, 2013
They fixed the ObamaCare site.
http://rexharrisonshat.com/healthcare/

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#176971 Oct 29, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay, let's see if I can answer a few of the above. Numbered they will be :
1. 2. 40 million? Whose fault, at least partly? Union membership down. So many firms (Boeing, Lockeed-Martin, Ford, Chrysler, Hyundai, Kia, Mercedes, GM etc) moving SOUTH to Alabama, Georgia, other southern states where there are none of those pesky unions - lower wages, almost half what they pay in the north - therefore , yes, more people on food stamps. Working people on food stamps. Great.
3.
Ah, Hyundai, Kia, Honda, Nisan, BMW, etc. moved South from the North? Which country?
Oh, Boeing did not move jobs. They created new jobs! The new plant in South Carolina was built to make LARGE composite fuselages that they could not make at their plant in Washington.
Have you ever seen a fiberglass boat being made with aluminum?

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

#176972 Oct 29, 2013
American Lady wrote:
NSA - obamas FAULT
October 28, 2013 A Judgment on Intelligence By Herbert E. Meyer Despite everything you've gleaned from spy novels and movies,... blah, blah, and blah.
US began monitoring allies' cellphones in 2002.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#176973 Oct 29, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay, let's see if I can answer a few of the above. Numbered they will be :
1.
2.
3.
4. Yes, millions fraudulent payments. Sadly. Oh, you know, many of them are legitimate, many also fraudulent. But tell me, tell everyone what the cost of welfare fraud amounts to as compared to Corporate welfare. I don't know the answer to that, but am willing to bet that the latter costs to the taxpayer are much higher than the former. And, Rogue will say that Corporations create jobs. Yes, they do. When they don't move them offshore. But welfare recipients create millions of job too. They buy stuff, consume, no?
5.
You mean like the mild subsidy that props up dairy farmers? Remove that and the cost of milk could go to $8 a gallon! And then what?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#176974 Oct 29, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
Some republicans actually do stand on principle over party Jacque, and would never in a million years vote to force taxpayers or Christians to pay for the killing of an innocent, unborn human life, or to advance socialism that gives the state so much power to interfere with the lives and liberty of a free people. There are exceptions to that in the republican party I admit, but they are more like democrats from the fifties then the radicals today who never fail to put party over the will of the people. Even democrat Bart Stupak had to be lied to and bought off to get this terd of a piece of legislation that very few read and understood before passing. Interesting that as the roll out continues to unravel, that just weeks after the republicans tried to get the individual mandate extended, like the corporate side was granted, we see red state democrat senators up for re-election calling for what the republicans were accused of being unreasonable for trying to negotiate. One of them even said the president needed to man up. Pretty outrageous by your standards. Also, I remember the president being the one who stated that he refuses to negotiate. No hypocrisy there now, is there.
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
I will tell you what voting on your principal is really. It is the the 34 House Democrats who voted "Nay" on ObamaCare in 2009!!!
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh yeah? That is a plus, means some democrats, in this case, 34, have a mind of their own, contrary to the 100% all republican congressmen and senators who voted unanimously against. WTG, talk about principles.
You do know that politicians are suppose to vote how the majority of their constituents want them vote? If they don't, they could be voted out of office.

Since: Feb 11

Nearer than you would like

#176975 Oct 29, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
You do know that politicians are suppose to vote how the majority of their constituents want them vote? If they don't, they could be voted out of office.
For someone with 20,000 posts, you sure don't know how to quote properly.

Let's extend your logic. If people were unhappy with Barack Obama they wouldn't have given him a mandate by re-electing him.

Since: Feb 11

Nearer than you would like

#176976 Oct 29, 2013
2004-11-05 04:00:00 PDT Washington --
President Bush proclaimed his election as evidence that Americans embrace his plans to reform Social Security, simplify the tax code, curb lawsuits and fight the war on terror, pledging Thursday to work in a bipartisan manner with "everyone who shares our goals."

Bush staked his claim to a broad mandate and announced his top priorities at a post-election news conference, saying his 3.5 million vote victory had won him political capital that he would spend enacting his conservative agenda.

"I earned capital in this campaign, political capital, and now I intend to spend it," Bush told reporters. "It is my style."

As he had done in his victory speech Wednesday, Bush spoke of building a bipartisan consensus and reaching out to the 48 percent of Americans who voted against him. Yet he made plain that he had no intention of moderating his agenda to reach that goal.

"When you win, there is ... a feeling that the people have spoken and embraced your point of view," Bush said. "And that's what I intend to tell Congress, that I made it clear what I intend to do as the president; now let's work."

----------

Bush gets re-elected and Republicants claim he can do as he wants because the people have spoken.

How soon they forget.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min DBWriter 1,101,351
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 15 min edogxxx 97,949
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 16 min Bill Braske 49,492
Abby 9-2 17 min edogxxx 1
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 1 hr the wandering girl 4,684
Crack and the Social, Moral, and Economic Decay... 3 hr joey 2
HKN Record Label Need UpComing Artist Call_0803... 4 hr mr innocent 1
•••
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••